There are two reasons why KR suggests to encode ‘巴山’ and ‘巴出’ separately.
1) Considering that Korean reading of ‘巴出’ is “Jeol(절)”, component ‘출(Chul, its syllable-final is /l/ (ell))’ is more peroper than ‘산(San, its syllable-final is /n/)’.
In that sense, ‘巴出’ is a Korean variant of ‘巴山’.
2) Depending on viewpoints, ‘巴出’ can be considered as a Korea-origin Hanja.
3) These two chars (mountain, exit) seem variants. However, since two components are so much different, KR suggests to encode these two separately.
IRG Working Set 2021v4.0
Source: ROK
Date: Generated on 2026-01-21
Attributes
TS=10
IDS=⿰亻卨
SC=11; TS=13
Evidence
1) Considering that Korean reading of ‘巴出’ is “Jeol(절)”, component ‘출(Chul, its syllable-final is /l/ (ell))’ is more peroper than ‘산(San, its syllable-final is /n/)’.
In that sense, ‘巴出’ is a Korean variant of ‘巴山’.
2) Depending on viewpoints, ‘巴出’ can be considered as a Korea-origin Hanja.
3) These two chars (mountain, exit) seem variants. However, since two components are so much different, KR suggests to encode these two separately.
Glyph Design & Normalization