Character Info
00718
 SAT-90136 |
IRGN2632WS2021v6.0Pending
Postponed for further discussion of encoding model, IRG 57.
Postponed for further discussion of encoding model, IRG 57.
Similar To: Non-similar and synonym: 萬 (U+842C)/
Attributes:
Meeting Minutes
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #62 2024-03-20 (Wed) 10:27 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | to be submitted to ws2024. |
| IRG #62 2024-03-20 (Wed) 10:27 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | could be submitted to ws2024. |
| IRG #57 2021-09-17 (Fri) 9:54 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Postponed for further investigation for encoding model. |
Attribute Changes
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 2.0 | For 00718, add Discussion Record "Postponed for further discussion of encoding model, IRG 57." |
| 2.0 | For 00718, change Status to Postponed |
| 7.0 | For 00718, add Discussion Record "May be submitted to WS2024, IRG 62." |
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| SAT-90136 | 1.0 |
Raw Info
| group | SAT |
| a) Source reference | SAT-90136 |
| b) PUA Code of TTF | F28D |
| c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 030.0 |
| d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 16 |
| e) First Stroke(Primary) | 5 |
| g) Total Stroke Sount | 19 |
| i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿳厶⿲刃工氏⿳一⺍口 |
| j) Similar/ Variants | Non-similar and synonym: 萬/ |
| k) Ref. to Evidence doc | SAT-90136-01.jpg;SAT-90136-02.jpg |
| l) Optional info | https://archive.wul.waseda.ac.jp/kosho/ha04/ha04_05095/ha04_05095_0003/ha04_05095_0003_p0053.jpg |
| m1)Previous IRG WS | Ext. F |
| m2)Sequence No of Previous IRG WS | 01322 |
Review Comments
This glyph most likely came from the word 'svastika' (like the evidense says) written in Siddham script, and then reimagined as a Chinese character, with typical CJK elements (except for the lowest part, but it is written as 口 in the first evidence anyways).
There are more CJK ideograph that evolved from Siddham: both encoded (U+2007C & U+2CF36) and currently unencoded (IRG2017: V-F000E / IRG2021: UK-20566~UK-20572). Many of them are listed in the 字孳補 dictionary.
On the picture you can see my preliminary thoughts on Siddham prototypes for those glyphs (this needs more research, as in some cases, I think, phonetics/forms do not match the glyphs).
https://cbetaonline.dila.edu.tw/zh/T2131_006
Need to reconfirm what this glyph should be.