Radical Change?

Radical Change?

Radical to 109 目?

Agree with Eiso that the character unifies to 𱆮 (U+311AE), but it isn't the variant of 鮮. According to 《揅經室集》, ⿰魚芊 shares the same meaning with 斯.

《揅經室集》
https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=41001&page=23

similar to 鼵, which 鵌鼵 are always mentioned together.

The complete sentence of evidence 1 is “鼵～同處穴”. According to 《康熙字典‧亥集下‧鼠部‧鼵》：“【爾雅‧釋獸】鳥鼠同穴，其鳥為鵌，其鼠為鼵。”It seems that ⿰鼠余 is the misprint of 鵌.

《舒蓺室詩存》
https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=41995&page=28

《康熙字典‧亥集下‧鼠部》
https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&file=77415&page=1529

Is it a misprint of 鼪？

《康熙字典‧亥集下‧鼠部‧鼪》:「【爾雅·釋獸】【註】江東呼鼬鼠爲鼪，能啖鼠。俗呼鼠狼。」
https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&file=77415&page=1528

According to 《爾雅》which the evidence mentioned and 《康熙字典》, it seems that ⿰鼠女 is the misprint of 鼤.






https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=72832&page=115
《爾雅注疏》

《康熙字典‧亥集下‧鼠部‧鼤》：「【爾雅‧釋獸】鼤鼠、鼨鼠。」
https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&file=77415&page=1527

This evidence was quoted from 《山海經》 which is 鼣. It seems that ⿰鼠火 is the misprint of 鼣.



https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=77823&page=57#%E7%99%BD%E8%80%B3
《山海經》，《四部叢刊初編》

There is another version of 《蘇魏公文集》, which shows 鼲 as below.



https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=2005&page=138
《蘇魏公文集》，《欽定四庫全書》

According to 《康熙字典‧亥集下‧鹿部‧𪊑》：“【正韻】經天切，𠀤音堅。【說文】鹿之絕有力者……”and 《康熙字典‧亥集下‧鹿部‧麉》：“ 【字彙】同𪊑。” , which ⿸鹿寸 share the same meaning and pronunciation with 𪊑, the evidence seems to be：“極有力者曰：麉、𪊑。” Therefore, I suspect that ⿸鹿寸 is the misprint of 𪊑.

《康熙字典‧亥集下‧鹿部》
https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=77415&page=1509#32

Agree with Eddie.

《康熙字典‧亥集下‧鹿部‧麂》：「【本草註】……本作𪊨。」
https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&file=77415&page=1509

According to the evidence, this character is related with 麂子. ⿸鹿𣅀 seems to be a misprint of 𪊨.

The glyph of 䰪 (U+4C2A) which shows in 《康熙字典》（同文書局） is similar to ⿰⿱夫月鬼.

https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&file=77415&page=1462

similar to 䢥(U+48A5) or 𨕒(U+28552).

similar to 邎(U+908E).

Is it a misprint of 誆?

TS=17

TS=6

Follow comment #2161, 《莊子注》 annotated that 阿鮭蠪 doesn't relate with fish, which is much more like a legendary creature. Therefore, ⿱龍魚 should maintain its radical in 212 龍.



《莊子注》，《欽定四庫全書》
https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=53877&page=15#box(176,57.666664123535156,1,0)

SC=5, TS=16

SC=9

As the evidence of WS2017-04940 , which probably simplify to ⿰鼠鳥, shows that it is a kind of bird. It seems that the radical should be changed to 196 鳥.

SC=13, FS=2, TS=24

SC=10, TS=15

SC=12, TS=17

SC=15, TS=23

SC=10, FS=2, TS=18 according to IRGN954AR.

SC=19, TS=27

SC=10, TS=21

Change Radical to 167' 钅

TS=18

as the glyph and IDS changed, SC=6, TS=13

TS=13

FS=2

FS=3

SC=4

FS=2

SC=5, FS=3

TS=16

FS=2

SC=8, FS=1

FS=5

FS=3

FS=3

FS=2

Agree with Lee, and suggest changed radical to 117 立 if it needs to be coded.

FS=2

FS=1

FS=1

FS=1

FS=2

SC=8

SC=6, TS=17.

TS=20

SC=12, TS=20

it looks like the radical should be 40 宀 such as 觀(U+89C0).

SC=7 according to IRGN2221.

TS=22

it looks like the radical should be 102 田 such as 𤳖 (U+24CD6).

Change IDS to ⿱雨⿲亻丨⿱备灬 as the bottom part of the glyph is ⿱田灬 instead of 魚.

FS=4 According to IRGN954AR.

FS=3

SC=11, TS=14

FS=4 according to IRGN954AR.

SC=19, TS=29 according to IRGN2221.

FS=3

SC=12, TS=22

SC=14 as there is 龷, which isn't 廿, in the first piece of evidence and the glyph.

TS=25

SC=14, TS=22

TS=17

SC=12, FS=5

SC=15

TS=12

SC=10

SC=12, TS=23

TS=18

TS=23

SC=15

Suggestion:　Change radical to 92 牙, SC=12, FS=3, TS=15.

it looks like the radical should be 154 貝, which “近” is the phonetic component.

TS=24

TS=21

TS=22

TS=25

《忠肅集》，光緖乙卯[1879]，王氏謙德堂校刊本。
https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&file=106745&page=577

https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=9021&page=135
《埤雅》，《四庫全書》

成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇海
https://archive.org/details/02076730.cn/page/n42/mode/2up

成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇海
https://archive.org/details/02076735.cn/page/n46/mode/2up

https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=118262&page=109#%E9%BC%A0
《韶州府志》

According to the evidence, the glyph should be 廾 instead of 𪜀.

The glyph with left-falling does not match with evidence 2 & 3 but it is compatible.

similar to 鼴.

Although the evidence said 𪄻 was a misprint of ⿰鳥春, the character is 𪄻 in 《廣韻》. it seems that more evidence is needed.




https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=1500&page=29#%F0%AA%87%86
《重修廣韻》，《四庫全書》



https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=88948&page=16#%E8%88%82
《泰定本廣韻》，《古逸叢書》

It should be discussed with character 01960, which has the same problem of component.

variant of 𪂁?

Note that 觱 doesn't match the pronunciation which provided in the original evidence.

agree with comment #5140.

The traditional form is coded in extension A.

The variant is coded in extension E.

Similar to 𪂬.

The traditional form is coded in extension F.

Should be accepted as 𧸝(U+27E1D) has been coded.

According to 《山西通志》, It is a variant of 法(U+6CD5).

《山西通志》，淸光緖18 [1892] 修，卷46~卷52：
https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=107798&page=864

According to the evidence , it share the same meaning with 䯺(U+4BFA), which probably is a variant:

According to the new evidence, and 《康熙字典‧酉集上‧角部‧觱》：“【詩·小雅】觱沸檻泉。” it is a variant of 觱(U+89F1).

It is possibly the variant form of 𫒨.

analogy simplifies from 鐣

analogy simplifies from 䬦

analogy simplifies from 𩛱

analogy simplifies from 䥈

variant of 鱱?

The simplification form is coded in extension B.

According to 《說文解字》,it seems that the meaning is different to 馈. The traditional form is coded in main block.

It possibly is the simplification form of 𩽤.