02356 and 𤞢 (U+247A2) are the same character.
https://www.kangxizidian.com/v2/index.php?page=3405&dpy=2

Based on UCV# 384

unify to 𬉦 (U+2C266).

According to the paraphrase content [从谷害声], this character could be unified with 𭐋 (U+2D40B).

[ WS2017-03505 ]
Unify to WS2017-03505 (UK-10504)?
https://hc.jsecs.org/irg/ws2017/app/index.php?id=03505

《爾雅注疏．卷八．釋草》

It is suggested that the glyph 02098 should be unified with 薃 (U+8583).

Unify to 絗 (U+7D57)?

Similar with TE-782A (WS2021-01575), so withdrawn.

Agree. Keep TE-387B (WS2021-04158).

Disagree. The two glyphs 匊 and ⿹勹水 are not non-cognate.

Disagree to be unified, there is no rule to judge unification.

T9-756E will be withdrawn.

Agree. Add a extension to 𮆝 (U+2E19D).

勿 and 匆 are different characters and have different meanings.

>unify to 𦊨(U+262A8)
Agree.

Disagree to be unified, there is no rule to judge unification.

Agree.

Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.

Disagree. ⿸户皿 and 扁 are totally different characters.

Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

Disagree to be unified, there is no rule to judge unification.

[ WS2017-04447 ]
Agree. Add a extension to WS2017-04447 KC-07700.

Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
But 觧 could be a variant of 解 or 鮮.

Agree. Keep TE-387B (WS2021-04158).

Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.

This glyph is used for personal name and is pronounced "jin".

https://baiyunju.cc/754
https://kknews.cc/culture/pega9j.html
This character comes from 老君碑, and in related inscriptions, it is written as 𢛣 or "⿰氵⿱民心". Therefore, should the glyph 02055 be unified with 𢛣 (U+226E3)?

The glyph and IDS should be changed to ⿰犭𮌈.
U+2E308 𮌈

IDS=⿰石⿱束貝 or 〾⿰石𧵩

Agree. Change Radical to 170 阜.

Agree.

Agree to change the IDS to 〾⿱艹煮.

I think the IDS should be keep as ⿸广⿱殸夂 based on the glyph.

The middle part of the glyph doesn't match the evidence.

The glyph doesn't match the evidence.

The glyph doesn't match the evidence.

Missing Evidence.

Missing Evidence.

Judging from the evidence, there is indeed a horizontal stroke above "糸".

No evidence.

The glyph doesn't match the evidence.

The glyph doesn't match the evidence.

In the evidence, the first stroke of the right part is a left-falling stroke, not like a horizontal stroke. Therefore, it is recommended to keep the glyph as "升".

The right part of the character in the evidence looks like [只+又].

The new evidence provided by someone else. TCA do not accept the new evidence because the shape is different with which TCA submitted.

The new evidence provided by someone else. TCA do not accept the new evidence because the shape is different with which TCA submitted.

The name of a living person is the different issue with ancient character.

The name of a living person is the different issue with ancient character.

The name of a living person is the different issue with ancient character.

The name of a living person is the different issue with ancient character.

The glyph doesn't match the evidence. The character on the evidence is ⿰山宮(U+5BAE).

The glyph doesn't match the evidence.

"者" in the evidence has a dot.

The glygh doesn't match the evidence. The right-middle part of the character in the evidence looks like ⿵冂米, not 𡇒.

The glyph doesn't match the evidence.
There is no horizontal stroke in the red circled of the evidence.

Please provide a clearer evidence to confirm the upper part of the glyph.

VN-F0B86 is not found in the evidence, please provide another evidence.

The middle part of the character in the evidence is "⺼", not "月".

The glyph doesn't match the evidence.

The glyph doesn't match the evidence.

Agree with Eiso. The glygh should be modified to match the evidence.

The four dots of the glyph "雨" are inconsistent with the evidence.

KR Norm. 86-2

In evidences, there are two ways of writing (⿰犭⿱大刀 & ⿰犭夯). Which shape should SAT take as the main shape?

The glyph doesn't match the evidence.

Agree with Eiso. The horizontal stoke on the upper right needs to be adjusted.

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

卝 is a common variant of Radical 140.0 艸, please see the picture below.

(https://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/variants/rbt/radical_tiles.rbt?pageId=2981943)

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

According to the naming ACT, we should keep the name glyph that people register.

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

According to the naming ACT, we should keep the name glyph that people register.

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

According to the naming ACT, we should keep the name glyph that people register.

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

This glyph is used for personal name, so it is not normalized.

Is the glyph normalization? The leftt part of this glyph in the evidence looks like 𦈢.

Is the glyph normalization? The upper-right part of this glyph in the evidence looks like 䒑, not 艹.

The lower part of the character is "冊" or "册"?

The glyph doesn't match the evidence.

Agree with Xieyang WANG. The glygh in the eivdence is ⿰口⿱𡥅皿.

The glyph doesn't match the evidence. The glyph on the evidence is U+21B8D 𡮍.

Is the glyph normalization? The upper part of this glyph in the evidence looks like 䒑.

(Cited from:https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%8D%9F%E5%95%89)

Most of the Chinese translations of porphyrin (s) are translated as "卟啉". Is there any other evidence that is translated as "(口+小) 啉"? In addition, the character "小" has no pronunciation of “Pu”.

KRNormalization Rule:175-1.

The pronunciation of this character is gāo.

TC-403E (WS2021-02735) is higher frequency of use. So, keep this glyph.

In the following example, these shapes(舀/ ⿱爫旧/ ⿱爫罒) are encoded separately.