According to the paraphrase content [从谷害声], this character could be unified with 𭐋 (U+2D40B).

The character is found in the context "或作⿰害各" immediately before, so the difference in the component must be intended.

一切經音義 （唐）釋慧琳撰 日本明治十三至十八年（1880-1885）日本東京弘教書院鉛印本
Both 𭐋 (U+2D40B) and SAT-06008 are from SAT source, so SAT need to decide which edition of 一切經音義 should be the best source to dig the unencoded characters.

As there has been no additional discussion, we still believe the shape should stand independent unless we have UCV.

One of the rationales is U+2D40B appears in a headword of 慧琳音義 (see below), which is a sign that suggests he sees it as a prescriptively acceptable form, as opposed to 非也. We rely on 大正藏 for printed form, and when it is suspicious, look for older versions. The evidence Tao Yang gives is from 縮刷藏 (弘教藏) from the late 19th century, but our evidence shows it consistent with the ultimate source of Tripitaka Koreana in the 13th c.

As a reminder of what we maintained in IRG #52 and #53, 慧琳's notation "非也" is not a reason for rejection alone, because we would likewise have to reject 擾 in favor of 𢺕, or 戯 of 戲 and so on by that standard.