Please wait while loading

IRG Working Set 2017v5.1

Source: Eiso CHAN
Date: Generated on 2020-09-21

Show Deleted

Unification

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00094
00094
人 9.3
5 ㇐ (1)
GDM-00018
Trad |
Oppose Unification
Agree with Tao Yang. #6947
00663
00663
土 32.4
7 ㇒ (3)
GDM-00020
Trad |
Oppose Unification
No, the evidence is clear. It looks it's the variant of 洼. The current village name is 深洼 according to National Database for Geographical Names of China.
01744
01744
木 75.9
13 ㇒ (3)
GDM-00073
Trad |
Oppose Unification
Support Tao Yang. #9096
03723
03723
艸 140.9
13 ㇔ (4)
GDM-00142
Trad |
Unification
It's not a good reason to withdraw the character, but the current evidence is not better actually.
01040
01040
山 46.10
13 ㇐ (1)
KC-07423
Trad |
Disunification
Agree with ROK. #8893
01918
01918
水 85.6
9 ㇒ (3)
T13-325F
Trad | 𠂒
Unification
U+6D69
No, the new evidence shows it's suitable to unify with 浩 (U+6D69).
03181
03181
禾 115.13
18 ㇔ (4)
T13-3A45
Trad |
Unification
It's a good sample for us to discuss how to handle the Ideographs of Empress Wu (則天文字, use IEW as below).

IEW was established during Wu Zhou period, and only include the "new" variants of 18 ideographs, but these 18 IEW derived more different glyphs in the history and the relationships are clear. Some glyphs look not unifiable for other characters, but we need to discuss how to handle them.
01722
01722
木 75.8
12 ㇐ (1)
UTC-03115
Trad |
Unification
Support to keep unification.
01520
01520
攴 66.7
11 ㇐ (1)
UK-10005
Simp |
Unification
This character should be unified to 01521.
00084
00084
二 7.12
14 ㇒ (3)
UK-10028
Trad | 𠂹
Disunification
The unification will be bad for the Small Seal encoding.
03780
03780
艸 140.13
17 ㇑ (2)
V-F04EB
Trad | 𫇰
Unification
Need discussion at the meeting.
00202
00202
八 12.7
9 ㇔ (4)
V-F0AAF
Trad |
Disunification
Non-cognates and not unify. This issue has been solved at Beijing.
03620
03620
車 159.13
20 ㇒ (3)
UTC-03154
Trad | 輿
Ucv
They are cognates really, but not unifiable cognates for IRG work, unless we add the new UCV rule.


Attributes

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
02279
02279
火 86.4
8 ㇒ (3)
GXM-00234
Simp |
Trad/Simp flag
It's not the simplified form of 燿 under the rules in 简化字总表.
02421
02421
火 86.15
19 ㇒ (3)
GZ-0501301
Trad |
Radical
No change and back to M set.
01435
01435
手 64.8
11 ㇑ (2)
GZ-2002101
Trad |
Radical
No change and back to M set.
02038
02038
水 85.9
12 ㇠ (5)
GZ-3492301
Trad | 𣲙
Radical
Support Ken, unless John K. disagrees. #7514
Residual Stroke Count
Support Ken, unless John K. disagrees. #7515
02453
02453
爪 87.9
13 ㇠ (5)
GZA-613460
Simp |
Radical
No change and back to M set.
01733
01733
木 75.9
13 ㇐ (1)
GZA-615331
Simp |
IDS
No need to change IDS, but it's not important.
04949
04949
麥 199.0
12 N/A
USAT09153
Trad | 𠈌
FS
I request IRG confirming if it's suitable to use 0 as FS value, which is not allowed in IRG PnP.
02667
02667
玉 96.14
18 ㇒ (3)
T13-384D
Trad | &P7-05;
IDS
IDS should be ⿰王⿱&P7-05;⿹戈夕
04291
04291
辵 162.7
11 ㇐ (1)
T13-3C3C
Trad |
Residual Stroke Count
I can't understand why we need to change the SC. Who can help me?
00005
00005
至 133.1
7 ㇠ (5)
UK-10142
Simp | 𠫔
Trad/Simp flag
It looks a typo for TS in Andrew's comment. T/S=0.
03782
03782
艸 140.13
17 ㇑ (2)
UK-10161
Trad |
Radical
Yifan's comment is acceptable.
00318
00318
十 24.9
11 ㇑ (2)
V-F006E
Trad | 𭁈𠀆
Radical
No change and back to M set.
01416
01416
手 64.8
11 ㇑ (2)
V-F01F5
Simp |
Trad/Simp flag
If T/S could be changed to 1, we need to add a new rule for 風/⿻几二 pair out of 简化字总表.
01559
01559
方 70.8
12 ㇑ (2)
V-F0253
Simp |
Trad/Simp flag
If T/S could be changed to 1, we need to add a new rule for 風/⿻几二 pair out of 简化字总表.
03492
03492
网 122.3
8 ㇐ (1)
V-F047C
Simp | 𪜀
Trad/Simp flag
If T/S could be changed to 1, we need to add a new rule for 羅/⿱罒𪜀 pair out of 简化字总表.
04716
04716
風 182.0
4 N/A
V-F0629
Trad |
FS
I request IRG confirming if it's suitable to use 0 as FS value, which is not allowed in IRG PnP. The current T/S Flag value is acceptable for me, but it's different for 01416, 01559, 03655 and so on for the same component.
00355
00355
丶 3.3
4 ㇒ (3)
V-F083D
Simp | 丿
Trad/Simp flag
T/S should be 0, which doesn't match T/S rules.
01600
01600
日 72.9
13 ㇐ (1)
V-F08E1
Trad |
Radical
No change and back to M set.
03655
03655
艸 140.4
8 ㇒ (3)
V-F15AE
Simp |
Trad/Simp flag
If T/S could be changed to 1, we need to add a new rule for 風/⿻几二 pair out of 简化字总表.
00825
00825
土 32.16
19 ㇒ (3)
V-F1788
Simp |
Trad/Simp flag
If T/S could be changed to 1, we need to add a new rule for 龍/竜 pair out of 简化字总表.
01257
01257
彳 60.18
22 ㇒ (3)
V-F1AAA
Trad |
Radical
No change and back to M set.
03821
03821
艸 140.19
23 ㇒ (3)
V-F1B37
Trad |
Radical
This is an editorial error. R=63, TS=24.
02445
02445
爪 87.8
12 ㇑ (2)
V-F1BDA
Trad |
Radical
The inserted component is làm mentioned in IRGN2434. We need to confirm the radical of the disunified character làm in future.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/162T5y6gcrzmECaaOV9nqSt0V0PDp0NEf/view?usp=sharing

