雜字

Normalize to ⿱蒜心

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

Personal name usage is no reason not to normalize the glyph to conform to TCA conventions. I still believe that the grass radical should be normalized.

The origin of this character is a name character, and we cannot change it at will. If we change it to [艹], the character will not be used on the ID card, so we are creating a character that no one uses, and we are losing the intent of the character we submitted.
Please see IRGN2546 for more information on the normalization of the TCA glyph.

To follow up on Comment #5880, TCA is doing a massive disservice to UCS and to the entire standardization community by not normalizing their representative glyphs to follow regional conventions, which is something that seemed to have started from Extension E with Radical #162. What TCA submits for UCS, in terms of representative glyphs, can be different from a specific font implementation that is used by Taiwan's personal name database. By not doing so, it gives the impression that TCA is submitting glyphs, not characters, to the IRG.

Also, all of the component shapes are unifiable, so there is no reason to include the 〾 prefix for the IDS.

I strongly agree with comment #15030, and also comment #15031.

TCA understands your viewpoint. (From my perspective, I agree with your point. )
The issue is, when the characters are normalized, they might not be what people or scholars who use them actually need. TCA has been deliberating on how to strike a balance between the two.
When submitting the WS2024 character set or others, TCA will try its best to select forms that follow Taiwan regional conventions.

Agree

Feedback on #15030
It is not possible to modify the glyph卝 into 艹, in Taiwan, there is a difference between 卝 and 艹 . TCA recommends change the radical to 心.