Agree with Eiso #11437 in principle. We may actually need to set a separate category to indicate that different arrangements of the same components are still unifiable in some cases. Some of these cases may be caused by the length of the strokes in the components, others not.
The importance of setting this classification is that structural differences sometimes lead to non-cognateness and disunifiability. If it is necessary to qualify some of the unifiable cases, a special section will be needed to discuss them.
Since UCV #307 belongs to “j-2. Differences in relative length of strokes”, it may indicate that the length of the strokes [should be in a single component?] leads to differences in the analysis of component structure. But even so, some examples classified as UCV #307 or UCV #305 should be treated as different arrangement of components, like 𢣁 in UCV #305 and examples in UCV #305b/305c/305d.
They are all derived from 款. First a 冖 is added from the original glyph to form 𬅭, then the lower-left part 示 is changed to be 禾 to form [11-6151], then the 一 is deleted to form this [TD-4A24], then the 丿 is deleted to form 𣣙 (only one character with this ⿰⿳十冖A欠 structure).
As a supplement to #9436, the head-character for the link that #9436 shows is ⿱爻巾 instead of ⿱爻布, but evidence in 補充資料 > 異體字表 shows ⿱爻布 ~ 希 (03511). Using 異體字表 as its reference, CNS 11643 website for T6-305A also considers 𢂞 ~ 希.
To consider 𢂞 simply as a variant of 希, and to consider ⿱父布 as a non-cognate character is better. As the evidence given in #9435 shows ⿱父布 instead of ⿱爻布, VU-2209E may need to be unified to WS2021-02285.
Evidence 1 shows "小老婆", meaning "妾" (~concubine).
#13022 for "小⿰女畝" shows "妾, 舊時男子在妻子以外娶的女子" (~concubine, [historically] refers to a woman that a man married in addition to his wife).
#13022 for "小⿰女畝囝" shows "舊指妾生的孩子, 在家庭中地位較低" ([historically] refers to a child born to a concubine who has a lower status in the family).
The function for "妾" and "concubine" may be slightly different (cf. https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A6%BE and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubinage) but that is not important.
The lower character can be analysed as ⿰亻西, when 亻 comes from 仏, 西 comes from 西 (west), which is non-cognate to 価 which should be analysed as ⿰亻覀, when 覀 comes from 襾.
IRG Working Set 2021v4.0
Source: Kushim JIANG
Date: Generated on 2024-12-05
Unification
𨔻 A04163-001 ~ 違 A04163
𭘮 B00933-005 ~ 幃 B00933
⿱艹𮧯 A03523-001 ~ 葦 A03523
⿴囗𮧯 A00735-001 ~ 圍 A00735
⿰火𮧯 B02406-003 ~ 煒 B02406
𫟘 A03704-003 ~ 衛 A03704
𮘪 A03861-001 ~ 諱 A03861
𨵾 A04393-001 ~ 闈 A04393
⿰𠦝𮧯 A04527-019 ~ 韓 A04527
