Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #60 2023-03-22 (Wed) 11:29 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | no change, ucv 305 does not apply. |
Version | Description |
---|---|
5.0 | For 01490, add Discussion Record "No change, UCV #305 is not applicable, IRG 60." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
TD-3B4D | 1.0 |
group | TCA |
a) Source reference | TD-3B4D |
b) PUA Code of TTF | E0CB |
c) KangXi Radical Code | 64.0 |
e) Stroke Count | 10 |
f) First Stroke | 1 |
g) Total stroke count | 13 |
i) IDS | ⿰扌唇 |
j) Similar/ Variants | U+20E83 |
k) Ref. to Evidence doc | IRGN2486_TCA_WS2021_evi_03 |
k1) Page No. | Page6, no.1075 |
l) Optional info | chún |
Review Comments
All ideographic evidence submitted by TCA is NOT TAKEN from the CNS 11643 standard, but is specially produced from the database of the Household Service Department. It is a proof of actual need/use. It is an official document with an official seal.
What Ken's understanding of TCA evidence is incorrect. Or are you talking about "actual use" in some other meaning that TCA does not understand?
Based on the provided readings, U+20E83 appears to be taking phonetic 振 while TD-3B4D appears to be using phonetic 唇. If this is the case, they are non-cognate and shouldn't be unified.