Please wait while loading

IRG Working Set 2024v3.0

Source: SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Date: Generated on 2026-02-16

Show Deleted | Show comments from version: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 | Show comments with status: Show All New Only Unresolved Only
The Image/Source column is displayed as it was in WS2024 v3.0. The character may have a different status in the latest working set.

Attributes

Showing 3 comments.

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
03871
03871
金 167.6.5
UK-30793
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
The IDS should also be updated to match the updated glyph. -> ⿰金⿱幺友
Residual Stroke Count
SC=7, TS=15, based on the updated glyph.
00340
00340
厂 27.8.4
VN-F2002
TS 10 · IDS
IDS
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
IDS=⿸厂⿻沈丶

Evidence

Showing 2 comments.

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
02495
02495
田 102.3.3
SAT-09058
TS 8 · IDS
New evidence
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
If we consider 亾 & 兦 being UCV, then KP1-5AB6 could be unified to this character. The evidence below is from IRGN1275:
03784
03784
车 159′.9.1
VN-F059D
TS 13 · IDS
New evidence
A possible G-source horizontal extension. @Dr. Liu Huidan @Kushim Jiang

Glyph Design & Normalization

Showing 11 comments.

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
01304
01304
山 46.19.1
GCW-00133
TS 22 · IDS
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The 3rd stroke of the lower right part (隹) should be 丶 instead of 丿 according to G-source convention, even if the evidence shows like 丿 (because that is so-called 旧字形, which is different from the G-source convention nowadays).
00109
00109
人 9.3.5
子 39.2.3
GDM-00378
TS 5 · IDS
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Suggest to modify the 2nd stroke to 捺 instead of 点 to match both the G-source convention and the SJ/T 11239—2001 evidence.
03202
03202
自 132.7.5
GZ-0501401
TS 13 · IDS 𠬶
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The 2nd stroke of the right part should not pass through the 1st stroke according to both G-source convention and the evidence.
03077
03077
羊 123.8.4
GZ-1911102
TS 14 · IDS
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The 5th stroke should be 横 instead of 提 according to both G-source convention and the evidence.
04148
04148
韋 178.9.4
GZ-4901401
TS 19 · IDS
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The bottom part of 韋 should be normalized according to the G-source convention.
01755
01755
日 72.7.1
GZA-230370
TS 11 · IDS
Normalization
The corner of the stroke 撇折 should be normalized to 新字形 (currently 撇 then 提).
00958
00958
土 32.15.4
KC-10155
TS 18 · IDS
Normalization
Suggest to remove the redundant hook in the component 系 according to K-source convention.
02985
02985
糸 120.9.3
KC-10168
TS 15 · IDS
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Suggest to remove the redundant hook from 糸 according to K-source convention.
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
I am confused whether the component between 彳 and 亍 is 氵 or 冫.
00541
00541
口 30.11.1
UK-30903
TS 14 · IDS
Normalization
Then normalize the right part from 匕 to 𠤎 in order to match the convention (UK usually obeys the G-source convention).
03331
03331
艸 140.13.2
VN-F04F6
TS 17 · IDS 𠣜
Normalization
Agree with #8394 to normalize the glyph. As we can confirm that this character is a variant of 繭, it would be better to change the structure more like 繭.

Other

Showing 4 comments.

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00817
00817
囗 31.3.2
SAT-04332
TS 4 · IDS
Comment
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
I think the "note" at the top of this page should be "Resubmitted from WS2021" instead of "Resubmitted from WS2024".
01884
01884
木 75.7.2
UTC-03375
TS 11 · IDS
Comment
Is there any pronunciation data to confirm whether it is a variant of either 椇 or 梖 or not?
00236
00236
冫 15.4.3
VN-F0046
TS 5 · IDS
Comment
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
I am just curious about if the character does appear in ancient literatures. The 冫 part on the right side seems to be a little bit strange anyway. Maybe I need to broaden my horizons haha.
Other
Is it possible to encode another reading mark in case more such situations being discovered later?