Please wait while loading

IRG Working Set 2024v2.0

Consolidated Comments
Filter By Source: Sort By: Show last 7 days only: Show Deleted:

Unification

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00322
00322
十 24.5.2
GCA-K0002
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2014F
Unify to 𠅏?

Shuowen: 𠅏, 古文克. 𠧹, 亦古文克.
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
No UCV and too different.
01717
01717
方 70.6.4
GCA-K0004
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+65C5
Unify to 旅.

|⿰方衣| (A01763-007) = |旅| (A01763)
The lishu evidence is like 挔.
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Not unify, the numbers of the components are different and no UCV.
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+65C5
Unify to 旅 (U+65C5), and suggest to add a new UCV for the right hand side.

This variation seems to be fairly systematic.




Source: https://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=67950



Source: https://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=19394&q=1



Source: https://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=82280
03687
03687
身 158.6.1
GCCPP-00029
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2A01A
Unify to 𪀚.

Guangyun: [𪀚] (息弓切) 似鷹而小, 能捕雀也.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Too much difference.
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with #263.
04197
04197
食 184.6.3
GCCPP-00032
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+4B32
Unify to 䬲.



▲ 华阳洞天主人 (著), 孤往山人 (校注). 孤往山人评注西游记. 2022: p.514

All evidences support phonetic symbol 句 < 丩.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Also variant of 餬. What's more, 《西游记》 is very very famous in China and the shape is stable in ancient versions.
04222
04222
饣 184′.6.3
GCCPP-00033
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2CCAF
Unify to 𬲯.

See comment #2 in evidence #2.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
See comments of GCCPP-00032.
04402
04402
魚 195.8.2
GCCPP-00034
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+29E61
Unify to 𩹡.

Consider 㹧𱮒, the phonetic symbol should be 昂 < 卬, instead of 昴 < 卯.
Update the representative glyph of 𩹡 to |⿰魚昂|.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰魚昂 is stable and right while 𩹡(U+29E61) is wrong but widely spread because 《汉语大字典》.
04489
04489
鱼 195′.8.2
GCCPP-00035
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2CD98
Unify to 𬶘.

Consider 㹧𱮒, the phonetic symbol should be 昂 < 卬, instead of 昴 < 卯.
Update the representative glyph of 𬶘 to |⿰鱼昂|.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰魚昂 is stable and right while 𩹡(U+29E61) is wrong but widely spread because 《汉语大字典》.
00212
00212
入 11.8.1
GCW-00018
SAT-10608
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+24D18
Unify to 𤴘.



▲ Guanyun, p.539

Consider phonetic symbol 入.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
《汉语大字典》 treat ⿱入疌 and 𤴘(U+24D18) as different characters.
Oppose Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
全字庫 agrees that U+24D18 reads nie4, so completely non-cognate in both G and T.

00249
00249
几 16.3.2
GCW-00019
TS 5 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+3563
Unify to 㕣.

Very useful component, as in 沿, 鉛, 㔯 and 船, whose phonetic symbol are all 㕣 *LON.
㕣 is the liding form of Shuowen Seal, and appears in 兗-series and 袞-series, whose phonetic symbol are all 㕣 *LON.

Consider update the representative glyph to ⿱几口, since 兗 > 兖 and 袞 > 衮.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱几口 can be useful as a special component. Many CJKUI have the shape. 㕣(U+3563) is coded at 17-21 in GB/T 7590-1987(China's national standard), which is different from ⿱几口.
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
As Comment #278 shows, they are source code separation.


▲ GB/T 7590—1987, 17-21

On the other hand, 㕣 (U+3563) could be also used as the variant of 公.
00374
00374
又 29.9.5
GCW-00020
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2B73C
Since TCA will submit this character as a UNC (mentioned in L2/24-165), it should be unified to that codepoint (probably U+2B73C) as a horizontal extension.
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Per document IRG N2709, this particular ideograph is officially being proposed as a UNC by TCA, and if accepted during the IRG #63, it should be removed from this working set. As stated in Comments #1814, China can submit a horizontal proposal after Unicode Version 17.0 has been released (2025). If the ideograph is considered urgent for China, which I suspect it is not given that it is in an IRG working set, China can submit a UNC proposal.
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual

U+2B73C in Unicode, 17.0.0 Alpha

The code point has been stable.
Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
Agree to unify. Suggest China to propose a horizontal extension for the character in the future.
00379
00379
口 30.3.1
GCW-00021
TS 6 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+4096
Unify to 䂖?

Undisguisable shapes.

Consider 潭 (Zhuang) daemz ~ 吞 (Zhuang) daen?
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
As the note says:
The character is mainly used by Zhuang(壮族) people who lived in the area between Beiliu County(北流市) and Yulin City(玉林市), Guangxi(广西). From the aspect of shape and pronunciation, it is related to 䂖(石). However, because the pronunciation of 石(dan4) is similar to 氹(dang4) and 潭(tan2) in dialect, the character is actually used as 氹(pool) or 潭(pool) by local Zhuang(壮族) people and no exception found. Considering the shape is interesting, suggest to seperately encode it as a special Variantof 石(䂖).
We suggest not to unify.
00824
00824
囗 31.10.4
GCW-00030
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+32629
Unify to [WS2021-00778] GDM-00364 ⿴囗恋 (Ext. J U+32629)
00830
00830
土 32.3.4
GCW-00034
TS 6 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+5739
Unify to 圹.

Shuowen: [广] 因广爲屋, 象對刺高屋之形... 讀若儼然之儼.
Guangyun: [广] (魚掩切) 因巗爲屋.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The shape is weird but stable. It is good to save it as a special variant.
00832
00832
土 32.4.2
GCW-00036
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2D387
Unify to 𭎇 (U+2D387)
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The pronounciation of ⿱少土 kui4 should be non-cognate with 塵(chen2). 𭎇 (U+2D387) is a variant of 塵(chen2).
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Highly possible variant of 圭.
00861
00861
土 32.7.1
GCW-00050
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]

U+32649
Unify to WS2021-00814 ⿰土辰 (Ext. J U+32649)
00893
00893
土 32.9.1
GCW-00065
TD-2375
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00897
土 32.9.2
TD-2375
TS 12 · IDS
Unify to WS2024-00897

The readings are the same, gǒu.
01218
01218
山 46.7.2
GCW-00116
TS 10 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unified to 宵 (U+5BB5)
U+5BB5


Looks the variant of U+5CED 峭
U+5CED
01219
01219
山 46.7.2
GCW-00118
TS 10 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unified to 𪧎 (U+2A9CE)
U+2A9CE


This character is the variant of U+21DFF 𡷿.
U+21DFF

U+2A9CE 𪧎 could be the variant of 定, based on the explanation of KC-11709.

Therefore, they are non-cognates.
02057
02057
水 85.2.3
丿 4.5.5
GCW-00154
TS 6 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Very similar but not unify to 㝽 (U+377D) for non-cognates. See UCV #354b.

U+377D
02069
02069
水 85.5.3
GCW-00157
TS 8 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but no unified to 沕 (U+6C95) for non-cognates.
U+6C95
01288
01288
山 46.13.4
GDM-00409
UK-30300
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02061
02061
水 85.4.3
GDM-00420
TS 7 · IDS 𣬛
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unified to 𣲭 (U+23CAD).

U+23CAD


𣲭口水 is the other name of 祁水 in Yongzhou, Hunan.
02085
02085
水 85.7.4
GDM-00422
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+23D8D
Unify to 𣶍 (U+23D8D) per UCV #363, but I don’t know if this UCV is useful.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
suggest to remove the UCV.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Simplified form should not be unified to traditional form.

UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
UCV #363 is such a bad UCV because in China 丬 and 爿 are generally considered to be a simplified/traditional distinction. I strongly support removing this UCV.
02138
02138
水 85.11.3
GDM-00424
TS 14 · IDS
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Consider level 1 UCV for 兜/兠:

Current cognate disunified examples:

U+2361B 𣘛 = U+6A77 橷
03164
03164
肉 130.9.5
GDM-00465
TB-5927
TS 13 · IDS ;
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00217
00217
八 12.8.4
GXM-00435
TS 10 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unify to 𭀤 (U+2D024)
U+2D024
03245
03245
艸 140.4.1
GXM-00458
TS 8 · IDS
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
UCV #404 unifies 艸 and 艹, but I am not sure it is a helpful UCV.
UCV
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱艸⿰氵畨 (A03585-002) = 藩 (A03585)
⿱艸⿵戊𮍌 (A03579-007) = 藏 (A03579)
⿱艸⿸厂⿱示一 (C11600-001) = 𦱯 (C11600)
⿱艸馬 (A03027-005) = 䔍 (A03027-001)
⿱艸⿻丨⿱𠈌二 (A03503-009) = 華 (A03503)
⿱艸㇯𦮙艹 (A03522-007) = 𦮙 (A03522-003)
⿱艸㙯 (A03586-007) = 藝 (A03586)
⿱艸㝛 (A03560-004) = 𰱵 (A03560-003)
⿱艸㠩 (漢字海) = 𮎰
⿱艸䦨 (A03600-003) = 蘭 (A03600)
⿱艸丁 (B03777-001) = 艼 (B03777)
⿱艸不 (B03797-002) = 芣 (B03797)
⿱艸丏 (漢字海) = ⿱艸丐 (C11408) = 𦬛 (C11408)
⿱艸之 (A03433-005) = 芝 (A03433)
⿱艸交 (B03834-003) = 茭 (B03834)
⿱艸介 (A03441-003) = 芥 (A03441)
⿱艸付 (A02994-003) = 苻 (A02994-001)
⿱艸侖 (B03925-001) = 菕 (B03925)
⿱艸倉 (漢字海) = 蒼
⿱艸⿰氵𠝣 (漢字海) = 𧁄
⿱艸⿰豕生 (漢字海) = 蕤
⿱艸⿰㚔匊 (漢字海) = 𧂲
⿱艸⿰長隶 (漢字海) = 𧀳
⿱艸㓹 (漢字海) = 𦺶
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Suggest not to unify because it is a surname.
02333
02333
牙 92.12.4
GZ-0171201
TS 17 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unfied to 𢿽 (U+22FFD) and U+22FE6 𢿦 because of non-cognates.
U+22FFD

U+22FE6


The top component is the phonetic element which is derived from 敝. The 新借 reading of 敝 is bi, but other characters with the 敝 phonetic element read similar to be. Note: The tone -z in 新借 is related to ancient 入声, this situation is also the same in Theater Mandarin of Naning Yongju Opera.
憋 bez
蹩 bez
鳖 bez
撇 bez
瞥 bez
00122
00122
人 9.7.1
GZ-0661201
TS 9 · IDS 𠆢
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Not unify to 𰃚 (U+300DA), non-cognates.
01557
01557
手 64.2.1
GZ-1951203
TS 5 · IDS
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
00619
00619
口 30.13.2
GZ-2352301
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+20F4F
Unify to 𠽏 (U+20F4F)?

If yes, we could expand UCV #90.
Oppose Unification
John Knightley
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
There are 8 URO disunification examples which suggests not expanding UCV #90
U+57F3 埳 ⿰土臽 vs U+586A 塪 ⿰土舀
U+60C2 惂 ⿰忄臽 vs U+6146 慆 ⿰忄舀
U+6390 掐 ⿰扌臽 vs U+642F 搯 ⿰扌舀
U+6DCA 淊 ⿰氵臽 vs U+6ED4 滔 ⿰氵舀
U+7130 焰 ⿰火臽 vs U+7196 熖 ⿰火舀
U+8AC2 諂 ⿰言臽 vs U+8B1F 謟 ⿰言舀
U+8F21 輡 ⿰車臽 vs U+8F41 轁 ⿰車舀
U+9921 餡 ⿰飠臽 vs U+9940 饀 ⿰飠舀
00055
00055
丿 4.4.5
GZ-3452101
TS 5 · IDS
Oppose Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+3002C is a very stable glyph in the ancient books, while GZ-3452101 looks like the 正字 of it, both of them should be kept to be encoded.
Oppose Unification
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The different pronunciations imply that these are non-cognate and therefore should not be unified. 𰀬 has the reading ying1. The pronunciation of GZ-3452101 comes from the top part, 乃, usually nai3 in Chinese.
01446
01446
心 61.6.1
GZ-4511202
TS 10 · IDS 西
Oppose Unification
XIONG Dan
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
It looks unifiable to 𢙣 (U+22663) (see UCV No. 225), but they are semantically different.

U+22663


U+22663 means "恶".
Oppose Unification
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed non-cognate therefore not unifiable.
00214
00214
八 12.5.2
GZHSJ-0020
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+34B7
Unify to 㒷 (U+34B7). Both are vulgar forms of 興, and the crossing or not of the 人 component should be a unifiable difference.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Suggest not to unify. Discussion needed.
Unification
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Should be discussed in conjunction with
00215
八 12.6.3
TC-2E68
TS 8 · IDS
.
00093
00093
亠 8.2.5
GZHSJ-0024
TS 4 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
U+20AD3
As a character, unified to 𠫓 (U+20AD3).
As a component, appear in component list collected by CESI, with examples 夣棄育.
03144
03144
肉 130.6.5
GZHSJ-0029
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+43FB
U+80FD
The evidence above suggest this is a unifiable variant of 䏻 (U+43FB), which is in turn a variant of 能
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
01999
01999
欠 76.9.5
GZHSJ-0036
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
We need to discuss whether to unify to GZHSJ-0037
01998
欠 76.9.3
GZHSJ-0037
TS 13 · IDS
01998
01998
欠 76.9.3
GZHSJ-0037
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
YUAN Zhiyu
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+23903
U+51B7
Should we consider unifying it to 𣤃, for they have the same abstract shape and have the same source in 冷齋夜話, or should we encode it separately since this form is stable in many evidences (also appeared in Evidence 4 of
01999
欠 76.9.5
GZHSJ-0036
TS 13 · IDS
, the same line as ⿱欸乃)?
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
We need to discuss whether to unify to GZHSJ-0036
01999
欠 76.9.5
GZHSJ-0036
TS 13 · IDS
01701
01701
攴 66.9.3
GZHSJ-0043
TS 13 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Do not unify to WS2021-04550 SAT-08653 ⿺鬼攴 (Ext. J U+33334) as non-cognate and different structural composition.
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+33334
Unify to U+33334
.

According to Eiso comment #8907, |⿺鬼攴| pronounced gwai2 in Cantonese, with phonetic symbol 甶 (鬼) *KUI.
All the evidence here (related to 畏 or 鬼) support the phonetic symbol 甶 *KUI or *ɁUI.

No examples for |⿰鬼?| ≠ |⿺鬼?|.
02106
02106
水 85.9.4
GZHSJ-0049
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+3D31
U+23D6B
Unified to 㴱 U+3D31 or 𣵫 U+23D6B?

Based on the evidence, it is also the variant of 深.

See WS2017-02033.
[ {{WS2017-02033}} ]
00035
00035
丨 2.3.4
GZHSJ-0056
TS 4 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+516E
U+20503
Unify to 兮 or 𠔃 based on Evidence 2 and the first piece of evidence in Comment #228?

The following pictures show this character is the variant of 兮.

▲ 《聚學軒叢書 第四集 隋唐石刻拾遺 上》, 揚州: 江蘇廣陵古籍刻印社, 1982.10, p. 29

▲ 黄永年: 《古代文献研究集林 第二集》, 西安: 陕西师范大学出版社, 1992.2, ISBN 7-5613-0401-3/K·32, p. 282

The first piece of evidence in Comment #228 show it is the variant of 𠔃.

The second piece of evidence in Comment #228 show the fanqie is 胡雞反.
00821
00821
囗 31.5.3
GZHSJ-0057
TS 8 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+56E7
Unify to 囧 (U+56E7)?

Same semantics and similar glyphs.
00317
00317
匚 22.8.3
GZHSJ-0066
UK-30058
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04399
04399
魚 195.7.3
GZHSJ-0079
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
U+9BC8
Unifiable with 鯈 (U+9BC8) as per UCV #305.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
Suggest to remove UCV #305 and disunify the two characters.
02816
02816
禾 115.12.1
GZHSJ-0082
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+25891
Unify to 𥢑 (U+25891) ?
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Too much difference.
00936
00936
土 32.12.3
GZHSJ-0137
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2436B
Unify to 𤍫 (U+2436B) by #307b, with horizontal extension by China.
02595
02595
目 109.2.5
力 19.5.2
GZHSJ-0143
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+52A9
Unify to 助 (U+52A9)?

