Please wait while loading

IRG Working Set 2017v5.2

Source: Eiso CHAN
Date: Generated on 2021-06-23

Show Deleted

Unification

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
04397
04397
酉 164.6
13 ㇠ (5)
USAT05627
Trad | 𢑑
Unification
U+2E828
Unify to 𮠨 (U+2E828)?

U+2E828 is also a SAT character.
01918
01918
水 85.6
9 ㇒ (3)
T13-325F
Trad | 𠂒
Unification
U+6D69
The new evidence shows it’s suitable to unify with 浩 (U+6D69).
01963
01963
水 85.8
11 ㇐ (1)
T13-3365
Trad | 𠂆
Unification
U+6DC5
The new glyph looks more similar to 淅 (U+6DC5). If yes, it’s better to unify.
03027
03027
石 112.11
16 ㇔ (4)
T13-3958
Trad | 𡉀
Unification
U+78F7
If the new glyph ⿰石⿱𰉗⿰夕𰀁 could be accepted, it's better to unify it to 磷.
Unification
The glyph has not been updated in IRGN2469 code chart.

02728
02728
田 102.4
9 ㇠ (5)
UTC-01159
Trad | 𡿧
Unification
T4-2A44 and KP1-5AC6 should be moved here.


Attributes

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00439
00439
口 30.8
11 ㇐ (1)
GZ-1831402
Simp |
Trad/Simp flag
T/S=0

杰 is not the simplification of 傑 in mainland China. 杰 is also included in GB/T 12345-1990.

04378
04378
邑 163.12
19 ㇑ (2)
USAT03733
Trad |
FS
FS=5?

If the radical is the left component, the FS should be 5; if the radical is the right component, the FS should be kept as current 2.
03226
03226
穴 116.9
14 ㇠ (5)
USAT05209
Trad |
IDS
⿱穴𱀋
00378
00378
口 30.3
6 ㇠ (5)
USAT07270
Trad |
IDS
IDS should be ⿱口屮.
02926
02926
矛 110.7
12 ㇒ (3)
USAT09034
Trad |
IDS
⿰矛⿱攵口

It is the bottom of U+2916C 𩅬.
02350
02350
火 86.9
13 ㇒ (3)
T13-3721
Trad | 𩵋
IDS
⿰火⿱𠚤⿻𠔼大 or ⿰火⿱𠚤⿻冂夫
02916
02916
目 109.14
19 ㇠ (5)
T13-393F
Trad | 𡲇
IDS
⿰目⿴𡲇中 or ⿰目⿻𡲇中
03027
03027
石 112.11
16 ㇔ (4)
T13-3958
Trad | 𡉀
IDS
⿰石⿱𰉗⿰夕𰀁
03197
03197
穴 116.6
11 ㇐ (1)
T13-3A4E
Trad | 𡉵
IDS
⿱穴⿻北乚 will be better.
04385
04385
邑 163.15
22 ㇑ (2)
T13-3C54
Trad | 𨙨廿𠬞
FS
FS=1?

If the radical is the left component, the FS should be 1; if the radical is the right component, the FS should be kept as current 2.
04616
04616
雨 173.4
10 ㇒ (3)
T13-3C71
Trad | &H6-05;
IDS
⿱𮦄月?

Cf. WS2017-04638
04653
04653
雨 173.15
21 ㇔ (4)
T13-3C75
Trad | &H6-05;
IDS
⿱𮦄潛
00021
00021
日 72.9
13 ㇒ (3)
UK-10579
Trad |
Radical
As Andrew’s comment on Comment #8647, the radical should be changed to 1.0 一.
Residual Stroke Count
If Comment #8647 and #9897 were accepted, SC should be 12.
FS
If Comment #8647 and #9897 were accepted, FS should be 3.
03379
03379
米 119.9
15 ㇑ (2)
V-F1E25
Trad |
Radical
As my analysis in Comment #1471 and #1472, the semantic element is 炭 and the phonetic element is 米. For this rationale, the radical should be 火. If the IRG experts consider it’s not too intuitive, we can keep the radical as 米.


Evidence

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
03668
03668
艸 140.5
9 ㇔ (4)
GDM-00138
Simp |
New evidence
The other scanned version of the same paper is showed as below.



It’s clear that his name is 曾庭蘭 here. [4] means 《同治吉水縣志》.
04661
04661
靑 174.6
14 ㇒ (3)
GXM-00199
Simp |
New evidence


As comment #9879 shows, I post the original source evidence of KC-07721. The source is shown as below.

柳疇睦:《溪堂集》,景仁文化社,卷之一

As this evidence shows, the glyph on the evidence is ⿰争靑, but China can normalized to ⿰争青 to follow the PRC convention, and ROK has normalized to ⿰爭靑 according to ROK Norm Rule 237-1.
02646
02646
玉 96.12
16 ㇑ (2)
GXM-00222
Trad |
New evidence
《旌德縣續志》,民國十四年石印本,卷之四

02900
02900
目 109.10
15 ㇒ (3)
GXM-00347
Trad |
New evidence
It's not acceptable to change the glyph, because the character in the new evidence has been encoded as U+25250 𥉐.
02438
02438
爪 87.4
8 ㇠ (5)
T13-3753
Trad |
New evidence


苗夔《說文建首字讀》(陶廬叢刻本)第九
00145
00145
人 9.11
13 ㇒ (3)
V-F0B0C
Trad |
Evidence
The original evidence for 𩵑. 《康熙字典》 showed this character was cited from 《字彙補》.

