| 0 - Seq. No. | 01574 |
| 1 - Discussion Record | |
| 2 - Kangxi Radical | 72 |
| 3 - Stroke Count | 6 |
| 4 - First Stroke | 1 |
| 5 - T/S (0/1) Flag | 0 |
| 6 - IDS | ⿱旦𢖱 |
| 7 - Total Strokes | 10 |
| 8 - G Source | |
| 9 - G Image | |
| 10 - G Similar Ideographs | |
| 11 - G Ref. to Evidence doc | |
| 12 - G Page No. in the document (optional) | |
| 13 - G Row No. in the Page (optional) | |
| 14 - G Position in the Row (optional) | |
| 15 - G file name of evidence image | |
| 16 - G Optional Information | |
| 17 - K Source | |
| 18 - K Image | |
| 19 - K Similar/ Variants
| |
| 20 - K Ref. to Evidence document | |
| 21 - i1)
Page No. in the evidence document (optional) | |
| 22 - i2)
Row No.
in the page
(optional) | |
| 23 - i3)
Position No.
in the row
(optional) | |
| 24 - K file name of evidence image | |
| 25 - K Revised information (2018.03.16) | |
| 26 - K Real Glyph | |
| 27 - UK Source | |
| 28 - UK Image | |
| 29 - UK Similar/ Variants | |
| 30 - UK Ref. to Evidence doc | |
| 31 - UK Title and Year | |
| 32 - UK Page No. | |
| 33 - UK PNG Image | |
| 34 - UK Font code point | |
| 35 - UK Mapping to traditional or simplified character | |
| 36 - UK SJT-11239-2001 | |
| 37 - UK Notes | |
| 38 - SAT Source | |
| 39 - SAT Image | |
| 40 - SAT Similar Ideographs | |
| 41 - SAT References to evidence documents | |
| 42 - SAT optional information | |
| 43 - T Source | |
| 44 - T Image | |
| 45 - T Similar/ Varianonets | |
| 46 - T References to evidence documents A | |
| 47 - T References to evidence documents B | |
| 48 - T File name of evidence image | |
| 49 - T Real Glyph | |
| 50 - UTC Source | |
| 51 - UTC Image | |
| 52 - UTC Similar Ideographs | |
| 53 - UTC References to evidence documents | |
| 54 - UTC SJ/T 11239-2001 | |
| 55 - V Source | V-F1926 |
| 56 - V Image | V-F1926.bmp |
| 57 - V Related | |
| 58 - V Reading | (Reading: sớm) |
| 59 - V Evidence | TĐCNDG |
| 60 - V Evidence File | V-F1926.jpg |
| 61 - V Code Point | F1926 |
| 62 - V Note | |
| 63 - WS2015 SN | |
| 64 - | |
2.0
Review Comments
Many speculations arise: is the top really 旦 instead of 且? isn't the radical (semantic component) 心? source of the text (because dictionaries occasionally mistranscribe characters)?
Here is additional evidence from TĐCNDG. Note that the analysis of the structure clearly says 旦⿱𢖱