Same case as SAT-08616

03136
肉 130.5.3
SAT-08616
TS 9 · IDS
00336
00336
厂 27.7.1
GZHSJ-0152
UK-30092
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03270
03270
艸 140.7.5
GZHSJ-0175
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+21769
Unify to 𡝩 (U+21769)?
00106
00106
人 9.3.3
GZHSJ-0184
TS 5 · IDS
Unification
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+3139A
Unifiable to 𱎚 (U+3139A)?
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
For 𱎚 (U+3139A), we have two sources for it. The first one is the evidence for WS2017-00092 which is the character used for Tày and the meaning is related to the Vietnamese word “người” (𠊛). The second one is for KC-04796 (KA-KC04796 in ExtF1 as 00225). The evidence shows below.

▲ 韓國經學資料集成 83冊 「詩經講義續集」 (The evidence is provided by Dr. Cho)
It is very clear that it is the variant of 仁 not 人. It is better to treat them as the non-cognates under the modern uses.
As Comment #768 shows, this character is used in Chairman Mao’s books, so it is necessary to use the original form in the digital text.
02081
02081
水 85.7.2
GZHSJ-0186
TS 10 · IDS 𮱤
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+319C5
Unify to 𱧅 (U+319C5). (UCV#123 巳㔾)

These two characters are variants of 滄.
Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+319C5
It seems OK to unify to 𱧅 (U+319C5).
01981
01981
木 75.16.5
KC-10010
UK-30619
TS 20 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03370
03370
艸 140.19.1
KC-10050
TS 25 · IDS
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Will we consider adding 韱 and 韯 as new UCV?
02220
02220
火 86.6.1
KC-10058
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2A94E
Unify or normalize to 𪥎 (U+2A94E)?
U+2A94E


They are both the variant of 奊, see here. If it is cited from the one-off evidence, it is better to use the encoded character directly.
02238
02238
火 86.8.2
KC-10069
TS 12 · IDS ;
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+715A
Unify to 煚 (U+715A)
Unification
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unify.
01459
01459
心 61.7.3
KC-10088
TC-5726
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unify.
01966
01966
木 75.13.3
KC-10092
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+23555
Unify to 𣕕 (U+23555) by UCV #89
Oppose Unification
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Disunify. Used personal name.
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
U+23555
Per #5369 and #5434, unify with 𣕕 (U+23555)?
00008
00008
一 1.5.1
KC-10175
TS 6 · IDS
Oppose Unification
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Disunify.
1) Used personal name.
2) It is not necessary to unify Kaishu(楷書) with Guwen(古文).
02131
02131
水 85.11.1
KC-10190
TC-717B
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unify.
01411
01411
彳 60.7.1
KC-10377
TS 10 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unified to 𢓣 (U+224E3)
U+224E3
Oppose Unification
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Disunify.
02995
02995
糸 120.12.2
KC-10400
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+26163
Unify to 𦅣 (U+26163)
00036
00036
丨 2.4.1
SAT-01303
TS 5 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unify to 𚾘 (U+1AF98) (tentative). See L2/24-201

02251
02251
火 86.10.2
SAT-05170
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+25255
Unify to 𥉕.

Shuowen (Duanzhu): [矇] (莫中切) 童蒙也. [此與周易童蒙異. 謂目童子如冡覆也. 毛公, 劉熙, 韋昭皆云: 有眸子而無見曰矇...]
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unifying 目 and 日 is too dangerous. 曚 and 矇 are all frequently used ideographs, even if unified, disunification will not be long.
00001
00001
一 1.0.0
SAT-05947
TS 1 · IDS
Oppose Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Generally speaking, this glyph is a radical, stroke, or a symbol. I found only one piece of evidence consider it as a character.
六書會原
01106
01106
宀 40.13.3
SAT-06007
TD-687A
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8C41
Unify to 豁?

从谷害聲.
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04145
04145
革 177.9.3
SAT-06010
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+29358
Unify to 𩍘?

Upper part |艹| of |𤰈| goes into |勹|.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Too much difference.
01537
01537
戈 62.7.5
SAT-06381
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+3040F
Unify to 𰐏 (U+3040F)?



Both are ⿹ [戈] [甬].
01565
01565
手 64.5.1
SAT-06657
TS 8 · IDS 𭤟
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+62C6
Unify to 拆 with new UCV (lv2)?

⿰木𭤟 (B01667-008) = 柝 (B01667)
⿰言𭤟 (0xF7BE2) = 訴. 張涌泉 敦煌經部文獻合集 小學類字書之屬 韻部字義抄: ▲爲訴的訛俗字.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰扌𭤟 A01887-007 is also a variant of 析. The evidence is from 齊是連公妻邢夫人墓誌.

02147
02147
水 85.11.5
SAT-06948
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+23F6E
Unify to 𣽮.



▲ GHZR, p.1875

Both are ⿰氵婬.
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+5A6C
Agree with Kushim. Add new UCV 婬 ~ ⿰女⿱爫𠙻.

⿰女⿱爫𠙻 is also not yet coded.

It is found in 《玉篇》 and 《類篇》.


(from MOE Variants Dictionary)
01387
01387
彐 58.5.5
SAT-07269
TS 8 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+38C7
Unify to 㣇.

Shuowen: [彙] (于貴切) 蟲似豪豬者. 从㣇, 𦞅省聲.
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]

See WS2021-01283
[WS2021-01283]
03136
03136
肉 130.5.3
SAT-08616
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+43E3
Unify to 䏣.

字林 千余反 (清開三魚平) shows status as 疽, phonetic symbol 且.
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]

See WS2021-03225
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+43E3
Unify to 䏣 (U+43E3)?

Same case as GZHSJ-0143

02595
目 109.2.5
GZHSJ-0143
TS 7 · IDS
02299
02299
火 86.22.3
SAT-08790
TS 26 · IDS &P15-01;
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+91C1
Unify to 釁?

Evidence 1 supports error form of 㸑.
Evidences 2&3 supports variant of 釁.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Too much difference.
02495
02495
田 102.3.3
SAT-09058
TS 8 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+753F
U+4EBE
Unify to 甿 (U+753F) and add 亾兦 to UCV #143.
01909
01909
木 75.9.1
SAT-09061
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+4299
Unify to 䊙?



玉篇 (元刊本)
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Too much difference.
02873
02873
竹 118.8.3
SAT-09081
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+4204
Unify to 䈄.

⿶凵⿻了从 (A00327-005) = 函 (A00327)
⿰氵⿶凵⿻了从 (A02238-016-1) = 涵 (A02238)
02020
02020
殳 79.6.3
SAT-09106
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+22F12
Unify to 𢼒?

Shuowen: [𢼒] (苦候切) 擊也. 从攴句聲. 讀若扣.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Too much difference.
01308
01308
巛 47.1.3
SAT-09115
TS 4 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+20502
Unify to 𠔂.

That is, unify to 灬.
cf.
02299
火 86.22.3
SAT-08790
TS 26 · IDS &P15-01;
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
For ideographs with simple structure like this two, we suggest not to unify.
00292
00292
刀 18.14.2
SAT-09127
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+21B4A
Unify to 𡭊.

Shuowen: [𡭊] (都隊切) 譍無方也. 从丵从口从寸. [對] 𡭊或从士. 漢文帝以爲責𡭊而爲言, 多非誠𡭊, 故去其口以从士也.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Too much difference.
01038
01038
女 38.7.1
SAT-09133
TS 10 · IDS 𡉵
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2171E
Unify to 𡜞.

Consider 𡉵𡊥 disunify to 兆. 𡜞 may disunify to 姚.
03340
03340
艸 140.14.1
SAT-09137
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+27013
Unify to 𧀓.

As shown in Evidences 2&3.
屢 with extra component 艹.
03834
03834
邑 163.6.3
SAT-09158
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+28697
Unify to 𨚗.

摩那𭅤, मानप्य (mānāpya).
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Suggest to unify and add a new UCV for the left hand side.

𮉼 is a variant of 冉:


There is another similar shape for 冉:

01627
01627
手 64.10.1
SAT-09161
TS 13 · IDS 𢉙
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+646D
Unify to 摭.

征石反 (章開三清入) shows status as 摭, phonetic symbol 庶(石).
02095
02095
水 85.8.4
SAT-09162
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+6DC4
Unify to 淄.

滓師反 (莊開三之平) shows status as 菑, phonetic symbol 甾 *TSƏ.
02809
02809
禾 115.11.3
SAT-09168
TS 16 · IDS 𮂬
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+417B
Unify to 䅻.

恥知反 (徹開三支平) shows status as 摛, with phonetic symbol 离(離) *RAI.
03545
03545
言 149.25.2
SAT-09174
TS 32 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8B9F
Unified to 讟 (U+8B9F) in irg51.

See WS2017-04035
[ {{WS2017-04035}} ]
01541
01541
戈 62.11.1
SAT-09176
TS 15 · IDS 𣈆
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+6229
Unify to 戩.

Per UCV #388, which has been expanded in IRG #58.

[WS2021-03400]

⿰山𣈆 (C02879-001) = 𡺽 (C02879)
⿰氵𣈆 (C06323-001) = 溍 (C06323)
00888
00888
土 32.8.4
SAT-09194
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+21369
Unify to 𡍩.

Disunifiable variant of 坼.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Too much difference.
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+21369
I agree on the unification comment #258. There are only one 丿 stroke difference between ⿰土⿱亠屰 and 𡍩. In WS2017, we have already unified ⿰犭⿳⿱⺊乛七巾 to 𤟝.

[ {{WS2017-02527}} ]
01840
01840
亠 8.8.4
SAT-09207
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+97F3
Unify to 音.

律文作簞, 音丹, 笥也.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Too much difference.
03080
03080
羊 123.9.3
SAT-09218
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+97CF
Unify to 韏?



▲ T2128_.54.0654c11
02607
02607
目 109.8.2
SAT-09263
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2519E
Unify to 𥆞.

Shuowen: [𥆞] (居倦切) 目圍也. 从䀠, 𠂆. 讀若書卷之卷. 古文以爲醜字.
03058
03058
网 122.8.2
SAT-09310
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+52D6
Unify to 勖.

B00256-006 = 勖 (B00256)
01367
01367
广 53.12.4
SAT-09315
TS 15 · IDS 广
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2439F
Unify to 𤎟.

Shuowen: [𤏯] (烏前切) 火气也. 从火𡍯聲. [烟] 或从因. [𠖜] 古文. [𤎟] 籒文从宀.
03405
03405
虫 142.7.2
SAT-09337
TS 13 · IDS 𭥐
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+45A7
Unify to 䖧.



類篇
00180
00180
人 9.17.3
SAT-09339
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+20428
Unify to 𠐨.

Variant of 愆.
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
a new UCV for ⿰亻X and ⿲亻丨X as lv. 2?
UCV
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Suggest to add a new UCV ⿰亻X and ⿲亻丨X as level 2.
修(U+4FEE) and 俢(U+4FE2) cognate
偹(U+5079) and 俻(U+4FFB) cognate
倐(U+5010) and 𠊅(U+20285) cognate
⿰纟𪝉(seen in GB18030 v1) and 𮶃(U+2ED83) cognate
㣠(U+38E0) and 𢓘(U+224D8) not completely cognate
候 and 侯 non-cognate
03485
03485
襾 146.1.5
SAT-09343
TS 7 · IDS 𠃊
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+3003E
It may be unifiable with 𰀾 (U+3003E). Henry's comment for 00083 in the ORT for IRG Working Set 2015 suggests that U+3003E is cognate with U+8FFA, which is claimed to be a synonym (aka cognate) of this ideograph.
02508
02508
疋 103.6.5
SAT-09345
TS 11 · IDS 𤴔
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8DDF
Unify to 跟.



▲ T2128_.54.0546c08



▲ T2128_.54.0731c03
03535
03535
言 149.12.1
SAT-09349
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8ACF
Unify to 諏.

Error form.
Shuowen: [諏] (子于切) 聚謀也. 从言取聲.
00220
00220
八 12.10.3
SAT-09351
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+84AD
Unify to 蒭?

Shuowen: [芻] (叉愚切) 刈艸也. 象包束艸之形.
Consider adding extra component 艹 and converting to 八.
04665
04665
齊 210.10.2
SAT-09352
TS 20 · IDS 𱍸
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+9F4E
Unify to 齎.

|⿲丿二丨| > |口|
01422
01422
彳 60.13.1
SAT-09357
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+5FB9
Unify to 徹 (U+5FB9) with new UCV?
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+5FB9
Agree unify to 徹.



▲ T2128_.54.0668a18



▲ GHZR, p.903
UCV
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree to new UCV of the entire right hand side.

澈:


撤:


See: https://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=24895
04003
04003
阜 170.10.3
SAT-09358
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+32257
Unify to 𲉗?



▲ T0101_.02.0493c17

All evidences mention 雜阿含經, while 雜阿含經 use 𨻗𫕈闍壯年婆羅門. Error form of 𨻗. Consider unifying to 𨻗 or 𲉗.
00357
00357
厶 28.6.3
SAT-09366
TS 8 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+3F0C
Unify to 㼌.

Shuowen: [㼌] (以主切) 本不勝末, 微弱也. 从二瓜. 讀若庾.
00261
00261
刀 18.5.5
SAT-09369
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+52AD
Unify to 劭.



▲ T2128_.54.0428c16
04021
04021
隶 171.7.2
SAT-09388
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+28F7E
Unify to 𨽾.

Phonetic symbol 𫩀.
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+28F79
Potentially unifiable to 𨽹.

Per UCV #485:


We can make a similar set glyphs for a new UCV.
02050
02050
毛 82.11.2
SAT-09392
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+23BC9
Unify to 𣯉.



廣韻 p.541
00146
00146
人 9.9.3
SAT-09400
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+5015
Unify to 倕.



▲ T2128_.54.0332b07
UCV
YUAN Zhiyu
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Should we have a UCV rule for 垂/⿱乖一?

⿱乖一 probably comes by an improper analogy with 乗/乘 and can be seen in many printed books since Ming dynasty:

酌中志 道光二十五年潘氏刊海山仙館叢書本

蛾術堂集 道光十八年蕭山沈氏漢讀齋刊本



明清小说俗字典


四庫全書總目提要 武英殿刊本

⿱乖一 is encoded as 12-364B in CNS11643:
https://www.cns11643.gov.tw/wordView.jsp?ID=800331

⿱乖一 is listed as a BabelStone Han variant for 埀 (where Andrew West gives its source as 《国语辞典》 p. 589):
https://www.babelstone.co.uk/Fonts/BSH_IVS.html

Disunified examples (I cannot determine whether they are cognate):
U+226C9 𢛉 and U+22764 𢝤.
01342
01342
干 51.9.4
SAT-09401
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2304A
Unify to 𣁊.

丿 of 交 is 頓筆 of 文.
03876
03876
金 167.7.3
SAT-09407
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+92C4
Unify to 鋄.

Shuowen (Duanzhu): [範] (防鋄切) 範軷也.
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
agree with #553. Also, Guangyun gives fanqie 防錽 for 笵, which appears to be more immediately equivalent to the character, ⿱竹汜, for which SAT-09407 is the in the fanqie given in the evidence.
01156
01156
尸 44.11.5
SAT-09426
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+379C
Unify to 㞜.

Variant of 𡲾, phonetic symbol 妥 *NUI.
00468
00468
口 30.9.2
SAT-09427
TS 12 · IDS 𦏾
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+564F
Unify to 噏.

Phonetic symbol 翕>合.
02227
02227
火 86.6.5
SAT-09436
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+31AB8
Unify to 𱪸?

|勹| > |龴|
|屮| > |丑|
Unification
YUAN Zhiyu
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+24309
May be unified to 𤌉.

芻 > ⿱丑丑 (see 經典文字辨證書) , ⿱彐彐 or even ⿱龴丑 or ⿱コ丑 (Consider how 刍 is formed from 芻. see 俗書刊誤). For example, 𠊣=㑳, 𨜉=𨜈=𨛃=鄒=⿰⿱龴⿼コ十阝(see 干禄字書), 煼=𰞝=𤊛=𭴥=𭴶=⿰火函(see 說文解字大徐本), 搊=𢬟(see 廣韻)

Refer also to 草書禮部韻, 草韻辨體


草書禮部韻 中國書店影印
00151
00151
人 9.10.3
SAT-09437
TS 12 · IDS 𤴗
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+5022
Unify to 倢.

Curve stroke > |凵|.
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Add ⿱山⿻龰⺕ and 𤴗 to UCV #389 as lv. 1.
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+5022
U+24D17
U+758C
Support unification to 倢 U+5022, with new UCV 𤴗 and 疌.

𤴗 and 疌 are variants without a doubt, and the first glyph is simply a stricter transliteration of the Shuowen seal glyph:


See also:
03667
足 157.10.2
SAT-09798
TS 17 · IDS 𧾷𤴗
03261
03261
艸 140.7.1
SAT-09447
TS 10 · IDS 𦫳
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+26B83
Unify to 𦮃.

