Based on three pieces of evidence (2 submitted and 1 new), the glyph should be ⿵门⿱𰁜大 not ⿵门奕. Evidence 1 shows the Putonghua reading is luán, that means the top of the inside part is 𰁜, the variant of 䜌 not 亦.
In PRC conventions, 𰁜 and 亦 are not the same. So, the theoretical traditional form should be ⿵門⿱䜌大 not ⿵門奕.
For the structure ⿱玨X, there are two situations for the radicals: 1) 玉, 2) the radical of component X
Rad=玉
U+73E1 珡 (variant of 琴)
U+7434 琴 (musical instrument)
U+7435 琵 (musical instrument)
U+7436 琶 (musical instrument)
U+7439 琹 (variant of 琴)
U+745F 瑟 (musical instrument)
U+24996 𤦖
U+24997 𤦗
U+249C2 𤧂 (variant of 琴)
U+249C6 𤧆 (variant of 琴)
U+24A0D 𤨍
U+24A58 𤩘
U+24A5F 𤩟 (variant of 琴)
U+2AEF4 𪻴 (variant of 琴 and 珍)
U+2B73B (musical instrument)
U+2DE65 𭹥 (musical instrument + variant of 筑)
U+2DE78 𭹸 (musical instrument + variant of 箜)
U+2DE92 𭺒
U+2DE95 𭺕
U+30877 𰡷 (variant of 琴)
U+30886 𰢆 (variant of 琴)
U+30887 𰢇 (variant of 琴)
U+3088C 𰢌 (variant of 琴)
U+31BD0 𱯐 (variant of 柬)
U+32BDE (variant of 拜)
Rad=the rad of X
U+22708 𢜈 (variant of 琴 and 慧)
U+235DC 𣗜 (variant of 琴)
U+28A16 𨨖 (variant of 琴)
U+2ABE5 𪯥 (variant of 斑 and 瑟)
U+2D310 𭌐
U+2D481 𭒁 (variant of 瑟)
U+2D8D1 𭣑
U+327D7 (variant of 弄)
For this case, the semantic element is 做, the phonetic element is 乞 (老借 haet, Cantonese is hat1; 新借 giz), so the radical 人 is from the right part 做, that means FS=3 is better to match the first stroke of 乞.
For this case, the semantic element is 作, the phonetic element is 乞 (老借 haet, Cantonese is hat1; 新借 giz), so the radical 人 is from the right part 作, that means FS=3 is better to match the first stroke of 乞.
Change Radical to 48.0 (工), SC=4, FS=5 and move 19.0 力 as the secondary one.
The top component is 巨, and the initial consonant (声母, phụ âm đầu/輔音頭) is l- (related to 來母 in middle Chinese), and the initial consonant of this one is s-, that means its previous form is consonant cluster. Based on the Vietnamese RS conventions, the most proper radical should be 工 (the radical of 巨).
*kl- → s-
U+22028 𢀨 V0-3D45 48.12
cự 巨 & lang 郎 = *klang → sang
The submitted evidence shows one 疏 (소) related to 洪淳穆 (홍순목, 1816 - 1884) in 1866. I also found one more piece related to 洪淳穆. He used the word as 乖盭 (괴려).
The evidence shows several person names as 柳楳~ (유매~), 李審 (이심), 蘇受益 (소수익), 禹有錫 (우유석), 王枝明 (왕지명), 朴斗萬 (박두만), 金乭山 (김돌산). And I found other one page shows several person names as 柳楳, 李⿱⿻十𠈌回, 李審, 蘇受益, 禹有錫, 王枝明, 朴斗萬, 金乭山, but I can’t find the original picture.
If 柳楳 is one person, the following character in the submitted evidence should mean the other person 李𤲷 or 李嗇 (이색). The following picture shows the the time.
▲ https://sjw.history.go.kr/id/SJW-F05040300-03900
If yes, it is not better to normalize the glyph to ⿱爽田, and the current reading is incorrect.
The second horizontal stroke (横) of the bottom left component 牛 should not be 避让 to become 提. The glyph shown on the evidence has been matched PRC conventions.
