«
02474
02475
02476
»
02475
Trad
爿 90.13
㇒ (3)
17

UK-10086
IRGN2480WS2017v6.1 Pending
postponed unified to U+ 2C30D, irg51.
Attributes:



Review Comments

Type
Description
Submitter
Data for Unihan
SEMANTIC_VARIANT
WS2017 v1.1
𬌍 (U+2C30D)
CHEN Zhixiang
China
2018-05-23 09:05:53
#1639
Other
COMMENT
WS2017 v2
CHEN Zhixiang
China
2018-08-31 08:23:22
#3394
RESPONSE
RESPONSE
WS2017 v2
> Unify with U+2C30D
Disagree. The rule mentioned by China to unify 㲋 and 兔 is not suitable for IRG.
Andrew WEST
UK
2018-10-21 17:40:54
#3303
Other
COMMENT
WS2017 v2
Henry CHAN
Individual
2018-10-23 10:10:28
#3516
Evidence
UNCLEAR_EVIDENCE
WS2017 v3
Questionable transcription. This is the same character 𬌍 U+2C30D refers to.
Below is the original inscription in 多友鼎.
The distinction between 兔 and 㲋 was already lost in the early stage. A feature that might tell 㲋 from 兔 is open mouth, but here it is closed. Thus we could not see any reason to transcribe it using 㲋.

http://www.guoxuedashi.com/yzjwjc/?bh=2835
http://www.gwz.fudan.edu.cn/Web/Show/1095
WANG Yifan
SAT
2019-02-21 05:46:24
#4726
Evidence
UNCLEAR_EVIDENCE
WS2017 v3
Keep pending.
Eiso CHAN
Individual
2019-04-27 13:18:31
#4933
Unification
UNIFICATION
WS2017 v5
Below is another version of 多友鼎, the glyph is "⿱⿰爿兔月".
In addition, according to the article (http://www.gwz.fudan.edu.cn/Web/Show/1095)provided by Wang Yifan, the author 王寧 explained that in the 周 Dynasty, 兔 and 㲋 were no distinction in glyphs. Therefore, based on these informations, UK-10086 could be unified with 𬌍 (U+2C30D).



(Cited from: http://www.gwz.fudan.edu.cn/Web/Show/280)
Conifer TSENG
TCA
2020-03-13 03:24:52
#8060
Unification
NO_UNIFICATION
WS2017 v5
There is no unification rule for 㲋 and 兔. This character may be equivalent to 2C30D, but they have non-unifiable glyph shapes. Therefore oppose unification.
Andrew WEST
UK
2020-04-27 10:16:51
#8656

Discussion Record

DateDescription
IRG #51
2018-10-23 (Tue)
5:11 pm +0700
Recorded by Henry CHAN
POSTPONE
Postponed for further evidence

Glyph Changes

Source ReferenceGlyph
UK-10086
2.0
Note: glyph data for version 1.1 is not available.

Raw Info
0 - Seq. No.02475
1 - Discussion Recordpostponed unified to U+ 2C30D, irg51.
2 - Kangxi Radical90
3 - Stroke Count13
4 - First Stroke3
5 - T/S (0/1) Flag0
6 - IDS⿰爿⿱㲋月
7 - Total Strokes17
8 - G Source
9 - G Image
10 - G Similar Ideographs
11 - G Ref. to Evidence doc
12 - G Page No. in the document (optional)
13 - G Row No. in the Page (optional)
14 - G Position in the Row (optional)
15 - G file name of evidence image
16 - G Optional Information
17 - K Source
18 - K Image
19 - K Similar/ Variants
20 - K Ref. to Evidence document
21 - i1) Page No. in the evidence document (optional)
22 - i2) Row No. in the page (optional)
23 - i3) Position No. in the row (optional)
24 - K file name of evidence image
25 - K Revised information (2018.03.16)
26 - K Real Glyph
27 - UK SourceUK-10086
28 - UK ImageUK-10086.bmp
29 - UK Similar/ Variants
30 - UK Ref. to Evidence doc008
31 - UK Title and YearA Source Book of Ancient Chinese Bronze Inscriptions (2016)
32 - UK Page No.page 158
33 - UK PNG ImageUK-10086.png
34 - UK Font code pointU+F574
35 - UK Mapping to traditional or simplified character
36 - UK SJT-11239-2001
37 - UK Notes
38 - SAT Source
39 - SAT Image
40 - SAT Similar Ideographs
41 - SAT References to evidence documents
42 - SAT optional information
43 - T Source
44 - T Image
45 - T Similar/ Varianonets
46 - T References to evidence documents A
47 - T References to evidence documents B
48 - T File name of evidence image
49 - T Real Glyph
50 - UTC Source
51 - UTC Image
52 - UTC Similar Ideographs
53 - UTC References to evidence documents
54 - UTC SJ/T 11239-2001
55 - V Source
56 - V Image
57 - V Related
58 - V Reading
59 - V Evidence
60 - V Evidence File
61 - V Code Point
62 - V Note
63 - WS2015 SN
64 -