Please wait while loading

IRG Working Set 2021v1.0

Source: WANG Yifan
Date: Generated on 2025-05-15

Show Deleted | Show comments from version: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
The Image/Source column is displayed as it was in WS2021 v1.0. The character may have a different status in the latest working set.

Unification

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
01057
01057
宀 40.13.4
SAT-03893
TS 16 · IDS 𡧡丿
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification with 賓 (U+8CD3) now.
The evidence particularly designates the component as the upper part.
01417
01417
戈 62.4.1
SAT-04258
TS 8 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification with 𢦒 (U+22992) now.
The evidence particularly designates the component as the upper part.
00828
00828
土 32.8.1
SAT-04378
TS 11 · IDS 𡗜
UCV
Agree to add UCV(s) per #2348 if approved.
04270
04270
阜 170.10.5
SAT-04580
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
U+2E955
Agree. Unify to 𮥕 (U+2E955).
01655
01655
日 72.3.2
SAT-04583
TS 7 · IDS 丿
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
00428
00428
又 29.17.2
SAT-05094
TS 19 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
02173
02173
火 86.6.4
SAT-05626
TS 10 · IDS 𢑑
Unification
Agree. Withdraw.
01476
01476
手 64.9.1
SAT-05633
TS 12 · IDS
UCV
Agree to add UCV per #2349 if approved.
02883
02883
禾 115.11.3
SAT-05697
TS 16 · IDS 鹿
Unification
Agree. Withdraw.
00416
00416
又 29.6.2
SAT-05802
TS 8 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
UCV
Agree to add UCV per #1047 if approved.
02292
02292
爿 90.13.1
SAT-05853
TS 17 · IDS 𤕫
Unification
Agree. Withdraw.
00561
00561
口 30.10.3
SAT-06006
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Agree. Withdraw.
00920
00920
土 32.16.4
SAT-06008
TS 19 · IDS
Oppose Unification
The character is found in the context "或作⿰害各" immediately before, so the difference in the component must be intended.
01239
01239
巾 50.16.3
SAT-06060
TS 19 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Still needs discussion whether 忄 and 巾 are unifiable.
02704
02704
目 109.9.3
SAT-06061
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Agree. Withdraw.
01364
01364
心 61.11.2
SAT-06077
TS 14 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
03943
03943
車 159.8.2
SAT-06136
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Agree. Withdraw.
02325
02325
牛 93.19.1
SAT-06149
TS 23 · IDS &SAT-H19A;
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
03144
03144
网 122.6.2
SAT-06265
TS 12 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion how much the top parts of WS2017-03505 and this are cognate.
00445
00445
口 30.5.2
SAT-06377
TS 8 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.

cf. disunified examples
俣 U+4FE3 / 㑨 U+3468
脵 U+8135 / 𫞆 U+2B786
04172
04172
金 167.13.4
SAT-06661
TS 21 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Possibly cognate, but we would like to know the identity of U+2E8C9.
Oppose Unification
The geometrical composition is rather different even though nearly unifiable (note that UCV #112 does not cover the U+2E8C9 shape). We would like to know if the two have developed via different paths (cognateness in shape).
00676
00676
口 30.15.1
SAT-06793
TS 18 · IDS 𢀩
Oppose Unification
Possibly cognate, but we would like to know about the identity of U+2D2FF.
04766
04766
鳥 196.12.2
SAT-06830
TS 23 · IDS
Unification
Agree. Withdraw.
02485
02485
玉 96.9.1
SAT-06892
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Agree. Withdraw.
00395
00395
卩 26.8.3
SAT-06950
TS 10 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
00534
00534
口 30.9.2
SAT-06968
TS 12 · IDS 𭁄
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
02967
02967
竹 118.12.4
SAT-07036
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Agree. Withdraw.
01283
01283
彐 58.5.5
SAT-07269
TS 8 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
02098
02098
水 85.13.4
SAT-08157
TS 16 · IDS
Oppose Unification
We need discussion because swapping of top-level radical is not consistently unifiable in the past practice.
04277
04277
阜 170.13.1
SAT-08377
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Agree. Withdraw.
00150
00150
人 9.7.3
SAT-08559
TS 9 · IDS 𢌜
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
03067
03067
糸 120.7.2
SAT-08568
TS 13 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Unification is in fact prohibited by NUCV #317.
01207
01207
巛 47.10.1
SAT-08726
TS 13 · IDS 𠙻
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion for the suggested UCV.
02177
02177
火 86.7.1
SAT-08823
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Agree. Withdraw.
01293
01293
彳 60.6.3
SAT-08911
TS 9 · IDS 𠂛
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion for suggested UCV.
00795
00795
土 32.5.1
SAT-08938
TS 8 · IDS 𭤟
Unification
U+2D38B
Agree. Withdraw. The glyph of U+2D38B should be updated.
01412
01412
心 61.18.3
SAT-08975
TS 21 · IDS
Unification
Agree. Withdraw.
01208
01208
巛 47.14.3
SAT-09025
TS 17 · IDS 𠙻
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion for the suggested UCV. Also see WS2021-01207.
00183
00183
人 9.10.1
SAT-09305
TS 12 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
00373
00373
十 24.6.1
SAT-10114
TS 8 · IDS 𪢴
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
01907
01907
止 77.3.2
SAT-10320
TS 7 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Needs discussion whether it is appropriate to unify with 𧾷 (U+27FB7) which apparently encoded for a component.