𩏍 A04528-025-1 ~ 韜 A04528
Consider unifying to 𨤦 (U+28926).
Kangxi Dictionary let 𨤦 correspond to the Guwen 古文 shape. Different Liding 隶定 to the same character.
For 齊 ~ ⿳亠⿲刀丫𱍸⿰丿丨/⿳亠⿲刀丫𱍸冂
𦠃 ~ 𪗇
𠆈 ~ 䶒
⿳亠⿲刀丫𱍸𠕀 (漢字海 #9458) ~ 𪗅
⿰〾木⿶𢍻十 A01923-009 ~ 𣔮 A01923-004 ~ 𣖋 A01923-005
⿰氵⿹𢦏力 (漢字海) ~ 渽
䳣 ~ 𪃘
𥡎 (GHZ p. 2806) ~ 𥞻
⿰禾〾𰏘 B03813-008 / ⿰禾〾𰏘 B03813-007 ~ 𥞻 B03813-001
𡙼 A01260-003 / ⿰〾矢〾𰏘 A01260-005 ~ 𥏟 A01260-011
⿰矢〾𰏘 (漢字海) ~ 𥏟
⿰弓〾𰏘 A01260-006 ~ 㢼 A01260-008
⿰〾革〾𰏘 B02604-006 / ⿰〾革〾𰏘 B02604-004 ~ 𩋇 B02604-003
⿰〾𰏘鳥 C17636-002 ~ 䳤 C17636
⿰〾𰏘攴 A01723-004 ~ 敝 A01723
⿰〾𰏘攵 A01723-005 / ⿰〾𰏘攵 A01723-007 ~ 敝 A01723
⿰〾𰏘頁 (漢字海) ~ 𩓝
⿰日〾𰏘 C04838-001 ~ 𣇢 C04838
⿱大〾𰏘 C01964-001 / ⿱大〾𰏘 C01964-002 ~ 𡘴 C01964
𠁅 ~ 䖏 (𠻔 ~ 𠼥 𢴃 ~ 㩀 𭞥 ~ 𢟶)
𠙚 ~ 處
⿸〾𮓗丘 A03609-021 ~ 虗 A03609-002
⿸〾𮓗几 A03604-009 ~ 虎 A03604
⿸〾𮓗又 A03606-017 ~ 𧆛 A03606-005
⿸〾𮓗林 C12181-008 ~ 𧇃 C12181-001
⿸〾𮓗甲 C12154-003 ~ 𧆥 C12154
⿸〾𮓗𠯵 A03611-005 ~ ⿸虍𠯵 A03611-002
⿸〾𮓗男 A03610-002 ~ 虜 A03610
⿸〾𮓗思 A01426-004 ~ 慮 A01426
⿸〾𮓗胃 A03364-003 ~ 膚 A03364
⿸〾𮓗𰤷 (GHZR, p.2751) ~ 盧 (𮉗 ~ 纑 𮎗 ~ 艫 𮬗 ~ 鱸)
(too many to list)
𩼱 B06006-003 ~ 鰿 B06006
⿰女⿱束貝 C02303-002 ~ 嫧 C02303
⿰氵⿱束貝 (SAT): 濅▲ ~ 濅漬, 澆▲ ~ 澆漬
⿰石⿱束貝 (SAT): ▲中 ~ 磧中
⿰禾⿱束貝 A02944-006 ~ 積 A02944
⿰糸⿱束貝 A03166-006 ~ 績 A03166
⿰𦣞⿱束貝 (SAT): 探▲ ~ 探賾
The importance of setting this classification is that structural differences sometimes lead to non-cognateness and disunifiability. If it is necessary to qualify some of the unifiable cases, a special section will be needed to discuss them.
Since UCV #307 belongs to “j-2. Differences in relative length of strokes”, it may indicate that the length of the strokes [should be in a single component?] leads to differences in the analysis of component structure. But even so, some examples classified as UCV #307 or UCV #305 should be treated as different arrangement of components, like 𢣁 in UCV #305 and examples in UCV #305b/305c/305d.
In this case, we may find:
⿱ ~ ⿹:
螜 ~ 𧏚, 𡠆 ~ 㜌, 𣖫 ~ 榖 ...
頾 ~ 頿, 𩒹 ~ 䫇, 嬃 ~ 𡡓 ...
𣻯 ~ 潁, ⿱頃山 (睡虎地) ~ ⿹頃山, ⿱頃糸 (漢字海) ~ 顈
⿰ ~ ⿺:
𣤚 ~ 燞, ⿺焦刂 B00243-002 ~ 劁 B00243
===============
For ⿱⿰尚A木 ~ ⿰棠A, I can only find ⿱敞木 and 𢿧𢿵𭣜. Consider:
𢿵:
[一切經音義] 染衣倀, [倀] 摘更反, 或作▲, 考聲云 “▲, 展也, 從木敞聲, 律中 (根本説一切有部毘奈耶尼陀那目得迦攝頌) 從手從貞作揁 (“霑衣大小便, 染衣揁認衣”), 非也”.
𢿧:
[一切經音義] 衣▲, [▲] 讁庚反, 考聲云 “𭣜, 展也, 從木敞聲, 律本作揁, 非也”.
𭣜:
[一切經音義] 𢿦前, 上讁更反, 經作楨, 非也. 楨音客庚反, 琴瑟聲也, 若以爲楨像字, 於義乖失. 今偕𭣜字, 用之稍近於理, 順俗爲去聲呼也.
[一切經音義] 衣𢿧, [𢿧] 讁庚反, 考聲云 “▲, 展也, 從木敞聲, 律本作揁, 非也”.
So ⿱敞木 and 𢿧𢿵𭣜 can be analyzed as being unfiable.
Consider unifying to 囧.
See evidence #3, 蒼頡篇云, 囧 (▲), 大 (火) 明也.
Also:
⿰⿴囗仌月 A01784-007 ~ 朙 A01784-001
Consider unifying to 𰮀 (U+30B80).
Cross reference comment #4540.
Also:
⿱〾高⿴囗仌 A03356-006 ~ ⿱🈩高口〾肉 A03356-009 ~ 膏 A03356.