Shuowen: [乖] (古懷切) 戾也. 从𠁥而𠔁. 𠔁, 古文別.
01681
01681
手 64.16.4
SAT-09453
TS 19 · IDS 𦏁
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+22E24
Unify to 𢸤.

Phonetic symbol 羲>我.
02400
02400
犬 94.14.3
SAT-09470
TS 17 · IDS 𡼡
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+736F
Unify to 獯.

Guangyun: [獯] (許云切) 北方胡名. 夏曰獯鬻, 周曰獫狁, 漢曰匈奴.
02382
02382
犬 94.9.5
SAT-09479
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2C33C
Unify to 𬌼(U+2C33C)?
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unify to 𬌼 (U+2C33C) by UCV #69b and #149.
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
There is no evidence of any semantic relation between this character and 𬌼 (U+2C33C). Also, the shapes are not identical. No unification without additional evidence establishing a relationship.
02580
02580
皿 108.1.1
SAT-09490
TS 6 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8840
Unify to 血.

Shuowen: [盇] (胡臘切) 覆也. 从血, 大.
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8840
段玉裁《說文解字注》5卷上
血 is written as ⿱一皿.


Unify to 血.
03262
03262
艸 140.7.1
SAT-09503
TS 10 · IDS 𦒳
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8356
Unify to 荖.

Add UCV 𦒳~老. Lots of examples.
⿱𦒳勿 (C10672-004) = 𦒸 (C10672-002)
⿱𦒳占 (C10674-003) = 𦒾 (C10674-001)
⿱𦒳目 (A03254-013) = 𦒿 (A03254-003)
03054
03054
网 122.3.2
SAT-09536
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+21DAC
Unify to 𡶬.

Expand UCV #238
|网|(网) = |𦉳|(网) = |⿵冂从|(网)

𦉺 = 𦉽
⿱⿵冂从矛 (B03509-002) = ⿱网矛
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Though there is a structural relationship, the overall result of unifying with an enclosing element is completely counter intuitive.
00454
00454
口 30.8.4
SAT-09639
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+229C2
Unify to 𢧂 (U+229C2) (exact match)
03540
03540
言 149.14.3
SAT-09648
TS 21 · IDS &P6-03;𠃊
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8B82
Unification to 讂.

Add new UCV 夐 with right hand side of SAT-09648.
02850
02850
竹 118.3.2
SAT-09702
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+25AF1
淮南子 gives 篅𥫱, so unify to 𥫱 (U+25AF1)?
02107
02107
水 85.9.4
SAT-09710
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+6F14
U+2400B
U+5BC5
Unified to 演 (U+6F14) or 𤀋 (U+2400B), add the UCV for the right components 寅~𡩟 (K is ⿱宀臾)~⿱宀㬰.

U+21A5F


The evidence shows the fanqie is 延典.
01090
01090
宀 40.8.4
SAT-09711
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+21A5F
Unify to 𡩟 (U+21A5F) (SAT glyph is the same as the K-source glyph for U+21A5F)
01444
01444
心 61.5.4
SAT-09773
TS 8 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+327F6
Unify to [WS2021-01317] ⿰忄史 (Ext. J U+327F6). Second evidence shows ⿰忄史 twice, and first evidence shows ⿰忄史 and ⿰忄⿻口人, but ⿰忄⿻口人 here is clearly a mistake for ⿰忄史.
02516
02516
疒 104.6.1
SAT-09789
TS 11 · IDS 𡕟
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+24DD6
Unify to 𤷖.

Evidence #2 力證反 (來開三蒸去) shows status as 𩜁, with phonetic symbol 夌 *RƏŊ.
04628
04628
鹿 198.9.4
SAT-09805
TS 20 · IDS 鹿𫨻
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+9E9A
麚 (U+9E9A)
Semantic identity implied by parallel definition in other texts of Shuowen. Add new UCV for equivalence of ⿰𡰥⿱コ又 and ⿰𡰥㕛 as components.
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+9E9A
Unify to 麚 (U+9E9A) with new UCV for 叚~𫨻. See also
03445
虫 142.15.5
GZ-2091203
TS 21 · IDS
GZ-2091203 where the evidence shows ⿱⿰虫𫨻共, but the font glyph is normalized to ⿱蝦共.
02509
02509
疋 103.8.5
SAT-09819
TS 13 · IDS 𤴔𡘆
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2808D
Unify to 𨂍 (U+2808D) with new UCV for 𧾷and 𤴔. Note that the following character in the evidence (⿰𤴔居 = 踞) is not encoded or proposed for encoding.
02511
02511
疋 103.12.5
SAT-09828
TS 17 · IDS 𤴔
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8E70
Unify to 蹰 (U+8E70) with new UCV for 𧾷and 𤴔.
01172
01172
山 46.3.1
SAT-09829
TS 6 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+37A9
U+5D50
Evidence 2 shows U+37A9 㞩 which is a variant form of 嵐. Evidence 1 also looks like a corrupt form of 㞩. Unify to 㞩 (U+37A9).
03201
03201
自 132.3.3
SAT-09883
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+65F3
Unify to 旳.

Shuowen: [旳] (都歷切) 明也. 从日勺聲. 易曰: 爲旳顙.
03361
03361
艸 140.16.3
SAT-09894
TS 19 · IDS 𭜮
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+30C95
Unify to 𰲕 (U+30C95)

When we check the submitted evidence of U+30C95 𰲕 SAT-06065 (aka WS2015-03675), the fanqie is also 鄧能反.



They are cognate, and I suggest adding UCV for 𣳾 and 𭜮 as Lv. 2.
02021
02021
殳 79.7.2
SAT-09922
TS 11 · IDS 𠔼
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+3C7F
Unify to 㱿 (U+3C7F)?

We need a new UCV for 𡉉 and 𠕓 like UCV #222a.
03576
03576
貝 154.5.3
SAT-10042
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+27D4D
Semantic and shape similarity suggest unification with𧵍 (U+27D4D)
Oppose Unification
YUAN Zhiyu
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
In two evidences the actual shape of the character is important (從夘貝).
龍龕手鏡 used this form as 今體:


龍龕手鏡 高麗本 (via 異體字字典)

龍龕手鑑 四部叢刊續編景印江安傅氏雙鑑樓藏宋刊本 (via 異體字字典)
03636
03636
足 157.5.2
SAT-10051
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+47E0
Unify to 䟠.

禹厥反 (云合三元入) shows status as 越, with phonetic symbol 戉 *WAT instead of 戊 *MU.
So the evidences support |戊| = [戉].
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+47E0
Potentially unifiable to 䟠.

There is already one case in Extension A: U+4B85
U+4B85
02577
02577
皮 107.11.4
SAT-10214
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02009
02009
止 77.11.3
SAT-10223
TS 15 · IDS 𣥚
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8D99
Unify to 趙 per UCV 423
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Also UCV #307
02512
02512
疋 103.15.1
SAT-10227
TS 20 · IDS 𤴔
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2E728
Unify to 𮜨 (U+2E728) with new UCV for 𧾷and 𤴔.
00112
00112
人 9.4.3
SAT-10237
TS 6 · IDS 𠆢
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+26953
Unify to 𦥓 (U+26953).

U+26953 𦥓 is the variant of 囟, see MJ045970.


▲ 廣漢和辭典, p. 332


▲ 大漢和辞典, p. 1046
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
Move back to the main set as it is a component in SAT-10235 (⿰糸⿱𠆢凶), and there have been no objections to encoding SAT-10235
02969
糸 120.6.3
SAT-10235
TS 12 · IDS 𠆢
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Agree with #8122. It's always useful to have unusual components encoded for purposes of illustration.
02203
02203
火 86.2.1
SAT-10292
TS 6 · IDS &H6-01;
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2419B
U+2419B


𤆛 is also a variant of 与. In fact, the third evidence 一切経音義高麗版 clearly gives 𤆛.
03644
03644
足 157.7.1
SAT-10393
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2C9B7
Unify to 𬦷 (U+2C9B7)
04661
04661
鼻 209.3.3
SAT-10401
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+9F3D
鼽 (U+9F3D)
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
UCV #249
00226
00226
冂 13.11.1
SAT-10445
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+5193
Unify to 冓 (U+5193). ⿱玨冉聲 indicates that ⿱玨冉 is the 聲旁 of 搆, which suggests that ⿱玨冉 and 冓 are interchangeable.
02924
02924
米 119.1.5
SAT-10472
TS 7 · IDS 𠃊
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+3140D is a simplified form of 幽, so these are non-cognate.
00054
00054
丿 4.4.4
SAT-10582
TS 5 · IDS
Unification
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+5FC5
Isn’t it merely a common handwriting form of 必? It’s just that the hook of the slanted stroke is not that visible, perhaps related to printing.
Unification
YUAN Zhiyu
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+355A
U+86A4
SAT-15802 is 㕚. It is the phonetic element of 蚤.
03436
03436
虫 142.13.3
SAT-10604
TS 19 · IDS 丿
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+87F2
Unify to 蟲 (U+87F2) with new UCV for 虫~䖝?
00213
00213
入 11.8.1
SAT-10608
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04641
04641
黍 202.0.3
SAT-10624
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+25778
Unify to 𥝸 (U+25778) by UCV #32a
03159
03159
肉 130.9.3
SAT-10643
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
TAO Yang
China
U+81DF
Obviously the variant of SAT-09865. Both of them come from 臟.
03418
03418
虫 142.9.3
SAT-10653
TS 15 · IDS
UCV
YUAN Zhiyu
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
It is 蝱 here.
Should we have a UCV rule for 亾/兦/亡 or not?
Disunified but cognate exampls:
𡚶-妄
𮎰-荒
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Maybe we could expand UCV #143.
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8771
Support unification to 蝱.

There are a huge number of variants involving 亡 and 亾, and the bulk of encoded ones are in Extension B:

㠩 U+3829 = 巟 U+5DDF
㡃 U+3843 = 㡆 U+3846
𧠬 U+2782C = 𧠰 U+27830
𮎰 U+2E3B0 = 荒 U+8352
𥞙 U+25799 = 𥡃 U+25843
𥿪 U+25FEA = 𥿼 U+25FFC
𩢯 U+298AF = 𩣇 U+298C7

There are some other unencoded examples:



Source: https://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=14706



Source: https://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=14701

03388
03388
虫 142.4.2
SAT-10689
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+868A
Unify to 蚊 (U+868A) (which is the character actually given in Huainanzi)
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Add new UCV for 攵/文
03169
03169
肉 130.10.2
SAT-90031
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+267B2
Unify to 𦞲 (U+267B2) per UCV#275
00082
00082
乙 5.12.1
T13-2267
TS 13 · IDS 𠃵
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+76F4
U+5353
U+2099D
Regarding comment #659, the glyph shown in 直音篇 has 卓 as its left bottom component, rather than 𠦝.
Since both characters are variants of 乾 and are derived from 直音篇, TCA agrees to unify and add a horizontal extension to 𰋮 (U+302EE).
02659
02659
石 112.4.4
T13-2F44
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+782D
Unify to 砭 (U+782D)

See WS2015-02828
01525
01525
心 61.15.3
T13-3E30
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
01655
01655
手 64.12.3
T13-3E35
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
01690
01690
手 64.23.4
T13-3E3F
TS 26 · IDS
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
04546
04546
鳥 196.8.3
T9-2148
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04405
魚 195.8.3
GXM-00482
TS 19 · IDS
Agree to unify to WS2024-04405 GKM-00482.
03165
03165
肉 130.9.5
TB-5927
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03164
肉 130.9.5
GDM-00465
TS 13 · IDS
Agree to unify to WS2024-03164 GDM-00465.
02096
02096
水 85.8.4
TB-7C28
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+6DA4
Unify to 涤 as Comment #3121.

UCV #194 has been expanded at IRG #63, see Appendix B.18 of IRG N2703 Editorial Report for IRG Meeting #63.
03248
03248
艸 140.4.3
TB-7E6F
TS 8 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2E39F
Unify to 𮎟 (U+2E39F)
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2E39F
The glyph source for U+2E39F is G-Source.
TCA is uncertain whether the bottom component of this character is [月] or not. If it is indeed [月], TCA agrees with this unification.
02212
02212
火 86.5.1
TC-3E5D
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02211
火 86.5.1
GZ-4311105
TS 9 · IDS
Agree to unify to WS2024-02211 GZ-4311105.
04548
04548
鳥 196.8.4
TC-6836
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
U+2A094
Possibly unifiable with 𪂔 (U+2A094) if cognate.
02594
02594
目 109.2.2
TC-7742
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02593
目 109.2.2
GZHSJ-0114
TS 7 · IDS
Agree to unify to WS2024-02593 GZHSJ-0114.
00897
00897
土 32.9.2
TD-2375
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00893
土 32.9.1
GCW-00065
TS 12 · IDS
Unify to WS2024-00893

The readings are the same, gǒu.
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00893
土 32.9.1
GCW-00065
TS 12 · IDS
GCW-00065 is a place name, which TCA agrees to unify to WS2024-00893.
02935
02935
米 119.6.4
TD-2F57
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+25E66
Unify to 𥹦 (U+25E66)?

cf. UCV #55
00168
00168
人 9.13.2
TD-5867
VN-F165E
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00169
人 9.13.2
VN-F165E
TS 15 · IDS
Agree to unify to WS2024-00169 VN-F165E.
01504
01504
心 61.12.2
TD-5B73
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+227E8
Unify to 𢟨 (U+227E8).
U+246D8
U+29A8E
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TCA has responded to the related unification issue in IRG N2608, p21.

Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+83BD
Agree to unify to u+227E8. And suggest adding a new UCV rule 莽/莾.
00223
00223
八 12.13.1
TD-5D76
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+5180
Unify to 冀 (U+5180). Clearly a corruption of 冀 that does not worth a codepoint. Consider a new UCV.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Disagree with the unification with 冀 (U+5180). The submitted character is an independent character, not a part of another character, and therefore should not be unified directly.
02393
02393
犬 94.11.1
TD-7A58
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02391
犬 94.11.1
GCW-00167
TS 14 · IDS
Agree to unify to WS2024-02391 GCW-00167.
04254
04254
馬 187.11.2
TE-4340
TS 21 · IDS
UCV
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Apparent variant of : 𩦧 (U+299A7). This is not an exact match. We would need a new UCV to equate 曼 with ⿳日罒方and 㬅.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TCA has no objection to the merger of UCV#278 and 465, but hopes to encode WS2024-04254: Regarding the right-hand part of the character form, 曼 is the standard character, while 㬅, 𭦗, and ⿳日罒万 are all vulgar forms of 曼. However, in this set of relationships, ⿰馬曼 is to be unified with ⿰馬㬅, which means the standard form is being unified with a variant form. Logically, the standard form should take precedence over variant forms.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with comment #5493. For ideographs used in registered residence system of government, it's better to unify them not just based on the rationale from a very professional view. We should handle characters used in registered residence systems in a more practical way. I recommond member bodies agree with this point to submit a proposal together and add following principles in IRG PnP( a rough draft).
For ideographs used in Government Administration System, if
1. There are structual differences which can cause the change of radical;
2. The different structures are non-cognate with each other in modern times and have major stroke differences(in this case, it is 方 and 又);
The two unifiable ideograph can be disunified under the request of Regional or national member bodies.
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
As the simplified variant U+2EE4E 𮹎 (⿰马曼) already exists, it is useful to encode TE-4340. If TE-4340 is unified to 𩦧 (U+299A7) then U+2EE4E will remain an orphan simplified form as it cannot traditionalfy to U+299A7.
Oppose Unification
John Knightley
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree comment #5691 as simplified form already encoded then it makes sense to encode the traditional form.
01852
01852
月 74.13.4
TE-725E
TS 17 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unified to 䑆 (U+4446)
U+4446


The radical of 䑆 is 130, the TE-725E glyph shows the radical is 74 clearly under TCA convention.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree the comment #5233.
These two characters have completely different radicals.
00270
00270
刀 18.7.5
UK-30032
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2D0E7
Unify to 𭃧 (U+2D0E7) with horizontal extension if cognate.

The example given at http://www.koreanhistory.or.kr/newchar/list_view.jsp?code=75462} suggests that they are the same character: 朽狀勿問日▼((厶/八/夕)+刂)肉削而已先生二字用於不當.
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
U+2D0E7
Good catch. I agree on the unification to 𭃧 (U+2D0E7).
03468
03468
衣 145.9.3
UK-30037
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2C862
U+7165
Evidences 1 & 2 support unifying to 𬡢(襖). cf 诚斋集 (卷五十四).
Evidences 3 & 4 support error form of 煥(焕). cf 禅社首坛颂碑.
Oppose Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
While I agree on the variants relationship provided by Kushim in comment #150, I think the fact that there are two independent historical use cases for ⿰衤奐 (Evidence 1 and 3) and one modern annotations usage (Evidence 4) already supported a separate codepoint for ⿰衤奐.

