«
01412
01413
01414
»
01413
61.0 心
SC=14, FS=4 TS=17

(v4.0)


(v1.0)

KC-05106
Glyph updated, 2022-12.
Glyph to be updated to ⿰忄⿱宷日, IRG 59.
SC=14, TS=17, IDS=⿰忄⿱宷日, 2021-10.
Attributes:



Review Comments

Type
Description
Submitter
Glyph Design & Normalization
GLYPH_DESIGN
WS2021 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
The glyph should be modified as below to match the evidence.

Eiso CHAN
Individual
2021-05-31 13:12:57 UTC
Attributes
ATTRIBUTES_IDS
WS2021 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
⿰忄⿱宷日
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2021-05-31 13:13:22 UTC
Attributes
ATTRIBUTES_SC
WS2021 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
SC=14
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2021-05-31 13:13:50 UTC
Attributes
ATTRIBUTES_TC
WS2021 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
TS=17
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2021-05-31 13:14:13 UTC
Glyph Design & Normalization
GLYPH_DESIGN
WS2021 v1.0
[ Resolved ]
KR will change the glyph and IDS, SC, TS as suggested.
ROK
2021-09-02 02:15:21 UTC
Glyph Design & Normalization
GLYPH_DESIGN
WS2021 v2.0
[ Resolved ]
The glyph has not been changed to ⿰忄⿱宷日.
Conifer TSENG
TCA
2022-01-10 01:24:43 UTC
Glyph Design & Normalization
GLYPH_DESIGN
WS2021 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
To repeat what TCA noted on 2022-01-09, the representative glyph has not been changed to ⿰忄⿱宷日 to match the evidence.
Ken LUNDE
UTC
2022-06-20 16:44:06 UTC
Unification
UNIFICATION
WS2021 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
U+2AB3A
The glyph shown in the evidence is suspicious because no other encoded character has the component ⿱宷日. It is possibly an error for U+2AB3A 𪬺 (K5-01E2). Consider unifying to 𪬺 (U+2AB3A) if cognate.
Andrew WEST
UK
2022-07-02 22:47:00 UTC
Unification
UNIFICATION
WS2021 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
U+65E5
On 2021-09-02, KR already mentioned that KR will change the glyph, IDS, SC, TS as suggested by Eiso (田 -> 日)
This is used in a personal name and therefore KR suggests not to unify.
ROK
2022-10-17 01:08:59 UTC
Glyph Design & Normalization
GLYPH_DESIGN
WS2021 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
> The glyph has not been changed to ⿰忄⿱宷日

==>

IRG did not discuss and make a decision, which explains why KR did not send a modified glyph (font) to IRG.
When and if IRG decides to change the glyph of SN01413 / KC 05106, KR will submit a modified glyph to IRG.

Note. There are five other KR-submitted glyphs which need be modified but have not been discussed and IRG did not make decisions. Five SNs are: 00071, 00084, 00180, 00338, 00592
KIM Kyongsok
ROK
2022-10-18 10:11:28 UTC
Unification
UNIFICATION
WS2021 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
> The glyph shown in the evidence is suspicious because no other encoded character ...
> Consider unifying to 𪬺 (U+2AB3A) ...

==>
The evidence is "Passers List for Scholarly Degrees [司馬榜目, Sama bangmok]" published by the government during Joseon Dynasty and, therefore, it is highly unlikely that there is an error in the evidence. KR suggests that it not be unified to 𪬺 (U+2AB3A).
KIM Kyongsok
ROK
2022-10-18 10:13:55 UTC
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v3.0
[ Resolved ]
The ROK submitted evidence shows this character is used for a person's name which the person belong to 密陽朴氏 (밀양박씨). 密陽 here means the 밀양시 in 경상남도 (慶尙南道). 밀양박씨 is a very large clan in ROK, and there are many famous people in the Joseon Dynasty history, such as 중종 (中宗)'s wife 경빈박씨 (敬嬪朴氏) who was a character in a famous ROK drama Women All over the World (여인천하/女人天下). I also believe this book doesn't include the error, but we can't confirm if this one is the 避諱字 of any other character. So, it is better to check the genealogy of 밀양박씨, such as https://www.zupu.cn/zhpk/10188 to judge how to handle this one.
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2022-10-20 08:34:20 UTC
Editorial
EDITORIAL_ISSUE
WS2021 v5.0
[ Unresolved ]
Is this character pended or not?
WANG Yifan
SAT
2023-07-21 07:34:59 UTC
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v5.0
[ Unresolved ]
The original evidence is from 『숙종기묘증광사마방목(肅宗己卯(1657)增廣司馬榜目)』 , here 朴⿰忄⿱宷日's elder brother is 朴恂 and his father is 朴贒, passed away as of 1657.

We can find 朴恂 in 『정묘식년사마방목(丁卯(1653)式年司馬榜目)』:

Note that their father's information here is consistent. Here we can learn that 朴恂 has a brother named 朴恦 and 朴贒 was still alive as of 1653.



『정묘식년사마방목(丁卯(1653)式年司馬榜目)』.

I think 朴恦 and 朴⿰忄⿱宷日 probably refer to the same person. Maybe 朴恦 changed his name. After all changing name is not very uncommon as we can see in the page above, 李澐 changed his name to 李沇.

For character 𪬺, I couldn't find more evidences for 朴𪬺. But we do have 李𪬺 in 承政院日記 승정원일기 821책 (탈초본 45책) 영조 12년 3월 12일 병오 29/31 기사, suggesting that 𪬺 is also a name character.

The website people.aks.ac.kr is also normalizing ⿰忄⿱宷日 to 𪬺, which suggests that they could be unifiable:

HUANG Junliang
Individual
2023-08-07 02:31:53 UTC
Evidence
EVIDENCE
WS2021 v5.0
[ Unresolved ]
KR disagrees.
Many data provided by HUANG Junliang are extracted from Internet.
They are digitalized data, NOT the original documents.
KR suggests that he provide original documents, NOT the digitalized data, to facilitate discussion.
ROK
2023-10-10 11:16:13 UTC

Meeting Minutes

DateDescription
IRG #59
2022-10-18 (Tue)
9:44 am +0800
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
pending for ROK response.
IRG #59
2022-10-19 (Wed)
10:03 am +0800
Recorded by CHEN Zhuang
Glyph to be updated to match ⿰忄⿱宷日.

Attribute Changes

VersionDescription
2.0
For 01413, change Stroke Count to 14
2.0
For 01413, change Total Stroke Count to 17
2.0
For 01413, change IDS to ⿰忄⿱宷日
2.0
For 01413, add Discussion Record "SC=14, TS=17, IDS=⿰忄⿱宷日, 2021-10."
4.0
For 01413, add Discussion Record "Glyph to be updated to ⿰忄⿱宷日, IRG 59."
4.0
For 01413, add Discussion Record "Glyph updated, 2022-12."

Glyph Changes

Source ReferenceGlyph
KC-05106
1.0
🢂
4.0

Raw Info
groupROK
a) Source referenceKC-05106
b) PUA Code of TTFEE7D
c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary)R061.0
d) Stroke Count (Primary)18
e) First Stroke(Primary)4
g) Total stroke count21
i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence)⿰忄瀋
j) Similar/ Variants N
k) Ref. to Evidence doc韓國學中央硏究院 司馬榜目
m1) Previous IRG WSN/A
m2) Sequence No of Previous IRG WSN/A