For ⿱ ~ ⿵:
⿱咸心 ~ ⿵咸心 (感)
𡞣 C02254 ~ ⿵咸女 C02254-001
⿱戌火 (漢字海) ~ 烕
𤥔 ~ 㓘
𣳹 ~ 𣴰
⿰言𭑃 (漢字海) ~ 𧧳
𰸉 ~ 𨀗
⿰魚⿱大干 (漢字海) ~ 𩶮
⿰月⿱大𰀁 (GHZR p.2215) ~ 𰮟
Since 𩩃 ≁ 𱅯, ⿱大干 / 𭑃 / ⿱大𰀁 ~ 𡗢 may be level 2.
⿱⿰三三皿 ~ 益
⿱烕⿰三三 A02285-014 ~ 𣹹 A02285-004
𣲇 (15-225C), 戶政用字, chù
𥐡 (15-2831), 戶政用字, chì
𥸰 (15-2C7E), 戶政用字, chì
𨊫 (15-325F), 戶政用字, chì
𩶷 (15-463C), 戶政用字, yú
𬍐 (12-2C7B), 戶政用字, chù
𬗃 (12-4130), 戶政用字, yū
For this character, the reading comes from 廣碑別字.
It is hard for me to find strong variation connection between 丂 ~ 亍, I can only find 㱙 ~ 𣦿.
Consider unify to 𬅭 (U+2C16D).
⿰𡉉欠 may not be regarded as an isolated abstract component. Considering all the characters with similar structure:
𬅭 ~ 款
⿰⿱〾𡉉方欠 (13-4E33) (kuǎn)
⿰⿱〾𡉉禾欠 (11-6151) (kuǎn)
They are all derived from 款. First a 冖 is added from the original glyph to form 𬅭, then the lower-left part 示 is changed to be 禾 to form [11-6151], then the 一 is deleted to form this [TD-4A24], then the 丿 is deleted to form 𣣙 (only one character with this ⿰⿳十冖A欠 structure).
Consider unifying to 𤸝 (U+24E1D).
⿱⺈男 A00388-028 ~ 勇 A00388
𤧓 (15-4363, 戶政用字, yǒng) ~ 𬍺 (13-402D, 戶政用字, yǒng)
Most of ⿱⺈田 ~ 角 or 舀, so ⿱⺈男 ~ 勇 lvl 1 or ⿱⺈田 ~ 甬 lvl 2.
Consider unifying to 翱 (U+7FF1) or 𮋉 (U+2E2C9).
Not unify to 𮋋 (U+2E2CB), as the Korean reading 황 (~ 皇) is different from 고.
To consider 𢂞 simply as a variant of 希, and to consider ⿱父布 as a non-cognate character is better. As the evidence given in #9435 shows ⿱父布 instead of ⿱爻布, VU-2209E may need to be unified to WS2021-02285.
Evidence
The (444, 548) refers to reference #444 and #548,
[444] 王万邦: 姓氏词典, 河南人民出版社, 1991
[548] 任若海: 太平图话姓氏综, 武陟观我堂, 清嘉庆年间
Evidence 1 shows "小老婆", meaning "妾" (~concubine).
#13022 for "小⿰女畝" shows "妾, 舊時男子在妻子以外娶的女子" (~concubine, [historically] refers to a woman that a man married in addition to his wife).
#13022 for "小⿰女畝囝" shows "舊指妾生的孩子, 在家庭中地位較低" ([historically] refers to a child born to a concubine who has a lower status in the family).
The function for "妾" and "concubine" may be slightly different (cf. https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A6%BE and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubinage) but that is not important.
Other
⿰亻𠤭 A01279-005 ~ 佂 A01279-004
⿰木𠤭 A01899-010 ~ 柾 A01899-007
⿰𠤭攵 A01720-002 ~ 政 A01720
For 𠤭 (SAT-04683),
T2128_.54.0515b20 漂: 𠤭瓢反 → 匹瓢反
T2128_.54.0746b06 𣎳: 𠤭刃反 → 匹刃反
T2128_.54.0748a23 紕: 𠤭毘反 → 匹毘反
T2128_.54.0767c13 爾疋讎𠤭也 → 爾雅讎匹也
So can also tell 𠤭~匹, then 正~𠤭 should be level 2.
▲ 蔡叶青, 海康方言志, 广州: 中山大学出版社
▲ 和製漢字の辞典（2014），亻部
The lower character can be analysed as ⿰亻西, when 亻 comes from 仏, 西 comes from 西 (west), which is non-cognate to 価 which should be analysed as ⿰亻覀, when 覀 comes from 襾.