Please wait while loading

IRG Working Set 2021v4.0

Consolidated Comments
Filter By Source: Sort By: Show last 7 days only: Show Deleted:

Unification

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00865
00865
土 32.10.4
GDM-00287
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
U+31DC6
黑文婷 argues that ⿰土窊 is a variant of 坬/窊[1]. The earliest known evidence of ⿰土窊 dates back to late Ming while the form 窊 can be found in Five Dynasties text. The form 坬 is commonly used in Qing text.

According to the evidences of 𱷆, 𱷆 is used in Jiangxi province, bordered by Guangdong province where ⿰土窊 is used according to Evidence 1. Based on this and the semantic relationship between ⿰土窊 and 坬, I think ⿰土窊 could be a variant of 𱷆. If 𱷆 is also pronounced as wa, then ⿰土窊 is potentially unifiable to 𱷆.

[ {{WS2017-03214}} ]


[1] 黑文婷,党怀兴,黑维强.黄土高原地名中“坬”的音义及来源[J].语文研究,2022(02):58-65. (PDF is attached below)

Attached PDF file
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
This character is used in hundreds of placenames in Shanxi(山西),Shannxi(陕西),Guangdong(广东) Province. Please see the second evidence of this character ,it's just one page of the book 《山西省行政区划与自然村标准地名手册·雁北地区》but it contains 6 ⿰土窊. Considering all of them are written as ⿰土窊 and ⿰土窊 and U+3EDC6 are usually considered different characters by normal people, it is really bad to unify ⿰土窊 to 𾷆 (U+3EDC6).
00901
00901
土 32.13.3
GDM-00293
TS 16 · IDS 𤲞
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+302AE
Unify to 𰊮 (U+302AE).

In IRG 59, WS2021-01186 has been unified to 𱜍 (U+3170D).

01186
山 46.13.3
GDM-00343
TS 16 · IDS 𤲞
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 𱜍 U+3170D, IRG 59.
Postponed for unification to WS2017-01129 ⿱山畬, evidence accepted, IRG 58.

U+3170D

Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+302AE
Evidence 1 and 2 both show that the replacement character for ⿰土𤲞 is U+756C 畬 which implies that ⿰土𤲞 = ⿰土畬 = U+302AE 𰊮 (UK-02707). Therefore unify to 𰊮 (U+302AE).
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+302AE
Support #9403 and #9839 to unify with 𰊮 (U+302AE), but it is not better to do the horizontal extension in future.

For Zhejiang, Fujian, Jiangxi and Guangdong, 畬 means She People (畲族) or some Hakka people (客家人), 𤲞 is always the variant with the same meanings, but 畬 is the proper one for the modern Chinese written system.
01167
01167
山 46.11.2
GDM-00342
TS 14 · IDS 𠵛
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+37E7
unify to 㟧 (U+37E7)?

Or add both of them to kSpoofingVariant?
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+380B
Unify to 㠋 (U+380B).
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
It is a variant of 萼, non-congnate with 㠋 (U+380B). The evidence is clear enough and the book is compiled by government, so it should be encoeded. By the way, many unencoded characters are replaced by common characters in National Database for Geographical Names of China(中国·国家地名信息库) and county annals.
03670
03670
虫 142.23.2
GKJ-00355
TS 29 · IDS
Oppose Unification
TAO Yang
China
Keep it as a stable miswritten form.
04146
04146
金 167.11.5
GKJ-00506
TS 19 · IDS
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
The new evidences are ⿲金𮧯刂. If we accept them, please also consider potential UCV for 韋/𮧯. According to the MOE dictionary, 𮧯 is a variant of 韋.
UCV
Kushim JIANG
Individual
For potential UCV 韋~𮧯:
𨔻 A04163-001 ~ 違 A04163
𭘮 B00933-005 ~ 幃 B00933
⿱艹𮧯 A03523-001 ~ 葦 A03523
⿴囗𮧯 A00735-001 ~ 圍 A00735
⿰火𮧯 B02406-003 ~ 煒 B02406
𫟘 A03704-003 ~ 衛 A03704
𮘪 A03861-001 ~ 諱 A03861
𨵾 A04393-001 ~ 闈 A04393
⿰𠦝𮧯 A04527-019 ~ 韓 A04527
𩏍 A04528-025-1 ~ 韜 A04528
01230
01230
巾 50.9.3
GKJ-00729
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+610E
unify to 愎?

Similar to the followings.
01239
巾 50.15.3
SAT-06060
TS 18 · IDS
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Pending
Postponed, SAT to supply statistics on the use of 巾 instead of 忄, SC=15, TS=18, IRG 58.
Not unified to 𢤳 U+22933, IRG 57.
01224
巾 50.5.5
SAT-06003
TS 8 · IDS
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Pending
Postponed, SAT to supply statistics on the use of 巾 instead of 忄, FS=5, IRG 58.
04798
04798
鳥' 196'.5.3
GKJ-00810
UK-20622
TS 10 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
In light of #9797, I suggest to disunify UK-20622 and GKJ-00810, and suggest that China corrects the glyph and IDS for GKJ-00810 to ⿰臼鸟 (simplified form of U+4CCE 䳎).
03432
03432
艸 140.14.1
GKJ-00985
TS 17 · IDS
Oppose Unification
TAO Yang
China
御定历代赋汇 补遗卷十五
A variant form of 叢.
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
.
藂 U+85C2 is also a variant form of 叢, according to the source cited by Huang Junliang.
04424
04424
頁' 181'.6.3
GKJ-01020
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+310A5
unify to 𱂥 (U+310A5)

The other method is to unify to U+310A5, but I don’t think it is a good solution.
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Also see WS2021-01195:TE-2B6A.
01195
山 46.15.3
TE-2B6A
TS 18 · IDS 𬱃
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 𡾆 (U+21F86), add new UCV rule 頟 and 𬱃, IRG 58.


Consider to add 𱂥 (U+310A5) and ⿰名页 as a new UCV.
Unification
TAO Yang
China
U+981F
U+5404
It's a stable error which could be kept in this set. Considering it's the wrong glyph of 頟, adding a new UCV to ⿰名頁 and 各頁 is also acceptable.
00655
00655
口 30.14.1
GKJ-01024
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+5678
unify to 噸 (U+5678)

Support #5231 to add a new UCV.
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
U+51FB
For 击, most of the cases stand 击~缶/𦈢, and few cases stand 击~屯, so maybe no sufficiently many cases to set a UCV.
Oppose Unification
TAO Yang
China
⿰击頁 is a stable variant of 頓 which could be encoded independently, so ⿲口击頁 could be kept for now.
滇雲歷年傳
小隱山房駢體文續鈔·文一卷·詩三卷·附詩餘賸稿
端溪硯史三卷
00760
00760
囗 31.1.5
SAT-01395
TS 2 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Not unify to 𡆠 (U+211A0)

Commonly, 𡆠 U+211A0 is used as the Wuzetian variant of 日, and IRG has decided to unify all the Wuzetian variants if the glyphs are similar. However, the submitted character can’t be unified with 𡆠 U+211A0.

All the evidence showed here and other ancient and modern publishing sources show the submitted character is only the Wuzetian variant of 日, and it is common, but 𡆠 U+211A0 could also be used as a local character used for one geographical name in 广东省永安县 (current 广东省河源市紫金县). 《廣東新語》 and 《康熙永安县次志》 listed this place, and 《广东新语注》 shows it is just a local character for the dialects. It is very hard to confirm the modern name of this place, but we can confirm 围子X or X围子 is a common form for the geographical name in Chinese Hakka-dialects speaking areas, like current 梅州, 河源, 惠州, 清远, 韶关 and so on under 广东省. 《福建、广东、广西地名生僻字表》 shows the possible Putonghua reading is kè, that means it must be not related to 日 (日 reads as ŋit5 in 河源).

Therefore, they are non-cognates for this use.


▲ 屈大均: 《廣東新語》, 清康熙刻本, 卷二


▲ 屈大均: 《廣東新語》, 北京: 中華書局, 1985.4, 統一書號: 11018·385, p. 62




▲ 屈大均, 李育中, 邓光礼, 林维纯, 熊福林, 陈伟俊: 《广东新语注》, 广州: 广东人民出版社, 1991.5, ISBN 7-218-00351-6/Z·26, pp. 52-53, 60



▲ 张进箓: 《康熙永安县次志译注》, 广州: 广东人民出版社, 2018.4, ISBN 978-7-218-12551-0, pp. 494-495


▲ 《福建、广东、广西地名生僻字表》, 1984, p. 39

I guess the current name for this place is 广东省河源市紫金县凤安镇凤民村围子剧. 剧 reads kʰiak1 in 河源.
Unification
John Knightley
Individual
Disagree that non-cognate, to prove non-cognate one needs to contrast the two glyphs however the new material from Eiso just shows the "square" glyph. If new UCV agreed then should unify.
00599
00599
口 30.11.5
SAT-04265
TS 14 · IDS 𠙼
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+91CF
Potentially unifiable to 量 U+91CF.

How often do these transliterations of Shuowen Guwen into Sungti typeface happen in SAT's repertoire? SAT-04264 was added in WS2021.

If there is still a certain amount of characters pending, we should potentially make a rule to make them all unifiable so SAT can directly register them as variants via an IVD collection.
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
U+28926
Consider unifying to 𨤦 (U+28926).
Kangxi Dictionary let 𨤦 correspond to the Guwen 古文 shape. Different Liding 隶定 to the same character.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Needs discussion on the unification of the bottom part because this is not a trivial case.

But also see [ {{WS2017-00562}} ]
.
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+31531
Potential unification to 𱔱 (U+31531). Suggest it to be coded via IVS.
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+31531
Unification to 𱔱 (U+31531) looks better.
00458
00458
口 30.6.2
SAT-04398
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+301EA
unify to 𰇪 (U+301EA)

Same meanings and similar glyphs.


▲ 希麟: 《續一切經音義》, 大正新修大藏經, 卷第一, p. 2129
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
U+301EA
Agree to unify with 𰇪 (U+301EA).

According to new 増上寺 version of Tripitaka Koreana (current private), the current glyph of U+301EA is likely a misinterpretation of a damaged glyph of 㖾. We will consider making this one representative glyph.
03517
03517
虫 142.5.2
SAT-04405
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+867A
U+27247
IVS to 虺 (U+867A) or 𧉇 (U+27247)?

Consider also 00249 (SAT-04406) ⿺兄貴 = 尵 (U+5C35) / 𫵒 (U+2BD52).
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Needs discussion whether 兄 and 兀/⺏ are unifiable.

cf. the current 《爾雅注疏》 reads: 虺頹、玄黃,皆人病之通名。而說者便謂之馬疾,失其義也。
00249
00249
儿 10.15.2
SAT-04406
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
John Knightley
Individual
U+2BD52
Submitter in comment #8973 says radical is ⺏ which suggests that IVS of 𫵒 (U+2BD52) possible.
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+5C35
U+2BD52
IVS to 尵 (U+5C35) or 𫵒 (U+2BD52)?

Consider also 03517 (SAT-04405) ⿺兄虫 = 虺 (U+867A) or 𧉇 (U+27247).
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
04941
04941
齊 210.4.4
SAT-04670
TS 16 · IDS &D10-01;丿
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+9F4C
Unify to 齌 (U+9F4C)?

Add new UCV:
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
U+9F4A
For 齊 ~ ⿳亠⿲刀丫𱍸⿰丿丨/⿳亠⿲刀丫𱍸冂
𦠃 ~ 𪗇
𠆈 ~ 䶒
⿳亠⿲刀丫𱍸𠕀 (漢字海 #9458) ~ 𪗅
Oppose Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
It looks more like additional component to us.
01669
01669
日 72.8.1
SAT-04680
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+2323B
unify to 𣈻 (U+2323B)

The evidence has shown the right part is related to 哉, and 㢤 and 哉 is always the variants.

[ {{WS2017-01588}} ]


Also add 㢤 (U+38A4), 㦲 (U+39B2) and 哉 as UCV lv. 1.

U+38A4

U+39B2
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
For 㢤/⿶𢍻十 ~ 㦲 ~ 哉:

⿰〾木⿶𢍻十 A01923-009 ~ 𣔮 A01923-004 ~ 𣖋 A01923-005
⿰氵⿹𢦏力 (漢字海) ~ 渽
䳣 ~ 𪃘
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Needs discussion as it is not a trivial difference.
01815
01815
木 75.10.1
SAT-05682
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+6954
other solution is to unify with 楔 (U+6954)

This character is the variant of 楔 without any doubt. If IRG accept the unification, 契, ⿱⿰丰刃廾, ⿱⿰丰力廾, ⿱⿰龶刃犬, ⿱⿰龶力大, ⿱⿰龶力廾, 𢍆, 𢍠, 𭑕, 𭚘 and so on should be treated as UCV lv. 1.
U+22346

U+22360

U+2D455

U+2D698


https://zi.tools/zi/%E6%A5%94
https://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/variants/rbt/word_attribute.rbt?quote_code=QTAxOTc4
https://zi.tools/zi/%E5%A5%91
https://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/variants/rbt/word_attribute.rbt?quote_code=QTAwODY0
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Needs discussion. I don't think we have 大/廾 UCV cases yet.
01610
01610
攴 66.9.2
SAT-05880
TS 13 · IDS 𰏘
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+655D
Why was this not unified to 敝 (U+655D)?

They are variants without doubt. Suggest to add a new UCV of 𰏘 (Extension G) and 㡀.
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Agree with Henry on #9875.
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
For 𰏘 ~ 㡀:

𥡎 (GHZ p. 2806) ~ 𥞻
⿰禾〾𰏘 B03813-008 / ⿰禾〾𰏘 B03813-007 ~ 𥞻 B03813-001
𡙼 A01260-003 / ⿰〾矢〾𰏘 A01260-005 ~ 𥏟 A01260-011
⿰矢〾𰏘 (漢字海) ~ 𥏟
⿰弓〾𰏘 A01260-006 ~ 㢼 A01260-008
⿰〾革〾𰏘 B02604-006 / ⿰〾革〾𰏘 B02604-004 ~ 𩋇 B02604-003
⿰〾𰏘鳥 C17636-002 ~ 䳤 C17636
⿰〾𰏘攴 A01723-004 ~ 敝 A01723
⿰〾𰏘攵 A01723-005 / ⿰〾𰏘攵 A01723-007 ~ 敝 A01723
⿰〾𰏘頁 (漢字海) ~ 𩓝
⿰日〾𰏘 C04838-001 ~ 𣇢 C04838
⿱大〾𰏘 C01964-001 / ⿱大〾𰏘 C01964-002 ~ 𡘴 C01964
03496
03496
虍 141.10.2
SAT-06257
TS 16 · IDS 𠔃
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+2E4E9
Unify to 𮓩 (U+2E4E9)?
The KC03747 glyph shown in ROK's CJK Ideographs Search System is as below. See https://www.koreanhistory.or.kr/newchar/list_view.jsp?code=73940


KR Norm. 130-1


It is better to expand UCV #311 as KR Norm. 130-1 shows.
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
For 虍 ~ 〾𮓗 / 𠁅 - 匆 ~ 〾𮓗 / 𮓙 - 几:

𠁅 ~ 䖏 (𠻔 ~ 𠼥 𢴃 ~ 㩀 𭞥 ~ 𢟶)
𠙚 ~ 處
⿸〾𮓗丘 A03609-021 ~ 虗 A03609-002
⿸〾𮓗几 A03604-009 ~ 虎 A03604
⿸〾𮓗又 A03606-017 ~ 𧆛 A03606-005
⿸〾𮓗林 C12181-008 ~ 𧇃 C12181-001
⿸〾𮓗甲 C12154-003 ~ 𧆥 C12154
⿸〾𮓗𠯵 A03611-005 ~ ⿸虍𠯵 A03611-002
⿸〾𮓗男 A03610-002 ~ 虜 A03610
⿸〾𮓗思 A01426-004 ~ 慮 A01426
⿸〾𮓗胃 A03364-003 ~ 膚 A03364
⿸〾𮓗𰤷 (GHZR, p.2751) ~ 盧 (𮉗 ~ 纑 𮎗 ~ 艫 𮬗 ~ 鱸)

(too many to list)
01731
01731
月 74.4.1
SAT-06399
TS 8 · IDS
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
.
Are there any intermediate forms of 翅 and SAT-06399 found, where the middle two strokes protrude on the left? We should consider IVD to 翅 directly if there are such examples.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
We are also curious to know.
00580
00580
口 30.11.2
SAT-06406
TS 14 · IDS 𩁹
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+20EE2
Unify to 𠻢 (U+20EE2) as the character is a variant of 謣 so the rhs should be cognate.
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Consider to add UCV for 于, 亏, 亐 as lv. 2 when they are cognates, or add 雩 and 𩁹 as lv. 1.
00412
00412
厶 28.8.5
SAT-06452
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
John Knightley
Individual
U+20D29
Unifiable to 𠴩 (U+20D29)
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Needs discussion. It mostly depends on whether the bottom component is unifiable.
Unification
John Knightley
Individual
U+20D29
The bottom part ⿱甘廾 has a similar shape to 其, they have same number of strokes, in fact the only difference in strokes is where the last two strokes connect. In short there have the same abstract shape. 康熙字典 only includes 𠴩 U+20D29 because it is an ancient variant of 箕. The 汉语大字典 also says the same.

Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
U+20D29
I agree with John. On the bottom component, note that 𢍌 is a variant of 其 and 𢍌 is similar to ⿱甘廾. ⿱甘廾 is potentially unifiable to 其. Does SAT have more characters with the exact ⿱甘廾 component? If not I suggest we unify to 𠴩 and SAT can use register this shape as IVD.

U+2234C
02808
02808
石 112.14.1
SAT-06454
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+78E7
Unify to 磧 (U+78E7)?

This is a strictly transliterated form of 磧. Suggest to add new UCV rule of 責 and ⿱束貝.
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
For 責 ~ ⿱束貝:

𩼱 B06006-003 ~ 鰿 B06006
⿰女⿱束貝 C02303-002 ~ 嫧 C02303
⿰氵⿱束貝 (SAT): 濅▲ ~ 濅漬, 澆▲ ~ 澆漬
⿰石⿱束貝 (SAT): ▲中 ~ 磧中
⿰禾⿱束貝 A02944-006 ~ 積 A02944
⿰糸⿱束貝 A03166-006 ~ 績 A03166
⿰𦣞⿱束貝 (SAT): 探▲ ~ 探賾
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Needs discussion since it is not a trivial difference.