The submitted character is a Zhuang character. In Comment #14420, U+3037C 𰍼 and U+3165C 𱙜 are also Zhuang characters.
For U+3165C 𱙜 (reads as ndi*), the semantic element is 好, and the phonetic element is 尼 (新借niz).
For U+3037C 𰍼 and the submitted character, we need to know an unencoded character first.
⿺尼冷 reads nit, and the semantic element is 冷, the phonetic element is 尼.
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 383
Therefore, the rationale of U+3037C 𰍼 (reads as dot) and the submitted character (reads as ciengz*) are that the semantic elements are both the omitted form of ⿺尼冷, and the phonetic elements are 夺 (新借doz, 老接dued) and 常 (新借cangz, 老借ciengz).
That means the structures for these characters are stable, and match the rationale. Therefore, the glyph must be updated to match the submitted evidence. Other characters (⿰尼X) are not related to this type.
The Zhuang reading is gemq. The Zhuang reading of 剑 is giemq (老借), gen (新借). It is close to gemq.
莶 is not a very common character, and reads cim1 in Cantonese, so the closest Zhuang reading should be ciem (老借, the same as 签), which is not similar to gemq.
The Zhuang word coenggemq means Chinese chives (韭菜), and previous character is 萗 with Radical #140.0.
The evidence shows ⿰禾逹 or ⿰木逹. The submitter should show the normalization rule.
On the evidence, the previous sub-sentence shows “山稻種於乾田” (n./plant v. prep. n./place), so this sub-sentence shows “泉~種於寒水”, that means “泉~” is also a kind of plant. It is not easy to know what it is.
If TCA wants to normalize the glyph to ⿰口爓, that will be OK; if not, the current glyph could be kept. When other sources do the horizontal extension, ⿰口爓 could be unified here.
Respond to Comment #11166, which is a good question.
Evidence 1 shows ⿰口⿱垖十, and Evidence 2 shows ⿱⿰口垖十.
Evidence 1 shows the reading is 火刀切, that means f-(-o2) + (d-)-ou1 = fou1;
Evidence 2 shows the reading is 科高切, that means f-(-o1) + (g-)-ou1 = fou1.
Evidence 2 shows the English phrase is “suffocation by drowning”, and the corresponding Cantonese load word is “沙~鷄𠱸 拜 地簍𡨴”. The English word “suffocation” reads /ˌsʌfəˈkeɪʃən/, and “沙~鷄𠱸” reads saa1 fou1 gai1 seon2, which the corresponding Chinese meaning is “窒息”.
埠 reads fau6 and bou6 in Cantonese, fouh in Zhuang (老借).
Three pieces of evidence shows the corresponding English word is “heavy” (/ˈhevi/), and Evidence 3 shows the corresponding Katakana form is ヘヷ, so the word reads he1 wi4 in Cantonese.
㗾 reads hoe1 or hoe4 in Cantonese as Comment #11715 shows. 靴 reads like he1 in other sub-dialects of Chinese Yue-dialects.
The evidence for this character and WS2021-03520 don’t show the usage for the geographic names, but the G-Source for this character is GDM. Could we need to know how to use this one for the geographic names?
The phonetic element must be 韋 (viz? The 老借 form of 位 is vih, and the 新借 form of 韦 is veiz, and 位 is vei), but it is not easy to understand the semantic rationale of the right part 迷. 《古壮字字典》 shows two relative entries, one is used for the Zhuang word “maex” (wife), the other one is used for the Zhuang word “mwh” (period, time). On the other hand, the 老借 form of 迷 is maez, the 新借 form is miz.
If we can’t clarify the right part, it is better to keep current radical without more radicals.
The corresponding IDS(es) is/are shown as ⿰山⿳𠂉一乙 and ⿰山气 in BabelStone, but only ⿰山气 in zi.tools.
However, ⿰山⿳𠂉一乙 is the the variant of 屹, and the right part is also the variant of 乞. The final consonant (辅音韵尾) is -t. ⿳𠂉一乙 has not been encoded separately.
There is also one ⿰山气 in SJ/T 11239—2001 as 26-64.
The corresponding glyph of U+2AA26 𪨦 is also shown as ⿰山气 in GB 18030—2022 (0x9836CA34).
