![]() (v5.0) ![]() (v1.0) UK-10803 |
Date | Description |
---|
Version | Description |
---|---|
5.0 | For 04020, change Stroke Count to 13 |
5.0 | For 04020, change Total Stroke Count to 16 |
5.0 | For 04020, change IDS to ⿰⿱旦來阝 |
5.0 | For 04020, add Discussion Record "SC=13, TS=16, IDS=⿰⿱旦來阝, glyph to be updated, 2023-05." |
5.0 | For 04020, add Discussion Record "Glyph updated, 2023-06." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
UK-10803 | ![]() 🢂 ![]() |
group | UK |
a) Source reference | UK-10803 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | E5A4 |
c) KangXi Radical Code (Primary) | 163.0 |
d) Stroke Count (Primary) | 12 |
e) First Stroke (Primary) | 2 |
f) Secondary KX Radical Code | N/A |
f) a. Secondary Stroke Count | N/A |
f) b. Secondary First Stroke | N/A |
g) Total Stroke Count | 15 |
i) IDS | ⿰⿱日來阝 |
j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
k1) References to evidence documents | 《中國古今地名大辭典》(商務印書館, 1931年) p. 1132 |
k2) Images Filenames | UK-10803-001.jpg |
l) Other Information | N/A |
m1) Previous IRG WS | WS2017 |
m2) Sequence No. | 04379 |
Review Comments
[ {{WS2017-04379}} ]
but postponed for better evidence. Hence I provide a presumably better evidence:
▲ 畿輔通志(清雍正刊本)卷13 folio 46
▲ 魏書(宋元明遞修本)卷106上 folio 8 gives ⿰⿱旦来阝.
▲ 魏書(南監本) 卷106上 folio 8 is same
Most, if not all, 魏書 versions after 南監本 gives ⿰⿱旦來阝.
▲ 魏書(北監本)卷106上 folio 8
▲ 魏書(汲古閣本)卷106上 folio 6 (⿰⿱旦來阝/⿰⿱目來阝)
▲ 魏書(武英殿本)卷106上 folio 8
In 廿二史考異, 錢大昕 argued that ⿰⿱旦來阝is a misprint of 郻.
▲ 廿二史考異(清乾隆刊本)魏書2 folio 2
魏書(中華書局)agreed on his opinion and changed text from ⿰⿱旦來阝 to 郻.
▲ 魏書(中華書局)pp. 2508
Change IDS to ⿰⿱旦來阝and update the glyph accordingly.
I made a mistake in previous comment: 錢大昕 argued that ⿰⿱旦來阝is a misprint of 鄡 and 中華書局 changed text from ⿰⿱旦來阝 to 鄡. Therefore, ⿰⿱旦來阝 is a semantic variant of 鄡.