If we encoded ⿰衤奐 as U+2C862 + VS17, then it would be very confusing when we digitalize evidence 3 by U+2C862 + VS17, because here ⿰衤奐 was never a variant for U+2C862 or 襖. On the other hand, as the radicals of 煥 is different to the one of ⿰衤奐, it is not better to encode ⿰衤奐 as an IVD for 煥, either.

If UK were to HE U+2C862, it raises the concern of over-unification because U+2C862 is not intended as an error form of 煥, they have different shape and pronunciations.

The component 奐 is very productive while the 𪥌 component is rarely used (only 𪶓 and 𬡢) in encoded characters. Encoding ⿰衤奐 will offer a better unification "anchor" for any future variants if they are discovered.
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with Huang Junliang. Unifying to either 𬡢 or 煥 would be unsatisfactory for one or more of the evidence examples, so it is best to encode it.
02354
02354
牛 93.12.1
UK-30038
TS 16 · IDS
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Submission note: Evidence 3 gives ⿰牜⿱古幸, we think it is unifiable to ⿰牜辜 so we are proposing new UCV 辜/⿱古幸
00315
00315
匚 22.8.3
UK-30058
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04656
04656
鼠 208.8.2
UK-30059
TS 21 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+9F33
Unify to 鼳?

Consider cognition reconstruction?



▲ GHZR, p.5091
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Oppose unification as ⿺鼠具 is a stable error for U+9F33 within this source.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with Andrew's comment #294.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Currently we have UCV #139a.


Is it appropriate to expand it and unify to 鼳 (U+9F33)?
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
In my opinion the difference is too great to unify.
03427
03427
虫 142.11.2
UK-30063
VN-F050B
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04319
04319
鬼 194.7.2
UK-30072
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04311
04311
鬼 194.6.2
UK-30074
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04380
04380
鬼 194.14.1
UK-30075
TS 24 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02748
02748
示 113.9.1
UK-30080
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00874
00874
土 32.7.3
UK-30081
TS 10 · IDS 𭻾
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00337
00337
厂 27.7.1
UK-30092
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
01200
01200
山 46.6.1
UK-30097
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04389
04389
鬼 194.16.1
UK-30106
TS 26 · IDS
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
Suggest to change NUCV #294 to a UCV. 曆~暦 is a very common variation, and there are a large number of unencoded characters with 暦 etc. that correspond to encoded characters with 曆 etc.
02971
02971
糸 120.6.3
UK-30181
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00089
00089
二 7.8.3
UK-30217
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+88FD
Unifiable to 製?
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
No unification rule for 二 and 衣 ... the glyph difference is too great to consider unification.
04480
04480
鱼 195′.7.3
UK-30232
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04504
04504
鱼 195′.9.4
UK-30233
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
01776
01776
日 72.9.1
UK-30234
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00968
00968
土 32.18.5
UK-30238
TS 21 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03387
03387
虫 142.4.1
戈 62.6.2
UK-30248
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
01207
01207
山 46.6.3
UK-30261
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
01285
01285
山 46.13.3
UK-30300
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00407
00407
口 30.6.3
UK-30309
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04295
04295
鬲 193.15.1
UK-30315
TS 25 · IDS
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Suggest level 1 UCV for 鬲/𮫙.

Copied from the submission note:

Evidence 5 and 6 give ⿰⿱𮫙革成, unifiable with ⿰鞷成. ⿰鞷成 is a variant form of U+29AE8 𩫨. 《元始天王大洞玉經》55a gives the alternative form ⿰⿳一品幸烕 (not submitted). Consider introduce new UCV 鬲/𮫙.
02283
02283
火 86.14.4
UK-30319
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04370
04370
鬼 194.12.4
UK-30320
TS 22 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04127
04127
雨 173.21.1
UK-30325
TS 29 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02466
02466
瓜 97.10.2
UK-30327
TS 15 · IDS
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Extend UCV 354d (爪瓜) to include 𤓰
03727
03727
車 159.7.4
UK-30339
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03724
03724
車 159.7.3
UK-30340
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03745
03745
車 159.9.5
UK-30341
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03760
03760
車 159.12.2
UK-30342
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03778
03778
車 159.18.2
UK-30343
TS 25 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03736
03736
車 159.8.5
UK-30344
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03775
03775
車 159.15.3
UK-30345
T13-3F21
TS 22 · IDS
Unification
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unify with ws2024 03774 as they share a same evidence.
03774
03774
車 159.14.3
UK-30345
TS 21 · IDS
Unification
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unify with ws2024 03775 as they share a same evidence.
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03775
車 159.15.3
T13-3F21
TS 22 · IDS
Agree to unify to WS2024-03775 T13-3F21
03775
03775
車 159.15.3
UK-30345
T13-3F21
TS 22 · IDS
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03774
車 159.14.3
UK-30345
TS 21 · IDS
Agree to unify to WS2024-03774 UK-30345.
03705
03705
車 159.4.2
UK-30346
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03731
03731
車 159.8.2
UK-30347
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03755
03755
車 159.11.2
UK-30348
T13-3E7A
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03765
03765
車 159.12.5
UK-30349
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03756
03756
車 159.11.2
UK-30350
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03753
03753
車 159.11.1
UK-30351
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03749
03749
車 159.10.1
UK-30352
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03697
03697
車 159.1.1
UK-30353
TS 8 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03700
03700
車 159.3.1
UK-30354
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03766
03766
車 159.12.5
UK-30355
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03744
03744
車 159.9.4
UK-30356
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03739
03739
車 159.9.2
UK-30357
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03720
03720
車 159.7.1
UK-30358
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03718
03718
車 159.6.5
UK-30359
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03762
03762
車 159.12.4
UK-30362
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03713
03713
車 159.5.4
UK-30363
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03732
03732
車 159.8.2
UK-30364
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03734
03734
車 159.8.4
UK-30365
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03750
03750
車 159.10.1
UK-30366
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03769
03769
車 159.13.2
UK-30367
TS 20 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03773
03773
車 159.14.2
UK-30368
TS 21 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03709
03709
車 159.4.4
UK-30369
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03771
03771
車 159.13.3
UK-30370
TS 20 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03740
03740
車 159.9.2
UK-30371
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03725
03725
車 159.7.3
UK-30385
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02458
02458
玉 96.15.3
UK-30408
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04162
04162
頁 181.9.4
UK-30411
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03475
03475
衣 145.10.4
UK-30413
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00930
00930
土 32.11.4
UK-30417
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02700
02700
石 112.10.4
UK-30421
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02196
02196
水 85.18.5
UK-30426
TS 21 · IDS
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Suggest UCV for 彝/𢑱/𢑴/彛.

Copied from the submission note:

Evidence 3 shows ⿰氵𢑴, evidence 4 shows ⿰氵彛, evidence 5 and evidence 6 show ⿰氵𢑱; they are all potentially unifiable variants of ⿰氵彝 given by evidence 1 and 2
02662
02662
石 112.5.1
UK-30441
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02551
02551
疒 104.18.1
UK-30448
TS 23 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03379
03379
虍 141.9.1
UK-30460
TS 15 · IDS
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Evidence 1 shows the glyph as ⿸⿻王⿰丿乛耎, but I trust it is unifiable with the glyph shown on Evidence 2.

Add ⿻王⿰丿乛, U+2D170 𭅰, U+2E4D7 𮓗, U+2D16F 𭅯, U+2CEC9 𬻉 to UCV #311 as lv. 1.
U+2D170
U+2E4D7
U+2D16F
U+2CEC9
00582
00582
口 30.12.1
UK-30461
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02478
02478
瓦 98.20.2
UK-30466
TS 25 · IDS
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Per submission note: Evidence 7 to 10 give ⿰𦉍瓦, potentially unifiable with ⿰罌瓦 in other evidences. Consider UCV level 1 for 𦉍/罌.

Unencoded cognate pairs:

U+26266 𦉦 = U+24AE1 𤫡 = ⿰王𦉍 B03502-006
01229
01229
山 46.8.1
UK-30501
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04594
04594
鸟 196′.8.3
UK-30504
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04547
04547
鳥 196.8.3
UK-30505
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03223
03223
舟 137.8.3
UK-30513
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02099
02099
水 85.8.5
UK-30529
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03358
03358
艸 140.16.1
UK-30560
TS 20 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04273
04273
马 187′.13.2
UK-30564
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02325
02325
片 91.5.1
瓦 98.4.3
UK-30574
TS 9 · IDS
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Copied from the submission note:

Evidence 1 gives ⿰片𭺛; evidence 2 gives ⿰片𭺜, normalized to ⿰片瓦. Consider extending UCV #439 to include 𭺛 and 𭺜.
00920
00920
土 32.11.2
UK-30590
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
U+83BD
UCV #490 莽莾
Unify to 𭏫 (U+2D3EB)?
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+2D3EB
Unification to 𭏫 (U+2D3EB) seems reasonable. Suggest to withdraw UK-30590, and horizontally extend to U+2D3EB, but as all evidences show ⿰土⿱艹㚏 rather than ⿰土⿱艹𬌪, change UK glyph to ⿰土⿱艹㚏.
02715
02715
石 112.12.4
UK-30655
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02583
02583
皿 108.5.1
UK-30696
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03003
03003
糸 120.12.4
UK-30742
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03920
03920
金 167.13.2
鼎 206.3.8
UK-30776
TS 21 · IDS
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Per original evidences, suggest level 1 UCV for

鼎/𣇓/𪔂/⿶㇯𪔂目日.

Cognate but currently disunified pairs:

U+85A1 薡 = U+26F4D 𦽍
01185
01185
山 46.4.3
UK-30800
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04642
04642
黑 203.4.2
UK-30802
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02757
02757
示 113.11.1
UK-30819
TS 16 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar to 䙔 (U+4654) but not cognate. 礻 is semantically the correct radical, therefore do not unify.
00770
00770
口 30.19.2
UK-30854
TS 22 · IDS
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Consider new UCV for 甖 and ⿱䀠瓦 (cf. suggested UCV for 罌 and 𦉍).

There are no existing encoded characters with ⿱䀠瓦, although SJ/T 11239—2001 37-75 is ⿰石⿱䀠瓦 (but no corresponding encoded form ⿰石甖).
00540
00540
口 30.11.1
UK-30892
VN-F1FE3
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02956
02956
米 119.13.2
UK-30951
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02168
02168
水 85.13.3
UK-30953
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
04113
04113
雨 173.16.1
UK-30962
TS 24 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00957
00957
土 32.15.1
UK-30972
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
01498
01498
心 61.11.2
UK-30991
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02098
02098
水 85.8.4
UK-30994
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02692
02692
石 112.9.4
UK-30995
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02127
02127
水 85.10.4
UTC-00777
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+6ECB
This is already the U-source form of U+6ECB 滋, so UTC should submit a disunification proposal if they believe that ⿰氵玆 was incorrectly unified to 滋 (U+6ECB) (personally, I think the unification is correct).
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
This ideograph is a disunification of U+6ECB 滋 that also affects U+FA99 滋. If accepted, the kIRG_KPSource property value of U+FA99, KP1-52B4, should be moved to the new code point, the kIRG_KPSource property value of U+FA99 should be changed to KPU-0FA99, and the kIRG_USource property value of U+6ECB, UTC-00777, should be removed.

Note that disunifications have been processed via previous IRG working sets, which is why the UTC decided to submit this ideograph. UTC-01159, UTC-01162, and UTC-02972 in IRG Working Set 2017 served as precedents.
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+6ECB
玆 and 茲 have often been used interchangeably in later periods. The following four pieces of evidence are provided for reference. Based on this, it is suggested to keep the unification with 滋 and ⿰氵玆.

(1)李守奎,〈古音研究中應當注意的幾個文字問題〉,《饒宗頤國學院院刊》第六期,2019年8月,p.178-181.


(2) 《漢語大字典》亠部「玆」, P316-317.


(3)《玉篇》(嘉慶19年重修本)卷之一 平聲.七之.津之切,”[⿰氵玆]……說文益也。…..”


(4) MOE Variant Dict. A02274-008 :
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Per the details in document IRG N2785, the UTC formally withdraws the withdraw of this ideograph, and requests that it be added back to the M Set.
03779
03779
车 159′.0.0
UTC-00792
TS 4 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8F66
Unify to 车.

As a character, they may be unifiable. May submit as a supplementary radical-component.
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
My personal opinion is that until someone—or a member body—prepares and submits a formal proposal to create a new CJK Components (or similar) block, we should continue to encode radical-like components as CJK Unified Ideographs.
04541
04541
鳥 196.6.1
UTC-03116
VN-F0696
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02739
02739
示 113.7.2
UTC-03242
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
01013
01013
大 37.11.1
UTC-03244
TS 14 · IDS 𠦝
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2D16A
In the fourth evidence, the fanqie 古旦反 suggests that it is a variant of 幹. The U+2D16A 𭅪 is also a variant of 幹. Suggest unify to 𭅪 as long as they are cognate.
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed to unification if they are indeed cognate.
02984
02984
糸 120.9.1
UTC-03245
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+7E20
Unify to 縠 (U+7E20), and change NUCV #264a to a UCV.
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+7E20
Agree to unify with 縠 (U+7E20).
03260
03260
艸 140.6.5
UTC-03247
TS 10 · IDS 𢑑
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2C72E
Unify to 𬜮 (U+2C72E).

See GB 18030—2022, 0x9932BD36
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2C72E
U+84AD
Unify to 𬜮 (U+2C72E) as they are both variants of 蒭, with horizontal extension from UTC and/or China.
03132
03132
聿 129.0.0
UTC-03248
TS 6 · IDS 𦘒
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+807F
Unify to 聿.

As a character, they may be unifiable.
[書] = ⿱ [聿] [日(者)].
[畫] = ⿱ [聿?𬚪?] [画(田?周?)].
[晝] = ⿱ [聿] [日].
May submit as a supplementary radical-component.
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
My personal opinion is that until someone—or a member body—prepares and submits a formal proposal to create a new CJK Components (or similar) block, we should continue to encode radical-like components as CJK Unified Ideographs.
02976
02976
糸 120.8.1
UTC-03249
TS 14 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
This ideograph is a disunification of U+7DF4 練 that also affects U+FAB0 練. If accepted, the kIRG_KPSource property value of U+FAB0, KP1-671B, should be moved to the new code point, and the kIRG_KPSource property value of U+FAB0 should be changed to KPU-0FAB0. As with the most recent disunification, Japan will not want to move the kIRG_JSource property value of U+7DF4, J0-4E7D, to the new code point due to compatibility concerns.

Note that disunifications have been processed via previous IRG working sets, which is why the UTC decided to submit this ideograph. UTC-01159, UTC-01162, and UTC-02972 in IRG Working Set 2017 served as precedents.
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Per the details in document IRG N2785, the UTC formally withdraws the withdraw of this ideograph, and requests that it be added back to the M Set.
01871
01871
木 75.5.1
UTC-03250
TS 9 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
This ideograph is a disunification of U+233D5 𣏕 that also affects U+FAD1 𣏕. If accepted, the kIRG_KPSource property value of U+FAD1, KP1-4B26, should be moved to the new code point, and the kIRG_KPSource property value of U+FAD1 should be changed to KPU-0FAD1.

Note that disunifications have been processed via previous IRG working sets, which is why the UTC decided to submit this ideograph. UTC-01159, UTC-01162, and UTC-02972 in IRG Working Set 2017 served as precedents.
01386
01386
彐 58.0.0
UTC-03251
TS 3 · IDS 𠃍
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
This ideograph is a disunification of U+5F50 彐 and U+2B739 𫜹.

