As shown above there are signficant number of disunification examples that suggest extending UCV 152 could be problematic, despite this being a Vietnamese normalization rule. It should be noted normalization rules unlike UCVs are unidirectional.
Whilst because of the Vietnamese normalization rules this becomes 芮 (U+82AE) there are many other uses in Chu-nom illustrating that even in Chu-nom it is a unidirectional process so it is it non-cognate, see https://zi.tools/zi/%E8%8A%AE .
(This comment corrects some typos in deleted comment #12120)
Suggest the tiger radical as the main radical 141.0 (虍) SC=12, FS=2 and the current radical as secondary radical. As said the tiger should be included, cf GZ-2072307 now U+32F87.
The current radical is the same as that of Ext F 𰀏 therefore the current radical be kept as 2nd radical, with 138.0 (艮), SC=3, FS=2 as the primary radical.
Since 𬷨 is the phonetic and 外 is the meaning the IDS ⿰外𬷨 is clear to those who are familiar with 𬷨, however this does not align with the current radical.
The IDS should remain as it is because, strange as it may seem at first sight, the established convention is to use 出 (U+51FA) not 岀 (U+5C80) in such cases.
Not suitable for normalization. The difference is too large this is not one of the normalization conventions.
Note on 新借 tones, this is a written convention not a spoken one, the actual spoken tone for modern loans (新借) varies from dialect to dialect. Since entering tones become second tones in south-western mandarin then they are written as second tones ~z. However, in a particular dialect the actual tone used would be whichever is closest to the second tone in south-western mandarin
Should be returned to M-set, there is not unification issue here, the current glyph and the proposed ⿰氵𱚹 glyph are unifiable, which design to use is a matter for the submitter to decide.
IRG Working Set 2024v3.0
Source: John Knightley
Date: Generated on 2026-02-14
Unification
Showing 3 comments.
Whilst because of the Vietnamese normalization rules this becomes 芮 (U+82AE) there are many other uses in Chu-nom illustrating that even in Chu-nom it is a unidirectional process so it is it non-cognate, see https://zi.tools/zi/%E8%8A%AE .
(This comment corrects some typos in deleted comment #12120)
Attributes
Showing 40 comments.
therefore the current radical be kept as 2nd radical, with 138.0 (艮), SC=3, FS=2 as the primary radical.
Evidence
Showing 1 comments.
Glyph Design & Normalization
Showing 9 comments.
Note on 新借 tones, this is a written convention not a spoken one, the actual spoken tone for modern loans (新借) varies from dialect to dialect. Since entering tones become second tones in south-western mandarin then they are written as second tones ~z. However, in a particular dialect the actual tone used would be whichever is closest to the second tone in south-western mandarin
Editorial
Showing 1 comments.