Evidence

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00021
00021
丨 2.4.1
SAT-01303
TS 5 · IDS
Unclear evidence response
As a composite character, the structure ⿰丨云 is standard and ⿰卜云 is extremely rare if any.

cf. https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2019/19346-gongche-policy.pdf
00765
00765
囗 31.3.2
SAT-04332
TS 4 · IDS
Unclear evidence response
Our woodblock evidence is from Tripitaka Koreana created 1236-1251, so it proves at least two variants were widely circulated at that time (or maybe Korea and Japan traditions). The ⿴〇内 variant also appears in Taisho Tripitaka, but we currently plan to use this one as the representative form as it is consistently used in the body, and the other as IVS.
New evidence
Glyph in 房山石經 inscription (this part from Liao dynasty 916-1125).
00428
00428
又 29.17.2
SAT-05094
TS 19 · IDS
Unclear evidence response
Sorry, it is the glyph that is wrong. The evidence matches IDS which is intended.
02808
02808
石 112.13.1
SAT-06454
TS 18 · IDS 𧵩
Unclear evidence response
We will consider modifying the glyph.
01047
01047
宀 40.9.4
SAT-06842
TS 12 · IDS
Unclear evidence response
I think what you see is a faint end of 王's top bar.
01270
01270
广 53.20.4
SAT-06884
TS 23 · IDS 广
Unclear evidence response
We believe that the inner part should be identical to the right part of the head character in each evidence.
00912
00912
土 32.15.1
SAT-06979
TS 18 · IDS 𤡜
Unclear evidence response
The said shape is stable in Taisho Tripitaka. For example, see U+301AA (WS2015-00506) and U+30B95 (WS2015-03412).
U+301AA

U+30B95

https://hc.jsecs.org/irg/ws2015/app/?id=00506
https://hc.jsecs.org/irg/ws2015/app/?id=03412
00718
00718
口 30.16.5
SAT-90136
TS 19 · IDS
Evidence
Please check the waseda.ac.jp link; that glyph is most authoritative, but their images are not free to redistribute.


Glyph Design & Normalization

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00428
00428
又 29.17.2
SAT-05094
TS 19 · IDS
Glyph design
We will update the glyph.
03144
03144
网 122.6.2
SAT-06265
TS 12 · IDS
Glyph design
We will update the glyph.
02476
02476
玉 96.7.1
SAT-06673
TS 11 · IDS 𢌜
Glyph design
It seems another character's glyph. We will replace with the correct one.
02133
02133
水 85.17.4
SAT-08944
TS 20 · IDS
Glyph design
Agreed. We will modify the glyph.


Other

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00020
00020
丨 2.3.1
SAT-01301
TS 4 · IDS
Comment
As UTC withheld the decision on whether it is a CJK ideograph, we need to consult IRG whether to accept it as an ideograph. Any suggestion is welcome.
00021
00021
丨 2.4.1
SAT-01303
TS 5 · IDS
Comment
As UTC withheld the decision on whether it is a CJK ideograph, we need to consult IRG whether to accept it as an ideograph. Any suggestion is welcome.
00718
00718
口 30.16.5
SAT-90136
TS 19 · IDS
Comment
As UTC withheld the decision on whether it is a CJK ideograph, we need to consult IRG whether to accept it as an ideograph. Any suggestion is welcome.