Note that disunifications have been processed via previous IRG working sets, which is why the UTC decided to submit this ideograph. UTC-01159, UTC-01162, and UTC-02972 in IRG Working Set 2017 served as precedents.
02210
02210
火 86.4.3
UTC-03275
TS 8 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03614
03614
贝 154′.14.2
UTC-03291
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00381
00381
口 30.3.5
UTC-03296
TS 6 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
To mirror Vietnam's comments in 02657, this ideograph should not be unified with 𠯇 (U+20BC7), because the phonetic components, 己 (kỷ) and 已 (dĩ), are very different. UTC-03296 would therefore be non-cognate with U+20BC7 in Vietnamese.
02657
02657
石 112.3.5
UTC-03297
TS 8 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Should probably not be unified with 𥐦 (U+25426) because the phonetic components, 己 (kỷ) and 已 (dĩ) are very different. UTC-03297 would be non-cognate with U+25426 in Vietnamese.
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with Comment #611.
02058
02058
水 85.3.1
UTC-03333
VN-F1E08
TS 6 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02063
02063
水 85.4.4
UTC-03335
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
01861
01861
月 74.52.4
UTC-03340
TS 56 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Support unification. The difference between the two forms of this character is the same as the difference between the regional forms of e.g. U+6220 戠 and U+6222 戢 (G forms extend the horizontal stroke of the left component into the 戈, but T forms have separate components). We should add a UCV for this variation.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The unification has been discussed in IRG meeting before and the decision was that it should be encoded seperately.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
IRGN2622 IRG61MiscEditorialReport, item 8:
Hongmen character unification (IRGN2634 Wang Xieyang)
The editors considered these CJK unified characters and thus they could be submitted to IRG for future extension.

To respect the procedure, this should be brought out al least before submission. If not, they should be treated as UNIFIED ideographs based on my comments in IRGN2634. The reasons why it should be seperately encoded was stated clearly and agreed by IRG.
UCV
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
If the IRG decides to unify, a new UCV should be added per Comment #305.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
I have pointed out clearly that the abstract shape of the two characters are the same in IRGN2634. Meanwhile, I have pointed out clearly that because both two characters have stable glyphs in long enough time, they should not be unified.
The suggestions in IRGN2634 have been discussed in detail in IRG meeting #61 and agreed by experts. It is not resonable at all that this two characters are unified later because of the same abstract shape.
Unification
John Knightley
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
All the editorial report in IRG61 said was that the characters could be submitted, it did not say that they could not be unified.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The editorial report clearly states that they are CJK unified characters. You can't just focus on the the second half of the sentence ignoring the first half.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The connection of 戈 is important for complex Hongmen characters. The origins of them are different. All complex Hongmen characters originate from the following thing:

Hongmen characters with 戈 conencted are directly transformed to Kai Form from the original shape.
Hongmen characters with 戈 unconencted are written in Kai form based on its abstract shape.
Hongmen characters with 戈 conencted or unconencted are prefered by different people in different regions with various meanings.
The UTC-03340 and UTC-03342 looks similar because we have normalized the glyphs of existing Hongmen characters:

Both UTC-03340 and UTC-03342 are one of the earliest forms of Hongmen characters to appear in books. This is also reasonable because the two kind of origins. The two glyphs are important for academical studies.
We are not interested in encoding them all. To avoid controversy, we normalized the glyphs, asked IRG for advice, and then submitted them.
It is not fair at all to deny my efforts on studying these characters without reading the related document. And procedurelly, they should not be unified with a reason I have already clearly stated a year ago. It is even acceptable to bring the discussion up again before the submission of IRG WS2024.
But after the submission, any objection should not be proved by IRG, let alone an objection based on clearly stated and discussed issues. It is just unacceptable.

{{IRG N2634 https://www.unicode.org/irg/docs/n2634-ComplexHongmenIdeographs.pdf}}
An article in Chinese introducing the Hongmen characters is attached as feedback. Experts can read it if you are interested.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The reason why UTC-03340 and UTC-03342 should be disunified was clearly stated in the document and was agreed by IRG:

Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
I think there has been a fundamental misunderstanding of the text in the editorial report.

The editorial report only indicated that these Hongmen Characters are CJK Unified Ideographs, i.e. they are not symbols.

There is no mention in the editorial report that the classification system proposed in the IRGN2634 was accepted as-is.

There is no golden status conferred to characters which are first initiated through a proposal from an individual contributor and characters which are submitted by member bodiesl

As part of the discussion process, IRG always has the right to amend or overturn its previous decisions upon discussion if there is unanimous agreement, or shall the need arise, a vote.

For example, IRG revises its unification rules (i.e. UCV/NUCV) every meeting. The PnP itself has also been revised many times.

It is not possible to claim that since IRG agreed to accept them as CJK Unified Ideographs, then they must be encoded without unification and without further discussion.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
I don't think I misunderstand the text in the editorial report. The title of my proposal is "Suggestions on unifying complex Hongmen related ideographs". The decisions in editorial report should absolutely a response to the unification. There is no problem at all to say IRG accepted the unification rules based on the text in the editorial report.
And it is acceptable to make a "further discussion" for me, what is not acceptable is that the further discussion is brought out based on a clearly stated and discussed issue. You can't just say yes to a thing in the past but say no to the same thing without any new reasons. This will be not acceptable in the standardization work.
Unification
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
I don’t think end users are going to distinguish different forms of this character in running text. They are only distinguished when they are symbols at the most. I suggest only encoding one traditional form and one simplified form of the character. And if you really find the distinction important, you can always either register for an IVD or submit a proposal to WG2/Unicode for encoding as CJK Symbols.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Although UTC-03340 and UTC-03342 have a very similar glyph, I suggest not to unify UTC-03340 and UTC-03342 based on the following three reasons:
1. The unconnected 戈 is a very important structure in the evolution of complex Hongmen Ideographs. An obvious unconnected 戈 component makes it possible that it can be replaced by other components such as 刂,丁,才,寸,etc.

The 刂 of 𰻞(U+30EDE) actually orginates from 戈 because the meanings of 戈 and 刂 are related to each other. If the 戈 was not written out, the 𰻞(U+30EDE) won't exist.
Meanwhile, no case of including 刂,丁,才,寸,etc as components is found when there is a connected 戈.
2. The UTC-03340 is the most common form of 贼 used in 四川(Sichuan) and shuar used in 北京(Beijing), but UTC-03342 is the first complex Hongmen Ideograph that is included in the publications. Both shapes are important.
3. According to IRG N2770R, the meanings of UTC-03340 and UTC-03342 are not overlapping with each other. In other similar cases, this always means disunification.
01858
01858
月 74.31.4
UTC-03341
TS 35 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Support unification. The difference between the two forms of this character is the same as the difference between the regional forms of e.g. U+6220 戠 and U+6222 戢 (G forms extend the horizontal stroke of the left component into the 戈, but T forms have separate components). We should add a UCV for this variation.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The unification has been discussed in IRG meeting before and the decision was that it should be encoded seperately.
IRGN2622 IRG61MiscEditorialReport, item 8:
Hongmen character unification (IRGN2634 Wang Xieyang)
The editors considered these CJK unified characters and thus they could be submitted to IRG for future extension.

To respect the procedure, this should be brought out al least before submission. If not, they should be treated as UNIFIED ideographs based on my comments in IRGN2634. The reasons why it should be seperately encoded was stated clearly and agreed by IRG.
UCV
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
If the IRG decides to unify, a new UCV should be added per Comment #306.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
01860
01860
月 74.32.5
UTC-03348
TS 36 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The unification has been discussed in IRG meeting before and the decision was that it should be encoded seperately.
IRGN2622 IRG61MiscEditorialReport, item 8:
Hongmen character unification (IRGN2634 Wang Xieyang)
The editors considered these CJK unified characters and thus they could be submitted to IRG for future extension.

To respect the procedure, this should be brought out al least before submission. If not, they should be treated as UNIFIED ideographs based on my comments in IRGN2634. The reasons why it should be seperately encoded was stated clearly and agreed by IRG.
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
While I agree that the abstract shape is the same, there is a significant structural difference that requires discussion before unification can be considered.
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
No unification rule. If related UCV is added, then acceptable.
02072
02072
水 85.6.1
UTC-03350
TS 9 · IDS 𠧗
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unified to 𣳓 (U+23CD3).
U+23CD3
03266
03266
艸 140.7.3
UTC-03353
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2C73B
Suggest unification with 𬜻.

U+2C73B


There is only one stroke difference between ⿳艹从干 and 𬜻 + VS17:



We can add a new IVD for 𬜻.
02782
02782
禾 115.5.3
UTC-03358
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
I agree with the potential unification, but it needs to be discussed.
01580
01580
手 64.6.3
UTC-03359
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+22B27
The shape of the submitted character is almost exactly like 𢬧(U+22B27), so it's recommended to unify it with 𢬧 (U+22B27).
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
It may be difficult to prove that these two ideographs are cognate.
Unification
TAO Yang
China
U+62DC
Unify to 拜 (U+62DC).
01619
01619
手 64.9.3
UTC-03360
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2D87D
Unify to 𭡽 (U+2D87D) with new UCV ?
02361
02361
犬 94.4.5
UTC-03362
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+72C3
Unification to 狃 (U+72C3) with new UCV 丑 and 丒?
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Two existing cases of disunification exist:

U+247C1 𤟁 (Extension B, TF-3076) = U+5CF1 峱
U+2B788 𫞈 (Extension D, JH-JTB2FC) = U+677B 杻

⿰糹丒 is currently not coded but can be found at https://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=33170:


⿰金丒 is currently not coded but can be found at https://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=47095:
UCV
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
A new UCV requires discussion.
02839
02839
穴 116.11.1
UTC-03364
TS 16 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unified to 𡑣 (U+21463).
U+21463
03289
03289
艸 140.9.2
UTC-03369
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+853B
Unify to 蔻 (U+853B) ?
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Disagree with unification.
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]

After the horizontal extension by J-source, this would be an exact match.
01312
01312
工 48.0.0
UTC-03377
TS 2 · IDS 𠃍
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+5DE5
unify to 工?

The Japanese reading of this character is コウ, which is the same as 工.
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+5DE5
The single piece of evidence provided does not convince me that this character should be separately encoded. If, as suspected, this is a variant form of 工 then it would be most appropriate to deal with it using IVS. Note that the much more common variant of 工 with a zig-zag middle stroke was not considered suitable for separate encoding, and is registered in the IVD for the Adobe and Hanyo-Denshi collections.
UCV
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
If the IRG unifies, UCV #408 needs to be updated.

Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The person who submitted this ideograph to the UTC pointed out that U+2B7B9 in the Extension D block is a disunification example. My own checking found that U+2D5FB in the Extension F block, which appears to be cognate with 巠 (U+5DE0) according to the Moji Jōhō Kiban database, is another example.

U+2B7B9

U+2D5FB

U+5DE0
00815
00815
囗 31.1.4
UTC-03393
TS 4 · IDS
Oppose Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Non-cognate with 𠮚 (U+20B9A), even the shape looks similar. The outer part of this character is 囗, but the outer part of U+20B9A is 口.
Oppose Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unicode does not encode *glyphs* but *characters*.
Oppose Unification
L F CHENG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The radical is different, and the submitted evidence shows the dot written non-centered, in various alignments.
Oppose Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The two 机s are non-cognate but they have the same *abstract shape* as ⿰{木}{几}. However, ⿴口丶 and ⿴囗丶 do not, even their *absolute shape* are not identical but just similar. Additionally, ⿴囗丶 also has the Q-like shape according to one of the evidences, you could not determine the character identity just from one of the possible absolute shape, which is the same issue as the relationship between {月(月)}, {月(肉)}, {月(舟)}, {月(丹)} and {月(冃)}.
Oppose Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Also agree with #3123 that the radical difference is enough to show they are two different *characters*.
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Wang Xieyang quoted the relevant sentence of the PnP in comment #3120: "Ideographs with different glyph shapes that are unrelated in historical derivation (non-cognate characters) are not unified no matter how similar their glyph shapes may be". In this case the outer box of UTC-03393 should be noticeably larger than the outer box of U+20B9A.

This my implementation of the two characters in my BabelStone Han and BabelStone Han PUA fonts, with the two characters clearly distinguished (although still easily confusable):

Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with the disunification.
In China, people often write 国 as 囗. ⿴囗丶 is just a version with another dot. The dot represents the compnent that is simplified. I think the position of the dot doesn't matter.
01605
01605
手 64.8.3
UTC-03401
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
02861
02861
竹 118.5.1
UTC-03402
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
02858
竹 118.5.1
GCW-00187
TS 11 · IDS
Need to resolve unification to WS2024-02858 GCW-00187
04497
04497
鱼 195′.8.4
UTC-03419
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
04511
04511
鱼 195′.10.3
UTC-03426
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
04522
04522
鱼 195′.12.5
UTC-03438
TS 20 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
01205
01205
山 46.6.2
UTC-03450
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2722A
Unify to 𧈪.

Evidence #1 supports variant of 蚩. Evidence #2 does not support variant of 蚩.
Fanqie data in evidence #2 shows 丑善翻.
Shuowen: [𧈪] (丑善切) 蟲曳行也. 从虫屮聲. 讀若騁. (phonetic symbol 屮)
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
蚩(U+86A9),说文:从虫,𡳿(之, not 屮)聲. 蟲也。Reading chi1 nowadays, used mainly in a name 蚩尤.
𧈪(U+2722A),说文:从虫,屮聲. 蟲申行也. Reading chan3 nowadays, used mainly in Wu dialect(吴语) meaning stretching.
In a nutshell, 蚩(U+86A9) and 𧈪(U+2722A) are non-cognate.
Evidence 1 shows that ⿱山虫 is a variant of 蚩. Evidence 2 shows that ⿱山虫 is a variant of 𧈪(U+2722A). In this circumstance, it will be reluctant to unify it neither to 蚩(U+86A9) nor 𧈪(U+2722A).
So my suggestion would be not to unify.
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
If they are non-cognate, they should not be unified.
02638
02638
目 109.16.1
UTC-03478
TS 21 · IDS 𰤷
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+77D1
Unify to 矑 (U+77D1) which is the form that Evidence 2 seems to show.
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+77D1
I also agree to unify to 矑 (U+77D1). As the co-author of the original proposal to add this character to UAX#45, when preparing the proposal, I have already told the first author that this character would most likely to be unified, and I suggest U-source just do an horizontal extension.
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with unification.
03680
03680
足 157.14.1
UTC-03479
TS 21 · IDS 𧾷𠪨
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8E94
Unify to 躔 (U+8E94) with new UCV?
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with #83
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8E94
I also agree to unify to 躔 (U+8E94). As the co-author of the original proposal to add this character to UAX#45, when preparing the proposal, I have already told the first author that this character would most likely to be unified, and I suggest U-source just do an horizontal extension.
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with unification.
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
[WS2021-04782]

The proposed UCV 廛/𠪨 was also discussed in the link above. For reference here is Kushim's comment in that thread on the application rate of this UCV:

<blockquote>

For 𠪨~廛:
𧓋 (C12501) ~ 𧔊 (C12501-001)
𧸪 (C13655-002) ~ 𧸳 (C13655)
𨞬 ~ 鄽 (GHZR: 4054.04)
⿰金𠪨 (C15168-002) ~ 𨮻 (C15168)
⿰𧾷𠪨 (B04971-005) ~ 躔 (B04971)
⿵門𠪨 (C15366-001) ~ 𨷠 (TB-2215) 𨷭 (TB-2219)
⿺走𠪨 (C13847-002) ~ 𧾡 (C13847)
So it's okay to add UCV 𠪨~廛.

</blockquote>

In IRG #61, there were different opinions about this UCV. It will be great if we can reach consensus this time.
03954
03954
門 169.3.1
UTC-03480
TS 11 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Not unified to 䦍.

Many other versions of 蒙古秘史 shows 䦍 instead of |⿵門兀| in 額䦍迭訥 (Mongolian e'üden-ü), with its phonetic symbol 乞. Here we believe that cognition reconstruction has occurred, where the phonetic symbol has been changed to 兀.
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with Comment #142.
04658
04658
鼠 208.9.1
UTC-03486
TS 19 · IDS 𣆨𮧓
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unify to UTC-03485 ⿺鼠革 -- Evidence 2 shows that ⿺𣆨𮧓 is a variant of ⿺鼠革
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with unification.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
04659
04659
鼠 208.16.1
UTC-03487
TS 26 · IDS 𣆨丿𰤷
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2A58C
Unify to 𪖌 (U+2A58C) -- Evidence 2 seems to show ⿺鼠盧
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2A58C
I also agree to unify to 𪖌 (U+2A58C). As the co-author of the original proposal to add this character to UAX#45, when preparing the proposal, I have already told the first author that this character would most likely to be unified, and I suggest U-source just do an horizontal extension.
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with unification.
00108
00108
夕 36.2.3
V4-4523
TS 5 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Not unify to 㒱 (U+34B1).

