Character Info
01372
Trad
Trad
 UK-10053 |
IRGN2480WS2017v6.1 Pending
Keep postponed, IRG 52.
pending unified to U+ 621C, irg51.
Keep postponed, IRG 52.
pending unified to U+ 621C, irg51.
Attributes:
Discussion Record
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #51 2018-10-23 (Tue) 5:02 pm +0700 Recorded by Henry CHAN | PENDING Pending for double verification by China |
| IRG #52 2019-05-15 (Wed) 4:12 pm +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Keep postponed |
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| UK-10053 | 2.0 |
Raw Info
| 0 - Seq. No. | 01372 |
| 1 - Discussion Record | Keep postponed, IRG 52. pending unified to U+ 621C, irg51. |
| 2 - Kangxi Radical | 62 |
| 3 - Stroke Count | 6 |
| 4 - First Stroke | 2 |
| 5 - T/S (0/1) Flag | 0 |
| 6 - IDS | ⿹戈⿱口土 |
| 7 - Total Strokes | 10 |
| 8 - G Source | |
| 9 - G Image | |
| 10 - G Similar Ideographs | |
| 11 - G Ref. to Evidence doc | |
| 12 - G Page No. in the document (optional) | |
| 13 - G Row No. in the Page (optional) | |
| 14 - G Position in the Row (optional) | |
| 15 - G file name of evidence image | |
| 16 - G Optional Information | |
| 17 - K Source | |
| 18 - K Image | |
| 19 - K Similar/ Variants | |
| 20 - K Ref. to Evidence document | |
| 21 - i1) Page No. in the evidence document (optional) | |
| 22 - i2) Row No. in the page (optional) | |
| 23 - i3) Position No. in the row (optional) | |
| 24 - K file name of evidence image | |
| 25 - K Revised information (2018.03.16) | |
| 26 - K Real Glyph | |
| 27 - UK Source | UK-10053 |
| 28 - UK Image | UK-10053.bmp |
| 29 - UK Similar/ Variants | |
| 30 - UK Ref. to Evidence doc | 008 |
| 31 - UK Title and Year | A Source Book of Ancient Chinese Bronze Inscriptions (2016) |
| 32 - UK Page No. | page 61 |
| 33 - UK PNG Image | UK-10053.png |
| 34 - UK Font code point | U+F551 |
| 35 - UK Mapping to traditional or simplified character | |
| 36 - UK SJT-11239-2001 | |
| 37 - UK Notes | |
| 38 - SAT Source | |
| 39 - SAT Image | |
| 40 - SAT Similar Ideographs | |
| 41 - SAT References to evidence documents | |
| 42 - SAT optional information | |
| 43 - T Source | |
| 44 - T Image | |
| 45 - T Similar/ Varianonets | |
| 46 - T References to evidence documents A | |
| 47 - T References to evidence documents B | |
| 48 - T File name of evidence image | |
| 49 - T Real Glyph | |
| 50 - UTC Source | |
| 51 - UTC Image | |
| 52 - UTC Similar Ideographs | |
| 53 - UTC References to evidence documents | |
| 54 - UTC SJ/T 11239-2001 | |
| 55 - V Source | |
| 56 - V Image | |
| 57 - V Related | |
| 58 - V Reading | |
| 59 - V Evidence | |
| 60 - V Evidence File | |
| 61 - V Code Point | |
| 62 - V Note | |
| 63 - WS2015 SN | |
| 64 - |
Review Comments
(U+621C) is read as dié, 説文:利也,一曰提也. They are non-cognate.
Disagree. UK-10053 is the variant of 城 according to the evidence, and 戜 (U+621C) is read as dié, 説文:利也,一曰提也. They are non-cognate and have different glyph shapes, so are not unifiable.
Disagree. UK-10053 is the variant of 城 according to the evidence, and 戜 (U+621C) is read as dié, 説文:利也,一曰提也. They are non-cognate.
The actual shape in the inscription (班簋) is like below (character in the center). Though its left hand component is somewhat obscure, it is identifiable as 呈 via similar glyphs on 戜者簋 etc. Despite the footnote, latest study has found this unlikely to be a variant of 城, which has median initial, while 呈 lateral. 説文 was compiled on post-Qin orthography, which as such unable to attest cognacy in pre-Qin writing where word-character correspondence is not fixed and non-phonetic components are liberally replaced. The meaning of the word is still disputed, so it should be either unified to 戜 according to the structure, or withdrawn as premature transcription.
I would also like to point out that various typographical and theoretical errors seen in the source literature make it generally unsuitable for new character proposal.
References:
http://www.guoxuedashi.com/yzjwjc/?bh=4341
http://www.guoxuedashi.com/kangxi/pic.php?f=xinjinwb&p=1719
http://www.gwz.fudan.edu.cn/Web/Show/1858