For this character, "strict transliteration" (嚴格隷定) is not an accurate description of its origin as it is not artificially transcribed. This is one of branches of diversified variants during the transition from Clerical to Regular script.
01842
01842
木 75.12.2
SAT-06594
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+22FF5
We should consider if UCV #307 is suitable for this case to unify with 𢿵 (U+22FF5).



IDS should also be ⿺棠攵.
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
Agree with Eiso #11437 in principle. We may actually need to set a separate category to indicate that different arrangements of the same components are still unifiable in some cases. Some of these cases may be caused by the length of the strokes in the components, others not.

The importance of setting this classification is that structural differences sometimes lead to non-cognateness and disunifiability. If it is necessary to qualify some of the unifiable cases, a special section will be needed to discuss them.

Since UCV #307 belongs to “j-2. Differences in relative length of strokes”, it may indicate that the length of the strokes [should be in a single component?] leads to differences in the analysis of component structure. But even so, some examples classified as UCV #307 or UCV #305 should be treated as different arrangement of components, like 𢣁 in UCV #305 and examples in UCV #305b/305c/305d.

In this case, we may find:

⿱ ~ ⿹:
螜 ~ 𧏚, 𡠆 ~ 㜌, 𣖫 ~ 榖 ...
頾 ~ 頿, 𩒹 ~ 䫇, 嬃 ~ 𡡓 ...
𣻯 ~ 潁, ⿱頃山 (睡虎地) ~ ⿹頃山, ⿱頃糸 (漢字海) ~ 顈

⿰ ~ ⿺:
𣤚 ~ 燞, ⿺焦刂 B00243-002 ~ 劁 B00243

===============

For ⿱⿰尚A木 ~ ⿰棠A, I can only find ⿱敞木 and 𢿧𢿵𭣜. Consider:

𢿵:
[一切經音義] 染衣倀, [倀] 摘更反, 或作▲, 考聲云 “▲, 展也, 從木敞聲, 律中 (根本説一切有部毘奈耶尼陀那目得迦攝頌) 從手從貞作揁 (“霑衣大小便, 染衣揁認衣”), 非也”.

𢿧:
[一切經音義] 衣▲, [▲] 讁庚反, 考聲云 “𭣜, 展也, 從木敞聲, 律本作揁, 非也”.

𭣜:
[一切經音義] 𢿦前, 上讁更反, 經作楨, 非也. 楨音客庚反, 琴瑟聲也, 若以爲楨像字, 於義乖失. 今偕𭣜字, 用之稍近於理, 順俗爲去聲呼也.
[一切經音義] 衣𢿧, [𢿧] 讁庚反, 考聲云 “▲, 展也, 從木敞聲, 律本作揁, 非也”.

So ⿱敞木 and 𢿧𢿵𭣜 can be analyzed as being unfiable.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
This is an edge case.

The meaning can be related with both 木 "tree" and 攴 "strike", and 一切經音義 consistently consider the semantic component should be 木, while later dictionaries think 攴. The 尚 component is composable with both, and no matter which interpretation you make, the structural integrity of the other possibility is broken.
00767
00767
囗 31.4.2
SAT-06654
TS 7 · IDS 𠔁
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
U+56E7
Consider unifying to 囧.
See evidence #3, 蒼頡篇云, 囧 (▲), 大 (火) 明也.

Also:
⿰⿴囗仌月 A01784-007 ~ 朙 A01784-001
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
U+56E7
Needs discussion on visual similarity with 囧.
00258
00258
八 12.7.3
SAT-06676
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
John Knightley
Individual
U+30B80
Virtually identical contextual quote seems have been used for both SAT-08988 and SAT-06676, which strongly suggests only one one code point required. According to the zi.tools link give the quote the meaning U+30B80 aka SAT-08988 was "(大藏經)
字見於大正新脩大藏經外字系統《一切經音義》:説文從八從肉作血脉在肉中~&MT0", which seems essentially to be that of SAT-06676.
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
U+30B80
Consider unifying to 𰮀 (U+30B80).
Cross reference comment #4540.

Also:
⿱〾高⿴囗仌 A03356-006 ~ ⿱🈩高口〾肉 A03356-009 ~ 膏 A03356.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Needs discussion as there seems no unification rule that covers this case.
02936
02936
竹 118.9.1
SAT-06728
TS 15 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+22CBF
We could discuss if it is OK to add ⿱ and ⿵ as a new UCV. If yes, we can consider to unify this character to 𢲿 (U+22CBF).
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
Agree in principle. [https://hc.jsecs.org/irg/ws2021/app/index.php?id=01842#c12586]

For ⿱ ~ ⿵:

⿱咸心 ~ ⿵咸心 (感)
𡞣 C02254 ~ ⿵咸女 C02254-001
⿱戌火 (漢字海) ~ 烕
𤥔 ~ 㓘
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Agree to have such UCV but we are not sure if this specific case can be handled using ⿱/⿵ when the supposed surrounding component is 𥬑(筑) which is not naturally enveloping in shape.
01047
01047
宀 40.9.4
SAT-06842
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+3763
unify to 㝣 (U+3763)

Also see WS2021-01815.
01815
木 75.10.1
SAT-05682
TS 14 · IDS


In 説文解字, 㝣 is different from 絜, but 㝣 could be loaned (假借) as 絜.


▲ 朱駿聲: 《説文通訓定聲》, 臨嘯閣藏本, 泰部弟十三
02485
02485
玉 96.9.1
SAT-06892
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+31BCB
unify to 𱯋 (U+31BCB)
00251
00251
儿 10.18.3
SAT-06900
TS 20 · IDS
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+4C2B
Possible unification to 䰫 (U+4C2B)
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
It is a crazy idea to unify this one with 䰫 (U+4C2B).

SAT has proved the current form is stable for different editions.
01395
01395
心 61.14.1
SAT-06989
TS 17 · IDS 𮧊
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+61BB
unify to 憻 (U+61BB)

It is a good chance to add 亶, 𮧊 (U+2E9CA) and ⿱面旦 as UCV lv.1.

U+23780 𣞀 vs U+6A80 檀
U+23780
U+6A80

U+28BAE 𨮮 vs U+28B56 𨭖
U+28BAE
U+28B56

U+2D2E2 𭋢 vs U+20FDE 𠿞
U+2D2E2
U+20FDE

U+2D400 𭐀 vs U+58C7 壇
U+2D400
U+58C7

U+2E09F 𮂟 vs U+4120 䄠
U+2E09F
U+4120

U+2EB59 𮭙 vs U+9E07 鸇
U+2EB59
U+9E07

U+311C3 𱇃 vs U+9C63 鱣
U+311C3
U+9C63

U+31327 𱌧 vs U+2A675 𪙵
U+31327
U+2A675
02724
02724
矛 110.27.3
SAT-06996
TS 32 · IDS &P15-01;
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
As #11809 shows, it is better to add 矛 and 𭿵 to UCV as lv.1.
03767
03767
言 149.6.1
SAT-07005
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+279F3
unify to 𧧳 (U+279F3) or U+8A87?

In the evidence, this character is used as the 反切上字 for 髁, that means the 聲母 of this character must be 溪母, and could be 合口 and 一等 or 二等. 𧧳 is the variant of 誇, that matches them.

We can also find the encoded character related to ⿱大干 as below.

U+29A43 𩩃 ≠ U+3116F 𱅯 = U+9ABB 骻
U+29A43
U+3116F
U+9ABB

U+31499 𱒙 = U+314AA 𱒪 = U+54B5 咵 ?
U+31499
U+314AA
U+54B5


There is also U+2D826 𭠦, and we don’t have ⿰扌𡗢, but it is the variant of 挎.
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
MOE Variant Dictionary


Based on 干祿字書, [⿰言⿱大干] is a variant of 誇.
However, if adding a new UCV=[⿱大干]/𡗢/夸, I think it is a bit dangerous, such as U+29A43 𩩃 is a variant of U+5E79 幹 or U+9AAD 骭, but it has no meaningful relationship with 骻 (U+9ABB).
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
For ⿱大干 / 𭑃 / ⿱大𰀁 ~ 𡗢:
𣳹 ~ 𣴰
⿰言𭑃 (漢字海) ~ 𧧳
𰸉 ~ 𨀗
⿰魚⿱大干 (漢字海) ~ 𩶮
⿰月⿱大𰀁 (GHZR p.2215) ~ 𰮟

Since 𩩃 ≁ 𱅯, ⿱大干 / 𭑃 / ⿱大𰀁 ~ 𡗢 may be level 2.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Needs discussion whether ⿱大干 and 𡗢 are unifiable.
03816
03816
貝 154.5.1
SAT-07087
TS 12 · IDS 𠆴
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+27D69
02885
禾 115.12.3
SAT-07086
TS 17 · IDS 𠆴
should be unify with 𧵩 (U+27D69) as WS2021-02885 shows
02885
禾 115.12.3
SAT-07086
TS 17 · IDS 𠆴
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 𥢼 U+258BC, add a new UCV rule of 𧵩 and ⿱𠆴貝, IRG 59.
02547
02547
瓦 98.6.1
SAT-07172
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+3F1D
unify to 㼝 (U+3F1D)

Also see
03523
虫 142.6.1
GKJ-00472
TS 12 · IDS
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 䖤 U+45A4, IRG 57.

03524
虫 142.6.1
SAT-09003
TS 12 · IDS
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 䖤 U+45A4, IRG 57.

04702
鳥 196.6.1
GKJ-00382
TS 17 · IDS
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 鴛 U+9D1B, new UCV rule of 死 and 夗 as the top component to be added, IRG 57.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
U+3F1D
Agree to unify to 㼝 (U+3F1D), UCV #445
00394
00394
卩 26.6.3
SAT-07211
TS 8 · IDS 𬼉
Unification
John Knightley
Individual
U+5378
Consider if best considered as 卸 (U+5378). No encoded characters have 𬼉 U+2CF09 as their right hand component but 𦈢 is used, it is not unheard of for handwritten characters to have one small stroke missing by mistake.
Oppose Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
In this case, we think the construction of the top part is related with that of 垂, therefore responsible for the difference of meaning with 𦈢.
Oppose Unification
John Knightley
Individual
Agree. Non-cognate so do not unify.
03984
03984
辵 162.12.1
SAT-08470
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+2B444
U+285D2
unify to 𫑄 (U+2B444) or U+285D2

The evidence shows it is the variant of 霆. 《隨函録》 uses 𫑄.


▲ 《新集藏經音義隨函録》, 高麗藏, 賢聖集音義第七之四
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
See
00150
人 9.7.3
SAT-08559
TS 9 · IDS 𢌜
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
No change, IRG 58.
Unified to 侹 U+4FB9, add a new UCV rule of 廷 and 𢌜, IRG 57.
01465
手 64.7.3
SAT-08486
TS 10 · IDS 𢌜
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 挺 U+633A, add a new UCV rule of 廷 and 𢌜, IRG 57.
01466
手 64.7.3
TC-487C
TS 10 · IDS
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 挺 U+633A, add a new UCV rule of 廷 and 𢌜, IRG 57.
02476
玉 96.7.1
SAT-06673
TS 11 · IDS 𢌜
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 珽 U+73FD, IRG 58.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
U+2B444
In principle we agree to unify with 𫑄 U+2B444; please check if the current UCV #109b covers this case.
Unification
John Knightley
Individual
Cognate so should unify. The alternate IDS ⿺辶手⿺雨 shows more clearly why UCV #109b should in principal be applied here.
03967
03967
辵 162.7.2
SAT-08538
TS 11 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+900C
unify to 逌 (U+900C)

海山仙館叢書 and the modern paper both give 逌. The submitted one and 逌 are very very similar.


▲ 玄應: 《一切經音義》, 海山仙館叢書, 卷第二十二


▲ 聂志军, 向红艳: 《敦煌遗书S.1815V再研究》, 《敦煌研究》, 2018年第1期, p. 118
01504
01504
手 64.11.1
SAT-08577
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+838F
unify to 莏 (U+838F)

The evidence shows 説文 捼~ 手相摩也. 許慎 also said the variant of 捼 is 挼, and Prof. 费秉勋 modified some definition based on the 《説文解字》, which he was studying “挼曲子” mentioned in 《东京梦华录》. At this time, the submitted character and the relative one are not used in the sentence in 《説文解字》.



▲ 許慎: 《説文解字》, 藤花榭本, 第十二上


▲ 费秉勋: 《宋舞杂考》//中国艺术研究院舞蹈研究所: 《舞蹈艺术丛刊 1986年第4辑(总第17辑)》, 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 1986.11, 统一书号: 8228·151, p. 112

The following book provided the similar word related to the submitted character.


▲ 李玉汶: 《漢英新辭典 第五版》, 上海: 商務印書館, 中華民國十年九月 (1921.9), p. 533

《廣韻》 and 《集韻》 showed more useful information.


▲ 《廣韻》, 符山堂藏板, 下平聲卷第二 (蘇禾切)


▲ 《集韻》, 南宋初明州刻本, 卷之一

Based on current unification rule, they could be unifiable because of cognate.
Oppose Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Not unifiable with 莏 (U+838F) because of different number of components.
00125
00125
衣 145.11.3
SAT-08636
TS 17 · IDS 𰠀
Unification
John Knightley
Individual
U+276D9
Unify to 𧛙 U+276D9.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Needs discussion whether 呆/𣎼 are unifiable.
Unification
John Knightley
Individual
U+276D9
Whilst of course 呆/𣎼 being unifiable would entail unification to 𧛙 U+276D9, it is sufficient in this case to discuss whether or not 𤔍 U+2450D and 𰠀 U+30800 are unifiable when used as a component.
01607
01607
支 65.6.3
SAT-08648
TS 10 · IDS
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Expand UCV #27 to 兌兑兊 and keep it as lv. 1.



Japan has used this UCV in Hanyo-Denshi and Moji_Joho IVD collections.


U+5156 兖 = U+5157 兗
U+5156
U+5157

U+6071 恱 = U+6085 悅 U+60A6 悦
U+6071
U+6085
U+60A6

U+6BE4 毤 = U+23B86 𣮆
U+6BE4
U+23B86

U+8412 萒 = U+26CC6 𦳆
U+8412
U+26CC6

U+20C55 𠱕 = U+54FE 哾
U+20C55
U+54FE

U+21DCB 𡷋 = U+37CB 㟋
U+21DCB
U+37CB

U+22B01 𢬁 = U+6329 挩 U+635D 捝
U+22B01
U+6329
U+635D

U+22F20 𢼠 = U+6553 敓 U+655A 敚
U+22F20
U+6553
U+655A

U+26B80 𦮀 = U+838C 莌 U+26CAE 𦲮
U+26B80
U+838C
U+26CAE

U+26CAE 𦲮 = U+44F2 䓲
U+26CAE
U+44F2

U+289A3 𨦣 = U+92B3 銳 U+92ED 鋭
U+289A3
U+92B3
U+92ED

U+294AC 𩒬 = U+4AC4 䫄
U+294AC
U+4AC4

U+2D8ED 𭣭 = U+2D8F3 𭣳
U+2D8ED
U+2D8F3

U+2DF66 𭽦 = U+24FEB 𤿫
U+2DF66
U+24FEB


Note: the outside component of U+22F20 𢼠 is not totally the same as U+514A 兊, but they must be unifiable.

The followings have not the corresponding 兑/兌 variant forms.

U+38DE 㣞U+38DE

U+20D77 𠵷U+20D77

U+211F0 𡇰U+211F0

U+2170E 𡜎U+2170E

U+2406B 𤁫U+2406B

U+278E5 𧣥U+278E5

U+27344 𧍄U+27344

U+2E8FD 𮣽U+2E8FD

U+31F79 𱽹U+31F79
03746
03746
角 148.4.1
SAT-08750
TS 11 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+89DD
Consider unification to 觝 U+89DD.

Another variation of 氐.

Existing UCV #453:
00581
00581
口 30.11.2
SAT-08851
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+55CC
Unify to 嗌 (U+55CC) because of unification of SAT-06800 to 益 with new UCV. If unification to U+55CC is considered inappropriate, then consider disunifying SAT-06800 from 益.
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
For ⿰三三 ~ 〾氺 / 𣹹 - 烕:

⿱⿰三三皿 ~ 益
⿱烕⿰三三 A02285-014 ~ 𣹹 A02285-004
Oppose Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
The application of UCV #430a to WS2021-02673 is based on observation that the top component is actually ☵-shaped instead of ☷. It does not covers this case and we do not believe this character is cognate with 嗌.
02043
02043
水 85.9.2
T9-773B
TS 12 · IDS
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
If add a new UCV 句~勾, TCA agree to unify.
03297
03297
舟 137.3.3
T9-7E3E
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+8224
Unify to 舤 (U+8224)?

Pronunication is given as fán which suggests the right hand side 凢 is a variant of 凡.

The following variants are currently coded:
U+51E2 凢 = 凡
U+51E3 凣 = 凡
U+3836 㠶 = 帆
U+225BE 𢖾 = 忛
U+233C6 𣏆 = 杋
U+25425 𥐥 = 矾
U+250F6 𥃶 = 𥃵
U+2AD6C 𪵬 = 汎
U+2D0AB 𭂫 = 凡

U+51E2 凢 and U+51E3 凣 are considered Source Code Separation with each other.

There is one example in Ext A, one in Ext C and one in Ext F. The rest are Ext B. We should consider expanding UCV for 凢 and 凣 to also cover 𭂫 and 凡.
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
If UCV (UCV# 54? )is added, TCA agree. Because 凢 is often used as the variant of 凡.
04325
04325
雨 173.10.3
TB-672B
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+2A777
unify to 𪝷 (U+2A777) possibly
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to the new rules (same components, different structure), TCA agree to be a VS of U+2A777.
02761
02761
石 112.7.3
TB-696C
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
U+787C
Suggest unify to 硼 (U+787C), S.1.5.i
Disunification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
Not suitable for S.1.5.i, it is not a question of more or less stroke.
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+787C
Suggest to Unify to 硼 (U+787C); and add a new UCV rule of 朋 ~ ⿰月习.

Based on the handwritten form, it seems very likely that ⿰月习 is an abbreviated form of 朋.

Another example of 朋 written as ⿰月习:


Sometimes it is completely joined as 用:
01276
01276
廾 55.7.3
TC-482E
TS 10 · IDS
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
U+5F07
Same reading yǎn and difference of one stroke from 弇 (U+5F07).
Disunification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
There is no UCV rule for these two lower components(开 and 廾).
02021
02021
水 85.7.3
TC-4B4B
TS 10 · IDS 𠘧
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
This character, if encoded, would likely be unifiable with ⿰氵盁, which is currently coded in CNS11643 as TC-7234. Would TCA prefer to code (TC-7234 instead, then unify TC-4B4B to TC-7234?