㒱 reads as 몽, which is the variant of 夢, non-cognate.
人 and 入 are not the UCV rule now, but we can add them to UCV as Lv. 2.
00248
00248
冫 15.12.3
VN-F004D
TS 14 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unified to WS2021-00110:VN-F164A ⿰二為.
00398
00398
口 30.5.5
VN-F007E
TS 8 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+20C99
Unify to 𠲙 (U+20C99) and horizontally extend VN-F007E.
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The Vietnamese is clearly not cognate with 𠲙 (U+20C99) and the shapes are not identical. Better to keep separate.
00974
00974
士 33.10.3
VN-F0117
TS 13 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unify to 𪻾 (U+2AEFE)
U+2AEFE
01235
01235
山 46.8.3
VN-F0159
TS 11 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unified to U+3168A 𱚊
U+3168A
01461
01461
心 61.7.3
VN-F01B3
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
01459
心 61.7.3
KC-10088
TC-5726
TS 11 · IDS
Per #328, this should be unified with WS2024-01459 (WS2024-01460 was already unified with that ideograph)
01492
01492
心 61.10.5
VN-F01CA
TS 13 · IDS
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Add ⿸尸⿱龷𧘇 and 展 to UCV
01522
01522
心 61.14.3
VN-F01D5
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
01558
01558
手 64.2.1
VN-F01E4
TS 5 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
01656
01656
手 64.12.3
VN-F0226
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
02090
02090
水 85.8.2
VN-F02DB
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+6332
U+6469
Unify to 挲 (U+6332)? The evidence shows the Vietnamese word “ma sa”, that means 摩挲. There is no V-Source under U+6332 挲, maybe it is OK to do the horizontal extension to U+6332 挲 if IRG agrees, or add it to IVD in future.
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
As you can see both in the GĐNHV example above and in this image from KCHN, Vietnam uses both forms. Not sure it's a good idea to unify, even if there is semantic overlap

02144
02144
水 85.11.4
VN-F02E4
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+30736
Unify to 𰜶 (U+30736). (UCV #307d)
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
U+30736
This should have been unified with 𰜶 (U+30736) and withdrawn
02635
02635
目 109.14.1
VN-F03B6
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02640
02640
目 109.16.5
VN-F03B9
TS 21 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]

Unify to WS2021-02721:VN-F1A6D per UCV #272.



Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Agree with unification
02669
02669
石 112.6.4
VN-F03C2
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
02868
02868
竹 118.7.4
VN-F040A
TS 13 · IDS 𣲭
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+6ED7
Unify to 滗?

The evidence shows the variant is 潷 and the Putonghua/Mandarin reading is bì.
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
U+6ED7
The meaning is "drain dry", which is similar to 滗 (U+6ED7), “xế” is a native word, so this a case where a variant of 滗 was borrowed for its meaning. Unification should be appropriate.
03243
03243
艸 140.3.1
VN-F04D4
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Still pending unification.
03301
03301
艸 140.10.1
VN-F04E6
TS 14 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Similar but not unified to 𱣿 (U+318FF)

U+318FF 𱣿 reads as lác, this character reads as cách, non-cognates.
See WS2017-01736
[ {{WS2017-01736}} ]
03323
03323
艸 140.12.2
VN-F04F4
TS 16 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Similar but not unified to 噧 (U+5667)
U+5667
03329
03329
艸 140.13.1
VN-F04F7
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
U+8548
蕈 (U+8548). Same semantic, very similar shape
03621
03621
赤 155.12.1
VN-F056E
TS 19 · IDS
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰公隹 has not been encoded, but we can add ⿰公隹 and 雄 as UCV pair. ⿰公隹 is OK to encode separately later.
UCV
LI Yuan
SAT
As Eiso mentioned in #8545, it may be necessary to add the following UCV: ⿰公隹 and 雄.
03637
03637
足 157.5.2
VN-F0573
TS 12 · IDS 𧾷
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
LI Yuan
SAT
Agree with comment #341.
03963
03963
門 169.9.4
VN-F0606
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03990
03990
邑 163.4.3
VN-F060A
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+90A6
Unify to 邦 (U+90A6).

The evidences show ⿰龵阝 which should be unifiable with 邦 (U+90A6) without a doubt.

See U+26C25 (Ext B):

Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Oppose unification, and suggest that China horizontally extend ⿰龵阝 to this character.
00323
00323
十 24.8.4
八 12.8.1
VN-F07DD
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+213A2
Unify to 𡎢 (U+213A2). The reading ngồi suggests that this is an error form of 𡎢, and unless there is additional evidence that it is a stable error found in multiple sources I suggest that it is postponed.
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Likely an error form, but enshrined in a published standard: Kho chữ nôm mã hoá.

00169
00169
人 9.13.2
VN-F165E
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
00765
00765
口 30.18.3
VN-F1706
TS 21 · IDS
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
UCV #213a
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2114E
Agree. Unify to 𡅎 (U+2114E) by UCV #213a.
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2114E is non-cognate with VN-F1706. U+2114E is read "tróm" (lacking teeth) and VN-F1706 "rầm" (mumble, thunder)
02675
02675
石 112.7.4
VN-F1E0C
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03408
03408
虫 142.7.3
VN-F1E10
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2E514
Unify to 𮔔 (U+2E514) by UCV #149
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2E514
Agree with unification 𮔔 (U+2E514) . We will withdraw this.
01777
01777
日 72.9.1
VN-F1F8A
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+3189D
Unify to 𱢝 (U+3189D).

[ {{WS2017-01618}} ]


Taberd (p. 417): 𱢝, Rày, hoc tempore “[Latin] at this time”. 𱢝旦, đến rày, usque nunc “[Latin] until now”.
The phonetic symbol is 例>𡿪 (*RAT). And the semantic part is 旦.

中国京语词典 (p. 43): ⿱旦例, rai2, 今日, 今天 “[Chinese] today”.
01489
01489
心 61.10.3
VN-F1FB8
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2BEB1
Unify to 𫺱 (U+2BEB1).
Suggest to add ⿱匕⿺㇉一 and 𪟽 as UCV Lv.1 due to the cognition (both the simplified form of 疑, also see the small character in the parenthesis next to the character entry). It seems that the former one is preferred by the Jing nationality (京族) in China and the latter one is preferred by people in Vietnam. I do not think we need to encode both shapes separately.
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The shapes are too different to recognize as identical. If we are going to arbitrarily equate simplified components based on interchangeability, then we should apply that across the board, including 馬/马, 金/钅, etc.
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+99AC
U+91D1
The two structures have a strict correspondence, and we could treat them as only glyph variants. That is a very different situation from 馬/马, 金/钅, etc. See the colors below.
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The point is not that we can derive correspondences, we can similarly derive correspondences from 馬 to 马, 鳥 to 鸟, etc. But, if we are going to say that because we can derive correspondences between glyphs that on the surface look quite different, then we should start using stronger unification that includes traditional and simplified. I don't think people want that, so the same treatment should be applied to simplified forms in languages other than Chinese used in the PRC.
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The question is, how to define “quite different”? They are both the simplified forms of the same character, not the simplified-traditional relationship. What is more, the correspondence works between strokes but not components; however, 馬 obviously has a lot more strokes than 马, you cannot simply establish such a correspondence.

For example, do you think that
04658
鼠 208.9.1
UTC-03486
TS 19 · IDS 𣆨𮧓
and
04657
鼠 208.9.1
UTC-03485
TS 22 · IDS
look “quite different”?
01730
01730
日 72.4.1
VN-F1FF7
TS 8 · IDS
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
01733
日 72.4.2
VN-F0259
TS 8 · IDS 𪟽
Unify to WS2024-01733.
01733
日 72.4.2
VN-F0259
TS 8 · IDS 𪟽

Suggest to add ⿱匕⿺㇉一 and 𪟽 as UCV Lv.1 due to the cognition (both the simplified form of 疑, also see the small character in the parenthesis next to the character entry). It seems that the former one is preferred by the Jing nationality (京族) in China and the latter one is preferred by people in Vietnam. I do not think we need to encode both shapes separately.
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The shapes are too different to recognize as identical.
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
See #4776.
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
https://hc.jsecs.org/irg/ws2024/app/?id=01489
01437
01437
心 61.4.1
VN-F1FFC
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+2AAE2
Unify to 𪫢 (U+2AAE2).
Suggest to add ⿱匕⿺㇉一 and 𪟽 as UCV Lv.1 due to the cognition (both the simplified form of 疑, also see the small character in the parenthesis next to the character entry). It seems that the former one is preferred by the Jing nationality (京族) in China and the latter one is preferred by people in Vietnam. I do not think we need to encode both shapes separately.
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The shapes are too different to recognize as identical.
Unification
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
See #4776. https://hc.jsecs.org/irg/ws2024/app/?id=01489
01691
01691
手 64.23.5
VN-F2041
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
01606
01606
手 64.8.3
VN-F20DF
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
02054
02054
气 84.9.4
VN-F2173
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+28540
consider unifying to 𨕀 (U+28540)

Both are the vulgar term for sexual intercourse, and the readings are both địt. Based on the current evidence, the phonetic element is 迭, and the semantic element is 气.

We can consider using this V glyph and RS, TS, IDS for U+28540 𨕀, but keep V2-7A3B as the V-Source reference if unified.
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
U+8FED
U+28540
The original source reference for V2-7A3B is Vũ Văn Kính, "Tự Điển Chữ Nôm", p. 272, shown in the image below. As you can see, the phonetic is 迭 (điệt). So, the current shape of U+28540 is incorrect. Unification will be acceptable if we change the shape of U+28540 to VN-F2173.

01145
01145
尸 44.3.1
VN-F2458
TS 6 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+21C31
U+5C3C
Consider possible unification to 𡰱 (U+21C31) as both are variant forms of U+5C3C 尼


Attributes

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
01734
01734
日 72.4.3
GCA-I0006
TS 10 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=8
03520
03520
讠 149′.7.1
GCA-I0009
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 149.1 (讠)
03601
03601
贝 154′.2.2
GCA-J0023
TS 6 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
04602
04602
鸟 196′.10.1
GCA-J0159
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
11
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
16
04621
04621
卤 197′.8.2
GCA-T0002
TS 15 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
3
01640
01640
手 64.11.1
GCCPP-00006
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The right component is also submitted in WS2024:

03272
艸 140.7.5
土 32.8.2
UK-30578
TS 11 · IDS


If both of them are accepted for encoding, the IDS of this character should be updated to ⿰扌WS2024-03272.
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
01641
01641
手 64.11.1
GCCPP-00007
TS 14 · IDS 𬜯
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
02918
02918
竹 118.17.2
GCCPP-00016
TS 23 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
18
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
24
03664
03664
足 157.9.3
GCCPP-00031
TS 16 · IDS 𧾷
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=10, TS=17
#26b, IRGN2221
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
Agree with comment #3306.
00022
00022
一 1.10.3
宀 40.8.1
GCW-00002
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Add the secondary radical as 40.0 (宀)? SC=8, FS=1
00029
00029
一 1.15.3
水 85.14.1
GCW-00004
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=16, TS=17
00037
00037
丨 2.4.2
见 147′.1.2
GCW-00005
TS 5 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿽见丨
00048
00048
丶 3.2.5
GCW-00006
TS 3 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿹了丶
00249
00249
几 16.3.2
GCW-00019
TS 5 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱𠘧口
00830
00830
土 32.3.4
GCW-00034
TS 6 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰土⿱亠㇁
01162
01162
尸 44.16.3
GCW-00101
TS 19 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰尾童
01196
01196
山 46.6.1
GCW-00112
TS 9 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=7
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=10
01237
01237
山 46.8.4
GCW-00123
TS 11 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=9
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=12
01415
01415
彳 60.10.1
GCW-00138
TS 13 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 144.0 (行) to match Kangxi conventions.
Radical
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with Eiso.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Change Radical to 144.0 (行), SC=7
01417
01417
彳 60.11.4
GCW-00139
TS 14 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 144.0 (行) to match Kangxi conventions.
Radical
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with Eiso.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Change Radical to 144.0 (行), SC=8
01420
01420
彳 60.12.2
GCW-00140
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 144.0 (行) to match Kangxi conventions.
Radical
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with Eiso.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Change Radical to 144.0 (行), SC=9
01480
01480
心 61.10.1
GCW-00141
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=11
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=15
01600
01600
手 64.8.3
鱼 195′.3.3
GCW-00146
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Why do we need the secondary radical in this case?
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
R2 FS=1
01893
01893
木 75.7.5
GCW-00149
TS 11 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
02057
02057
水 85.2.3
丿 4.5.5
GCW-00154
TS 6 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
The secondary radical does not seem necessary
Radical
Xieyang WANG
Individual
Agree with comment #8053.
03041
03041
缶 121.5.3
GCW-00191
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Add the secondary radical as 196.1 (鸟), SC=6, FS=3.

Based on Evidence 2, the meaning is related to “hawk”, Evidence 1 looks the variant of 鹞.
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Change primary radical to 196.1 (鸟), SC=6, FS=3 (cf. additional evidence in comment #7314 where the character is under 鸟 radical). Add 121.0 缶 as secondary radical for compatibility with U+26253 𦉓.
03065
03065
羊 123.2.5
GCW-00193
TS 2 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
8
03086
03086
羊 123.14.1
雨 173.12.4
GCW-00194
TS 20 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The primary radical should be 173.0 雨.
03220
03220
石 112.6.3
舟 137.5.1
GCW-00198
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Suggest to swap primary and secondary radicals
03267
03267
艸 140.7.4
GCW-00202
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿱艹汨

The evidence shows it is the variant of 荡/蕩, and the top component of 昜 is 日 not 曰, so 汨 is more suitable.
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Agree with logic for IDS changed noted above.
03300
03300
艸 140.10.1
GCW-00206
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
3
03335
03335
艸 140.13.4
GCW-00212
TS 17 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Add the secondary radical as 32.0 (土), SC=14, FS=2
03354
03354
艸 140.15.5
GCW-00213
UK-30560
TS 19 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=16, FS=1, TS=20
03792
03792
辵 162.4.3
GCW-00226
TS 8 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=8
#40, IRGN1105
03794
03794
辵 162.5.2
GCW-00227
TS 8 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=9
#40, IRGN1105
03822
03822
辵 162.12.1
GCW-00228
TS 15 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
16
03844
03844
阜 170.9.2
GCW-00229
TS 11 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
12
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
170
03841
03841
阜 170.15.2
GCW-00230
TS 17 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
18
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
170
03992
03992
邑 163.6.1
GCW-00241
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
163
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
9
04396
04396
魚 195.3.5
GCW-00247
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
04448
04448
鱼 195′.3.5
GCW-00248
TS 11 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
04494
04494
鱼 195′.8.4
GCW-00253
UK-30233
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=9, TS=17
#27a, IRGN2221:
04533
04533
鳥 196.4.2
GCW-00254
TS 9 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=15
04609
04609
鸟 196′.11.5
GCW-00261
TS 16 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
02846
02846
立 117.10.1
GCW-00267
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
11
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
16
02100
02100
水 85.9.1
GCW-00268
TS 12 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
02073
02073
水 85.6.2
GCW-00270
TS 9 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=5
02853
02853
竹 118.3.5
GCW-00276
TS 9 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱竹𫜹
04017
04017
邑 163.16.2
GCW-00278
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
163
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
19
02194
02194
水 85.18.3
GCW-00281
TS 21 · IDS 𮅕
IDS
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
If evidence 2 is indeed ⿰氵⿱𫂁马, suggest to change IDS and glyph to ⿰氵⿱𫂁马 so that it is the legit simplified variant of 𤅲 (U+24172), and then we can unify ⿰氵⿱𮅕马 to ⿰氵⿱𫂁马. Otherwise we will end up with the situation where 𤅲 is missing encoded simplified form and ⿰氵⿱𮅕马 is missing encoded traditional form, which may lead to two more encoded characters in the future.
03039
03039
纟 120′.13.1
GCW-00283
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
14
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
17
02550
02550
疒 104.17.1
GCW-00286
UK-30448
TS 22 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=18, TS=23
01789
01789
日 72.11.1
GDM-00415
TS 15 · IDS 𬜯
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
01948
01948
木 75.12.1
GDM-00416
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=13
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=17
02055
02055
水 85.2.1
GDM-00418
TS 3 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=6
02056
02056
水 85.2.2
GDM-00419
TS 6 · IDS 𠃊
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=1
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=5
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=5
02350
02350
牛 93.11.1
GDM-00430
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
SC=12, TS=16
#17, IRGN2221
02586
02586
皿 108.10.1
艸 140.11.4
GDM-00434
TS 15 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2 (for Radical 108)
02683
02683
石 112.8.4
GDM-00442
UK-30995
TS 13 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
9
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
14
02721
02721
石 112.14.2
GDM-00449
TS 19 · IDS
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3 (IRGN954AR)
03049
03049
缶 121.8.2
GDM-00460
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
9
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
15
03269
03269
艸 140.7.5
GDM-00466
TS 11 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
8
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
12
03339
03339
艸 140.13.5
GDM-00468
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=14, TS=18
03554
03554
讠 149′.10.1
GDM-00472
TS 12 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
Agree with comment #3297, FS=2.
03786
03786
车 159′.12.3
GDM-00475
TS 15 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=16
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
Agree with comment #3311.
03953
03953
門 169.2.2
入 11.8.2
GDM-00478
TS 10 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3 (primary radical)
04271
04271
马 187′.13.1
GDM-00489
TS 16 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
04506
04506
鱼 195′.10.1
GDM-00494
TS 18 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
04517
04517
鱼 195′.11.5
GDM-00495
TS 19 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=12, TS=20
#40, IRGN1105
04614
04614
鸟 196′.13.1
GDM-00504
TS 18 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
00057
00057
丿 4.5.2
GDM-00507
TS 6 · IDS
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Consider ⿻白丨 or ⿱丿甴.
02604
02604
目 109.7.3
GPGLG-1006
TS 5 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
12
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed 12.
01339
01339
干 51.7.5
GPGLG-1011
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Change Radical to 81.0 (比), SC=6, FS=3
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=10
03502
03502
见 147′.9.3
GPGLG-1014
TS 13 · IDS
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
03024
03024
纟 120′.5.1
GPGLG-1015
TS 1 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
8
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree TS 8
01842
01842
肉 130.9.1
GPGLG-2025
TS 13 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 130.0 (肉), SC=9, FS=1

The Zhuang word “hoz” means “neck, throat”, that means the radical should be 130.