http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2020/20210-irgn2434-disunify-722b.pdf
01647
01647
曰 73.10
14 ㇑ (2)
V-F1D57
Trad |
Radical
No change and back to M set.
00040
00040
丨 2.11
12 ㇔ (4)
V-F1DB7
Trad | &S2-01;
FS
FS should not be changed. 3 is correct.


Evidence

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
04319
04319
辵 162.11
15 ㇐ (1)
GXM-00012
Trad |
Evidence
Maybe TCA can provide anything useful.
02612
02612
玉 96.8
12 ㇒ (3)
GXM-00048
Simp | 𫂱
Evidence
New evidence should be accepted.
00107
00107
人 9.5
7 ㇒ (3)
GXM-00366
Trad |
Evidence
Support Tao Yang. #9103
03830
03830
艸 140.24
28 ㇒ (3)
GZ-0702301
Trad |
Evidence
Agree with JK, back to M set.
01336
01336
心 61.10
13 ㇑ (2)
KC-07234
Trad |
Evidence
IRG has accepted the new evidence at IRG #53.
00736
00736
土 32.9
12 ㇐ (1)
UTC-03032
Trad | 𢆓
Unclear evidence
No, the evidence is clear.
01521
01521
攴 66.7
11 ㇐ (1)
UK-10006
Simp |
New evidence
Vietnam has provided the new evidence for the Tay Nom use, and the phonetic element is the real 来 in the new evidence, so this character should be kept. #5666
04379
04379
邑 163.12
15 ㇑ (2)
UK-10803
Trad |
Unclear evidence
I don't think so.
03989
03989
角 148.3
10 ㇑ (2)
UK-10850
Trad |
Unclear evidence
No, the evidence is clear.
04498
04498
金' 167'.8
13 ㇔ (4)
UK-10911
Simp |
Unclear evidence
No, the evidence is clear.
01626
01626
日 72.12
16 ㇐ (1)
V-F1D45
Trad |
Unclear evidence
This type of issues for evidence have been clarified by me at the IRG meeting.
01488
01488
手 64.13
16 ㇠ (5)
V-F1D47
Trad |
Evidence
This type of issues for evidence have been clarified by me at the IRG meeting.


Glyph Design & Normalization

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
02795
02795
疒 104.13
18 ㇐ (1)
T13-3874
Trad |
Normalization
It looks it's better to modify the glyph for the inserted component as the real 萬 to follow TCA conventions.
03042
03042
石 112.14
19 ㇐ (1)
T13-395B
Trad |
Glyph design
The glyph issue should be re-discussed at the next meeting.


Editorial

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
04087
04087
貝 154.5
12 ㇔ (4)
KC-07673
Trad |
Editorial issue
Why D set?
03962
03962
衣 145.11
17 ㇒ (3)
UK-10303
Trad |
Editorial issue
Why D set?