Alternatively, both characters could be unified to 溋 U+6E8B, with addition of new UCV rule 盈 / 盁 / ⿱𠘧皿.

Data page for TC-7234 (Character Source: 財政部財稅用字):


Data page for TC-4B4B (Character Source: 內政部戶政用字):
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
Because of the common component(盁), TCA has agreed to change the proposed form to TC-7234. But EVIDENCE is unable to provide the Table produced by the Household System, and TCA can provide the BMP glyph and attributes printed by Tax Center(財稅中心) in 2004 as new evidence.

UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
TCA suggest adding new UCV rule盈 / 盁 /⿱𠂊皿/ ⿱𠘧皿.
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please remove 盈 from the UCV request.

盁 /⿱𠂊皿/ ⿱𠘧皿 is enough.
03006
03006
米 119.4.5
TC-4E64
TS 10 · IDS
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
If we accept the new evidence, please also consider a new UCV 允/𠃔.

Cognate examples:
𭀚 = 充
𭠐 = 抁
𢼠 = 敓 = (⿰兊攵, B01473-007)
𠡌 = 𠡜
𤴴 = 𤵔 = 㽸 = 𤴺
01768
01768
木 75.3.1
TC-7739
TS 7 · IDS
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Similar shape and same reading. Seems like a number of UCV rules (B1, J4) could be applied.
Oppose Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
They are lots of personal characters in ⿰?亍 structure, and their readings are random.

𣲇 (15-225C), 戶政用字, chù
𥐡 (15-2831), 戶政用字, chì
𥸰 (15-2C7E), 戶政用字, chì
𨊫 (15-325F), 戶政用字, chì
𩶷 (15-463C), 戶政用字, yú
𬍐 (12-2C7B), 戶政用字, chù
𬗃 (12-4130), 戶政用字, yū

For this character, the reading comes from 廣碑別字.



It is hard for me to find strong variation connection between 丂 ~ 亍, I can only find 㱙 ~ 𣦿.
Disunification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
丂~亍 is not a common variant relationship. TCA agree with Kushim Jiang veiws, not unify.
Oppose Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
The reading provided by TCA is xiǔ, because 《廣碑別字》 lists it as a variant of 朽 (U+673D).

However, this character is sourced from 內政部戶政用字 based on the info from the CNS11643 website. As a person's name character, it is more likely to be a variant of 「行」 with the 「彳」 component swapped out to 「木」 for the custom of 五行.
02586
02586
田 102.7.3
TD-2D6E
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
U+2AC26
Is it 𪰦 (U+2AC26)? It also seems to be a Taiwanese personal name.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
Are we going to make a new UCV rule 田 and 日?
01490
01490
手 64.10.1
TD-3B4D
TS 13 · IDS
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to the new rules (same components, different structure), TCA agrees to be a VS of U+20E83.
Oppose Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
Oppose unification to 𠺃 (U+20E83).

Based on the provided readings, U+20E83 appears to be taking phonetic 振 while TD-3B4D appears to be using phonetic 唇. If this is the case, they are non-cognate and shouldn't be unified.
01902
01902
欠 76.10.1
TD-4A24
TS 14 · IDS 𥞤
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
U+238D9
𣣙 (U+238D9)
Both have the same reading, kuǎn; Perhaps extend, UCV i., Differences of extra or reduced stroke or dot, to 木 and 禾 where they are part of larger component, like ⿳士冖木 and ⿳士冖禾
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
U+2C16D
Consider unify to 𬅭 (U+2C16D).

⿰𡉉欠 may not be regarded as an isolated abstract component. Considering all the characters with similar structure:

𬅭 ~ 款
⿰⿱〾𡉉方欠 (13-4E33) (kuǎn)
⿰⿱〾𡉉禾欠 (11-6151) (kuǎn)

They are all derived from 款. First a 冖 is added from the original glyph to form 𬅭, then the lower-left part 示 is changed to be 禾 to form [11-6151], then the 一 is deleted to form this [TD-4A24], then the 丿 is deleted to form 𣣙 (only one character with this ⿰⿳十冖A欠 structure).
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
If a new UCV rule is added, TCA agree.
02624
02624
疒 104.9.3
TD-512B
TS 14 · IDS 𠂊
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
U+24E1D
Perhaps unifiable with 𤸝 (U+24E1D)?
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
U+24E1D
Consider unifying to 𤸝 (U+24E1D).

⿱⺈男 A00388-028 ~ 勇 A00388
𤧓 (15-4363, 戶政用字, yǒng) ~ 𬍺 (13-402D, 戶政用字, yǒng)

Most of ⿱⺈田 ~ 角 or 舀, so ⿱⺈男 ~ 勇 lvl 1 or ⿱⺈田 ~ 甬 lvl 2.
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
If UCV (勇~⿱⺈男)is added, TCA agree to unify.
03173
03173
羽 124.8.3
TD-536C
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
U+2E2C9
U+2E2CB
Possibly unifiable with 𮋉 (U+2E2C9) or U+2E2CB 𮋋?
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
U+7FF1
U+2E2C9
Consider unifying to 翱 (U+7FF1) or 𮋉 (U+2E2C9).

Not unify to 𮋋 (U+2E2CB), as the Korean reading 황 (~ 皇) is different from 고.
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
If UCV is added, TCA agree to unify.
03378
03378
艸 140.10.1
TD-5447
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+2BB9D
unify to 𫮝 (U+2BB9D) ?

Both are used for person name in Taiwan Province.
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to UCV #307c, TCA agree to be a VS of U+2BB9D.
04533
04533
髟 190.6.1
TD-724B
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+29B16
unify to 𩬖 (U+29B16) based on the reading?
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
If UCV is added, TCA agree to unify.

Reading is a reference in the literature, but it is not suitable as a source of recognition in the use of names, as reading is a matter for the person concerned to decide.
02801
02801
石 112.12.2
TE-2622
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to new UCV #307c, TCA agrees to unify, and TCA wants to keep 02801(⿰石萑).

These two characters are a good case in which reading is based.
02950
02950
竹 118.11.1
TE-2668
TS 17 · IDS 𭅗
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to new UCV #307c, TCA agrees to unify, and TCA wants to keep 01856 (TE-2360, ⿰木⿱竹𭅗).
03102
03102
糸 120.12.2
TE-267D
TS 18 · IDS
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
U+2700A
Unifiable with 𧀊 (U+2700A), UCV #307c
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to UCV #307c, TCA agree to be a VS of U+2700A.
03427
03427
艸 140.13.4
TE-2766
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
LI Yuan
SAT
U+6FF8
It should be unified to 濸 (U+6FF8) according to UCV 307c.
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to UCV #307c, TCA agree to be a VS of U+6FF8.
03992
03992
辵 162.13.2
TE-292B
TS 17 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+31FA8
unify to 𱾨 (U+31FA8) possibly
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to UCV #307c, TCA agree to unify with 𱾨 (U+31FA8).
03108
03108
糸 120.13.2
TE-367E
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
U+2706D
Unifiable with 𧁭 (U+2706D), UCV #307c
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to UCV #307c, TCA agree to be a VS of U+2706D.
03642
03642
虫 142.13.3
TE-3773
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+87F9
unify to 蟹

The new UCV for 解觧 has been added.
01388
心 61.13.3
SAT-06249
TS 17 · IDS
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 𢢣 U+228A3 per UCV rule #457, IRG 59.
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to UCV rule #457, TCA agree to be a VS of U+87F9.
02980
02980
竹 118.15.1
TE-415D
TS 21 · IDS
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to the new rules (same components, different structure), TCA agrees to be a VS of U+255D6.
02982
02982
竹 118.16.1
TE-446F
TS 22 · IDS
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to the new rules (same components, different structure), TCA agrees to unify, and TCA wants to keep 01601(⿰扌簷).
03988
03988
辵 162.12.2
TE-6E7C
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
According to new UCV #307c, TCA agrees to unify to 𮑋 (U+2E44B).
02041
02041
水 85.9.1
UK-20188
TS 12 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+6DDE
unify to 淞 (U+6DDE)


▲ 范端昂, 汤志岳: 《粤中见闻》, 广州: 广东高等教育出版社, 1988.7, ISBN 7-5361-0086-8/Z·1, p. 119
This modern publishing edition gives 淞.




▲ 曾楚楠, 《潮州文化丛书》编纂委员会: 《潮州文化丛书·第一辑 韩愈在潮州(增订本)》, 广州: 广东人民出版社, 2021.7, ISBN 978-7-218-14801-, pp. 65-67
Based on the analysis, this character should be the omission of 吴淞 (near Yangtze River Delta); 陂塘 means narrow pond, which is a common stable word.

口 and 厶 are commonly unifiable.
02472
02472
玉 96.5.3
UK-20199
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+739C
unify to 玜 (U+739C)
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+739C
We do not oppose unification to 玜 (U+739C) with a new UCV (see also UK-20188)
02605
02605
疒 104.5.1
UK-20302
TS 10 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
The character shown in #12873 is U+24D6E 𤵮 kuí. As U+24D6E has a subtle but important difference in glyph construction compared with UK-20302 (⿸疒⿱㇒火 compared with ⿸疒灭) and a different pronunciation and meaning, the two characters are not cognate, and according to IRG PnP Section 2.1.3 should not be unified: "Ideographs with different glyph shapes that are unrelated in historical derivation (non-cognate characters) are not unified no matter how similar their glyph shapes may be".
01039
01039
宀 40.7.1
UK-20396
TS 10 · IDS 𮕜
Unification
L F CHENG
Individual
U+219FE
Similar to U+219FE
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+219FE
Agree to unify to 𡧾 (U+219FE) as both are variants of "寧".
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
As Andrew’s comment on #9874, this is really not a “wrong” character, and it is very common in the ancient books as #10647.

I don’t oppose to unify with 𡧾 (U+219FE), but I don’t know why 《汉语大字典》 include ⿳宀乛皿 form not this one, that is so strange.

I strongly request UK for consideration to do the horizontal extension later, if this one been unified.
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
U+219FE
I agree with Eiso that UK should consider HE for 𡧾.

The 𡧾 in GHZ is quoted from 四聲篇海:



However, both 泰和四聲篇海 and 成化四聲篇海 give the shape ⿱宀𮕜.



泰和五音新改併類聚四聲篇(金元遞修本) 7:4b



成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇(明成化刊本)7:6b

And the remaining stroke count of this character is 7 in 四聲篇, consistent with the shape 𮕜, but not ⿱乛皿 given in the GHZ as it has only 6 strokes.
02073
02073
水 85.11.2
UK-20398
TS 16 · IDS
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+2ADC2
Unify to 𪷂 (U+2ADC2).

The pronunciation of U+2ADC2 𪷂 is also mu4, so it is also a variant of 慕 without a doubt.

Suggest to update UCV #32a to Level 1 as well.
00332
00332
刀 18.19.1
UK-20463
TS 21 · IDS
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+5299
The quoted text is a mistake for “劃劙雲陰,卷月日也". Suggest to unify ⿰蟸刂 to 劙 (U+5299) with new UCV for 蟸~蠡.
01157
01157
山 46.9.5
UK-20468
TS 12 · IDS
UCV
Henry CHAN
Individual
IRG should reconsider adding a new unification rule of 眉 ~ 睂 because the 眉 component is extremely productive.

Based on a quick lookup of IDS, there are 38 characters with 眉 component while there are 10 characters encoded with 睂.
02670
02670
皮 107.19.2
UK-20579
TS 24 · IDS 𧁧
Unification
TAO Yang
China
U+25039
Unify to 𥀹 (U+25039)
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
No UCV for the unification, and although obviously a variant of U+25039, the component structure is different. Therefore do not agree to unification.
01896
01896
木 75.27.3
UK-20926
SAT-07235
TS 31 · IDS
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
U+31936
Potentially unifiable to 𱤶 if we change NUCV #403 火灬 to UCV.

[ {{WS2017-01808}} ]
00129
00129
人 9.2.1
UTC-03208
TS 4 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
Do not unify to 仃 (U+4EC3) as non-cognate (right side of proposed character is 工 lacking final stroke)
00578
00578
口 30.11.1
UTC-03216
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+2BAD5
unify to 𫫕 (U+2BAD5)

This character share the same pronunciation and meaning with 𫫕 (U+2BAD5). This one (UTC-03216) is more proper than UTC-00561 for U+2BAD5 𫫕 for Cantonese use. Maybe it is better to change the U-Source for U+2BAD5 𫫕 to UTC-03216 in future.

The original evidence of UTC-00561.

▲ kCheungBauerIndex 379.04

Also see WS2021-00150, 01465, 01466, 02476.
00150
人 9.7.3
SAT-08559
TS 9 · IDS 𢌜
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
No change, IRG 58.
Unified to 侹 U+4FB9, add a new UCV rule of 廷 and 𢌜, IRG 57.
01465
手 64.7.3
SAT-08486
TS 10 · IDS 𢌜
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 挺 U+633A, add a new UCV rule of 廷 and 𢌜, IRG 57.
01466
手 64.7.3
TC-487C
TS 10 · IDS
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 挺 U+633A, add a new UCV rule of 廷 and 𢌜, IRG 57.
02476
玉 96.7.1
SAT-06673
TS 11 · IDS 𢌜
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 珽 U+73FD, IRG 58.
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+2BAD5
Unify to 𫫕 (U+2BAD5), and suggest UTC change glyph and source reference for U+2BAD5 to UTC-03216.
Unification
John Jenkins
Unicode
I'm okay with the unification, but I would personally prefer keeping the source reference to UTC-00561, which better matches the exact shape in our original source (kCheungBauerIndex 379.04). If Eiso says that the the glyph UTC-003216 is actually the better glyph, I believe him, but I would still prefer matching our original source.
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
U+2BAD5
Agree to unify with 𫫕 (U+2BAD5), but as a unifiable variant whose glyph is distinct from its current source reference, UTC-00561.
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+2BAD5
Unify to 𫫕 (U+2BAD5).

I prefer switching the source and glyph of U+2BAD5 to UTC-03216 (⿰口梃) instead of the current one, because 廷 is the predominant form in Hong Kong, and 𢌜 is practically no longer used.
00268
00268
冂 13.10.5
UTC-03222
TS 12 · IDS
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
no unify to 圕 (U+5715)

U+5715 圕 means 圖書館/圖書舘 (library), and this character means 圖書 (book, Latin word is libri)
00143
00143
人 9.6.1
V4-4076
TS 8 · IDS 西
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
Do not unify to 価 (U+4FA1) as non-cognate.
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Agree with #9576. V4-4076 is used primarily as the name of the ethnic group Tày. 価 (U+4FA1) is a simplification of 價.
01175
01175
山 46.11.4
VN-F015D
TS 14 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+25EBA
maybe unify to 𥺺 (U+25EBA)?

Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
It's better to not unify where the structure results in classification by different radicals, e.g 米 vs. 山.
02285
02285
父 88.5.1
VN-F0BD9
TS 9 · IDS
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
U+2209E
We now believe that this character is identical to 𢂞 (U+2209E), Vietnamese "bố". Both have a semantic overlap meaning "father" and the source glyph for U+2209E seen in "Giúp đọc Nôm và Hán Việt" shown below has the same semantic and phonetic, ⿱父布. We propose to unify, changing the glyph for U+2209E to this.
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
The T-source character for U+2209E seems to be a variant of 希 xī, so not cognate with the Vietnam character ⿱父布. Therefore unification is not appropriate. Suggest to keep this character in WS2021, and remove the V-source reference (VN-2209E) from U+2209E.
Disunification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
As a supplement to #9436, the head-character for the link that #9436 shows is ⿱爻巾 instead of ⿱爻布, but evidence in 補充資料 > 異體字表 shows ⿱爻布 ~ 希 (03511). Using 異體字表 as its reference, CNS 11643 website for T6-305A also considers 𢂞 ~ 希.

To consider 𢂞 simply as a variant of 希, and to consider ⿱父布 as a non-cognate character is better. As the evidence given in #9435 shows ⿱父布 instead of ⿱爻布, VU-2209E may need to be unified to WS2021-02285.
03754
03754
角 148.12.4
VN-F1B70
TS 19 · IDS
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
03755
角 148.12.5
VN-F0547
TS 19 · IDS
unify to WS2021-03755:VN-F0547 ⿱解会

The new UCV for 解觧 has been added.
01388
心 61.13.3
SAT-06249
TS 17 · IDS
IRGN2581WS2021v4.0Unified&Withdrawn
Unified to 𢢣 U+228A3 per UCV rule #457, IRG 59.


Attributes

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
02750
02750
石 112.5.5
GDM-00261
TS 10 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=3
#1, IRGN954AR:
02581
02581
田 102.4.3
GDM-00271
TS 9 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=5, TC=10
#3, IRGN954AR:
00803
00803
土 32.5.5
GDM-00273
TS 8 · IDS
FS
Andrew WEST
UK
FS=3
00885
00885
土 32.12.1
GDM-00276
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
SC=13
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=16
00820
00820
土 32.7.4
GDM-00292
TS 10 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=8
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=11
04673
04673
魚' 195'.8.1
GDM-00302
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=9.
03422
03422
艸 140.13.3
GDM-00317
TS 17 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿱艹𱶌
03365
03365
艸 140.9.2
GDM-00319
TS 13 · IDS 丿
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Should the IDS be changed from ⿱艹⿲丨丿辛 to ⿱艹⿰&S2-01;辛?
00950
00950
大 37.4.2
GDM-00326
TS 8 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=7
00953
00953
大 37.6.2
GDM-00327
TS 10 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 130.0 (肉), SC=3, FS=1
02654
02654
白 106.8.2
GDM-00338
TS 13 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=5
#25, IRGN954AR:
02941
02941
竹 118.10.1
GDM-00360
TS 16 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
00771
00771
囗 31.6.4
GDM-00365
TS 9 · IDS
IDS
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Update IDS to ⿴囗𰁜, since it is a simplification of 圝.
04626
04626
魚 195.11.1
GKJ-00216
TS 22 · IDS 𢛢
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
IDS=〾⿰魚𢛢

The current IDS suggested in #5926 doesn’t match the glyph. And Tao Yang has explained the reason.
04952
04952
龍 212.11.3
魚 195.16.4
GKJ-00229
TS 27 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Remove the second RS, there is no need to the second one and the discussion record is to keep the radical as 212.0 龍.
01934
01934
魚 195.10.1
殳 79.17.1
GKJ-00254
TS 21 · IDS 𣪊
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Per Kangxi, the majority of characters with ⿹𣪊X structure by default have X used as the radical, so the second radical 79.0 (殳) is not necessary.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Including 79.0 as a secondary radical will aid in discoverability.
04579
04579
魚 195.5.3
GKJ-00262
TS 16 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IDS=⿰魚卯 if Comment #4214 been accepted.

