| 0 - Sequence Number | 01432 |
| 1 - Disscussion Record | withdrawn, irg49. |
| 2 - UTC Source | |
| 3 - UTC Image | |
| 4 - UK Source | |
| 5 - T Source | |
| 6 - T Image | |
| 7 - K Source | |
| 8 - K Image | |
| 9 - SAT Source | |
| 10 - SAT Image | |
| 11 - G Source | GHZR42030.06 |
| 12 - G Image | GHZ42030.06.bmp |
| 13 - UTC Code | |
| 14 - Kangxi Radical | 64 |
| 15 - Stroke Count | 9 |
| 16 - First Stroke | 2 |
| 17 - T/S (0/1) Flag | 0 |
| 18 - IDS | ⿰扌⿱罒⿺乚三 |
| 19 - Radical Stroke (RS) | 3 |
| 20 - RS+SC(stroke count) | =P65+T65 |
| 21 - Total Stroke | 12 |
| 22 - 修正总笔画数 | |
| 23 - Similar Ideographs | NO |
| 24 - UTC Evidence (Figure No.) | |
| 25 - UTC Evidence (Title) | |
| 26 - UTC Evidence (Location) | |
| 27 - UTC kTotalStrokes | |
| 28 - UTC Ext. F2 Serial No. | |
| 29 - T References to evidence documents A | |
| 30 - T References to evidence documents B | |
| 31 - T File name of evidence image | |
| 32 - T kTotal Strokes | |
| 33 - K Ref. to Evidence doc | |
| 34 - K file name of evidence image | |
| 35 - K kTotalStrokes | |
| 36 - G Ref. to Evidence doc | 《汉语大字典》(第二版) |
| 37 - G Page No. in Evidence file(optional) | 2030 |
| 38 - G Row No. in Evidence file(optional) | 6 |
| 39 - G Position in the Row (optional) | 1 |
| 40 - G file name of evidence image | GHZ42030.06.jpg |
| 41 - G kTotalStrokes | 12 |
| 42 - SAT Evidence | |
| 43 - SAT kTotalStrokes | |
| 44 - UK Ref. to Evidence doc | |
| 45 - UK file name of evidence image | |
| 46 - UK Font code point | |
| 47 - UK Font glyph | |
| 48 - UK Other source references | |
| 49 - UK Mapping to traditional or simplified character | |
| 50 - UK Total stroke count | |
| 51 - UK Note | |
Comments
MISDESIGNED_GLYPH
Below is information provided by expert Chau Gienwen:
GHZR42030.06 《漢大》字形有誤,査《宋元以來俗字譜》〈通俗小說〉實際作「⿰扌⿱罒𫧇」(見《宋元以來俗字譜》第42頁),建議撤銷GHZR42030.06,而「⿰扌⿱罒𫧇」留待日後再交。
Translation by Henry:
There is an error in HYDZD's glyph. Checking 《宋元以來俗字譜》, the actual form is 𫧇 (on the bottom right). Suggest to withdraw GHZR42030.06 and resubmit correct character later.
---
Henry's comment:
China may consider to directly change the glyph to be consistent with the original source in the form as ⿰扌⿱罒𫧇.