On the other hand, TC-2A6B looks related to A01101-004, but the glyph of A01101-004 shows ⿰山气, and the source shows ⿰山⿳𠂉一乙 cited from 《正字通》.
UK-30010 looks related to ⿰山气, and the usage of UK-30010 supports ⿰山气.
IRG Working Set 2024v5.0
Source: Eiso CHAN
Date: Generated on 2026-07-12
Attributes
Showing 243 comments.
IRG N2862R #6Hc
The evidence shows it is the variant of 荡/蕩, and the top component of 昜 is 日 not 曰, so 汨 is more suitable.
Based on three pieces of evidence (2 submitted and 1 new), the glyph should be ⿵门⿱𰁜大 not ⿵门奕. Evidence 1 shows the Putonghua reading is luán, that means the top of the inside part is 𰁜, the variant of 䜌 not 亦.
In PRC conventions, 𰁜 and 亦 are not the same. So, the theoretical traditional form should be ⿵門⿱䜌大 not ⿵門奕.
We can find 峦塘 and 栾塘 in 永福县.
Based on the evidence, Component ⺄ is the variant of Component 雨 (⻗), and 支 is the phonetic element (老借 ci, cei, 新借 cih).
cf.
U+2B86E 𫡮
U+31380 𱎀
U+31388 𱎈
The semantic element is 氵(<水), the phonetic element is 𫯓 (S=多, P=來).
If the submitter hopes to keep the current IDS, it is also OK.
Rad=石
WS2024-02723 ⿰磨木 (L:S, R:P)
WS2024-02724 ⿰磨古 (L:S, R:P)
WS2024-02727 ⿰磨告 (L:S, R:P)
Rad=麻
WS2024-02724 ⿰磨古 (L:S, R:P)
Rad=rad of X
WS2024-02723 ⿰磨木 (L:S, R:P)
U+287D6 𨟖 (L:P, R:S)
U+31426 𱐦 (L:P, R:S)
U+32389 𲎉 (L:P, R:S)
U+30060 𰁠
U+31399 𱎙
U+32412
[WS2021-00124]
亮 reads liengh (老借) and lieng (新借); 展 reads cienj (老借) and canj (新借).
不 in the submitted IDS is U+F967
See the radical
The radical of 釁 is 酉.
It is the variant of 𢼶 and 𣁊.
This rule has been added to IRG N2862.
SC=7, FS=2, TS=10
If IRG agrees, I will add the following rule.
Add 肙/䏍, FS=2, SC=7
See Comment #12601 under WS2024-02316.
See Comment #12601 under WS2024-02316.
See Comment #12601 under WS2024-02316.
See Comment #12601 under WS2024-02316.
GKX-0305.11: ⿱屮母
T4-262D, JMJ-034444: ⿱䶹母
On the other hand, SAT-10062 is ⿱山母, which is the same as TC-313C, and SAT-10062 and TC-313C are both related to 每.
If SAT has plan to unify SAT-10062 (⿱山母) to U+21D0B 𡴋 per UCV #96 (lv. 2), it is OK to keep current IDS.
It is also normalized the glyph to match IDS and Evidence 2 not 3.
IDS is also needed to updated.
The component at the bottom is unclear.
口 is not here after updating the glyph.
or normalize the glyph to match current IDS.
Count the value for ⿱雨勳.
The reading is also the same as 斗.
For the structure ⿺尾X, we have three situations for the radicals: 1) 尸, 2) 毛, 3) the radical of X.