I support Henry's comment.
00127
00127
亠 8.16.2
魚 195.7.4
GKJ-00279
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
195.0 魚 should be the first radical.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with Eiso
04606
04606
魚 195.9.5
GKJ-00280
TS 20 · IDS
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The FS of 亟 (U+4E9F) is 1. Please confirm.
02664
02664
皮 107.11.3
GKJ-00348
TS 16 · IDS
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
Change Radical to 196.0 (鳥), SC=5, FS=5
04783
04783
鳥 196.14.1
GKJ-00349
TS 25 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰截鳥
IDS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
IDC⿰ cannot be shown normaly, please confirm.
IDS
John Knightley
Individual
Change IDS from 截鳥 to ⿰截鳥.
04709
04709
鳥 196.7.1
GKJ-00365
TS 18 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1 or 3?
00409
00409
鳥 196.10.1
厂 27.19.3
GKJ-00366
TS 21 · IDS
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Secondary radical (27 厂) seems unnecessary.
03565
03565
虫 142.8.5
GKJ-00400
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=9, TC=15
#3, IRGN2221:
03579
03579
虫 142.10.1
GKJ-00433
TS 16 · IDS 𤭃
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=11, TC=17
#12, IRGN2221:
03550
03550
虫 142.8.1
GKJ-00439
TS 14 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR:
03647
03647
虫 142.14.1
GKJ-00449
TS 20 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS =2
#36, IRGN954AR:
03522
03522
虫 142.6.1
GKJ-00465
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=7, TC= 13
#17, IRGN2221:
03551
03551
虫 142.9.1
GKJ-00469
TS 15 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR:
04069
04069
金 167.6.1
GKJ-00504
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
FS=3
04146
04146
金 167.11.5
GKJ-00506
TS 19 · IDS
IDS
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
⿰鍏刂
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It's not better to update the IDS to ⿰鍏刂 because of the semantics based on the evidences. Please keep ⿲金韋刂.
04186
04186
金 167.15.4
GKJ-00507
TS 23 · IDS
Radical
HUANG Junliang
Individual
Per new evidences, add secondary radical 149.0 (言)
04126
04126
金 167.11.1
GKJ-00512
TS 19 · IDS
Radical
HUANG Junliang
Individual
Per new evidence, add secondary radical 112.0 (石).
02440
02440
犬 94.14.1
GKJ-00567
TS 17 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
02449
02449
犬 94.15.1
GKJ-00581
TS 18 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
16
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
19
02416
02416
犬 94.11.1
GKJ-00596
TS 14 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
02349
02349
犬 94.6.1
GKJ-00597
UK-20025
TS 9 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
FS = 2
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
02452
02452
犬 94.15.3
GKJ-00598
TS 18 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=14, TC=17
02462
02462
犬 94.19.1
GKJ-00601
TS 22 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
02831
02831
示 113.4.1
GKJ-00624
TS 8 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TC=9
#31, IRGN954AR:
01793
01793
木 75.8.1
GKJ-00635
TS 12 · IDS
IDS
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Per IRGN1183 Revised IDS decomposition principles, the IDS should be reverted to ⿲木犬木:
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Agree with Henry.
01307
01307
彳 60.14.1
GKJ-00721
TS 17 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
03191
03191
耳 128.2.3
GKJ-00727
TS 8 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Given that the glyph has been updated, the IDS should be changed to ⿰耳𡿨 as suggested.
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
U+21FE8

The kTotalStrokes value for 𡿨 U+21FE8 is 1, but the glyph on the evidence shows the SC should be 2 as the current value. Maybe the IDS should be ⿰耳⿱丿丶.

The glyph on the evidence looks like the following.
02845
02845
示 113.9.3
GKJ-00745
TS 13 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TC=14
#31, IRGN954AR:
02850
02850
示 113.11.2
GKJ-00746
TS 15 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TC=16
#31, IRGN954AR:
03716
03716
衣 145.9.4
GKJ-00753
TS 14 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=15.
04682
04682
魚' 195'.12.2
GKJ-00757
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=10.
01935
01935
目 109.4.1
比 81.5.2
GKJ-00775
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Keep primary radical 109.0 目 only, remove secondary radical 81.0 比.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Keeping 109.0 as a secondary radical will aid in discoverability.
03436
03436
艸 140.14.2
GKJ-00778
TS 18 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=4
02626
02626
疒 104.10.1
GKJ-00798
TS 15 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2, SC=11, TC=16
#36, IRGN954AR:
02128
02128
水 85.17.2
GKJ-00856
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=16
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TS=19
02746
02746
石 112.5.1
GKJ-00884
TS 10 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Given that the glyph has been updated, the IDS should be changed from ⿰石⿱一帀 to ⿰石市.
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=4
01959
01959
气 84.4.2
GKJ-00888
TS 8 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=5
#25, IRGN954AR
01983
01983
气 84.14.4
GKJ-00891
TS 18 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=15, TC=19
#31c, IRGN2221
01968
01968
气 84.7.5
GKJ-00900
TS 11 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=8, TC=12
#42, IRGN954AR
00447
00447
口 30.5.3
GKJ-00910
TS 8 · IDS
IDS
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
⿰口⿱𠘧口
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The current IDS is OK, there is no need to change.
03693
03693
行 144.14.4
GKJ-00914
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=15, TC=21
#31c, IRGN2221:
03687
03687
行 144.11.1
GKJ-00915
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=12, TC=18
#35, IRGN2221:
03694
03694
行 144.14.5
GKJ-00920
TS 20 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The IDS is yet to be changed from ⿲彳綠亍 to ⿲彳绿亍.
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Given that the glyph has been updated, SC=11, TC=17.
03677
03677
行 144.4.2
GKJ-00928
TS 10 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=5
#25, IRGN954AR:
02841
02841
示 113.8.4
GKJ-00937
TS 12 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TC=13
#31, IRGN954AR:
02551
02551
瓦 98.7.1
GKJ-00947
TS 11 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TC=12
#12, IRGN2221:
02545
02545
瓦 98.3.1
GKJ-00948
TS 7 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TC=8
#12, IRGN2221:
02569
02569
生 100.6.1
GKJ-00952
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The IDS is yet to be updated from ⿰生亞 to ⿰生亚
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
IDS is still unchanged.
00640
00640
口 30.13.3
GKJ-00956
TS 16 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=4
02039
02039
水 85.9.1
GKJ-00957
TS 13 · IDS 𠫴
IDS
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The IDS should be reverted to ⿰法少 because the character is composed of 法 + 少.
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Keep IDS as ⿰氵𠫴 because the IDS is purely descriptive of the character's shape, and is not intended to provide any semantic information.
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
TC=12
00113
00113
口 30.4.3
GKJ-00962
TS 7 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=4
00382
00382
卜 25.6.1
GKJ-00964
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Change Radical to 24.0 (十), SC=6, FS=1 for consistency with GKJ-01026 (⿰千分) which is under Radical 24.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with UK
03372
03372
艸 140.9.5
GKJ-00978
TS 13 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Alternative IDS for consideration: ⿱艹架
03743
03743
見 147.14.3
GKJ-00995
TS 21 · IDS
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
02555
02555
瓦 98.11.3
GKJ-00997
TS 15 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TC=16
#12, IRGN2221:
04555
04555
鬼 194.6.3
GKJ-00998
UK-20785
TS 16 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1



▲ IRGN954AR
04567
04567
鬼 194.12.2
GKJ-01004
UK-20788
TS 22 · IDS
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3
01522
01522
手 64.12.1
GKJ-01010
TS 15 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
02418
02418
犬 94.11.1
GKJ-01013
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=10, TC=13
02386
02386
犬 94.9.1
GKJ-01016
TS 12 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
00302
00302
刀 18.5.3
GKJ-01027
TS 7 · IDS
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Change Radical to 24.0 (十), SC=5, FS=3 because GKJ-01026 (⿰千分) is under Radical 24. Alternatively, change GKJ-01026 to use Radical 18, but both characters should be under the same radical as they are the same abstract character with different layout of components.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with UK (#9638)
04117
04117
金' 167'.10.3
GXM-00433
TS 15 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
01003
01003
女 38.12.2
GZ-0161404
TS 15 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
FS=3
00727
00727
鳥 196.9.2
口 30.17.2
GZ-0252103
TS 20 · IDS
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Keep primary radical R=196.0 (鳥), remove second radical R(2)=30.0 (口).
01696
01696
日 72.11.4
GZ-0342702
TS 15 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=3
00616
00616
口 30.12.3
GZ-0762502
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 174.0 (靑), SC=7, FS=3
03717
03717
衣 145.9.4
GZ-0842204
TS 14 · IDS 穿
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=15
03895
03895
足 157.10.4
GZ-1101103
TS 17 · IDS 𧾷
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
02164
02164
火 86.4.2
GZ-1631503
TS 8 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=5
#25, IRGN954AR
02376
02376
犬 94.8.2
GZ-1691202
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The glyph and IDS should be changed to ⿰犭𮌈.
U+2E308 𮌈
00772
00772
囗 31.7.1
GZ-1712401
TS 10 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=8
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=11
03726
03726
衣 145.11.2
GZ-2041101
TS 16 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=17.
01735
01735
肉 130.6.2
GZ-2081109
TS 9 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=5
#10, IRGN954AR
00144
00144
人 9.6.2
凵 17.7.5
GZ-2081307
TS 9 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
SC=7
02590
02590
田 102.8.3
GZ-2141206
TS 13 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=5
#12, IRGN954AR:
00477
00477
口 30.7.3
GZ-2151603
TS 10 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 97.0 (瓜), SC=5, FS=1
03376
03376
艸 140.10.1
GZ-2232101
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
If the missing dot is added to the 救 component, SC=11, TC=15.
03705
03705
衣 145.7.3
GZ-2342102
TS 12 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=13.
02421
02421
犬 94.12.1
GZ-2381201
UK-20035
TS 15 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
03160
03160
羊 123.8.4
GZ-2471202
TS 14 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change FS to 1.
00210
00210
人 9.14.2
GZ-2472401
TS 16 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 159.0 (車), SC=9, FS=3
01325
01325
心 61.6.4
GZ-2512401
TS 10 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=3
01656
01656
日 72.4.1
GZ-2602305
TS 8 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=5, TC=9
#28, IRGN954AR
01024
01024
子 39.12.2
GZ-2702102
TS 15 · IDS
FS
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=4
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with FS=4
00419
00419
又 29.7.3
GZ-2902802
TS 8 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=4
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Change Radical to 117.0 (立), SC=4, FS=3 Even if 立 is the phonetic here, 立 is a much better radical for indexing purposes than 又. Note that U+2E128 𮄨 is Radical 117.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with UK
03729
03729
衣 145.15.1
GZ-3011201
TS 20 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=21.
03724
03724
衣 145.11.4
GZ-3021303
TS 16 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=17.
00398
00398
厂 27.6.4
GZ-3231202
TS 8 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
02920
02920
立 117.18.1
GZ-3321510
TS 23 · IDS
IDS
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS from ⿰亲墓 to ⿰亲暮.
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
The IDS is still not changed.
03720
03720
衣 145.10.3
GZ-3491109
TS 15 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=16.
04940
04940
鼻 209.10.3
GZ-3511102
TS 24 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=5
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=5
02387
02387
犬 94.9.1
GZ-3632103
TS 18 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=15
01733
01733
肉 130.6.1
GZ-3781201
TS 10 · IDS
FS
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2
03595
03595
虫 142.10.5
GZ-3852202
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=14
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=14
02355
02355
犬 94.6.5
GZ-3871101
TS 10 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=7
00146
00146
人 9.6.5
GZ-4061403
TS 8 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
SC=7 (阝=3)
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=9
00779
00779
囗 31.12.2
GZ-4212304
TS 16 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=15
02740
02740
石 112.4.3
GZ-4232407
TS 9 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=4
#23, IRGN1105:
02990
02990
竹 118.18.1
GZ-4402601
TS 26 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=20
00322
00322
刀 18.13.3
GZ-4561107
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 10.0 (儿), SC=3, FS=13
04030
04030
酉 164.7.4
GZ-4622501
TS 14 · IDS
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
03709
03709
衣 145.8.3
GZ-4722701
TS 13 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=14.
02014
02014
水 85.6.4
GZ-4802201
TS 9 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=1
01041
01041
宀 40.8.1
GZ-5021501
TS 12 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 92.0 (牙), SC=7, FS=4
00041
00041
乙 5.3.2
KC-00010
TS 4 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add as secondary Radical: 42.0 (小), SC=1, FS=5
Radical
ROK
not agree
00064
00064
乙 5.6.3
KC-00032
TS 7 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 140.0 (艸), SC=6, FS=5
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=10
Radical
ROK
not agree.

