Evidence 2 shows it is a variant character（异体字） of 件，and in this case maybe it is a textual variant（异文） of 舛. A textual variant (异文) might be caused by the use of a variant character (异体字), but it could also involve completely different words or structures.
Based on the discussions and evidences of both [WS2021-00655] and this proposal, it is better to encode ⿰击頁 independently, and add a new UCV for 頓~ ⿰击頁.
Thanks for comment #11574.
But for evidence 2，⿰口釐 is attested in the photographic reproduction of the book. As both this form and the more common 喱 were used purely for phonetic transcription in this context, they were functionally interchangeable. Their concurrent usage in the source material confirms that this is a valid textual variant, thereby supporting its encoding. https://www.shidianguji.com/book/CADAL02081307/chapter/1lcim2bmceaeu?page_from=searching_page¶graphId=7548201344226623527&keywords=%E4%B9%98%E9%A3%8E%2C%E9%A9%B6%2C%E4%B8%87%E5%B1%B1%2C%E4%B9%98%E9%A3%8E%E9%A9%B6%E5%87%BA%E8%80%81%E4%B8%87%E5%B1%B1&hightlightIndex=0&topicId=&version=3&contentMatch=1
IRG Working Set 2024v3.0
Source: SU Ruixin
Date: Generated on 2025-11-07
Unification
Showing 2 comments.
Evidence
Showing 2 comments.
But for evidence 2，⿰口釐 is attested in the photographic reproduction of the book. As both this form and the more common 喱 were used purely for phonetic transcription in this context, they were functionally interchangeable. Their concurrent usage in the source material confirms that this is a valid textual variant, thereby supporting its encoding.
（2）［唐］慧琳 撰 ：《一切經音義》，《中華大藏經（漢文部分）》，中華書局，1993年02月，第1版，第327頁。
（3）［唐］玄應 撰：《一切經音義》，《中華大藏經（漢文部分）》，中華書局，1993年02月，第1版，第939頁。
（4）《洪武正韻》
（5）張涌泉 主編 ：《敦煌經部文獻合集》，中華書局，2008年08月，第1版，第4859頁。
（6）日版《大藏經》