Agree with #13743

Agree with #13737, change IDS to ⿰吏𱤽

Radical 37 is phonetic, and the meaning is "cover", hence "盖" as semantic. 皿 is given as the radical based on that analysis. We agree with adding radical 37 as secondary.

Agree with #13771

Agree with radical change to 戶

Better IDS: ⿰月𱤽 (U+3193D)

Note, this means "blood", so 毛 is phonetic and 血 is semantic. Suggest keeping 血 as primary or secondary.

Better IDS: ⿸疒𱜢 (U+31722)

From the dictionary: "Giúp đọc Nôm và Hán Việt", p. 816:

The reading given is "wù", which matches the phonetic, 戊 ("wù"). What is the evidence for the reading "wù"?

From "Ngọc Hoàng phổ độ tôn kinh quốc âm". Reading "vót" suggests 忽 (hốt), not 怱 (thông).

Truyện Kiều 1870

The actual forms in texts (above and below) do resemble U+2B826. We can consider withdrawing this

中国京语词典, p 123

We have not counted the number of appearances.

”chùng" means "loose, baggy", so these are definitely non-cognate. It is acceptable to unify non-cognate characters with identical appearance, such as U+7551 畑 (Japanese 'field', Vietnamese 'lamp') or VN-F1BD7 and the variant of U+8B49 證 in #11650. However, VN-F1BD7 should be encoded separately from U+28CA2 and U+30FD3

It's never been standardized, so there are minor variations in most of the currently encoded characters. For example: U+972A 霪 and U+2AC6C 𪱬

The majority of the 乃 elements in NomNaTong are drawn this way.

My take on the way the reading is shown in #3072 is that the author considers it a "serious" reading, in the sense it is accepted in some dictionaries, but he suggests that it is ultimately erroneous, based on a misunderstanding of the character's origin as a character created in Japan to represent "ものがたり”, when it is just an error form of 話.

Why is this marked as similar to 軲 (U+8EF2). I'm not aware of any xie-sheng connection between 古 and 占 and the given readings are "gū" and "zhān". Is there any evidence for the similarity?

Is this a variant of 逵 U+9035, also read "kuí"?

Expanding on the point in #4863, the evidence in #1350 suggests TE-3836 as a variant of 觱, found in the compound 觱沸 ("bì fèi"). This could be fortuitous, with TE-3836 being just a name, but can TCA provide the source of the reading "jiǎn", or is that just a guess based on the phonetic 減 ( jiǎn)?

Variant of 韜 (tāo)? Same reading and similar shape.

U+93C1 鏁

U+89B0

U+9016 逖

U+908A 邊

U+908A 邊

shape and reading "bì" suggest that this is a semantic variant of U+8F9F 辟 and related characters: U+28413 𨐓, U+28419 𨐙, etc.

U+7235

U+9077 遷

這 (U+9019)

kFanqie 桑果

kMandarin qù

kJapanese ヘン あたり べ ほとり

kMandarin tà

kMandarin biān

kMandarin jué

kJapanese らん
note: based on this apparently being an alternative to write 金襴 (きんらん), an expensive fabric woven with silk and gold thread