TS=10
00066
00066
乙 5.6.5
KC-00033
TS 7 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 138.0 (艮), SC=1, FS=5
Radical
ROK
not agree
00069
00069
乙 5.7.3
KC-00049
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 136.0 (舛), SC=1, FS=5
Radical
ROK
not agree
00079
00079
乙 5.9.5
KC-00064
TS 10 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 183.0 (飛), SC=1, FS=5
Radical
ROK
not agree
00083
00083
乙 5.10.4
KC-00071
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 189.0 (高), SC=1, FS=5
Radical
ROK
not agree
00081
00081
乙 5.10.2
KC-00072
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 188.0 (骨), SC=1, FS=5
Radical
ROK
not agree
00085
00085
乙 5.11.1
KC-00081
TS 13 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=12
Total Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
KR does not agree to change TS=12. Keep TS=11. The middle component has 6 strokes. See U+7D2F below.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=12 (the kRSUnicode property value of U+7D2F 累 is 120.5, meaning Radical #120 (TS=6) plus TS=5 for 田)
Total Stroke Count
ROK
TS=12
00187
00187
人 9.10.4
KC-00167
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=9
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=11
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
agree
00221
00221
人 9.15.4
KC-00216
TS 17 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰亻𪧨
IDS
ROK
KR suggests to add secondary IDS.
00290
00290
冫 15.13.3
KC-00270
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=12
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=14
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
not agree
00440
00440
口 30.4.5
KC-00395
TS 7 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 29.0 (又), SC=5, FS=2
Radical
ROK
not agree
00435
00435
口 30.4.1
KC-00396
TS 7 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 7.0 (二), SC=5, FS=2
Radical
ROK
not agree
00441
00441
口 30.5.1
KC-00402
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 33.0 (士), SC=5, FS=2
Radical
ROK
not agree
00442
00442
口 30.5.1
KC-00404
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 32.0 (土), SC=5, FS=2
Radical
ROK
not agree
00461
00461
口 30.6.3
KC-00412
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 82.0 (毛), SC=5, FS=2
Radical
ROK
not agree
00464
00464
口 30.6.4
KC-00413
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 67.0 (文), SC=5, FS=2
Radical
ROK
not agree
00454
00454
口 30.6.1
KC-00421
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 140.0 (艸), SC=5, FS=2
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
As #10358 shows, I also confirm if this character is a Korean Idu character. If yes, the upper component is the omitted form of one other character; if not, the best radical should be 140.0.
Radical
ROK
This character is a Korean Idu character, therefore Radical can not change.
00504
00504
口 30.8.3
KC-00454
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 132.0 (自), SC=5, FS=2
Radical
ROK
not agree
00732
00732
口 30.17.4
KC-00568
TS 20 · IDS
IDS
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to evidence, ⿸廣叱 would be better.
IDS
ROK
not agree
00752
00752
口 30.21.2
KC-00579
TS 24 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 122.0 (网), SC=19, FS=5
Radical
ROK
not agree
00844
00844
土 32.9.1
KC-00675
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=8
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=11
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
not agree change SC & TS.
00296
00296
凵 17.6.5
KC-01081
TS 9 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=7
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
SC=7
00180
00180
人 9.10.1
KC-04818
TS 12 · IDS
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
With normalization, IDS should be ⿰亻卨
IDS
Henry CHAN
Individual
IDS=⿰亻卨
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
SC=11; TS=13
IDS
ROK
Glyph updated, therefore change as:
IDS=⿰亻卨
SC=11; TS=13
00565
00565
口 30.10.4
KC-04897
TS 13 · IDS 𤇾
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Consider to add the second radical as 86.0 火 based on 《直音篇》, SC=9, FS=4.
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
SC=9, FS=4.
00919
00919
土 32.13.3
KC-04943
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Please explain SC=13. I count SC=12 (and TS=15).
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
According to Kangxi dictionary, 雋 was counted as 13.
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
01162
01162
山 46.10.4
KC-05014
TS 13 · IDS
IDS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
D10-01 in IRGN2225 maybe can applied to this issue.
IDS can be ⿱ D10-01山, instead of ⿳亠⿲刀丫?山, which contain a question mark "?".
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Consider using ⿱&D10-01;山
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
KR would rather keep the current IDS.
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
⿳亠⿲刀丫𱍸山
IDS
ROK
agree
01338
01338
心 61.8.3
KC-05079
TS 12 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱𢼄心
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
IDS is not necessarily unique.
The suggested IDS could be added (not replace the original IDS).
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=4
#76, IRGN954AR
FS
ROK
FS=4
01348
01348
心 61.9.4
KC-05081
TS 12 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=3
FS
ROK
agree
01552
01552
手 64.13.3
KC-05122
TS 16 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Consider to add the second radical as 181.0 (頁), SC=7, FS=1.
Radical
ROK
not agree
02004
02004
水 85.5.3
KC-05231
TC-3E43
TS 8 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=6, TC=9
Residual Stroke Count
ROK
SC=6, TC=9
02469
02469
玉 96.4.3
KC-05376
TS 8 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=4
#76, IRGN954AR
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
KR agrees to chagne FS to 4.
02482
02482
玉 96.8.3
KC-05388
TS 13 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱𢼄玉
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
IDS is not necessarily unique.
The suggested IDS could be added (not replace the original IDS).
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=4
#76, IRGN954AR
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
KR agrees to chagne FS to 4.
04169
04169
金 167.13.3
KC-05828
TS 21 · IDS
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=5
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
KR does not agree.
FS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
For the indexing purpose, 彙 should be FS=5.
But the glyph has undergone normalization. May need discussion about this case.
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
KR does not agree.
In KR, left-to-bottom (NOT top-to-right) stroke is written first in the right top component.
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
FS=5, support #3826 and #7869
FS
ROK
agree. FS=5
03714
03714
衣 145.9.1
KC-06760
TS 14 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=15.
Total Stroke Count
ROK
agree. TS=15
04489
04489
香 186.9.3
KC-07352
TS 18 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
KR does not agree.
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Does ROK mean the first stroke of 咸 is 3 (撇) in the ROK conventions?
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
KR agrees to chagne FS=1.
01562
01562
手 64.14.2
SAT-03728
TS 17 · IDS 𠔿
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=12, TC=15
01783
01783
木 75.7.1
SAT-03881
TS 11 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=3
03773
03773
言 149.8.4
SAT-04274
TS 15 · IDS 𠮷
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3
03030
03030
米 119.11.4
SAT-04276
TS 17 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=3
02964
02964
竹 118.12.3
SAT-04392
TS 18 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=13, TC=19
#11, IRGN2221:
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=4
#56, IRGN954AR:
00458
00458
口 30.6.2
SAT-04398
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 45.0 (屮), SC=6, FS=2
03774
03774
言 149.8.4
SAT-04579
TS 15 · IDS
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3
04265
04265
阜 170.8.5
SAT-04584
TS 11 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
01091
01091
尸 44.8.4
SAT-04626
TS 11 · IDS &D4-01;
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
⿸尸⿱⿱丷八毛 or ⿸尸⿳丷八毛
01669
01669
日 72.8.1
SAT-04680
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=7, TC=11
01475
01475
手 64.9.1
SAT-04704
TS 12 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=3
#58, IRGN954AR
01664
01664
日 72.7.2
SAT-05041
TS 11 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=3
02693
02693
目 109.7.2
SAT-05057
TS 12 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=3
03341
03341
艸 140.7.1
SAT-05063
TS 11 · IDS
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
FS=2.
00429
00429
又 29.19.2
SAT-05093
TS 21 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
The Radical cannot possibly be 29.0 (又), because 又 is not even a component.
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
Maybe it is a better idea to have Radical 109.0 (目), SC=16, FS=2
00399
00399
厂 27.7.1
SAT-05585
TS 9 · IDS 𰀠
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
⿸厂⿱龷⿰𠄌⿺乀丿
00533
00533
口 30.9.2
SAT-05617
TS 12 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 1.0 (一), SC=11, FS=2
03071
03071
糸 120.7.5
SAT-05666
TS 13 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=3
01252
01252
广 53.4.4
SAT-05684
TS 7 · IDS 广廿
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1.
01452
01452
手 64.6.1
SAT-05685
TS 9 · IDS 𠆢
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=3
02282
02282
爪 87.21.3
SAT-05859
TS 25 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=4
01931
01931
殳 79.7.2
SAT-05865
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
⿰⿱⿷匚二几殳
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Need to replace the ?. ⿰⿱⿳⿸厂二一几殳
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=1
03806
03806
豸 153.5.3
SAT-06072
TS 12 · IDS
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
03723
03723
衣 145.11.3
SAT-06100
TS 16 · IDS 𰲝
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=17.
01538
01538
手 64.12.4
SAT-06125
TS 15 · IDS 丿
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=3
01240
01240
干 51.3.4
SAT-06176
TS 6 · IDS &SAT-D06A;
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
⿱丶平
00059
00059
乙 5.5.5
SAT-06215
TS 6 · IDS 𠃊
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
FS=2
02630
02630
疒 104.12.1
SAT-06241
TS 17 · IDS 𤰅
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR:
03219
03219
肉 130.3.2
SAT-06374
TS 9 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change FS to 1.
01414
01414
心 61.19.4
SAT-06383
TS 22 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
An alternative IDS is ⿰忄𱶫 (U+31DAB(Ext H)).
01254
01254
广 53.5.4
SAT-06420
TS 8 · IDS 广
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1.
01421
01421
火 86.8.1
戈 62.8.1
SAT-06465
TS 12 · IDS 𤆰
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Keep primary radical 86.0 (火), remove secondary radical R(2)=62.0 (戈).
01094
01094
尸 44.10.2
SAT-06471
TS 13 · IDS 𠂕
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
IDS=⿸尸⿱氺𠂕(.);⿸尸⿱⿲二丨二𠂕(T)
01837
01837
木 75.12.1
SAT-06475
TS 16 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=4
03282
03282
臼 134.3.1
SAT-06505
TS 10 · IDS &P10-01;
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Alternative IDS for consideration: ⿳𦥑一八
03851
03851
走 156.4.1
SAT-06508
TS 11 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
00413
00413
厶 28.8.5
SAT-06514
TS 10 · IDS 𠓞
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 7.0 (二), SC=8, FS=5
01089
01089
尸 44.6.5
SAT-06635
TS 9 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
FS=4
02345
02345
犬 94.5.3
SAT-06646
TS 8 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰犭⿱大刀
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Per comment #1643, change IDS to ⿰犭⿱大刀.
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=1
The IDS is yet to be updated to ⿰犭⿱大刀.
01258
01258
广 53.8.4
SAT-06647
TS 11 · IDS 广
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3.
00767
00767
囗 31.4.2
SAT-06654
TS 7 · IDS 𠔁
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
FS=5?
FS
Henry CHAN
Individual
FS=3
00258
00258
八 12.7.3
SAT-06676
TS 9 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
FS=2
00355
00355
勹 20.10.3
SAT-06711
TS 12 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 93.0 (牛), SC=8, FS=3
02287
02287
爿 90.2.2
SAT-06795
TS 6 · IDS
IDS
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰爿𠤎
04024
04024
酉 164.5.1
SAT-06822
TS 12 · IDS
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
01047
01047
宀 40.9.4
SAT-06842
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=10
Total Stroke Count
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TS=13
FS
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=1
02881
02881
禾 115.10.1
SAT-06845
TS 15 · IDS 𥝸
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2
#59, IRGN954AR:
01270
01270
广 53.20.4
SAT-06884
TS 23 · IDS 广
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3.
01951
01951
毛 82.10.2
SAT-06885
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=11, TC=15
FS=1
#55, IRGN954AR
01037
01037
宀 40.6.1
SAT-06967
TS 9 · IDS
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
IDS=⿱宀⿻丅龷
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
IDS might be ⿱宀⿻干艹.
01539
01539
手 64.12.4
SAT-06992
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=13, TC=16
#26b, IRGN2221
03902
03902
足 157.12.1
SAT-07000
TS 19 · IDS 𧾷&SAT-H12A;
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
⿰𧾷𱣎 (U+318CE)
03648
03648
虫 142.14.2
SAT-07054
TS 20 · IDS 𩰫
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The IDS for current glyph should be ⿲虫⿱𠮛⿵冂𢆉㐄.
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
If normalization is accepted, SC=13, TS=19, no change for FS.
03607
03607
虫 142.11.2
SAT-07153
TS 17 · IDS 巿
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The SC value of 11 suggests that the upper-right component is 市 (⿱亠巾), but the IDS uses 巿 (⿻一巾). Change IDS to ⿱⿰臣市虫?
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS =1
#33, IRGN954AR:
04229
04229
門 169.8.2
SAT-08310
TS 16 · IDS
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1
00872
00872
土 32.11.2
SAT-08314
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
⿰土⿱山⿰歹攵
00863
00863
土 32.10.3
SAT-08341
TS 13 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 24.0 (十), SC=11, FS=1
01784
01784
木 75.7.1
SAT-08345
TS 11 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=3
03098
03098
糸 120.12.1
SAT-08353
TS 18 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR:
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=13, TC=19
#36, IRGN954AR:
01523
01523
手 64.12.1
SAT-08367
TS 15 · IDS &SAT-H12A;
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
With extension H, IDS should now use U+318CE. ⿰扌𱣎
03945
03945
車 159.9.5
SAT-08372
TS 16 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱⿲幺車幺⿺𠃊㐅
02243
02243
火 86.13.4
SAT-08382
TS 17 · IDS 𮘎
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
⿱⿲幺言幺灬
01715
01715
日 72.14.1
SAT-08386
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
⿰日⿻𰰜⿱从丛
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=15, FS=2, TS=19
03217
03217
耳 128.15.5
SAT-08444
TS 21 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Add the second radical as 57.0 (弓) or 102.0 (田), then SC=18 or 16, FS=1.

The evidence shows the rationale for this character is 從⿲弓畐弓(SAT-08446)耳聲, that means 耳 is the phonetic. The semantic is the unencoded ⿲弓畐弓(SAT-08446) which is the variant of 䰜, 弜 for 䰜 is used for 象形 (象孰飪五味气上出也), and 畐 is the variant of 鬲. Both the radicals for 弜 and 畐 are OK for the second radical.
02291
02291
爿 90.10.2
SAT-08464
TS 14 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=4
01947
01947
毛 82.7.5
SAT-08488
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱⿰己殳手
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
We prefer the current one.
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
〾⿱㱼毛
02083
02083
水 85.12.1
SAT-08498
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
13
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
16
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
01603
01603
手 64.24.1
SAT-08524
TS 27 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=25, TC=28, FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
01802
01802
木 75.9.1
SAT-08553
TS 13 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change SC to 10.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change TC to 14.
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
03172
03172
羽 124.8.3
SAT-08561
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=7, TC=13
#18, IRGN2221:
00040
00040
乙 5.2.5
SAT-08575
TS 3 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
⿷乙⺀
01504
01504
手 64.11.1
SAT-08577
TS 14 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR
01548
01548
手 64.13.2
SAT-08587
TS 16 · IDS 𡼁
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=14, TC=17
#11, IRGN2221
02901
02901
穴 116.8.4
SAT-08609
TS 13 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=3
#58, IRGN954AR:
03368
03368
艸 140.9.2
SAT-08693
TS 13 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿱艹⿷見厶.
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Should the IDS be changed from ⿺莧厶 to ⿱艹⿷見厶 or ⿷莧厶?
01233
01233
巾 50.10.2
SAT-08700
TS 13 · IDS
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1.
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree FS=1
04408
04408
音 180.9.2
SAT-08780
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
〾⿰音曷

Evidence 1 shows ⿰音⿱日⿹勹⿺𠃊㐅, Evidence 2 shows ⿰音⿱日匂.
01004
01004
女 38.12.3
SAT-08825
TS 15 · IDS 𡺋
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
FS=2
03391
03391
艸 140.11.2
SAT-08830
TS 14 · IDS 𧆨
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 15.
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TC=15
00252
00252
入 11.12.3
SAT-08844
TS 14 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 159.0 (車), SC=7, FS=5
00605
00605
口 30.12.1
SAT-08850
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=13
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=16
01629
01629
文 67.12.4
SAT-08868
TS 16 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
#44, IRGN954AR
01261
01261
广 53.10.1
SAT-08895
TS 13 · IDS 广𭮀
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Add the secondary radical as 61.0 心 if my comment #6747 is right. And then, SC=9, FS=4.
03216
03216
耳 128.15.4
SAT-08942
TS 21 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=1
02133
02133
水 85.17.4
SAT-08944
TS 20 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=1
03601
03601
虫 142.12.1
SAT-08954
TS 18 · IDS 𦯧
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR:
02674
02674
皿 108.7.1
SAT-09012
TS 12 · IDS
FS
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2 for 艹.
04002
04002
辵 162.18.4
SAT-09259
TS 22 · IDS
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1
02544
02544
瓜 97.11.2
SAT-10081
TS 17 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
If the left component is 虛 (U+865B) as shown in Evidence 1 (though it looks like 虚 (U+865A) in Evidence 2), the IDS should be changed from ⿰虚瓜 to ⿰虛瓜.
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
If the left component is 虛 (U+865B) as shown in Evidence 1, SC=12
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
Agree to change IDS to ⿰虛瓜
03841
03841
貝 154.18.3
SAT-10196
TS 25 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
03387
03387
艸 140.11.1
T9-7658
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=13
02181
02181
火 86.7.3
T9-783E
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IDS should be changed to ⿰火肜; 〾 is not needed as 肜 can be both ⿰月彡 and ⿰⺼彡. Plus there is UCV rule 53.
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Per the Version 2.0 comment, the IDS should be changed to ⿰火肜 (no need to prefix with 〾).
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Agree. IDS=⿰火肜
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
The IDS is yet to be updated to ⿰火肜.
01477
01477
手 64.9.1
T9-7853
TS 13 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=10
02038
02038
水 85.8.5
T9-7875
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=9
02059
02059
水 85.10.1
T9-7925
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=11
00506
00506
口 30.8.3
T9-7A3D
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 135.0 (舌), SC=5, FS=3
Radical
Conifer TSENG
TCA
Agree to change the Radical to 135.0(舌).
01497
01497
手 64.10.4
T9-7A5B
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=11
01532
01532
手 64.12.3
T9-7A70
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=13
02152
02152
水 85.21.5
T9-7A7B
TS 25 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=22
03381
03381
艸 140.10.3
T9-7C3F
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=12
02888
02888
禾 115.12.5
T9-7C5F
TS 17 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Should the IDS be changed from 〾⿰禾巽to ⿰禾巽?
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Agree to change the IDS=⿰禾巽.
03458
03458
艸 140.15.4
T9-7C7C
TS 21 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=17
01695
01695
日 72.11.3
TB-4B46
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=12, TC=16
#17, IRGN2221
02025
02025
水 85.8.1
TB-5E6F
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=7
00375
00375
十 24.7.3
TC-3051
TS 9 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=4
01770
01770
父 88.4.1
木 75.4.3
TC-3452
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change Radical to 88.0 (父), SC=4 (no change), FS=1

If the reading is mù provided by TCA, the better radical should be 父 not 木.
Radical
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Agree to change Radical to 88.0 (父).
01737
01737
月 74.6.3
TC-4A25
TS 10 · IDS
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Eiso is correct, the Vietnamese sense is related to light, hence 'moon'.
00420
00420
又 29.9.1
TC-5644
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 155.0 (赤), SC=4, FS=1
Radical
Conifer TSENG
TCA
Agree to change the Radical to 155.0(赤).
04009
04009
邑 163.3.5
TC-766C
TS 6 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IDS should be ⿰孑阝

The left component is 孑, not a 孑-like component for 子.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Keep ⿰子阝, like U+273C4, U+2EB2A.
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
At least, this case is different from U+273C4 𧏄. The Kangxi Dictionary shows the left part is the real 子. So, it’s OK to use 子 as the left component in the IDS.

For U+2EB2A 𮬪, the current source reference is cited from 大正藏, I can’t understand the contextual meaning. Maybe SAT knows if the left component is 子. I also find out U+2EB2A is used as a place name character in 广东德庆, which is near to Xijiang River (西江), but it’s a pity that I don’t know the meaning as well.

According to the pronunciation provided by TCA, jié means the phonetic element should be 孑 not 子, so I still think ⿰孑阝 will be better. If TCA hopes to keep ⿰子阝, maybe we should use two IDSes for this case.
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FYI: We suspect that U+2EB2A 𮬪 is a malformed glyph of 鳩 in the SAT context.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
To the comment #5442:
Prefer to use two IDSes (⿰子阝, ⿰孑阝) for this case.
03456
03456
艸 140.15.2
TC-7C61
TS 21 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=17
02548
02548
瓦 98.6.3
TC-7D38
TS 11 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=7, TC=12
01790
01790
木 75.7.3
彡 59.8.1
TC-7E60
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿲木彡木, because the first and third components are the same.
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Add the secondary radical as 59.0 (彡), SC=8, FS=1 based on the new evidence under #5339.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Agree to change IDS to ⿲木彡木.
00188
00188
人 9.10.4
TD-2261
TS 12 · IDS 𠈌
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 8.0 (亠), SC=10, FS=3
Radical
Conifer TSENG
TCA
Keep radical 9.0(人), and add the second radical as 8.0 (亠).
01092
01092
尸 44.9.3
TD-2561
TS 12 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Add the second radical as 112.0 (石), SC=7, FS=5

The reading mǒu means 某, so two radicals should be better.

Also see WS2021-01948:TC-7C7C
01948
毛 82.7.5
TC-7C7C
TS 11 · IDS
01739
01739
月 74.7.2
TD-2939
TS 11 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=8, TC=12
#36, IRGN954AR
02190
02190
火 86.8.2
TD-2C62
TS 12 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Add the second radical for 140.0 (艸), SC=8, FS=3
00868
00868
土 32.10.5
TD-376E
TS 13 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=9?
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=12?
01819
01819
木 75.10.3
TD-3C56
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=9, TC=13
#18, IRGN2221
02488
02488
玉 96.9.3
TD-4037
TS 13 · IDS 𠆢
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
⿰王⿱人镸
using 人 instead of 𠆢 would match the IDS for this element as it appears in other characters, such as 隂 (U+9682)
02849
02849
示 113.11.1
TD-612B
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=12, TC=17
#17, IRGN2221:
02093
02093
水 85.13.2
TD-6B79
TS 16 · IDS
Radical
HKSAR
Hong Kong
As the glyph starts with the radical component 艹 instead of氵, should the radical be changed to 140.0艸? If yes, SC=12, FS=4.
Radical
Conifer TSENG
TCA
Agree to change the radical to 140.0艸.
00997
00997
女 38.11.1
TD-7A64
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
⿰女硏
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
Maybe we chould use two IDSes for this case, ⿰女硏 and ⿰妬幵?
01361
01361
心 61.11.1
TD-7B5E
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=12
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
TC=15
03397
03397
艸 140.11.4
TD-7E22
TS 15 · IDS 𣶬
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=12, TC=16
#25, IRGN2221:
00660
00660
口 30.14.2
TE-214D
TS 17 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
⿰口⿱罒⿸耂⿱丶日
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
Keep 〾⿰口署, it is easier to understand.
01071
01071
寸 41.14.4
TE-2240
TS 17 · IDS 𠕻
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
FS=2
01392
01392
心 61.13.4
肉 130.13.4
TE-2562
TS 17 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change Radical to 130.0 (肉).

