The text can be dated back to 嘉靖廣東通志.


▲ 廣東通志（明嘉靖刊本）卷60葉16 gives 㗸.


▲ 廣東通志（明萬曆刊本）卷70猺獞葉14 gives 𠷢.



▲ 廣東通志（清康熙刊本）卷29葉19 gives 𠷢 or 𠼫 (too small to determine)

After 雍正廣東通志, a new version was published in 道光 periods:


▲ 廣東通志（清道光刊本）卷330葉34 gives 銜. The editor of 道光志 did not follow 雍正志 and used 銜 instead. Note that 㗸/𠷢/𠼫/銜 are synonyms, so the choice is still consistent with the other gazetteers.

Therefore, I suspect ⿲𧾷𦈢亍 is a misprint of 𠷢. Consider pending more evidences.

As the comment by Huang Junliang shows multiple examples of 𠷢, and as there is only a single piece of evidence for ⿲𧾷𦈢亍, it is probable that the proposed character is a one-off mistake for 𠷢. Therefore postpone pending additional evidence.