I am somewhat confused about your intention in your comment
(due to the meaning of "reconsider"):
> IRG should reconsider adding a new unification rule of 眉 ~ 睂
> because the 眉 component is extremely productive.
> Based on a quick lookup of IDS,
> there are 38 characters with 眉 component
> while there are 10 characters encoded with 睂.
a) Do you suggest that IRG should add a new unification rule of 眉 ~ 睂?
b) Or, do you suggest that IRG should cancel a decision to add a new
unification rule of 眉 ~ 睂? (Howevr, in this case, IRG did not seem to have decided to add a unification rule of 眉 ~ 睂).
IRG Working Set 2021v4.0
Source: KIM Kyongsok
Date: Generated on 2024-10-10
Unification
I am somewhat confused about your intention in your comment
(due to the meaning of "reconsider"):
> IRG should reconsider adding a new unification rule of 眉 ~ 睂
> because the 眉 component is extremely productive.
> Based on a quick lookup of IDS,
> there are 38 characters with 眉 component
> while there are 10 characters encoded with 睂.
a) Do you suggest that IRG should add a new unification rule of 眉 ~ 睂?
b) Or, do you suggest that IRG should cancel a decision to add a new
unification rule of 眉 ~ 睂? (Howevr, in this case, IRG did not seem to have decided to add a unification rule of 眉 ~ 睂).
Thx.
Other
Right.
https://www.koreanhistory.or.kr/newchar/
Right.