Rad.=尸
U+5C57 屗
U+21C6D 𡱭
U+21C88 𡲈
U+21C89 𡲉
U+21C8A 𡲊
U+21C8B 𡲋
U+21CA4 𡲤
U+21CA5 𡲥
U+21CA7 𡲧
U+21CA8 𡲨
U+21CAA 𡲪
U+21CAB 𡲫
U+21CB8 𡲸
U+21CBC 𡲼
U+21CC0 𡳀
U+21CC3 𡳃
U+21CCA 𡳊
U+21CD3 𡳓
U+21CD4 𡳔
U+21CD5 𡳕
U+21CD6 𡳖
U+21CD7 𡳗
U+21CDD 𡳝
U+21CE6 𡳦
U+21CEA 𡳪
U+21CF1 𡳱
U+21CF2 𡳲
U+21CF3 𡳳
U+2AA15 𪨕
U+2AA19 𪨙
U+2AA1D 𪨝
U+2AA1F 𪨟
U+2BD5E 𫵞
U+2BD63 𫵣
U+2D567 𭕧
U+2D568 𭕨
U+3037A 𰍺
U+30384 𰎄
U+30385 𰎅
U+316C1 𱛁
U+316C2 𱛂
Rad.=毛
U+2DBE2 𭯢
Rad.=the rad. of X
U+20868 𠡨
U+209EE 𠧮
U+219A5 𡦥
U+22F59 𢽙
U+23341 𣍁
U+25591 𥖑
U+25700 𥜀
U+28914 𨤔
U+2A450 𪑐
U+2BBE8 𫯨
U+2BC35 𫰵
U+2CA0A 𬨊
U+319C7 𱧇
U+32A0E
U+33339
Rad.=尸 & the rad. of X
U+5C58 屘
U+3273A
For the structure ⿱𦥯X, there are two situations for the radicals: 1) the radical of X, 2) 臼
Rad=rad of X
U+56B3 嚳
U+58C6 壆
U+5B78 學
U+5DA8 嶨
U+6FA9 澩
U+71E2 燢
U+7910 礐
U+89BA 覺
U+89F7 觷
U+96E4 雤
U+9C5F 鱟
U+9DFD 鷽
U+9ECC 黌
U+3F47 㽇
U+4077 䁷
U+4441 䑁
U+4BB8 䮸
U+20539 𠔹
U+20FDF 𠿟
U+216A3 𡚣
U+23C53 𣱓
U+246F1 𤛱
U+25023 𥀣
U+2574A 𥝊
U+263D7 𦏗
U+2C2E1 𬋡
U+2C830 𬠰
U+2E0AE 𮂮
U+325E2
U+326C9
U+328FC
U+32C06
Rad=臼
U+244DF 𤓟
U+2698E 𦦎
U+26991 𦦑
U+26997 𦦗
U+2699B 𦦛
U+269A0 𦦠
U+269AF 𦦯
U+269B5 𦦵
U+269C0 𦧀
U+2C6FD 𬛽
U+2E373 𮍳
Looks the variant of 魁, and the radical of 魁 is the outside component 鬼.
For the structure ⿺免X, there are two situations for the radicals: 1) 儿, 2) the radical of X.
Rad.=儿
U+204BE 𠒾
U+204C4 𠓄
U+204CD 𠓍
U+2A782 𪞂
Rad.=the rad of X
U+52C9 勉
U+2188E 𡢎
U+231B6 𣆶
U+251C5 𥇅
U+2831C 𨌜
U+28F7A 𨽺
U+2BC32 𫰲
U+2CDD6 𬷖
U+2ECEA
IRG N1105 shows below.
Maybe we need to follow the later one?
