«
T12-2128
T13-222A
T13-2C62
»
01877
Trad
水 85.2
㇒ (3)
6

T13-222A
not unified to U+6C42, irg51.
Similar To: 求 (U+6C42)
U+6C42U+6C42
Attributes:



Review Comments

Type
Description
Submitter
Glyph Design & Normalization
GLYPH_DESIGN
WS2017 v1.1
According to the evidence, the bottom of the glyph should be 氺 instead of 水.
Henry CHAN
Individual
2018-05-14 00:00:00
#382
Unification
UNIFICATION
WS2017 v1.1
U+6C42
IVD to 求 (U+6C42).

Last dot changed into top 撇 quite common in vulgar characters; e.g. 犮 --> 叐.
Henry CHAN
Individual
2018-05-14 00:00:00
#381
Unification
UNIFICATION
WS2017 v2
U+6C42
IVD to 求 (U+6C42).

Last dot changed into top 撇 quite common in vulgar characters; e.g. 犮 --> 叐.
Henry CHAN
Individual
2018-08-22 09:09:08
#2000
Evidence
UNCLEAR_EVIDENCE
WS2017 v2
Epigraphic form of U+6C42 求. Not appropriate for encoding without additional evidence.

The majority of characters submitted by TCA that we reviewed are epigraphic forms of existing encoded characters that are listed in catalogues of epigraphic character forms used in stone and bronze inscriptions, such as Bēi Biézì Xīnbiān 碑別字新編 and Piānlèi Bēi Biézì 偏類碑別字. We do not consider that it is appropriate to encode these variant forms of characters without additional evidence of actual use in printed texts. We recommend using IVD to represent epigraphic, calligraphic and ancient forms of existing encoded characters if there is no evidence of actual use in printed texts. We have flagged 174 of the characters submitted by TCA as requiring additional evidence of actual use in printed texts.
Andrew WEST
UK
2018-09-09 17:51:49
#2848
Glyph Design & Normalization
GLYPH_DESIGN
WS2017 v3

(from《中華字海.水部》p1010.)

According to the new evidence, the glyph match the evidence. So, TCA don't have to update the glyph.
Conifer TSENG
TCA
2018-11-22 09:44:20
#3544

Discussion Record

DateDescription
IRG #51
2018-10-24 (Wed)
1:40 pm +0700
Recorded by Henry CHAN
NOT_UNIFIED_TO
U+6C42
U+6C42
IRG #51
2018-10-24 (Wed)
1:42 pm +0700
Recorded by Henry CHAN
TCA will update the glyph.

Glyph Changes

Source ReferenceGlyph
T13-222A
2.0
Note: glyph data for version 1.1 is not available.

Raw Info
0 - Seq. No.01877
1 - Discussion Recordnot unified to U+6C42, irg51.
2 - Kangxi Radical85
3 - Stroke Count2
4 - First Stroke3
5 - T/S (0/1) Flag0
6 - IDS⿱丿⿻一水
7 - Total Strokes6
8 - G Source
9 - G Image
10 - G Similar Ideographs
11 - G Ref. to Evidence doc
12 - G Page No. in the document (optional)
13 - G Row No. in the Page (optional)
14 - G Position in the Row (optional)
15 - G file name of evidence image
16 - G Optional Information
17 - K Source
18 - K Image
19 - K Similar/ Variants
20 - K Ref. to Evidence document
21 - i1) Page No. in the evidence document (optional)
22 - i2) Row No. in the page (optional)
23 - i3) Position No. in the row (optional)
24 - K file name of evidence image
25 - K Revised information (2018.03.16)
26 - K Real Glyph
27 - UK Source
28 - UK Image
29 - UK Similar/ Variants
30 - UK Ref. to Evidence doc
31 - UK Title and Year
32 - UK Page No.
33 - UK PNG Image
34 - UK Font code point
35 - UK Mapping to traditional or simplified character
36 - UK SJT-11239-2001
37 - UK Notes
38 - SAT Source
39 - SAT Image
40 - SAT Similar Ideographs
41 - SAT References to evidence documents
42 - SAT optional information
43 - T SourceT13-222A
44 - T ImageT13-222A.bmp
45 - T Similar/ Varianonets
46 - T References to evidence documents A金石文字辨異
47 - T References to evidence documents B
48 - T File name of evidence imageT13-222A.jpg
49 - T Real Glyph
50 - UTC Source
51 - UTC Image
52 - UTC Similar Ideographs
53 - UTC References to evidence documents
54 - UTC SJ/T 11239-2001
55 - V Source
56 - V Image
57 - V Related
58 - V Reading
59 - V Evidence
60 - V Evidence File
61 - V Code Point
62 - V Note
63 - WS2015 SN
64 -