Source: Toshiya SUZUKI
Date: Generated on 2021-06-20
12 ㇒ (3)
Trad | ⿺先母
The discussion record says as "unified by 01852, irg50.", but 01852 is this character itself.
Maybe it would be a typo of "unified by 00185".
11 ㇐ (1)
Trad | ⿲氵才⿸𠂆亍
For the discussion about the identity of the middle component, here is the heading glyph of the entry and the same characters in the description text in the same entry. This is taken from 古逸叢書, the source material of the original evidence by TCA. The existence of the hook in the middle component is varied. So I suggest not to determine something critical by the existence of the hook. Also I note about the hook in the right component (lower-right part).
And, checking the corresponding entry in 大廣益會玉篇(宋本), which is the descendant of 原本玉篇, the corresponding printing form would be 淅. The 反切 notation in 原本玉篇 is 枽激反, it corresponds to 宋本玉篇's 桑激切. 浙 in 宋本玉篇 has different 反切 notation 之列切 (unfortunately, the entry for 浙 in 原本玉篇 was lost and we cannot discuss the glyph shape, sigh).
According to 康煕字典 description, 𣶁 is 俗字 of 淅 (taken from 正字通 - yet I've not dug the source in 正字通), so 𣶁 would be another candidate of the unification.
10 ㇔ (4)
Simp | ⿰土间
If the first 2 zeros from "unified by 0000709, irg50." could be removed, the format would be same with others.
11 ㇐ (1)
Simp | ⿰来攴
The discussion record might have a typo, not "10521" but "01521".
7 ㇒ (3)
Trad | ⿱山仍
Discussion Record says as "unified by 01053, irg50", but 01053 is this character itself.
Maybe "unified by 01049, irg50" would be better.
WS2017-01049 was originally assigned to GDM-00051, it has a discussion record "unifies 01053, irg50".