The pronunciation is sī provided by TCA, so the semantic element should be 育.
02948
02948
竹 118.11.1
TE-2655
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=12, TC=18
#17, IRGN2221:
03083
03083
糸 120.10.2
TE-2725
TS 16 · IDS 𧆠
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Given that the glyph has been updated, SC=11, TC=17.
The IDS should be changed from ⿰糹𧆠 to ⿰糹虖.
01309
01309
彳 60.15.3
TE-2C27
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
The IDS should be changed from 〾⿰彳鄭 to ⿰彳鄭.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
Agree to change the IDS. (remove 〾)
01866
01866
木 75.14.2
TE-2D31
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
An alternative IDS for consideration: ⿰木⿱卝涖
03437
03437
艸 140.14.2
TE-2F7C
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The IDS should at least be normalized to ⿱艹閣. If not, there is a danger that ⿱艹閣 may be separately encoded in the future.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to UCV#152, ⿱艹閣 should not be separately encoded in the future. Could IDS have two kinds? Make ⿱卝閣 the primary IDS and ⿱艹閣(or 〾⿱艹閣) as the secondary IDS.
03450
03450
艸 140.14.5
TE-3024
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The IDS should at least be normalized to ⿱艹綾. If not, there is a danger that ⿱艹綾 may be separately encoded in the future.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to UCV#152, ⿱艹綾 should not be separately encoded in the future. Could IDS have two kinds? Make ⿱卝綾 the primary IDS and ⿱艹綾(or 〾⿱艹綾) as the secondary IDS.
03440
03440
艸 140.14.3
TE-302C
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The IDS should at least be normalized to ⿱艹毓. If not, there is a danger that ⿱艹毓 may be separately encoded in the future.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to UCV#152, ⿱艹毓 should not be separately encoded in the future. Could IDS have two kinds? Make ⿱卝毓 the primary IDS and ⿱艹毓(or 〾⿱艹毓) as the secondary IDS.
03441
03441
艸 140.14.3
TE-302D
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The IDS should at least be normalized to ⿱艹𥠺. If not, there is a danger that ⿱艹𥠺 may be separately encoded in the future.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to UCV #152 & #320, ⿱艹𥠺 should not be separately encoded in the future. Could IDS have two kinds? Make ⿱卝⿰禾昷 the primary IDS and 〾⿱艹𥠺 as the secondary IDS.
03445
03445
艸 140.14.4
TE-3048
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The IDS should at least be normalized to ⿱艹旗. If not, there is a danger that ⿱艹旗 may be separately encoded in the future.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to UCV#152, ⿱艹旗 should not be separately encoded in the future. Could IDS have two kinds? Make ⿱卝旗 the primary IDS and ⿱艹旗(or 〾⿱艹旗) as the secondary IDS.
04947
04947
齒 211.8.1
TE-354A
TS 20 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Should be 211.2 now.

Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
The excerpt above is from the Unicode Version 15.1 Alpha code charts, and reflects that synttax change to the kRSUnicode property that allows non-Chinese simplified radicals to be specified. I agree that 211.2 should be used here. Of course, the IRG P&P will need to be changed to reflect this.
Radical
Conifer TSENG
TCA
Agree to use 211.2 for 歯.
02862
02862
示 113.15.4
TE-3828
TS 20 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR:
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Should the IDS be changed from 〾⿰礻蔑 to ⿰礻蔑?
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Agree. IDS=⿰礻蔑
00963
00963
大 37.13.4
TE-7141
TS 16 · IDS 𦥯
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
02893
02893
禾 115.14.5
TE-7865
TS 19 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=16, TC=21
#32, IRGN2221:
01029
01029
子 39.16.4
TE-787D
TS 19 · IDS 广𫲲
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 53.0 (广), SC=16, FS=3
Radical
Conifer TSENG
TCA
Agree to change the Radical to 53.0 (广).
02978
02978
竹 118.14.5
TE-7A49
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=16, TC=22
#32, IRGN2221:
04049
04049
田 102.17.3
釆 165.15.2
TE-7B76
TS 22 · IDS
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Keep primary radical 102.0 田, remove secondary radical 165.0 釆.
02027
02027
水 85.8.1
TF-7E62
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=9
04020
04020
邑 163.12.2
UK-10803
TS 15 · IDS
IDS
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Based on the 魏書 evidences, I think we should encode ⿰⿱旦來阝 instead, with ⿰⿱日來阝 being a unifiable variant of ⿰⿱旦來阝.

Change IDS to ⿰⿱旦來阝and update the glyph accordingly.
03799
03799
豆 151.9.3
UK-20024
TS 16 · IDS
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=4 According to IRGN954AR.
01106
01106
山 46.4.1
UK-20038
TS 7 · IDS
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3.
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Per #4254, FS=3
02580
02580
田 102.3.2
UK-20046
TS 8 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=5
00810
00810
土 32.6.4
UK-20059
TS 9 · IDS 𣲆
IDS
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Based on the evidences mentioned above. I think we should encode ⿱氾土, with ⿱𣲆土 and ⿱汜土 being its variants.

The original has ~銅爲之, ⿱氾土 is likely a variant of 笵. 「範銅爲之」appears in 清史稿:

Attached PDF file

清史稿(1942) pp. 211

change IDS to ⿱氾土 and update the glyph accordingly.
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
SC=5, TS=8
02499
02499
玉 96.10.4
UK-20113
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The glyph and IDS shown are for 宫, which TC=9. SC=10, is this a conscious normalization of the stroke count, or should it be SC=9?
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=9, TC=13
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
I thought that we counted the strokes of 宫 as if it were 宮, which is why the automatic attribute counts at the top right of this page are correct.
02316
02316
牛 93.9.2
UK-20150
TS 13 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=4
#63, IRGN954AR
04885
04885
麥 199.5.1
UK-20183
SAT-09217
TS 16 · IDS
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3
02512
02512
玉 96.12.2
UK-20196
TS 16 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=1
03900
03900
足 157.11.3
UK-20221
TS 18 · IDS 𧾷
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=4 according to IRGN954AR.
01829
01829
木 75.11.1
UK-20223
TS 15 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿲木豆木, because the first and third components are the same.
01978
01978
气 84.10.4
UK-20224
TS 14 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=3
01942
01942
毛 82.5.3
UK-20228
TS 9 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=4
01752
01752
月 74.11.4
UK-20238
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Keep R74 'moon'
01362
01362
心 61.11.1
UK-20252
TS 15 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
An alternative IDS is ⿱𱡘心. (U+31858(Ext H))
01027
01027
子 39.14.2
虫 142.11.5
UK-20282
UTC-00623
TS 17 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
FS=3 for R=39
01704
01704
日 72.12.3
UK-20283
UTC-00667
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=13, TC=17
#11, IRGN2221
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with HKSAR
00353
00353
勹 20.7.3
UK-20304
UTC-00778
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 77.0 (止), SC=5, FS=3
00559
00559
口 30.10.2
UK-20312
TS 13 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=11
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=14
02542
02542
瓜 97.7.3
UK-20352
TS 12 · IDS
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Change Radical to 32.0 (土), SC=10, FS=3

Radical follows 坐.
00669
00669
口 30.14.4
UK-20368
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=15
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=18
00754
00754
口 30.22.2
UK-20384
TS 25 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=23
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=26
04417
04417
頁 181.10.4
UK-20410
TS 19 · IDS 𠂤
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3
02709
02709
目 109.12.1
UK-20411
TS 17 · IDS 𣈆
IDS
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰目晉 per new evidence and the new UCV 晉/𣈆 discussed in IRG #58, update the glyph accordingly.
01110
01110
山 46.4.3
UK-20417
TS 7 · IDS
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2.
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Per #4256, FS=2
03267
03267
肉 130.16.1
UK-20418
TS 20 · IDS 𦰩
Radical
LI Yuan
SAT
Because the pronunciation is hú, same as the right part, so the left part 𦰩 would be related to the radical. Consider to change Radical to 140.0 (艸), SC=17, FS=2
02539
02539
玉 96.20.1
UK-20450
TS 24 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=4
01760
01760
肉 130.14.1
UK-20488
UTC-03203
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change Radical to 130.0 (肉), SC=14, FS=1
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Agree to change to R130 'meat'
01988
01988
水 85.1.2
UK-20514
TS 5 · IDS 𰛅
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
⿻水丨
03048
03048
米 119.23.4
UK-20533
TS 29 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=5
#72, IRGN954AR:
03247
03247
肉 130.10.3
UK-20535
TS 14 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=1
00142
00142
人 9.6.1
UK-20541
TS 8 · IDS
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Given the meaning, it is highly probable that the structure is meant to be ⿰亻⿱𠤎天 (i.e. ⿸化天)
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
According to the new evidence, it is now clearer that IDS should be ⿰亻⿱𠤎天 or ⿸化天.
00949
00949
大 37.3.1
UK-20548
TS 6 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 26.0 (卩), SC=4, FS=1
00775
00775
囗 31.9.4
UK-20551
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=10
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=13
01105
01105
山 46.3.1
UK-20566
TS 6 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 45.0 (屮), SC=3, FS=1
00935
00935
夕 36.3.2
UK-20567
TS 6 · IDS
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Given the glyph based on comment #4927, ⿹⺄⿺𠃊夕?
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=2?
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=5?
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
FS=5?
01799
01799
木 75.8.5
UK-20573
TS 12 · IDS 𠃛𠃛
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
〾⿲木𠃛𠃛
04654
04654
魚 195.15.4
UK-20591
TS 26 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=14 as there is 龷, which isn't 廿, in the first piece of evidence and the glyph.
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=25
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
All 廣 components (with 黃 or 黄) should be counted as 15 in IRG WS to KX. The real glyph shapes and the regional conventions are not important for the stroke counts. The SC and TS should be kept as the submitted ones.
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please see #4105.
00648
00648
口 30.13.5
UK-20598
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=14
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=17
02737
02737
石 112.4.2
UK-20611
TS 9 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=3
03154
03154
羊 123.7.4
UK-20618
TS 13 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2
01114
01114
山 46.5.3
UK-20626
TS 8 · IDS
IDS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
⿱山冊.
01115
01115
山 46.5.3
UK-20627
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 106.0 (白), SC=3, FS=2
00784
00784
土 32.2.2
UK-20632
TS 5 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 18.0 (刀), SC=3, FS=1
00887
00887
土 32.12.1
UK-20635
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=11
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=14
00436
00436
口 30.4.2
UK-20684
TS 7 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=5 (if glyph is changed per #9663)
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=8 (if glyph is changed per #9663)
00517
00517
口 30.8.4
UK-20696
TS 11 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=9
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=12
03047
03047
米 119.18.1
UK-20828
TS 24 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR:
04471
04471
食' 184'.8.4
UK-20859
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I agree with Eddie that ⿰饣穸 is an error form, 穸 and 𡨝 is non-cognate.



▲ 汉字海(华语教学出版社, 2018) pp. 691 quotes 汉语方言大词典 but changes the glyph to ⿰饣⿳穴人又, which is the simplified form from the T-glyph of 𩜯 (康熙字典). I don't have 汉语方言大词典 but I guess the original evidence is likely where 汉字海 quotes. More evidences from 汉语方言大词典 will be appreciated.

汉字海 also gives a simplified form from the G-glyph of 𩜯 (廣韻): ⿰饣叜.

I suggest we encode ⿰饣叜 instead per new evidence, change IDS to ⿰饣叜 and update the glyph accordingly.

U+2972F
01698
01698
日 72.11.4
UK-20878
TS 15 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=1
#67, IRGN954AR
00928
00928
土 32.19.2
UK-20881
TS 22 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 122.0 (网), SC=17, FS=5
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Second radical not required because 羅 is such a common phonetic component, and ⿱維土 is not a thing, so there is no scope for confusion over the radical in this case.
02057
02057
水 85.9.5
UK-20902
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=10, TC=13
#3, IRGN2221
02588
02588
田 102.7.5
UK-20909
TS 12 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=3
#21, IRGN954AR:
02111
02111
水 85.15.2
UK-20910
TS 18 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
02863
02863
示 113.16.4
UK-20944
TS 21 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=1
#67, IRGN954AR:
01716
01716
日 72.14.3
UK-20950
TS 18 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=1
#13, IRGN954AR
02404
02404
犬 94.10.2
UTC-00281
TS 14 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=4
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with HKSAR
02847
02847
示 113.9.5
UTC-03173
TS 13 · IDS 𫨻
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TC=14
#31, IRGN954AR:
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Agree with HKSAR
02060
02060
水 85.10.1
UTC-03201
TS 13 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=12, TC=15
#23, IRGN2221
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
#42, IRGN954AR
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with HKSAR
00421
00421
又 29.9.3
UTC-03210
TS 11 · IDS 𰆊
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 26.0 (卩), SC=9, FS=3 (to be consistent with ROK-submitted ideographs with the same component)
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Agree with Ken.
00883
00883
土 32.11.5
V0-3453
TS 14 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 170.0 (阜), SC=11, FS=3
02158
02158
水 85.24.4
V0-485C
TS 27 · IDS
Radical
HKSAR
Hong Kong
Should the radical 212.0龍 be added as the secondary radical? If so, SC=11, FS=4.
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
As suggested by IRGN2515, we could make 212.0龍 the primary radical, with with the semantically correct 85.0 水 secondary.
00360
00360
勹 20.15.3
V4-424F
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=14
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=16
00689
00689
口 30.15.2
V4-4436
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 169.0 (門), SC=10, FS=2
00936
00936
夕 36.3.4
V4-4525
TS 9 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=6
01212
01212
工 48.9.5
V4-4725
TS 11 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TC=12.
01215
01215
工 48.11.2
V4-472D
TS 14 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 140.0 (艸), SC=10, FS=5
01352
01352
心 61.9.5
V4-4837
TS 13 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=3
#15, IRGN954AR
01848
01848
木 75.12.3
V4-4B57
TS 17 · IDS 𰙔
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=13
02116
02116
水 85.16.1
V4-4C75
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=17
02258
02258
火 86.15.2
V4-4D51
TS 19 · IDS 𬞕
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=16, TC=20
#36, IRGN954AR
02566
02566
生 100.5.4
V4-4E2B
TS 10 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TS=11

According to IRGN954AR #13, the left part of 礼 is counted as 5 strokes:
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=6, TC=11
#31, IRGN954AR:
00340
00340
力 19.10.5
V4-516F
TS 12 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 129.0 (聿), SC=6, FS=2
03285
03285
臼 134.13.3
V4-525E
TS 19 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change FS to 2
03389
03389
艸 140.11.1
V4-532B
TS 15 · IDS 𫇰
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change FS to 2.
03725
03725
衣 145.11.5
V4-5431
TS 15 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=17.
00086
00086
乙 5.11.1
VN-F0013
TS 12 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2 is correct
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
00098
00098
二 7.2.1
VN-F0017
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 77.0 (止), SC=5, FS=1
00104
00104
二 7.8.2
VN-F0019
TS 10 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3 according to IRGN954AR

FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3 according to IRGN954AR
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 175.0 (非), SC=2, FS=1
00259
00259
八 12.10.4
VN-F001E
TS 13 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 119.0 (米), SC=7, FS=5 or 38.0 (女), SC=10, FS=4
00153
00153
人 9.7.5
VN-F0026
TS 9 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1 or 4
00405
00405
厂 27.11.5
VN-F0073
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=12
00519
00519
口 30.8.4
VN-F009B
TS 11 · IDS 𦍌
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰口𱻊
00556
00556
口 30.10.1
VN-F00AA
TS 13 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=5
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree FS=5
00717
00717
口 30.16.4
VN-F00EC
TS 19 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 15.0 (冫), SC=18, FS=3
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=20
01064
01064
宀 40.20.1
VN-F0140
TS 23 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=19
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=22
02866
02866
禸 114.17.5
VN-F0167
TS 21 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=4, TC=22
#11, IRGN2221:
01269
01269
广 53.14.3
VN-F0191
TS 17 · IDS 广
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿸广⿱殸夊 will be better

This character is the variant of 慶, and the bottom of 慶 is 夊 not 夂.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
I think the IDS should be keep as ⿸广⿱殸夂 based on the glyph.
IDS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with #1531.
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Agree with #1531.
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=1
01365
01365
心 61.11.2
VN-F01CC
TS 14 · IDS 𭁈𰀁
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰忄𱑏 once Unicode 15.0 is released.
01488
01488
手 64.9.5
VN-F0208
TS 13 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=10
01576
01576
手 64.15.2
VN-F023D
TS 18 · IDS 𬞕
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=16, TC=19
#36, IRGN954AR
01611
01611
攴 66.10.3
VN-F024D
TS 14 · IDS 𭓇
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=2
02034
02034
水 85.8.2
VN-F02D5
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰氵𱽐
02137
02137
水 85.18.1
VN-F0304
TS 21 · IDS
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IDS should be changed to ⿰氵𧢄.
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Not opposed to changing IDS, but it's not clear what the benefit is. The current IDS, 漂見, follows the analysis of the dictionary compiler, as he notes "(phiêu kiến)". Historically, 漂 was used first alone, then the component 見 was added to distinguish it.
02304
02304
牙 92.9.1
VN-F033B
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=8
02645
02645
疒 104.15.4
VN-F038F
TS 20 · IDS 广
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿸疒廠
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Evidence shows 欠 on the right side of 尚, so ⿸疒廠 is not an accurate IDS
02649
02649
癶 105.2.3
VN-F0392
TS 7 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=1
#13, IRGN954AR:
02688
02688
目 109.4.3
VN-F03A0
TS 9 · IDS 𫜵
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Agree to change of IDS.
02834
02834
示 113.7.1
VN-F03DF
TS 11 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TC=12
#31, IRGN954AR:
03238
03238
肉 130.8.4
VN-F04AB
TS 12 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2
#36, IRGN954AR:
03874
03874
足 157.4.2
VN-F0577
TS 11 · IDS 𧾷
Residual Stroke Count
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=5, TS=12.
以 is counted as 5 strokes by Kangxi.
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Agree with Henry, I thought we were following Kangxi.
04043
04043
酉 164.21.1
VN-F05BC
TS 28 · IDS 𧃲
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
04703
04703
鳥 196.6.1
VN-F0694
TS 17 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=4
04779
04779
鳥 196.13.3
VN-F06AE
TS 24 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=12, TS=23
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The SC should be counted as 粵 U+7CB5 not 粤 U+7CA4, so keep the current data for SC and TS.
00309
00309
刀 18.8.2
VN-F06C2
TS 10 · IDS 齿
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 211.1 (齿), SC=2, FS=2
04055
04055
里 166.12.4
VN-F06CE
TS 19 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 212.2 (竜), SC=9, FS=3 (the kRSUnicode property will be able to represent non-Chinese simplified radicals, such as this one, from Unicode Version 15.1 using two apostrophes, '', so I suggest using 2 as the digit to represent the same in IRG work; this would need to be added to the P&P)
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Agree with #12650
00019
00019
一 1.21.4
VN-F0703
TS 22 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 210.0 (齊), SC=8, FS=4
02042
02042
水 85.9.1
VN-F0732
TS 12 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰汫⿱⿵𠆢丶𰆊 if the rhs is not 令. If the rhs is a form of 令 then normalize the glyph to use the standard V form of 令.
00383
00383
卜 25.6.5
VN-F0767
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 138.0 (艮), SC=2, FS=1
00530
00530
口 30.9.1
VN-F077D
TS 13 · IDS
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Might be ⿰口⿷匚⿱口田?
04507
04507
馬 187.8.4
VN-F0947
TS 18 · IDS 𦍌
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰馬𱻊
02935
02935
竹 118.8.4
VN-F0AFD
TS 14 · IDS 𦍌
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿱竹𱻊
00739
00739
口 30.18.1
VN-F0B17
TS 21 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=19
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=22
02448
02448
犬 94.14.4
VN-F0B6E
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=15, TC=18
#26b, IRGN2221
01074
01074
小 42.5.5
VN-F0B84
TS 8 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=4.
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to the Unihan data, 巴 is 4 strokes and 少 is the radical 42 with 1 residual stroke, so it seems that SC=5 is correct.
03068
03068
糸 120.7.2
VN-F0B89
TS 13 · IDS
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
IDS would change to ⿰糹别
03576
03576
虫 142.9.4
VN-F0B9E
TS 15 · IDS 𤇮
Residual Stroke Count
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=8
Total Stroke Count
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TS=14
00036
00036
丿 4.11.5
VN-F0BE9
TS 12 · IDS 𠂊丿𰀁
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Suggest alternatively ⿳⺈𠔿𠂡
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Suggest IDS change to ⿳⺈囚⿲丿𰀁㇂.
00005
00005
一 1.7.5
VN-F0BEA
TS 8 · IDS &S8-01;
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=7 (if TS of 龍 is 16, because TS of 𦚏 is 9, then the right component's TS should be 7)
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 212.0 (龍), SC=-9 (negative), FS=0
02604
02604
疒 104.4.2
VN-F0CFD
TS 9 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿸疒內.
03076
03076
糸 120.8.2
VN-F0D66
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰糹𱽐
00323
00323
刀 18.13.4
VN-F0D73
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 85.0 (水), SC=12, FS=2
01213
01213
工 48.10.1
VN-F1138
TS 13 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 32.0 (土), SC=10, FS=3
02984
02984
竹 118.16.3
VN-F15FE
TS 22 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=1
00037
00037
丿 4.12.5
VN-F1601
TS 12 · IDS 𥾽
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 120.0 (糸), SC=6, FS=4
00430
00430
又 29.23.5
VN-F1602
TS 25 · IDS 𦇒𠬠
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 120.0 (糸), SC=19, FS=1
00025
00025
丨 2.12.2
VN-F163B
TS 13 · IDS
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Change Radical to 127.0 (耒), SC=7, FS=2
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with UK
00130
00130
人 9.2.5
VN-F163D
TS 4 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3 according to IRGN954AR

FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with Eiso
00012
00012
一 1.10.3
VN-F1644
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 5.0 (乙), SC=10, FS=3
00092
00092
乙 5.13.3
VN-F1645
TS 14 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 124.0 (羽), SC=8, FS=3
00008
00008
一 1.8.3
VN-F1663
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Add Secondary Radical to 9.0 (人), SC=7, FS=3
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with UK, but I would go one step further by making 9.0 as the *only* radical. I cannot see how 1.0 could possibly be the radical for this ideograph.
00692
00692
口 30.15.3
VN-F1670
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 154.0 (貝), SC=11, FS=3
00209
00209
人 9.14.1
VN-F1677
TS 16 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 38.0 (女), SC=13, FS=3
00946
00946
夕 36.18.4
VN-F1692
TS 21 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 15.0 (冫), SC=19, FS=4
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Original RS is technically correct and should be assigned as second RS per IRGN2515
00320
00320
刀 18.13.1
VN-F1699
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 77.0 (止), SC=11, FS=2
00339
00339
力 19.10.3
VN-F169D
TS 12 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree, FS=2
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
00344
00344
力 19.14.5
VN-F169F
TS 16 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 110.0 (矛), SC=11, FS=3
00348
00348
力 19.16.5
VN-F16A0
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 110.0 (矛), SC=13, FS=3
00365
00365
匸 23.16.2
VN-F16A9
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 164.0 (酉), SC=11, FS=1
01079
01079
小 42.9.4
VN-F16AB
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=8.
00889
00889
土 32.12.1
VN-F16B3
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 131.0 (臣), SC=9, FS=2
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Original radical is technically correct and should be assigned as secondary.
00426
00426
又 29.11.1
VN-F16C0
TS 13 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=10
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=12
00742
00742
口 30.18.2
VN-F170F
TS 21 · IDS 𧀒
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=17
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=20
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
The standard stroke count for 艹 (U+8279) is 4, not 3.
00456
00456
口 30.6.1
VN-F1767
TS 9 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 11.0 (入), SC=7, FS=1
00880
00880
土 32.11.4
VN-F1779
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
⿰土𱷥
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Now that U+31DE5 is encoded, we can use it in the ids: ⿰土𱷥
00816
00816
日 72.6.1
VN-F1791
TS 10 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 32.0 (土), SC=7, FS=2
03296
03296
舛 136.4.1
VN-F17AF
TS 10 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS should be 3
01100
01100
尸 44.13.5
VN-F17E7
TS 16 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 39.0 (子), SC=13, FS=3
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Original RS is technically correct and should be assigned as second RS per IRGN2515
01098
01098
尸 44.12.3
VN-F1801
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 172.0 (隹), SC=7, FS=5
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Original RS is technically correct and should be assigned as second RS per IRGN2515
00116
00116
亠 8.9.5
VN-F180F
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 44.0 (尸), SC=8, FS=5
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Original RS is technically correct and should be assigned as second RS per IRGN2515
01031
01031
子 39.18.2
VN-F1821
TS 21 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 194.0 (鬼), SC=11, FS=2
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Original RS is technically correct and should be assigned as second RS per IRGN2515
01218
01218
工 48.14.2
VN-F1823
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=13
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=16
01221
01221
己 49.13.2
VN-F1828
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=10.
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TC=13.
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
爲 and 為 are unifiable, and they should be counted as 爲 for SC. There is no need to change.
01422
01422
戈 62.8.3
VN-F1835
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=9, TC=13
#17, IRGN2221
00407
00407
厂 27.16.1
VN-F183F
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 133.0 (至), SC=12, FS=1
02113
02113
水 85.15.3
VN-F184E
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
The IDS should be changed from ⿱彼海 to ⿰彼海.
01411
01411
心 61.18.2
VN-F1873
TS 22 · IDS 𭁈
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=16, TC=20
01249
01249
幺 52.16.3
VN-F187B
TS 19 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰𱥯幾 once Unicode 15.0 has been published.
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Unicode 15.0 has been published.
04441
04441
風' 182'.15.2
VN-F1883
TS 19 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿺𲋄暴
01287
01287
彡 59.12.1
VN-F1892
TS 15 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
FS=3
#45, IRGN954AR
01407
01407
心 61.17.3
VN-F1896
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=16
#18, IRGN2221
01597
01597
手 64.17.5
VN-F18A5
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=16
01521
01521
手 64.11.5
VN-F18BD
TS 14 · IDS 𤴔
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
An alternative IDS is ⿰扌𱱇 (U+31C47(Ext H)).
01487
01487
手 64.9.4
VN-F18F6
TS 12 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰扌𱒢
02572
02572
生 100.10.2
VN-F1902
TS 13 · IDS 𦉼
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=8
01608
01608
支 65.10.4
VN-F190C
TS 14 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=11, TC=15
#11, IRGN2221
01061
01061
宀 40.15.5
VN-F190D
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 49.0 (己), SC=15, FS=3
01708
01708
日 72.13.1
VN-F192B
TS 20 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=16
00684
00684
口 30.15.1
VN-F1990
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 75.0 (木), SC=14, FS=3
01246
01246
干 51.13.1
VN-F1991
TS 16 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 75.0 (木), SC=12, FS=3
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Original RS is technically correct and should be assigned as second RS per IRGN2515
04438
04438
風' 182'.8.3
VN-F1992
TS 12 · IDS
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
00990
00990
女 38.10.1
VN-F1997
TS 13 · IDS
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
FS=4
02031
02031
水 85.8.1
VN-F19B9
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Could the IDS be ⿲氵扌⿻冖丸 despite the position of the dot?
02082
02082
水 85.11.4
VN-F19BF
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
⿰氵𱷥
02090
02090
水 85.12.4
VN-F19C4
TS 14 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
TC=15
02017
02017
水 85.6.5
VN-F19DE
TS 9 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰氵𱰤
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
An alternative IDS is ⿰氵𱰤 (U+31C24 (Ext H)).
00356
00356
勹 20.14.4
VN-F19E5
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
SC=13
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=15
01850
01850
木 75.12.4
VN-F19E6
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=13, TC=17
#23, IRGN2221
01247
01247
干 51.15.4
VN-F19E9
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 85.0 (水), SC=15, FS=4
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Original RS is technically correct and should be assigned as second RS
02212
02212
火 86.10.5
VN-F19F1
TS 13 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
TC=14
02225
02225
火 86.12.2
VN-F19F5
TS 16 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=13, TC=17
02176
02176
火 86.6.5
VN-F19FD
TS 10 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰火𱰤
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
An alternative IDS is ⿰火𱰤 (U+31C24 (Ext H)).
02174
02174
火 86.6.4
VN-F1A01
TS 11 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=7
02395
02395
犬 94.9.3
VN-F1A21
TS 12 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰犭𱬹
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
An alternative IDS is ⿰犭𱬹 (U+31B39 (Ext H)).
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
We prefer using 𱬹 (U+31B39 (Ext H)), it just had not been encoded when we submitted the attributes.
02546
02546
瓦 98.4.1
VN-F1A29
TS 9 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=2
01933
01933
殳 79.13.5
VN-F1A35
TS 18 · IDS 殿
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=14, FS=2
02635
02635
疒 104.12.1
VN-F1A40
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=13, TC=18
#29, IRGN2221:
02610
02610
疒 104.6.3
VN-F1A4C
TS 11 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=1
02679
02679
皿 108.10.4
VN-F1A5C
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
盗 and 盜 are unifiable, it may be better to count by 盜 per Kangxi for consistency. In that case, SC=11, TS=16.
02683
02683
皿 108.19.4
VN-F1A5D
TS 24 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
盗 and 盜 are unifiable, it may be better to count by 盜 per Kangxi for consistency. In that case, SC=20, TS=25.
02716
02716
目 109.13.3
VN-F1A62
TS 18 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=1
00964
00964
大 37.15.4
VN-F1AA2
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 212.2 (竜), SC=8, FS=1 (the kRSUnicode property will be able to represent non-Chinese simplified radicals, such as this one, from Unicode Version 15.1 using two apostrophes, '', so I suggest using 2 as the digit to represent the same in IRG work; this would need to be added to the P&P)
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
212.2 (竜) is the phonetic and this means "strange", so the original radical is technically correct and should be assigned as secondary.
03096
03096
糸 120.11.5
VN-F1ABE
TS 17 · IDS 𤴔
IDS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Should the IDS be changed from ⿰糹⿰𤴔吏 to ⿲糹𤴔吏?
03066
03066
糸 120.7.1
VN-F1AD0
TS 13 · IDS
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS should be 5
03114
03114
糸 120.13.5
VN-F1AD7
TS 19 · IDS
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰糹𦁀.
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It's better to keep the current IDS because of the rationale, which the semantic element is 絲 and the phonetic element is 貝.

If the we use ⿰糹𦁀 as the IDS, it will make the people think the semantic element is 糹(糸), the phonetic element is 𦁀, and the shape of the middle element should be near to 糹 not current 糸.
01065
01065
宀 40.22.1
VN-F1AE9
TS 25 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=21. There is no dot inside 者.
Total Stroke Count
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TS=24
00101
00101
二 7.6.1
VN-F1AF3
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 126.0 (而), SC=2, FS=1
00096
00096
亅 6.7.3
VN-F1AF5
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Add Second Radical to 127.0 (耒), SC=2, FS=5
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Agree with 127.0 (耒) as second radical. Note that the semantic is 了, since this means "finish", "already".
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with UK
03215
03215
耳 128.15.2
VN-F1AF9
TS 19 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TC=21
03230
03230
肉 130.6.3
VN-F1AFE
TS 12 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=1
03311
03311
舟 137.11.5
VN-F1B0C
TS 17 · IDS 𤴔
IDS
LI Yuan
SAT
IDS should be ⿰舟𱱇. The last part is U+31C47. (http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetUnihanData.pl?codepoint=31C47)
03413
03413
艸 140.12.4
VN-F1B13
TS 15 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
TC=16
#36, IRGN954AR:
03478
03478
艸 140.17.3
VN-F1B34
TS 21 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=4
03564
03564
虫 142.8.4
VN-F1B53
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰虫𱣅
02669
02669
皮 107.12.4
VN-F1B65
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=13, TS=18.

According to IRGN954AR, the left hand side of 補 should be counted as 6 strokes, so SC=13, TS=18.
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Our original submission was SC=13. Suggest changing back.
00024
00024
丨 2.10.3
VN-F1B7B
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Change Radical to 150.0 (谷), SC=4, FS=2
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with UK
03803
03803
牙 92.11.3
豕 152.9.3
VN-F1B7E
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
SC=12, TS=16.
00038
00038
丿 4.14.5
VN-F1B8B
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 154.0 (貝), SC=8, FS=2
00097
00097
亅 6.19.1
VN-F1B93
TS 20 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 156.0 (走), SC=13, FS=1
00291
00291
冫 15.15.4
VN-F1BAD
TS 17 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 162.0 (辵), SC=13, FS=4
04237
04237
門 169.11.2
VN-F1BD9
TS 19 · IDS 𭁈𰀁
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰門𱑏 once Unicode 15.0 is released.
03721
03721
衣 145.10.4
VN-F1C01
TS 15 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=16.
04464
04464
食 184.13.2
VN-F1C09
TS 21 · IDS 𠀎𧘇
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰飠𱢒
00255
00255
入 11.19.4
VN-F1C3F
TS 21 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 212.0 (龍), SC=4, FS=2
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
TS=20
02595
02595
田 102.11.4
VN-F1C41
TS 16 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
⿺𱷥田
00027
00027
丨 2.14.4
VN-F1C8D
TS 15 · IDS
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
⿺𱷥中
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Change Radical to 117.0 (立), SC=10, FS=4
NB U+25A9D 𥪝 is under Radical 117
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
If we are going to not use the semantic element (中) to determine the radical, we should use consider a new radical variant of 212, since the left side, U+31DE5, is a simplification of 龍.
00238
00238
儿 10.6.2
VN-F1CCA
TS 8 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 11.0 (入), SC=6, FS=2
01674
01674
日 72.8.3
VN-F1CD1
TS 12 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
HKSAR
Hong Kong
SC=9, TC=13
00926
00926
土 32.18.3
VN-F1CD2
TS 21 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 61.0 (心), SC=17, FS=3
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Original radical is technically correct and should be assigned as secondary.
02728
02728
矢 111.12.3
VN-F1CE4
TS 17 · IDS
FS
HKSAR
Hong Kong
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=4
01278
01278
而 126.5.1
弋 56.8.1
VN-F1CFE
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Change Radical to 126.0 (而), SC=5, FS=1
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
126.0 (而) would be a natural way to look this up and should be an alternate radical. However, the meaning of this character is "two" and 而 is phonetic, so based on IRG rules, the best radical might be 7.0 (二), SC=9, FS=1
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
I'm not sure what IRG rules you are referring to. However, IRG PnP §2.2.1 d. (5) c) states:

"If the technically correct (aka semantic) radical for an ideograph hampers its discoverability, or is region-dependent, the primary radical shall be assigned as though made by an ideograph expert who is neither a specialist in the history of the Han script nor familiar with ideograph etymology. The technically correct radical can be assigned as a second radical. Both are shown in the code charts, though the primary one serves as the basis for ordering within a CJK Unified Ideographs block."

Therefore, in this case the primary radical should be R126 而.
03024
03024
米 119.9.2
VN-F1E25
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
Consider adding second radical 86.0 (火), SC=11, FS=1
It is very obvious that 炭 is the semantic component.
03704
03704
衣 145.7.2
VN-F1F44
TS 12 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
TS=13.
01017
01017
子 39.5.5
VN-F1F45
TS 8 · IDS
FS
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
FS=1? Unless it is written from right to left
FS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with FS=1 if Radical is #39.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Add secondary Radical as 5.0 (乙), SC=7, FS=1
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
There is no clear semantic element in this character. The meaning is "back of the neck, nape". The phonetic is probably the final of 孛. 乙 may be a device to mark this for "nôm" usage. Whichever radical increases "discoverability" is fine as primary radical, so 乙 might be better.
00523
00523
口 30.8.4
VN-F20C0
TS 11 · IDS
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰口𱣅


Evidence

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
03953
03953
車' 159'.4.1
GDM-00222
TS 8 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 许正华: 《金华地区传统名产》, 金华: 浙江省金华地区科学技术委员会, 1983.5, p. 138


▲ 《中华人民共和国地质部 区域地质矿产调查报告 H-50-XXIX 衢县幅 比例尺1:200000》, 浙江省地质局, 1969, p. 59

This form is used widely, it is OK to encode it.

If you check the ancient books, you will find the geographical name listed there is 猷輅, which the original name is 牛路 (牛: cattle, 路: road/path). And they used 猷辂 on the local guideboards.




There is one famous pugilistic art, and they registered as 䣭辂拳 in 第三批浙江省非物质文化遗产名录.


