U+3002C is a very stable glyph in the ancient books, while GZ-3452101 looks like the 正字 of it, both of them should be kept to be encoded.

Generally speaking, this glyph is a radical, stroke, or a symbol. I found only one piece of evidence consider it as a character.
六書會原

Of cource, ⿱䒑亅and ⿱䒑丨 should be distinguished from each other for they’re totally different characters.
In this case, China should keep ⿱䒑亅 in WS2024 rather than unify it to 兮. ⿱䒑亅 is quite normally used glyph which is usually exist in same texts with 兮.
干祿字書 清光緒中常熟鮑氏刊本
干祿字書箋證
說文字原集注
字典校錄

唐李玄福墓誌
刘梦得文集
China would like to add a horizontal extension for this character.

The glyph doesn't match the evidence.

Revise the reference name of GXM.

Add it to the radical block.

Encode with Jianzi mode rather than a character.