For the structure ⿱玨X, there are two situations for the radicals: 1) 玉, 2) the radical of component X
Rad=玉
U+73E1 珡 (variant of 琴)
U+7434 琴 (musical instrument)
U+7435 琵 (musical instrument)
U+7436 琶 (musical instrument)
U+7439 琹 (variant of 琴)
U+745F 瑟 (musical instrument)
U+24996 𤦖
U+24997 𤦗
U+249C2 𤧂 (variant of 琴)
U+249C6 𤧆 (variant of 琴)
U+24A0D 𤨍
U+24A58 𤩘
U+24A5F 𤩟 (variant of 琴)
U+2AEF4 𪻴 (variant of 琴 and 珍)
U+2B73B (musical instrument)
U+2DE65 𭹥 (musical instrument + variant of 筑)
U+2DE78 𭹸 (musical instrument + variant of 箜)
U+2DE92 𭺒
U+2DE95 𭺕
U+30877 𰡷 (variant of 琴)
U+30886 𰢆 (variant of 琴)
U+30887 𰢇 (variant of 琴)
U+3088C 𰢌 (variant of 琴)
U+31BD0 𱯐 (variant of 柬)
U+32BDE (variant of 拜)
Rad=the rad of X
U+22708 𢜈 (variant of 琴 and 慧)
U+235DC 𣗜 (variant of 琴)
U+28A16 𨨖 (variant of 琴)
U+2ABE5 𪯥 (variant of 斑 and 瑟)
U+2D310 𭌐
U+2D481 𭒁 (variant of 瑟)
U+2D8D1 𭣑
U+327D7 (variant of 弄)
Rad=玉=the rad of X
U+32BEC
U+30060 𰁠
U+31399 𱎙
U+32412
[WS2021-00124]
Add the secondary radical as 9.0 (人), SC=21, FS=5
For the structure ⿱䜌X, there are three situations for the radicals: 1) the radical of X, 2) 言, 3) 糸
Rad=rad of X
U+535B 卛
U+5971 奱
U+5B4C 孌
U+5B7F 孿
U+5DD2 巒
U+5F4E 彎
U+6200 戀
U+6523 攣
U+66EB 曫
U+6B12 欒
U+7053 灓
U+77D5 矕
U+81E0 臠
U+883B 蠻
U+947E 鑾
U+9E1E 鸞
U+3618 㘘
U+3748 㝈
U+3869 㡩
U+3ABB 㪻
U+3F4B 㽋
U+20673 𠙳
U+2082A 𠠪
U+20A2B 𠨫
U+20B93 𠮓
U+20B96 𠮖
U+22376 𢍶
U+23035 𣀵
U+239B1 𣦱
U+244D6 𤓖
U+24ADC 𤫜
U+2503A 𥀺
U+268CF 𦣏
U+269BD 𦦽
U+26AF2 𦫲
U+277CF 𧟏
U+2829F 𨊟
U+283F6 𨏶
U+293F9 𩏹
U+2965F 𩙟
U+29ABE 𩪾
U+2A23D 𪈽
U+2AB57 𪭗
U+2D4DD 𭓝
U+2DBEE 𭯮
U+2E382 𮎂
U+2E72D 𮜭
Rad=言
U+8B8A 變
U+27B8C 𧮌
Rad=糸
U+261E5 𦇥
U+261F7 𦇷
U+30AF9 𰫹
The radicals of U+9FBB 龻 and U+470C 䜌 are both 言, so the radicals 糸 are not better.
Note that the top component is the phonetic element in this character.
See similar question in WS2024-04416.
Add 飠/𩙿/食, FS=3, SC=9
Rad=X
U+51EB 凫
U+5C9B 岛
U+67AD 枭
U+8885 袅
U+32C39
Rad=鸟
U+2EE54
吿 V1-4E5F
No need to update the glyph.
The top component is 巨, and the initial consonant (声母, phụ âm đầu/輔音頭) is l- (related to 來母 in middle Chinese), and the initial consonant of this one is s-, that means its previous form is consonant cluster. Based on the Vietnamese RS conventions, the most proper radical should be 工 (the radical of 巨).
*kl- → s-
U+22028 𢀨 V0-3D45 48.12
cự 巨 & lang 郎 = *klang → sang
U+2AA64 𪩤 V4-4723 48.8
cự 巨 & liệt 列 (>lít) = *klít → sít
U+2AA6A 𪩪 V4-4734 48.19
cự 巨 & liễm 歛 (>lượm) = *klớm → sớm
U+31719 𱜙 VN-F016C 48.10
cự 巨 & luân 侖 (>lỏn) = *klon → son
* the variant of U+22027 𢀧
⿰&Z5-01;免
IRG N2862R #7Dd shows the value should be 7.
Evidence
Showing 4 comments.
吴川历史文化丛书编委会; 钟德: 《吴川方言》 (《吴川历史文化丛书》), 广州: 广东人民出版社, 2021.10, ISBN 978-7-218-14901-1, p. 524
This evidence support current glyph, so it is OK to keep it as-is as Comment #12037.
