TE-2D68 |
Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #59 2022-10-20 (Thu) 10:52 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | add first R=41.0 (寸), SC=15 |
IRG #59 2022-10-20 (Thu) 10:55 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | add second Radical to 41.0 (寸), SC=15. |
Version | Description |
---|---|
4.0 | For 02250, add Discussion Record "R(2)=41.0 (寸), SC(2)=15, FS(2)=4, IRG 59." |
4.0 | For 02250, change Radical (Secondary) to 41.0 (寸) |
4.0 | For 02250, change Stroke Count (Secondary) to 15 |
4.0 | For 02250, change First Stroke (Secondary) to 4 |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
TE-2D68 | 1.0 |
group | TCA |
a) Source reference | TE-2D68 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | E184 |
c) KangXi Radical Code | 86.0 |
e) Stroke Count | 14 |
f) First Stroke | 4 |
g) Total stroke count | 18 |
i) IDS | ⿱𤇾𡬠 |
j) Similar/ Variants | No |
k) Ref. to Evidence doc | IRGN2486_TCA_WS2021_evi_04 |
k1) Page No. | Page4, no.1618 |
l) Optional info | yíng |
Review Comments
FS should be kept as-is.
See WS2021-02210:T9-7D53
All ideographic evidence submitted by TCA is NOT TAKEN from the CNS 11643 standard, but is specially produced from the database of the Household Service Department. It is a proof of actual need/use. It is an official document with an official seal.
What Ken's understanding of TCA evidence is incorrect. Or are you talking about "actual use" in some other meaning that TCA does not understand?