▲ Zhuang-Chinese-English Dictionary, p. 632
03500
03500
见 147′.7.2
GPGLG-2028
TS 11 · IDS
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
03021
03021
纟 120′.3.5
GPGLG-2029
TS 6 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
4
03952
03952
长 168′.13.5
GPGLG-2032
TS 17 · IDS
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
FS=1.
02605
02605
目 109.8.1
GPGLG-3058
TS 5 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
13
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
3
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed 13
01838
01838
肉 130.4.2
GPGLG-3060
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 130.0 (肉), SC=4, FS=2

The Zhuang word “gen” means “arm”, so the radical should be 130.0.


▲ Zhuang-Chinese-English Dictionary, p. 477
04278
04278
骨 188.8.1
GPGLG-3061
TS 18 · IDS
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
FS=2.
04223
04223
饣 184′.8.3
GPGLG-3064
TS 11 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
SC=9.
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=12.
04485
04485
鱼 195′.7.5
GPGLG-4004
TS 15 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
01803
01803
日 72.12.1
GPGLG-4019
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=13, TS=17
Residual Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree SC=13, TS=17
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Per #5565, SC=13
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Per #5565, TS=17
03059
03059
网 122.9.3
GPGLG-5012
TS 14 · IDS 𬙙
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
10
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
15
Residual Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed 10
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed 15
01211
01211
山 46.6.5
GXM-00442
TS 9 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
03254
03254
艸 140.6.1
GXM-00459
TS 10 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
03973
03973
门 169′.4.1
GXM-00472
TS 7 · IDS
IDS
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
wrong IDS: should be ⿵门屯.
03985
03985
阜 170.3.5
马 187′.2.5
GXM-00475
TS 5 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=3 (secondary radical), TS=6
#42, IRGN954AR
03993
03993
邑 163.6.1
GXM-00476
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
163
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
9
03999
03999
邑 163.8.3
GXM-00477
TS 10 · IDS
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
163
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=11
04141
04141
革 177.2.1
阜 170.8.1
GXM-00478
TS 11 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
R=177.0革: SC=3, FS=5, TS=12
R2=170.0阜: SC(2)=9, TS=12
#42, IRGN954AR
04405
04405
鳥 196.8.3
GXM-00482
UK-30505
T9-2148
TS 19 · IDS
Radical
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 196.0 (鳥), kRSUnicode value should be 196.8.
04492
04492
鸟 196′.8.3
GXM-00483
UK-30504
TS 13 · IDS
Radical
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 196.1 (鸟)
04267
04267
马 187′.8.3
GXM-00484
TS 11 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
03478
03478
衣 145.11.1
GXM-00486
TS 16 · IDS 𬜯
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=17
01443
01443
心 61.5.4
GZ-0032501
TS 8 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=6
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=9
02482
02482
甘 99.12.2
GZ-0052201
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=13, TS=18 (者 counts as 9)
Residual Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree SC=13, TS=18
03609
03609
贝 154′.10.3
GZ-0082105
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=11, TC = 15. The ORT Attributes predictor gives 7 strokes for 成. The unihan data is inconsistent. Personally I think 6 is more intuitive.
01877
01877
木 75.6.2
GZ-0082201
TS 10 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=4
04558
04558
鳥 196.10.4
GZ-0091202
TS 21 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The IDS should be changed to ⿺笔鳥 after glyph update.
IDS
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree change IDS to ⿺笔鳥.
02148
02148
水 85.12.1
GZ-0121101
TS 15 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰氵棑 will be better?
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Agree with #5979
02366
02366
犬 94.6.5
GZ-0132101
TS 9 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=7, TS=10 (阝 is 3 strokes according to IRGN954AR)
Residual Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree SC=7, TS=10
IDS
L F CHENG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰犭邦
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
FS=3
02225
02225
火 86.6.4
GZ-0132201
TS 10 · IDS
IDS
L F CHENG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰火邦
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=1?
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=7
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=11
03397
03397
虫 142.6.2
GZ-0132401
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
7
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
3
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
13
Residual Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree SC 7
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree TC 13
IDS
L F CHENG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰虫邦
02333
02333
牙 92.12.4
GZ-0171201
TS 17 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=16
03273
03273
白 106.7.2
艸 140.8.1
GZ-0221301
TS 12 · IDS
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Suggest change to Radical 106.0 (白), SC=7, FS=2
Radical
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree
Change Radical to 106.0 (白), SC=7, FS=2.
Consider retaining original radical as second radical.
01633
01633
手 64.10.3
GZ-0311401
TS 13 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=5
04170
04170
風 182.2.3
GZ-0341301
TS 11 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The IDS should be changed to ⿺風卜.
IDS
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agrred change IDS to ⿺風卜.
02352
02352
牛 93.11.4
GZ-0472201
TS 15 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=16, SC=12 (IRGN954AR counts 之 as 4 strokes)
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed TS=16, SC=12
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
FS=3
02663
02663
石 112.5.4
GZ-0532301
TS 9 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=6, TS=11
Residual Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed SC=6, TS=11.
03446
03446
虫 142.16.2
GZ-0611201
TS 6 · IDS
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=22
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed TS=22
02206
02206
火 86.3.4
GZ-0671301
TS 7 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=4
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=8
01159
01159
尸 44.13.5
GZ-0722101
TS 16 · IDS
IDS
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Update IDS to ⿺尼常.
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=1
01819
01819
日 72.15.3
GZ-0771402
TS 19 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Change Radical to 9.0 (人), SC=17, FS=1
01827
01827
日 72.5.5
GZ-0862101
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 72.0 (日)
IDS
SHEN Tianheng (CheonHyeong Sim)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Should be ⿱日召 instead of ⿱曰召.
Radical
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed change radical to 72.0 (日)
IDS
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed change IDS to ⿱日召
03606
03606
贝 154′.6.4
GZ-1111302
TS 10 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
Agree with comment #1709.
03308
03308
艸 140.10.5
GZ-1181201
TS 14 · IDS 丿丿
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰⿹节丿⿹节丿
01430
01430
彳 60.21.2
GZ-1192303
TS 24 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=20
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=23
03343
03343
艸 140.14.4
GZ-1222203
TS 17 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=18
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed TS=18
03153
03153
肉 130.8.3
GZ-1432203
TS 12 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
1
01321
01321
己 49.7.5
GZ-1481401
TS 3 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=1
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=10
02126
02126
水 85.10.4
GZ-1572501
TS 13 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Change Radical to 112.0 (石), SC=8, FS=4
02589
02589
皿 108.13.2
阜 170.15.4
GZ-1621102
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Radical 108 皿 does not make much sense semantically. Therefore suggest changing to Radical 170 (阝), SC=15, FS=4
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree with Comment #874.
Radical
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed change to Radical 170 (阝), SC=15, FS=4.
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
For R=108.0皿, FS=5
#42, IRGN954AR
03892
03892
金 167.9.3
GZ-1741104
TS 17 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=5
01713
01713
斤 69.17.5
GZ-1832301
TS 21 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=4
01771
01771
日 72.8.3
GZ-1842101
TS 12 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=5
02585
02585
皿 108.7.3
几 16.10.1
GZ-1901401
TS 12 · IDS
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Add Radical2: 16.0 (几), SC=10, FS=1
01601
01601
手 64.8.3
GZ-1922402
TS 12 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=1
04140
04140
面 176.11.1
GZ-1941401
TS 19 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=20
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
FS=4.
01315
01315
工 48.9.1
GZ-2172305
TS 12 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Add Radical 177.0 (革), SC=3, FS=1, as secondary radical
02307
02307
爪 87.12.3
GZ-2241107
TS 16 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=4
02778
02778
禾 115.4.5
又 29.7.3
GZ-2392102
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 29.0 (又), SC=7, FS=3
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
For R=115.0禾, FS=3
#1, IRGN954AR
03424
03424
虫 142.10.4
GZ-2441501
TS 16 · IDS 𦰩
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
11
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
1
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
17
Residual Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed SC=11
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed TC=17
04144
04144
革 177.8.3
GZ-2672204
TS 17 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
4
03977
03977
门 169′.5.2
GZ-2712401
TS 8 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=4
02159
02159
水 85.13.1
GZ-2791503
TS 16 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Change Radical to 140.2 (艹), SC=12, FS=4
03702
03702
車 159.4.1
GZ-2912503
TS 11 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=4
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
Agree with comment #1731.
01987
01987
木 75.18.2
夕 36.19.2
GZ-2951304
TS 22 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Add the secondary radical as 36.0 (夕) to follow the radicals of 梦, SC=19, FS=2
03996
03996
阜 170.8.1
GZ-2962403
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
An alternative IDS is ⿰阝𬺛(U+2CE9B).
02035
02035
毛 82.5.1
GZ-2982501
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Add Radical 212.1 (龙), SC=4, FS=3 as secondary radical
03303
03303
艸 140.10.3
GZ-3211505
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
1
01435
01435
心 61.3.2
GZ-3332201
TS 6 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=4
02723
02723
石 112.15.4
木 75.16.4
GZ-3352502
TS 20 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 75.0 (木), SC=16, FS=4
03366
03366
艸 140.17.4
水 85.18.2
GZ-3362401
TS 21 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 85.0 (水), SC=18, FS=2
Radical
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed change radical to 85.0 (水), SC=18, FS=2
02632
02632
目 109.13.1
GZ-3392303
TS 18 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
14
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
19
Residual Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed SC=14
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed TC=19
00979
00979
女 38.12.5
GZ-3552510
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 38.0 (女), SC=12, FS=5

夊 is not included in the glyph
Radical
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree Change Radical to 38.0 (女), SC=12, FS=5
01440
01440
心 61.4.3
GZ-3821301
TS 8 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=1
04569
04569
鳥 196.15.3
GZ-3842501
TS 26 · IDS
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰外𬷨
IDS
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Since 𬷨 is the phonetic and 外 is the meaning the IDS ⿰外𬷨 is clear to those who are familiar with 𬷨, however this does not align with the current radical.
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
Change Radical to 36.0 (夕), SC=23, FS=2
00003
00003
一 1.3.3
丿 4.3.4
GZ-3932501
TS 4 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Add secondary radical as 4.0 丿? SC=3, FS=4.
01382
01382
弓 57.7.4
GZ-3952401
TS 10 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Change Radical to 106.0 (白), SC=5, FS=5
01149
01149
尸 44.6.5
GZ-3981103
TS 9 · IDS 尿
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Change Radical to 29.0 (又), SC=7
01944
01944
木 75.11.4
GZ-3982201
TS 15 · IDS
IDS
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰染⿱𠆢𠫓
01337
01337
巾 50.14.1
GZ-3991301
TS 17 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=15
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=18
03293
03293
艸 140.9.4
GZ-4021105
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=10, TS=14
Residual Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed SC=10, TS=14
00253
00253
凵 17.12.5
GZ-4022108
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰岀屋
IDS
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The IDS should remain as it is because, strange as it may seem at first sight, the established convention is to use 出 (U+51FA) not 岀 (U+5C80) in such cases.
04124
04124
雨 173.20.2
GZ-4122404
TS 28 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=21, TS=29
Residual Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed SC=21, TS=29
00242
00242
冫 15.7.4
GZ-4231104
TS 99 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=9
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agreed TS=9
01879
01879
木 75.7.1
GZ-4241101
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰木⿷匚令
03473
03473
衣 145.10.4
GZ-4241301
TS 16 · IDS
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
02780
02780
禾 115.5.3
GZ-4312501
TS 10 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
1
02401
02401
犬 94.16.4
GZ-4821113
TS 9 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=19
03467
03467
衣 145.9.3
GZ-4881101
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=15
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree TS=15
04148
04148
韋 178.9.4
GZ-4901401
TS 19 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
10
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
19
Residual Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree SC 10
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree TC 19
02003
02003
止 77.8.1
牙 92.7.2
GZ-5011202
TS 12 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Add the secondary radical as 92.0 (牙), SC=7, FS=2
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
I feel that 92.0 (牙) is a better primary radical.
02010
02010
止 77.12.4
音 180.7.2
GZ-5011208
TS 16 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Add the secondary radical as 180.0 (音), SC=7, FS=2
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
180.0 (音) seems to be a better primary radical
02686
02686
石 112.9.1
GZA-202390
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2

