Just a note that, it is very similar but totally different to 䲧 (U+4CA7). The difference is 士 and 土. Maybe we could record this pair in Unihan Database? In order to remind the font designers not to confuse users.

Comment on #12948:
As far as I know about Kagoshima dialect, unlike most of the dialects in Japan, words can END in plosives. In the evidence, it writes the pronunciation of 髙 as タッ, which is actually resulted in the loss of some information - Kagoshima dialect pronounce it as /tak/ (FYI, standard Japanese is /taka/), different to so-called 促音 in Japanese, the /k/ sound would NEVER change according to the subsequent consonant. It is just a *coincidence* that the next consonant in this place name is also /k/.
The evidence also shows that the proposed character is pronounced as クッ, but we do not know whether it is /kuk/, /kut/, /kus/ or any other possibilities. It would be better if we could get more information about the complete pronunciation, to judge what its semantic really is.

The 3rd stroke of the lower right part (隹) should be 丶 instead of 丿 according to G-source convention, even if the evidence shows like 丿 (because that is so-called 旧字形, which is different from the G-source convention nowadays).

Change 点 in 攵 to 捺. No need to 避让. Its simplified form (WS2024-02546) is also 捺.

Suggest to modify the 2nd stroke to 捺 instead of 点 to match both the G-source convention and the SJ/T 11239—2001 evidence.

The bottom-left stroke should be 竖提 instead of 竖折.

Change 撇 in 非 to 竖 according to G-source convention.

The 2nd stroke of the right part should not pass through the 1st stroke according to both G-source convention and the evidence.

The 5th stroke should be 横 instead of 提 according to both G-source convention and the evidence.

The bottom part of 韋 should be normalized according to the G-source convention.

The corner of the stroke 撇折 should be normalized to 新字形 (currently 撇 then 提).

Suggest to remove the redundant hook in the component 系 according to K-source convention.

Suggest to remove the redundant hook from 糸 according to K-source convention.

I am confused whether the component between 彳 and 亍 is 氵 or 冫.

Then normalize the right part from 匕 to 𠤎 in order to match the convention (UK usually obeys the G-source convention).

Agree with #8394 to normalize the glyph. As we can confirm that this character is a variant of 繭, it would be better to change the structure more like 繭.