▲ 吴川历史文化丛书编委会; 钟德: 《吴川方言》 (《吴川历史文化丛书》), 广州: 广东人民出版社, 2021.10, ISBN 978-7-218-14901-1, p. 527
▲ 승정원일기 2478책 (탈초본 121책) 헌종 14년 10월 26일 병인 21/24 기사 1848년 道光(淸/宣宗) 28년
If 柳楳 is one person, the following character in the submitted evidence should mean the other person 李𤲷 or 李嗇 (이색). The following picture shows the the time.
▲ https://sjw.history.go.kr/id/SJW-F05040300-03900
If yes, it is not better to normalize the glyph to ⿱爽田, and the current reading is incorrect.
Glyph Design & Normalization
Showing 59 comments.
See below.
The semantic element is 食/飠 (<養, bottom), and the phonetic element is 丈 (老借 form is ciengh, 新借 form is cang).
The submitted character is a Zhuang character. In Comment #14420, U+3037C 𰍼 and U+3165C 𱙜 are also Zhuang characters.
For U+3165C 𱙜 (reads as ndi*), the semantic element is 好, and the phonetic element is 尼 (新借niz).
For U+3037C 𰍼 and the submitted character, we need to know an unencoded character first.
⿺尼冷 reads nit, and the semantic element is 冷, the phonetic element is 尼.
▲ 《古壮字字典》, p. 383
Therefore, the rationale of U+3037C 𰍼 (reads as dot) and the submitted character (reads as ciengz*) are that the semantic elements are both the omitted form of ⿺尼冷, and the phonetic elements are 夺 (新借doz, 老接dued) and 常 (新借cangz, 老借ciengz).
That means the structures for these characters are stable, and match the rationale. Therefore, the glyph must be updated to match the submitted evidence. Other characters (⿰尼X) are not related to this type.
The Zhuang reading is gemq. The Zhuang reading of 剑 is giemq (老借), gen (新借). It is close to gemq.
莶 is not a very common character, and reads cim1 in Cantonese, so the closest Zhuang reading should be ciem (老借, the same as 签), which is not similar to gemq.
The Zhuang word coenggemq means Chinese chives (韭菜), and previous character is 萗 with Radical #140.0.
The most proper form should be ⿱艹剑.
If yes, the IDS should be updated correspondingly, but the SC and TS should be kept.
And, IDS should be ⿰麥員.
U+21641 𡙁 is the unifiable variant of U+723D 爽 per UCV #108, but there is no K-Source reference for U+21641 𡙁 now.
It is better to use ⿱爽田 to match ROK conventions. The Korean reading provided by the submitter is 상, which is the same as 爽.
There is no K-Source under 戬, but K1-6B79 is under 戩.
The K-Source for U+9ED8 默 is K0-5979, but U+9ED9 黙 is K6-1021.
Suggest normalizing the K glyph to ⿱艹默.
On the evidence, the previous sub-sentence shows “山稻種於乾田” (n./plant v. prep. n./place), so this sub-sentence shows “泉~種於寒水”, that means “泉~” is also a kind of plant. It is not easy to know what it is.
The new evidence on Comment #9875, the right part of this character follows 戹 like 阸, 𩚬, 㧖, 呝.
Does TCA plan to normalize the glyph if possible?
See U+8794 螔, U+892B 褫, U+8B15 謕, U+29E9B 𩺛 and so on.
Evidence 2 shows the right part is the new component *U+2FAE6 (TCP-00136) in IRG N2878R2 ⺄ (related to 飞).
Also see U+57F6 埶, U+57F7 執, U+5B70 孰 and so on.
The glyph should be updated.
Two pieces of evidence show the semantic element is 刀 (knife). The meaning of this character is also “knife”.
刀 and 力 is also UCV pair. UCV #141b supports this choice.
That means ⿰刀也 is the best choice.
Evidence 1 shows ⿰口⿱垖十, and Evidence 2 shows ⿱⿰口垖十.
Evidence 1 shows the reading is 火刀切, that means f-(-o2) + (d-)-ou1 = fou1;
Evidence 2 shows the reading is 科高切, that means f-(-o1) + (g-)-ou1 = fou1.
