| 0 - Seq. No. | 01555 |
| 1 - Discussion Record | |
| 2 - Kangxi Radical | 69 |
| 3 - Stroke Count | 17 |
| 4 - First Stroke | 1 |
| 5 - T/S (0/1) Flag | 0 |
| 6 - IDS | ⿱斫𥭋 |
| 7 - Total Strokes | 21 |
| 8 - G Source | |
| 9 - G Image | |
| 10 - G Similar Ideographs | |
| 11 - G Ref. to Evidence doc | |
| 12 - G Page No. in the document (optional) | |
| 13 - G Row No. in the Page (optional) | |
| 14 - G Position in the Row (optional) | |
| 15 - G file name of evidence image | |
| 16 - G Optional Information | |
| 17 - K Source | |
| 18 - K Image | |
| 19 - K Similar/ Variants
| |
| 20 - K Ref. to Evidence document | |
| 21 - i1)
Page No. in the evidence document (optional) | |
| 22 - i2)
Row No.
in the page
(optional) | |
| 23 - i3)
Position No.
in the row
(optional) | |
| 24 - K file name of evidence image | |
| 25 - K Revised information (2018.03.16) | |
| 26 - K Real Glyph | |
| 27 - UK Source | |
| 28 - UK Image | |
| 29 - UK Similar/ Variants | |
| 30 - UK Ref. to Evidence doc | |
| 31 - UK Title and Year | |
| 32 - UK Page No. | |
| 33 - UK PNG Image | |
| 34 - UK Font code point | |
| 35 - UK Mapping to traditional or simplified character | |
| 36 - UK SJT-11239-2001 | |
| 37 - UK Notes | |
| 38 - SAT Source | USAT01707 |
| 39 - SAT Image | USAT01707.bmp |
| 40 - SAT Similar Ideographs | |
| 41 - SAT References to evidence documents | IRGN2230SATWS2017Evidences_v2_1.pdf |
| 42 - SAT optional information | |
| 43 - T Source | |
| 44 - T Image | |
| 45 - T Similar/ Varianonets | |
| 46 - T References to evidence documents A | |
| 47 - T References to evidence documents B | |
| 48 - T File name of evidence image | |
| 49 - T Real Glyph | |
| 50 - UTC Source | |
| 51 - UTC Image | |
| 52 - UTC Similar Ideographs | |
| 53 - UTC References to evidence documents | |
| 54 - UTC SJ/T 11239-2001 | |
| 55 - V Source | |
| 56 - V Image | |
| 57 - V Related | |
| 58 - V Reading | |
| 59 - V Evidence | |
| 60 - V Evidence File | |
| 61 - V Code Point | |
| 62 - V Note | |
| 63 - WS2015 SN | |
| 64 - | scan-000004.png |
2.0
Review Comments
Note to Henry, add more tags for the evidence issue. The only one tag for the evidence is not better.
Agree with Tao Yang.