![]() KC-07531 |
Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #51 2018-10-24 (Wed) 11:34 am +0700 Recorded by Henry CHAN | NOT_UNIFIED_TO![]() U+6C02 |
IRG #52 2019-05-14 (Tue) 4:03 pm +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Glyph no change, Not unified to 𣯛 U+23BDB, R=43, FS=1, Not unified to 𭕲 U+2D572 |
IRG #52 2019-05-15 (Wed) 5:17 pm +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Radical kept |
IRG #53 2019-10-22 (Tue) 2:54 pm +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Radical kept as 43 (尢) |
Version | Description |
---|---|
4.0 | For 02493, change Radical to 43 (尢) |
5.0 | For 02493, change Stroke Count to 14 |
5.0 | For 02493, change First Stroke to 1 |
5.1 | For 02493, change IDS to ⿸𭆆尨 |
5.1 | For 02493, add Discussion Record "IDS=⿸𭆆尨, 2020-06." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
KC-07531 | ![]() |
0 - Seq. No. | 02493 |
1 - Discussion Record | IDS=⿸𭆆尨, 2020-06. Radical kept as 43 (尢), IRG 53. Radical kept, IRG 52. Glyph no change, Not unified to 𣯛 U+23BDB, R=43, FS=1, Not unified to 𭕲 U+2D572, IRG 52. not unified to U+6C02, irg51. |
2 - Kangxi Radical | 43 |
3 - Stroke Count | 14 |
4 - First Stroke | 1 |
5 - T/S (0/1) Flag | 0 |
6 - IDS | ⿸𭆆尨 |
7 - Total Strokes | 17 |
8 - G Source | |
9 - G Image | |
10 - G Similar Ideographs | |
11 - G Ref. to Evidence doc | |
12 - G Page No. in the document (optional) | |
13 - G Row No. in the Page (optional) | |
14 - G Position in the Row (optional) | |
15 - G file name of evidence image | |
16 - G Optional Information | |
17 - K Source | KC-07531 |
18 - K Image | KC-07531.bmp |
19 - K Similar/ Variants | |
20 - K Ref. to Evidence document | 韓國古典飜譯院 韓國文集叢刊 322輯 荷亭集 |
21 - i1) Page No. in the evidence document (optional) | |
22 - i2) Row No. in the page (optional) | |
23 - i3) Position No. in the row (optional) | |
24 - K file name of evidence image | KC-07531.jpg |
25 - K Revised information (2018.03.16) | |
26 - K Real Glyph | |
27 - UK Source | |
28 - UK Image | |
29 - UK Similar/ Variants | |
30 - UK Ref. to Evidence doc | |
31 - UK Title and Year | |
32 - UK Page No. | |
33 - UK PNG Image | |
34 - UK Font code point | |
35 - UK Mapping to traditional or simplified character | |
36 - UK SJT-11239-2001 | |
37 - UK Notes | |
38 - SAT Source | |
39 - SAT Image | |
40 - SAT Similar Ideographs | |
41 - SAT References to evidence documents | |
42 - SAT optional information | |
43 - T Source | |
44 - T Image | |
45 - T Similar/ Varianonets | |
46 - T References to evidence documents A | |
47 - T References to evidence documents B | |
48 - T File name of evidence image | |
49 - T Real Glyph | |
50 - UTC Source | |
51 - UTC Image | |
52 - UTC Similar Ideographs | |
53 - UTC References to evidence documents | |
54 - UTC SJ/T 11239-2001 | |
55 - V Source | |
56 - V Image | |
57 - V Related | |
58 - V Reading | |
59 - V Evidence | |
60 - V Evidence File | |
61 - V Code Point | |
62 - V Note | |
63 - WS2015 SN | |
64 - |
Review Comments
Error form of 氂? If so, consider unification to 氂 (U+6C02).
Unifiable with 𣯛 U+23BDB and 𭕲 U+2D572
S.1.5.b, S.1.5.i
S.1.5.b and S.1.5.i do not seem relevant.
KC-07531, U+23BDB and U+2D572 are different characters.
Radical change to 尢 43.0.
FS=1
If R=43 then SC=14, FS=1
If R=92 then keep SC=13, FS=3
Discussion record (IRG #52): Glyph no change, Not unified to 𣯛 U+23BDB, R=43, FS=1, Not unified to 𭕲 U+2D572
And FS=1, SC=14.
(U+2D186 𭆆)