Evidence 2 shows the English phrase is “suffocation by drowning”, and the corresponding Cantonese load word is “沙~鷄𠱸 拜 地簍𡨴”. The English word “suffocation” reads /ˌsʌfəˈkeɪʃən/, and “沙~鷄𠱸” reads saa1 fou1 gai1 seon2, which the corresponding Chinese meaning is “窒息”.
埠 reads fau6 and bou6 in Cantonese, fouh in Zhuang (老借).
Therefore, the normalization is acceptable.
㗾 reads hoe1 or hoe4 in Cantonese as Comment #11715 shows. 靴 reads like he1 in other sub-dialects of Chinese Yue-dialects.
Therefore, Comment #12178 is reasonable.
For Component 穴, see V1-614C for U+7A7A 空 and V1-614D for U+7A7F 穿.
For Component 䍃, there are ⿱𱼀缶 and ⿱爫缶.
⿱𱼀缶
U+6416 搖 V1-5756 (no U+6447 摇)
U+9059 遙 V1-6956 (no U+9065 遥)
⿱爫缶
U+55C2 嗂 V2-8A79
U+7464 瑤 V1-5F35 (no U+7476 瑶)
U+8B20 謠 V1-6757 (no U+8B21 謡)
U+9DC2 鷂 V0-484E
U+4058 䁘 V3-3479
U+213DF 𡏟 V2-7331
U+24053 𤁓 V0-3B72
U+24060 𤁠 V2-7B22
U+31924 𱤤 VN-F02AD
U+31A4B 𱩋 VN-F0822
U+32947 VN-F191D
U+32AB7 VN-F19CB
U+33450 VN-F1C3B
The evidence shows the reading of the right part is diện, which must be 面.
There is no V-source reference under U+79C3 秃 now.
Remove the hook of the end of the left part to follow Vietnamese conventions. See the left part of the following characters.
U+5F11 V1-5447
U+6BBA V1-5B46
U+2ACBD V4-4B33
Remove the hook of the end of the left part to follow Vietnamese conventions. See the left part of the following characters.
U+5F11 V1-5447
U+6BBA V1-5B46
U+2ACBD V4-4B33
Editorial
Showing 11 comments.
[ {{WS2017-03140}} ]
But, now KC05501 is used under U+2E086 𮂆.
KC10116 is also ⿰禾厚.
Maybe the better reference for U+2E086 𮂆 is KC08090.
[WS2021-01439]
U+22DA7 𢶧 is a TF-Source character, so we don’t know how to confirm its usage.
Other
Showing 18 comments.
Based on UCV #336, TCA could do the horizontal extension in future.
If we can’t clarify the right part, it is better to keep current radical without more radicals.
There is a person named 姜馞 / 강발 there, but I can’t confirm if they are the same person.
When I searched 姜馞, I found one page, but I still not get more useful information now.
Similar to U+2157F 𡕿
cf. 渕//𰔂 vs 淵
The corresponding IDS(es) is/are shown as ⿰山⿳𠂉一乙 and ⿰山气 in BabelStone, but only ⿰山气 in zi.tools.
However, ⿰山⿳𠂉一乙 is the the variant of 屹, and the right part is also the variant of 乞. The final consonant (辅音韵尾) is -t. ⿳𠂉一乙 has not been encoded separately.
There is also one ⿰山气 in SJ/T 11239—2001 as 26-64.
The corresponding glyph of U+2AA26 𪨦 is also shown as ⿰山气 in GB 18030—2022 (0x9836CA34).
On the other hand, TC-2A6B looks related to A01101-004, but the glyph of A01101-004 shows ⿰山气, and the source shows ⿰山⿳𠂉一乙 cited from 《正字通》.
UK-30010 looks related to ⿰山气, and the usage of UK-30010 supports ⿰山气.
We need to consider how to handle them later.
[WS2021-00651]
However, this mapping is wrong.
▲ Row 43 in GB/T 7590—1987
The above picture shows 43-67 is U+304C6 𰓆. RS values for 扻𰓆抅 are all 64.4.
▲ Row 43 in GB/T 13132 (provided by Xieyang Wang)
So, G5-4B63 should be U+6440 摀.
The G-Source reference for U+3A36 㨶 could be changed to GKX.
Similar to U+26EF7 𦻷