01888
01888
木 75.7.4
GZA-430292
TS 11 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=1
04182
04182
风 182′.8.3
GZA-614560
TS 12 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The IDS should be changed to ⿺风朋.
01607
01607
手 64.8.4
GZA-616599
TS 11 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=3
03603
03603
贝 154′.4.2
GZA-618020
TS 8 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
Agree with comment #3301.
03306
03306
艸 140.10.4
GZA-618185
TS 13 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=14
Total Stroke Count
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree TS=14
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿺荒无
04519
04519
鱼 195′.12.3
GZA-621167
TS 20 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
01358
01358
广 53.7.4
GZA-624073
TS 10 · IDS 广
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=8
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=11
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=1
02305
02305
爪 87.10.5
GZHSJ-0003
TS 14 · IDS 𤔔
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
⿰𤔔⿹𠃌一
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=11
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=15
04168
04168
頁 181.15.3
GZHSJ-0005
TS 24 · IDS
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿳⿴𦥑同冖頁, 𦥑 produces the expected number of strokes.
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
An alternative IDS is ⿱&P15-01;頁.
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
SC=14.
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=23.
01418
01418
彳 60.12.1
GZHSJ-0018
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=13
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=16
04649
04649
黽 205.13.2
GZHSJ-0021
TS 26 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
14
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
27
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
1
03317
03317
艸 140.12.5
GZHSJ-0028
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
12
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
16
03144
03144
肉 130.6.5
GZHSJ-0029
TS 10 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 168.1 (长), SC=6, FS=5
00049
00049
丶 3.3.3
GZHSJ-0030
TS 4 · IDS 丿
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰⿻㇉丿丶?
01998
01998
欠 76.9.3
GZHSJ-0037
TS 13 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=1
03838
03838
邑 163.8.5
GZHSJ-0038
TS 10 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
11
02149
02149
水 85.12.1
GZHSJ-0039
TS 15 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰氵𤉹
03515
03515
言 149.4.3
GZHSJ-0041
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change the IDS from ⿰訁(U+8A01)卆 to ⿰言(U+8A00)卆?
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰言卆
Support HKSAR (Comment #3294).
01701
01701
攴 66.9.3
GZHSJ-0043
TS 13 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=10
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=14
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Add Radical 194.0 (鬼), SC=4 as secondary radical.
01805
01805
日 72.12.2
黑 203.4.2
GZHSJ-0046
UK-30802
TS 16 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Per #6278, swap the primary and secondary radicals
00018
00018
一 1.9.2
GZHSJ-0050
TS 10 · IDS 𠀃
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿻𠀇多?
04281
04281
骨 188.9.4
GZHSJ-0053
TS 18 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
19
00035
00035
丨 2.3.4
GZHSJ-0056
TS 4 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱丷丁 or ⿱䒑亅
02273
02273
火 86.13.1
GZHSJ-0058
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=15
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=19
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Add Radical 140.2 (艹), SC=15, FS=3 as secondary radical for discoverability
00317
00317
匚 22.8.3
GZHSJ-0066
UK-30058
TS 10 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 22.0 (匚), SC=8, FS=3 based on the 金文 form on Evidence 2, Evidence 3 and Evidence 9, Evidence 10 under WS2024-00315.
02133
02133
水 85.11.2
GZHSJ-0069
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=13
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=17
03816
03816
辵 162.11.2
GZHSJ-0070
TS 14 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
15
03836
03836
阜 170.7.1
GZHSJ-0076
TS 9 · IDS 𦔮
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
10
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
170
04399
04399
魚 195.7.3
GZHSJ-0079
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The IDS should be changed to ⿱攸魚.
01867
01867
木 75.4.1
GZHSJ-0095
TS 8 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=5
00252
00252
凵 17.7.5
GZHSJ-0101
TS 9 · IDS ?
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
㇯𠚡舀
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
GZHSJ-0101 is not quite the same as the outside component of U+206A1 𠚡, which has one additional vertical stroke at the bottom middle. It is the same as the bottom outside component of the T and J forms of U+2700D 𧀍 (but the G form is the same as the outside of 𠚡).
00065
00065
乙 5.2.4
GZHSJ-0102
TS 3 · IDS
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Evidence 1 shows ⿺乚丷.
Evidence 4 and the above evidence from 干祿字書 shows ⿰⿺乚丶丶.
02146
02146
水 85.11.5
GZHSJ-0122
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=13
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=16
03815
03815
辵 162.11.1
GZHSJ-0125
TS 14 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
15
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
An alternative IDS is ⿺𬨝(U+2CA1D)甫.
02461
02461
玉 96.18.2
GZHSJ-0127
TS 22 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰王瞿
03019
03019
糸 120.21.4
GZHSJ-0134
TS 27 · IDS
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=5 (IRGN954AR)
01424
01424
彳 60.13.2
GZHSJ-0135
TS 16 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿲彳𮱨攵
02595
02595
目 109.2.5
力 19.5.2
GZHSJ-0143
TS 7 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Add 19.0 (力), SC=5, FS=2 as secondary radical.
04640
04640
黃 201.6.2
GZHSJ-0145
TS 17 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
18, based on IRGN2221 which suggests 12 strokes for 黃/黄
01369
01369
广 53.19.1
GZHSJ-0150
TS 22 · IDS 广
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=20
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=23
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
01092
01092
宀 40.9.1
GZHSJ-0160
TS 12 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿳宀十𣌢
03832
03832
邑 163.4.3
GZHSJ-0162
TS 6 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
7
03209
03209
臼 134.16.4
龍 212.6.3
GZHSJ-0173
TS 22 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Add Radical 212.0 (龍), SC=6, FS=3 as a secondary radical.
02917
02917
竹 118.17.1
GZHSJ-0174
TS 23 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱竹壐
03344
03344
艸 140.14.4
GZHSJ-0178
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿱𫇦殘
02152
02152
水 85.12.3
GZHSJ-0180
UK-30953
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=13
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=16
02402
02402
犬 94.17.5
KC-10002
TS 21 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change TS=20.
04259
04259
馬 187.13.3
KC-10006
TS 23 · IDS 𠔉
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰馬誊
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
An additional IDS is OK.
02590
02590
皿 108.13.3
KC-10008
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱⿰彖攵皿
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿱⿰彖攵皿.
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
FS=5
01981
01981
木 75.16.5
KC-10010
UK-30619
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=17
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=21
04014
04014
阜 170.14.1
KC-10013
TS 22 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=17
Total Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change TS=17.
01679
01679
手 64.16.2
KC-10017
TS 20 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=19
02768
02768
示 113.13.2
KC-10019
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示戢
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示戢.
01481
01481
心 61.10.1
KC-10025
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=13
02450
02450
玉 96.11.5
KC-10029
TS 16 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
15
Total Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change TS=15.
02353
02353
牛 93.12.1
KC-10030
TS 16 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰牛華
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
An additional IDS is OK.
Change FS=2
01796
01796
日 72.11.2
KC-10037
TS 15 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=5
02504
02504
田 102.11.1
KC-10043
TS 16 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱𡙁田
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿱𡙁田.
03376
03376
艸 140.22.1
KC-10048
TS 28 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=26
Total Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change TS=26.
03367
03367
艸 140.18.1
KC-10049
TS 24 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=22
Total Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change TS=22.
03370
03370
艸 140.19.1
KC-10050
TS 25 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=21
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change SC=21.
02761
02761
示 113.11.4
KC-10066
TS 16 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示淵
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
12
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
17
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示淵.
Change SC=12.
Change TS=17.
02744
02744
示 113.9.1
KC-10074
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change FS=2.
01791
01791
日 72.11.1
KC-10078
TS 15 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
01459
01459
心 61.7.3
KC-10088
TC-5726
TS 11 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=10
01529
01529
心 61.17.2
KC-10090
TS 21 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=20
01966
01966
木 75.13.3
KC-10092
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=9
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=13
03359
03359
艸 140.16.2
KC-10094
TS 22 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿳艹⿰㇯黑灬犬灬
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
20
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱艹⿺黑犬
Total Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change TS=20.
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Could change IDS to ⿱艹⿺黑犬?

KR requests IRG to discuss.
03276
03276
艸 140.8.3
KC-10095
TS 18 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=7, TS=11
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change SC=7, TS=11.
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿱艹禿

If Comment #7672 been accepted, IDS should be updated as well.
00606
00606
口 30.13.1
KC-10097
TS 16 · IDS 𠈌
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱⿻十𠈌回
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿱⿻十𠈌回.
04159
04159
頁 181.7.3
KC-10098
TS 16 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰𠯳頁
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
An additional IDS is OK.
01268
01268
山 46.11.2
KC-10101
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=10?
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=13?
02879
02879
竹 118.9.3
KC-10102
TS 15 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
FS=4
#76, IRGN954AR
02636
02636
目 109.15.1
KC-10103
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
11
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
16
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change SC=11, FS=2, TS=16.
02515
02515
疒 104.4.1
KC-10105
TS 9 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿸疒不

不 in the submitted IDS is U+F967
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿸疒不.
01516
01516
心 61.14.1
KC-10107
TS 17 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
01809
01809
日 72.13.1
KC-10119
TS 17 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱敬日
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿱敬日.
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Per #5392, ⿱敬日
02750
02750
示 113.9.2
KC-10121
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示則
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示則.
03480
03480
衣 145.13.1
KC-10123
TS 19 · IDS
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change FS=2.
02563
02563
白 106.9.1
KC-10128
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
01371
01371
廴 54.3.5
KC-10134
TS 6 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿺廴己
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿺廴己.
01744
01744
日 72.5.4
KC-10138
TS 9 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱日必

See the radical
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿱日必.
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
⿱日必
02751
02751
示 113.9.3
KC-10141
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示急
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示急.
02745
02745
示 113.9.1
KC-10145
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示勃
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示勃.
02746
02746
示 113.9.1
KC-10149
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示郁
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示郁.
02764
02764
示 113.12.1
KC-10150
TS 17 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示雲
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示雲.
02763
02763
示 113.11.5
KC-10152
TS 16 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示翏
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示翏.
02769
02769
示 113.14.2
KC-10153
TS 19 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示𢾰
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示𢾰.
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
13
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
18
01976
01976
木 75.14.4
KC-10157
TS 18 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=10
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=14
02728
02728
示 113.2.3
KC-10161
TS 7 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示八
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示八.
02735
02735
示 113.6.3
KC-10162
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示䏌
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示䏌.
01823
01823
日 72.18.1
KC-10163
TS 22 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
03288
03288
艸 140.9.2
KC-10165
TS 13 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱艹𡷇
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
An additional IDS is OK.
03093
03093
羽 124.13.1
KC-10166
TS 19 · IDS
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change FS=2
02505
02505
田 102.12.3
KC-10169
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change SC=11, TS=16.
00008
00008
一 1.5.1
KC-10175
TS 6 · IDS
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
An additional IDS=⿻王丷 is OK.
04236
04236
香 186.18.1
KC-10181
TS 27 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2 (based on IRGN 954AR)
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change FS=2.
03746
03746
車 159.10.1
KC-10197
TS 17 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=11, TS=18
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change FS=2, SC=11, TS=18.
02736
02736
示 113.6.3
KC-10201
TS 12 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示各
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示各.
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
TS=11
02887
02887
竹 118.10.1
KC-10212
TS 16 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱𥮉土
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
An additional IDS is OK.
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 32.0 (土) or add the secondary radical? SC=13, FS=3.

⿱甫土 is not an encoded character, and there is no evidence to support it. U+25B89 𥮉 has been encoded, and the K-Source reference is K6-1118.
U+25B89
02290
02290
火 86.16.2
KC-10224
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=15
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=19
01772
01772
日 72.8.3
KC-10242
TS 12 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=5
04234
04234
香 186.11.3
KC-10252
TS 20 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=5
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=5 ?
01695
01695
攴 66.4.1
KC-10256
TS 8 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=14
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=18
03879
03879
金 167.7.4
KC-10260
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
8
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
16
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change SC=8, TS=16.
02174
02174
水 85.14.2
KC-10265
TS 17 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰氵𠻳 (rhs 攵 not 欠)
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS= ⿰氵𠻳.
02192
02192
水 85.18.1
KC-10266
TS 21 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
02795
02795
禾 115.8.1
KC-10276
TS 13 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
SC=9, TS=14
#25, IRGN2221
03460
03460
示 113.6.3
KC-10298
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰示旭
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
113.0 示
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=11
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰示旭.
Radical
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 113.0 (示), TS=11.
01109
01109
宀 40.15.1
KC-10307
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱宀𬍼

Agree with Conifer on Comment #2271. ROK could normalize the glyph.
03186
03186
肉 130.13.3
KC-10332
TS 17 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
FS=4
01108
01108
宀 40.14.3
KC-10375
TS 17 · IDS
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
⿱宀夐(U+5910)
01261
01261
山 46.10.4
KC-10385
TS 13 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
Add Radical 189.0 (高), SC=3, FS=2, as secondary radical
02995
02995
糸 120.12.2
KC-10400
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿲糸㞷攵
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰糸𢽠 or ⿲糸𱖔攵
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰糸𢽠 (shorter is better)
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change IDS=⿰糸𢽠.
00817
00817
囗 31.3.2
SAT-04332
TS 4 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿴〇⿻冂𠃊
02251
02251
火 86.10.2
SAT-05170
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=4
01565
01565
手 64.5.1
SAT-06657
TS 8 · IDS 𭤟
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=3
01566
01566
手 64.5.1
SAT-06941
TS 8 · IDS 𰆰
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=3
01387
01387
彐 58.5.5
SAT-07269
TS 8 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=3
03136
03136
肉 130.5.3
SAT-08616
TS 9 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
03479
03479
衣 145.12.1
SAT-08679
TS 18 · IDS 𡙕
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
13
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
19
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
Should the IDS be changed from ⿱𡙕衣 to ⿱⿲㚔龵乚衣?
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Agree with HKSAR, but Evidence 1 shows ⿱⿲㚔手乚衣.
02873
02873
竹 118.8.3
SAT-09081
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
5
03855
03855
毛 82.7.1
SAT-09108
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Should the radical be changed to 82 (毛)? If so, SC=7, FS=1.
01308
01308
巛 47.1.3
SAT-09115
TS 4 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
00292
00292
刀 18.14.2
SAT-09127
TS 16 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰⿳业𦍌口刂
03340
03340
艸 140.14.1
SAT-09137
TS 17 · IDS
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=4
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=18
03834
03834
邑 163.6.3
SAT-09158
TS 9 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The IDS should be changed to ⿰𮉼(U+2E27C)阝.
01627
01627
手 64.10.1
SAT-09161
TS 13 · IDS 𢉙
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=11
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=4
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=14
02095
02095
水 85.8.4
SAT-09162
TS 11 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=5
02809
02809
禾 115.11.3
SAT-09168
TS 16 · IDS 𮂬
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
12
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
17
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰禾𮂬
03545
03545
言 149.25.2
SAT-09174
TS 32 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=5
01840
01840
亠 8.8.4
SAT-09207
TS 10 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 8.0 (亠), SC=8, FS=4
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
⿳亠丷肎
03080
03080
羊 123.9.3
SAT-09218
TS 15 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
FS=4
03345
03345
艸 140.14.4
SAT-09246
TS 17 · IDS 广
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=18
03360
03360
艸 140.16.2
SAT-09256
TS 19 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
20
02960
02960
米 119.15.4
SAT-09261
TS 21 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱⿸麻比米
03058
03058
网 122.8.2
SAT-09310
TS 13 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
7
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
12
01367
01367
广 53.12.4
SAT-09315
TS 15 · IDS 广
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=1
03757
03757
車 159.11.5
SAT-09336
TS 18 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=10, TS=17
IDS
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰車⿸尸免
03767
03767
車 159.12.1
SAT-09344
TS 19 · IDS 𫟛
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=12, TS=19
04665
04665
齊 210.10.2
SAT-09352
TS 20 · IDS 𱍸
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Should the IDS be changed to ⿳亠⿲刀了𱍸員?
04021
04021
隶 171.7.2
SAT-09388
TS 15 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
An alternative IDS is ⿰𫯝(U+2BBDD)隶.
02050
02050
毛 82.11.2
SAT-09392
TS 15 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰⿱罒⿺⿽十二二毛 or ⿰⿱罒𠦂毛

U+20982
IDS
TAO Yang
China
Agree with #5795
01156
01156
尸 44.11.5
SAT-09426
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=3
00151
00151
人 9.10.3
SAT-09437
TS 12 · IDS 𤴗
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰亻⿱山⿻龰⺕
03261
03261
艸 140.7.1
SAT-09447
TS 10 · IDS 𦫳
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
11
03217
03217
舛 136.0.1
一 1.7.2
SAT-09449
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 1.0 (一), SC=5, FS=5
01160
01160
尸 44.14.5
SAT-09464
TS 17 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=1
02400
02400
犬 94.14.3
SAT-09470
TS 17 · IDS 𡼡
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰犭⿱山黒
02344
02344
牛 93.8.1
SAT-09498
TS 12 · IDS
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS = 4 (IRGN954AR)
03262
03262
艸 140.7.1
SAT-09503
TS 10 · IDS 𦒳
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
11
01980
01980
木 75.16.3
SAT-09505
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=15
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=19
01270
01270
山 46.11.2
SAT-09507
TS 14 · IDS 𮲡
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=10
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=13
00067
00067
乙 5.4.5
SAT-09562
TS 5 · IDS
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit (Daniel)
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Normalize IDS to ⿹⺄月 (instead of ㇈)?
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿹⺄月 will be better.
02259
02259
火 86.11.3
SAT-09585
TS 15 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰⿱⺈田炎
03903
03903
金 167.11.3
SAT-09597
TS 19 · IDS 𣐂
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
01334
01334
巾 50.11.1
SAT-09612
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=12
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=15
04645
04645
黑 203.10.2
SAT-09617
TS 21 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
5
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
22
04632
04632
鹿 198.15.4
SAT-09630
TS 26 · IDS 鹿
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
2
01698
01698
攴 66.8.2
SAT-09633
TS 12 · IDS 𣐥
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=9
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
TS=13
03540
03540
言 149.14.3
SAT-09648
TS 21 · IDS &P6-03;𠃊
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Should the IDS be changed from ⿰言⿳&P6-03;⿺𠃊目乂 to ⿰言⿱&P6-03;𥄁?
03541
03541
言 149.15.5
SAT-09695
TS 22 · IDS
IDS
Toshiya SUZUKI
Japan
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Although I have no position about the glyph design, I support HKSAR's comment. If the glyph design looking like "⿰言墮" is not used differently, IDS "⿰言墮" would be more helpful.
IDS
LI Yuan
SAT
Support HKSAR's comment, the glyph should be modified to ⿰言墮.
01910
01910
木 75.9.1
SAT-09701
TS 13 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
FS=2
04215
04215
食 184.14.1
SAT-09712
TS 23 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
22
00347
00347
心 61.9.1
SAT-09733
TS 13 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 61.0 (心), SC=9, FS=1
02553
02553
癶 105.7.5
SAT-09771
TS 12 · IDS 𠮛
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong SAR
FS=1
01444
01444
心 61.5.4
SAT-09773
TS 8 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰忄⿻人口
01373
01373
廾 55.3.4
SAT-09775
TS 4 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
SC=1
03284
03284
艸 140.9.1
SAT-09776
TS 12 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
5
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
Convenor
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
13
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿱𦲶一
03527
03527
言 149.8.4
SAT-09780
TS 15 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS = 3
03324
03324
艸 140.12.3
SAT-09781
TS 15 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
TS=16
01868
01868
木 75.4.1
SAT-09787
TS 8 · IDS