The uploaded evidence includes two glyph variants of "𤴗"—one with a short horizontal line and one with a dot. Should a UCV be added for these two glyph variants?
In the evidence, the right-side component of the glyph only appears similar to "互" but is not actually "互"; it is a variant form of "氐". I have some doubts about whether it is appropriate to encode this glyph directly as "互". The data shown below for "低" in HNG could serve as a reference.
https://search.hng-data.org/search/%E4%BD%8E
IRG Working Set 2024v3.0
Source: LI Yuan
Date: Generated on 2025-06-15
Unification
Showing 2 comments.
Attributes
Showing 32 comments.
Evidence
Showing 10 comments.
Additionally, are 佛説須摩提女經 and 須摩提女經 the same scripture?
https://search.hng-data.org/search/%E4%BD%8E
Glyph Design & Normalization
Showing 1 comments.
Other
Showing 2 comments.