《康熙字典》


《字彙補》


If we search 弘農王 in the Internet, the most obvious result is related to 劉辨 in 《三國演義》《三國志》《後漢書》. 《字彙補》 doesn’t mean 劉辨 here. The author of《字彙》 is 梅膺祚 in Ming Dynasty, and 吴任臣 re-edited the book and changed the name to 《字彙補》, so we can guess maybe 弘農王 here means a tetrarch (藩王) in Ming Dynasty.
I finally found out the record in 《明神宗顯皇帝實録》. The name of 弘農王 is 朱倪𩵑.


In the same book, the last character of his name was also written as ⿰亻魚.


Glyph Design & Normalization

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00002
00002
一 1.4
5 ㇐ (1)
GHC-00004
UTC-03123
Trad | 𥘅
Glyph design
The G glyph should match the evidence and the v2.0 glyph.
00147
00147
人 9.11
13 ㇔ (4)
GHC-00040
UTC-03108
Trad |
Glyph design
The UTC glyph is missing in IRGN2469 code chart.

01229
01229
彐 58.5
8 ㇠ (5)
GHC-00043
UTC-03087
Trad |
Glyph design
The UTC glyph is missing in IRGN2469 code chart.

02523
02523
犬 94.8
12 ㇐ (1)
GHC-00050
UTC-03156
Trad | &H8-01;
Glyph design
The UTC glyph is missing in IRGN2469 code chart.

00646
00646
囗 31.6
9 ㇔ (4)
GPGLG-1007
Simp |
Normalization
Could we normalize the glyph as below?

05037
05037
鳥' 196'.6
11 ㇒ (3)
GPGLG-3052
Simp |
Glyph design
Could we modify the glyph as below?

00952
00952
子 39.7
10 ㇐ (1)
KC-07219
Simp |
Glyph design
It’s better to update the glyph to match the evidence as below.

01485
01485
手 64.13
16 ㇑ (2)
KC-07241
UTC-03142
Trad |
Glyph design
The UTC glyph is missing in IRGN2469 code chart.

00089
00089
十 24.14
16 ㇔ (4)
KC-07360
Trad |
Glyph design
The K glyph has been updated to match the new evidence and ROK request in IRGN2469 code chart, but we need to update the glyph in the review tool at the same time. See #7291.

00612
00612
口 30.16
19 ㇒ (3)
KC-07386
Trad | 𥡝
Glyph design
It’s better to update the glyph to match the evidence as below.

00619
00619
口 30.19
22 ㇐ (1)
KC-07389
Trad | 𦰩𦰩
Glyph design
The last stroke should be 捺 not 點 based on the evidence like the following design.

02982
02982
石 112.8
13 ㇒ (3)
KC-07567
Trad |
Normalization
It looks the normalization is not acceptable, although it has been matched the ROK's normalization rule. Will it mean all the component 兔 be normalized to the component 免 in future encoding work?
03238
03238
穴 116.14
19 ㇔ (4)
KC-07595
Trad |
Glyph design
It’s better to modify the glyph to match the evidence as below.

01012
01012
尢 43.10
13 ㇔ (4)
KC-07981
Trad |
Glyph design
Please consider Comment #569 and #2422 again.
00121
00121
人 9.8
10 ㇑ (2)
USAT06493
Trad |
Glyph design
Should the last stroke be 捺 not 點 based on the evidence?
04995
04995
爪 87.1
5 ㇔ (4)
T13-2D57
Trad | 丿
Glyph design
The outline in IRGN2469 code chart is too high, which looks like a component there. It’s better to make it lower in the body face.

01318
01318
心 61.9
12 ㇐ (1)
T6-487C
UTC-02972
Trad |
Glyph design
TCA should provide T6-487C glyph to chief editor and ATM, and the source reference for U+2F8A4 should be changed to TU-2F8A4.
01692
01692
木 75.6
10 ㇔ (4)
V-F1DA0
Trad |
Glyph design
The V glyph has been updated in IRGN2469 code chart. If the new glyph has been accepted by IRG, the SC, TS and IDS should be updated correspondingly.



Editorial

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00425
00425
口 30.7
10 ㇑ (2)
KC-07782
Trad |
Editorial issue
not unified to U+20CF1, irg51.

The current editorial record is not right.
00161
00161
人 9.13
15 ㇑ (2)
USAT05849
Trad | 𢾕
Editorial issue
unified with U+50B2 and add ucv of right components., IRG 53.


Other

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
01726
01726
木 75.8
12 ㇔ (4)
GDM-00077
Trad |
Other
For comment #9878, I don’t know 㮾 is used in which place name in Guangdong, but the tone of this character in Putonghua should be 3 not 4.

The famous place name with 㮾 should be 磁浮㮾梨站 in Changsha, Hunan.
00657
00657
土 32.3
6 ㇐ (1)
GDM-00200
UTC-02997
Simp |
Other
As comment #9877, the Putonghua pronunciation of GDM-00200 provided by China is incorrect.


Data for Unihan

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
04040
04040
言' 149'.4
6 ㇐ (1)
GXM-00186
Simp |
Semantic variant
This character is also used as Bouyei character (方块布依字), which the current Bouyei word is daanx and the meaning is to “talk” and to “say”. It looks the variant of 谭 and 譚 as well.

It’s not acceptable to treat this character as the simplified variant of 谭, because 谭 and 譚 are the real T/S pair, but it’s OK to treat it as the semantic variant of 谭 and 譚.
00688
00688
土 32.6
9 ㇐ (1)
UK-10924
Simp |
Trad variant
WS2021-00905:GDM-00277