▲ https://www.ihningbo.cn/regulation/show/11



▲ 杨建新: 《浙江文化地图 第四册 钱塘风物 浙江民间文化》, 杭州: 浙江摄影出版社, 2011.12, ISBN 978-7-5514-0018-3, pp. 268-269

𬨎辂 is also used in the books related to toponymic survey, but not common for the local people.
03506
03506
虫 142.3.5
GDM-00223
TS 9 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 《中国共产党山东省青岛市黄岛区组织史资料 1939—1987》, 青岛: 中共青岛市黄岛区委党史征委会, 1989.4, p. 292
04793
04793
鳥' 196'.2.5
GDM-00225
TS 7 · IDS
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
Also the second stage simplified form (Table 2) of U+96D5 雕. 《第二次汉字简化方案(草案)》(1977) p.3:

04524
04524
骨 188.8.1
GDM-00227
TS 18 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual


▲ 桦甸县地方志编纂委员会: 《桦甸县志》, 长春: 吉林人民出版社, 1995.7, ISBN 7-206-02269-3/Z·92, pp. 35-36
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 常秉志: 《桦甸县地名录》, 吉林: 吉林省桦甸县地名委员会, 1984.10, 吉林省内部资料准印证第4082号, p. 16
03131
03131
糸' 120'.8.2
GDM-00233
TS 11 · IDS
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
《中国京语词典》(2014) P10:

New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
《湖北省建始县地名志》 (1983) P284:
04207
04207
金' 167'.5.1
GDM-00234
TS 10 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Is it the misprint form of 锛? 梁河县 is under current 德宏州, and 锛鼓山 was changed to 铓鼓山 now.


▲ 德宏州史志办公室: 《德宏史志系列丛书 德宏历史资料 历史卷》, 潞西: 德宏民族出版社, 2012.10, ISBN 978-7-80750-755-0, p. 430


▲ 李根源, 刘楚湘, 许秋芳: 《民国腾冲县志稿【点校本】》, 昆明: 云南美术出版社, 2004.12, ISBN 7-80695-180-6/Z·44, p. 206
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual

The shape is both clear and resonable.
04212
04212
金' 167'.12.2
GDM-00236
TS 17 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please confirm the source name of the first evidence. 阳山县 is in 广东省清远市, 抚宁县 is in 河北省秦皇岛市.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 毛荣楷: 《怀岭禅风——六祖惠能在怀集的故事》, 肇庆: 怀集县冷坑镇委、镇政府 & 《新怀集》编辑部 & 怀集县志办公室, 2005.8, p. 55

This is a common word in Yue-dialects, this form is used commonly in 肇庆.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 秦皇岛市地名办公室: 《秦皇岛市地名词典》, 天津: 天津人民出版社, 1994.9, ISBN 7-201-01759-4/K·233, p. 231
01810
01810
木 75.9.4
GDM-00240
TS 13 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual


▲ 慈溪市民间文学集成办公室: 《中国民间文学集成浙江省宁波市慈溪市卷》, 杭州: 浙江省民间文学集成办公室, 1989.4, 书号: Z CSL-1989-0022, pp. 351-352
01013
01013
女 38.16.4
GDM-00243
TS 19 · IDS
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
What is the name of Evidence 1?
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
I also need to know the name of Evidence 1 to confirm the language tag. There are Chinese Gan-dialects and Chinese Mandarin-dialects in 瑞昌市. The words look like Gan more.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
江西省公安厅一处 编纂:《江西方言土语汇集》第六册,1991年9月,P42
02065
02065
水 85.10.4
GDM-00248
TS 13 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual


▲ 大埔县地方志编纂委员会: 《大埔县志》, 广州: 广东人民出版社, 1992.11, ISBN 7-218-00994-8/K·230, p. 50 & p. 55
01146
01146
山 46.8.4
GDM-00251
TS 11 · IDS
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
中国测绘科学研究院:地名库外字代码对照表,2004年



However, I checked 1:50000 topographic map (1972) of Liquan County, Shannxi Province, the name of the village is 山底村. So it should be used in another place name which I don't know.
For encoding, I think the evidence is enough.
01113
01113
山 46.5.3
GDM-00252
TS 8 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual


▲ 苏秉琦: 《考古学文化论集(三)》, 北京: 文物出版社, 1993.12, ISBN 7-5010-0685-7/K·283, p. 12 & p. 23
01147
01147
山 46.8.4
GDM-00254
TS 11 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please provide the evidence in 皇朝輿地水道源流 and 中华姓氏源流大辞典.
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
《中华姓氏源流大辞典》 P89:
02782
02782
石 112.10.1
GDM-00262
TS 15 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
It is better to provide the other evidence from 福建省地名全册.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
《建宁县地名录》has pronounciation.
02803
02803
石 112.12.4
GDM-00264
TS 17 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 贵州省黔西南布依族苗族自治州史志征集编纂委员会: 《黔西南布依族苗族自治州志·民政志》, 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 1989.12, ISBN 7-221-01548-1/K·51, p. 214


▲ 《贵州省中草药新医疗法展览资料选编》, 贵州省中草药新医疗法展览会, 1972, p. 74
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ ~硐小学
02779
02779
石 112.9.4
GDM-00266
TS 14 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 《闽北农业科技手册》, 1978.5, p. 62
New evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Found in the Vietnamese dictionary: Đại Tự Điển Chữ Nôm, p. 37

01431
01431
手 64.4.1
GDM-00270
TS 7 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please confirm the source name of the submitted evidence.
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
十三經注疏·禮記註疏
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
The source name of evidence 1 is 《金瓶梅词话》难解词语释义校补与拾遗(续).赵景波.丹东师专学报.1997-11-25
00803
00803
土 32.5.5
GDM-00273
TS 8 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 《重修揚州府志》, 嘉慶刻本, 卷之三十三
00842
00842
土 32.9.1
GDM-00274
UK-20964
TS 12 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
汉语文字学史(修订本) is also one good evidence. It is better to show it here.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
汉语文字学史(修订本)
00848
00848
土 32.9.2
GDM-00279
TS 12 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please confirm the source name.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
安化县人民政府:湖南省安化县地名录,1983年3月,P54
00804
00804
土 32.5.5
GDM-00281
TS 8 · IDS 𢀖
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please confirm the source name of Evidence 2.
04687
04687
鳥' 196'.3.1
土 32.5.3
GDM-00286
TS 8 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 陕西省临潼县志编纂委员会: 《临潼县志》, 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1991.8, ISBN 7-208-01191-5/K·276, p. 58

《临潼县志》 gives 坞刘村.


▲ National Database for Geographical Names of China

If the information provided by National Database for Geographical Names of China is right, 坞 looks more correct.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
The pronounciation of ⿰土鸟 is niao3, which is resonable. Placenames can change over time.
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
It is better to check more evidence to make sure it is not an accidental typo. When we need to say the geographic name could be or has been changed, please show the evidence. Guessing doesn’t make sense for our encoding works.

On the other hand, the traditional one 䲧 is included in Kangxi Dictionary, but the pronunciation is 動五切 which is similar to 杜, that means 塢鵑 is the variant form of 杜鵑. 从鳥土聲, and niǎo is not reasonable for this rationale.
00865
00865
土 32.10.4
GDM-00287
TS 13 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please confirm the source name of Evidence 2. I know these places are under 阳城县.
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
《陝西延綏鎮志》 6:39a:



Also present in various editions of 《陝西通志》
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 《湖南省长沙市地名录》, 长沙: 长沙市人民政府, 1986.3, 内部发行, p. 447

(This evidence is provided by my friend Yang Lu.)
02470
02470
玉 96.5.1
GDM-00294
TS 9 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 国务院东北经济区规划办公室农林组: 《生态农业建设——东北经济区生态农业建设模式选编》, 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学出版社, 1987.8, ISBN 7-81008-018-0/S·3, p. 192

国务院东北经济区规划办公室 is an authoritative group under the State Council of PRC, which the previous name was 东北能源交通规划办公室 before 1985.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 杨新华, 赵恒珊, 韩明安: 《中苏贸易口岸》, 哈尔滨: 黑龙江人民出版社, 1991.3, ISBN 7-207-01954-8/F·395, p. 116

When this book was published, the Soviet Union had not yet disintegrated.
04805
04805
鳥' 196'.7.4
GDM-00297
TS 12 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please confirm the source name.
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
Also the second stage simplified form (Table 2) of U+9E70 鷹. 《第二次汉字简化方案(草案)》(1977) p.4:
04029
04029
酉 164.7.3
GDM-00298
TS 14 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 国家文物局: 《中国文物地图集 山西分册(中)》, 北京: 中国地图出版社, 2006.12, ISBN 7-5031-4205-7, p. 293


▲ 刘清泉: 《绿色文明录(第一册)》, 太原: 山西高校联合出版社, 1994.8, ISBN 7-81032-684-8/S·38, p. 21
04672
04672
魚' 195'.8.1
GDM-00300
TS 16 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual


▲ 方炳桂: 《闽都风情录》, 福州: 福建教育出版社, 1997.3, ISBN 7-5334-2284-8/K·56, pp. 67-68
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 中国食品杂志社, 杜福祥, 谢帼明: 《中国名食百科》, 太原: 山西人民出版社, 1988.6, ISBN 7-203-00009-5/Z·4, p. 870
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 福州市地方志编纂委员会: 《福州市志 第四册》, 北京: 方志出版社, 2000.7, ISBN 7-80122-568-6/K·238, p. 420


▲ 福州市地方志编纂委员会: 《福州市志 第五册》, 北京: 方志出版社, 1999.2, ISBN 7-80122-418-3/K·154, p. 325


▲ 李如龙: 《论方言和普通话之间的过渡语》//中国社会科学院语言文字应用研究所社会语言学研究室: 《语言·社会·文化——首届社会语言学学术讨论会文集》, 北京: 语文出版社, 1991.1, ISBN 7-80006-232-5/H·64, p. 159


▲ 福建省糖业烟酒公司, 中国民主建国会福州市委员会, 福州市工商业联合会: 《实用副食品手册》, 福州: 福建科学技术出版社, 1982.10, 书号: 17211·15, p. 179


▲ 洪锡山: 《吴修潭先生传略》//中国人民政治协商会议福建省晋江市委员会文史资料委员会: 《晋江文史资料选辑 第十九辑》, 泉州: 泉州晚报印刷厂, 1997.12, p. 98
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 广东省汕头市地方志编纂委员会: 《汕头市志 第2册》, 北京: 新华出版社, 1999.1, ISBN 7-5011-4387-0, p. 454


▲ 赖云青, 何玳丽: 《大亨黄金荣》, 北京: 作家出版社, 1987.8, ISBN 7-5063-0023-0/I·22, p. 101
04673
04673
魚' 195'.8.1
GDM-00302
TS 17 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 《四川省仁寿县地名录》, 眉山: 仁寿县地名领导小组, 1982.10, p. 444
04669
04669
魚' 195'.7.2
GDM-00303
TS 15 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 清远市地方志编纂办公室: 《清远县志》, 1995, 内部发行, p. 117
04254
04254
阜 170.3.1
GDM-00305
TS 6 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 《蘇州府志》, 光緒九年刻本, 卷第二十九
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
《第二次汉字简化方案(草案)》(1977) p.4:
00951
00951
大 37.5.1
GDM-00306
TS 8 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
National Database for Geographical Names of China shows the glyph should be 𰥎 very clear. We need more evidence to confirm if this is a typo.


▲ National Database for Geographical Names of China

For the rationale, this character means 大 (big). 大 reads as ɾʱəu¹³ in 泾县话, ha⁵¹ (文) hu²⁴ (白) in 泾县茂林话, tʰa⁵⁵ (文) tʰo⁵⁵ (白) in 泾县查济话. (Thanks for 神死’s help on the Chinese Wu-dialects.) It is not difficult to know, this character is to record the syllable derived from the 白读 of 大, so the upper component should be 大.
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
For #10205, U+3094E 𰥎
U+3094E
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual

中国测绘科学研究院:地名库外字代码对照表,2000年11月
This is definately a variant of U+3094E 𰥎. Should we unify them or encode them seperately?

Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The new evidence under Comment #12739 looks good. If IRG confirms this is not suitable for unification, this character could be encoded separately as variant.
00256
00256
八 12.2.5
GDM-00307
TS 4 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
I think Yifan’s Comment #4848 is still reasonable. John showed the 木棉花 (kapok) reads as reux in Zhuang. And the dictionary shows U+26AFC 𦫼 reads as reuz. The initials and finals are the same, but the tones are different. It is possible to use U+26AFC 𦫼 to record reux in 隆安, and the semantics are also reasonable.
U+26AFC
New evidence
John Knightley
China
The character GDM-00307 ⿱丷了 was used in the name of Nazreux village before 1982 (广西壮族自治区隆安县小林乡那料屯).





Whilst looking at the dictionary first published in 1989 suggests this might come from 𦫼 (reuz) it is very unlikely that this was the case here. No place names in the 1934 "Longan County Chronicles" (隆安县志) use 了 as a phonetic component but many use 尞 as a phonetic component, and even includes 那寮 as a place name, therefore ⿱丷了 is most likely a variant of U+5bee 寮 or another 尞 phonetic character.
01035
01035
宀 40.5.1
GDM-00310
TS 8 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The submitted evidence just show the character, but the real use cases have not been provided. When we check the places in 福建省龙岩市长汀县, we can find more than 160 places which use 岽. 岽 is a common character used the geographical names in Chinese Hakka-dialects areas.


▲ 肖九根, 卢小芳: 《略论赣南客家话“上”义类方位词》//庄初升, 温昌衍: 《客家方言调查研究——第十二届客家方言学术研讨会论文集》, 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2018.10, ISBN 978-7-306-06448-6, p. 386


▲ 林雄, 顾作义: 《经典广东》, 广州: 广东教育出版社, 2009.8, ISBN 978-7-5406-7624-7, p. 87

There are more than 550 places in 江西省赣州市, more than 1020 places in 广东省梅州市 with 岽.

On the other hand, we know U+2BCD2 𫳒 is cited from ZJW, and we can’t find the real use of it in 长汀县, 龙岩市, even other Chinese Hakka-dialects areas in 福建省, 江西省, 广东省, 广西壮族自治区, 香港特别行政区, 澳门特别行政区, 台湾省 and so on.
U+2BCD2


The most reasonable understanding is that this is a typo, and the correct form should be 岽. It is better to withdraw this character.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
李如龙:地名与语言学论集,福州:福建省地图出版社,1993年8月,P146
01038
01038
宀 40.7.1
GDM-00312
TS 10 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
When we say if one character is used or useful for one place, the proponent must provide at least one piece of sufficient evidence. If not, I agree with Henry for suggesting China to withdraw the character based on the discussion result.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
I think IRG encode not only characters used or useful for one place, but also characters used in books which can be schoolars' references. The shape in the evidence is clear enough, what's more, 山 and 宀 can be written as each other when used on the head of a character, so the shape is reasonalbe. So I don't think it should be withdrawed. Rejecting this character will only lead to a later resubmition.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
李如龙:地名与语言学论集,福州:福建省地图出版社,1993年8月,P145

It is a print error. I will find another good evidence for the character and come back again.
02899
02899
穴 116.7.2
GDM-00313
TS 12 · IDS
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
新訂中州全韻
03365
03365
艸 140.9.2
GDM-00319
TS 13 · IDS 丿
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
《第二次汉字简化方案(草案)》 Table 2 Section 5
03375
03375
艸 140.10.1
GDM-00322
TS 14 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 广东师院, 湖南师院, 华中师院, 武汉师院: 《动物及动物饲养学(下册)》, 内部发行, 1976.4, p. 222



▲ 黄琪琰, 宋承方: 《鱼病防治实用技术》, 北京: 农业出版社, 1992.2, ISBN 7-109-02213-7/S·1452, pp. 171-172


▲ 叶重光: 《名优淡水产品养殖技术图说》, 郑州: 河南科学技术出版社, 2001.8, ISBN 7-5349-2542-8/S·595, p. 166


▲ 陈锦富, 陈辉: 《鱼病防治技术》, 北京: 金盾出版社, 1997.7, ISBN 7-5082-0377-1, p. 109

Water bloom is common in 高要 (肇庆), 南海 and 顺德 (佛山), so this character must be used to record Chinese Yue-dialect. I have no knowledge on this, so I can’t show the Cantonese reading now.
00953
00953
大 37.6.2
GDM-00327
TS 10 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
What is the source name of Evidence 1?
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual

泰和五音新改並類聚四聲篇(金刊元修本) 大部(⿱大?,音爻), quotes 搜真玉鏡.


成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇(明成化刊本) 卷4 folio 30b 大部(⿱大𮌇+VS18,音父)
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
贵阳市花溪区地方志办公室:贵阳市花溪区志,贵阳:贵州人民出版社,2007年8月,P71
00099
00099
二 7.3.2
山 46.2.1
GDM-00330
TS 5 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please confirm the source name of Evidence 1.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
江西省公安厅一处:江西方言土语汇集 第八册,1992年5月,P17
00807
00807
土 32.6.3
GDM-00336
TS 9 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
There are two source names, but only one piece of evidence. Which one is right?
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
宜兴县地名委员会:江苏省宜兴县地名录,1983年1月,P125
01125
01125
山 46.6.2
GDM-00339
UK-20629
TS 9 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Where is the evidence cited from 合併字學篇韻便?
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
合併字學篇韻便覽
00107
00107
二 7.10.5
GDM-00356
TS 12 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The evidence for 煙霞萬古樓詩殘稿 and 寒松閣老人集 will be good for encoding.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 季裕庆: 《江苏名城录》, 北京: 北京旅游出版社, 1987.11, 书号: 12273·12, p. 148


▲ 中国人民政治协商会议江苏省宜兴县委员会文史资料研究委员会: 《宜兴文史资料 第四辑》, 无锡: 中国人民政治协商会议江苏省宜兴县委员会文史资料研究委员会, 1983.4, p. 156


▲ 程裕祯, 解波: 《中国名胜楹联大观》, 北京: 中国旅游出版社, 1987.3, ISBN 7-5032-0022-7/I·3, p. 119
02765
02765
石 112.8.1
GDM-00357
TS 13 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 平定段⿱斩石石道班


▲ 杜五安: 《太旧路英雄谱》, 太原: 山西人民出版社, 1995.09, ISBN 7-203-03383-X, p. 498
02989
02989
竹 118.17.2
GDM-00358
TS 23 · IDS 𨗩
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 望城县人民政府: 《湖南省望城县地名录》, 长沙: 望城县湘江印刷厂, 1983.3, p. 178

The other page of the same book shows the pronunciation and the meaning.
02788
02788
石 112.10.4
GDM-00361
TS 15 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 沁源老区建设促进会: 《英雄的沁源人民》, 北京: 海潮出版社, 1997.12, ISBN 7-80054-921-6/K·64, p. 97
03678
03678
行 144.5.1
GDM-00362
TS 11 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The evidence shows this is a general geographical name (地理通名). This general geographical name is used widely in Beijing, the following book provided eight forms from different materials, and the authors checked 《京师坊巷志稿》 written by 朱一新 and found that several forms were not used in the real geographical names.


▲ 王越, 王华: 《胡同里的北京》, 北京: 中国工人出版社, 2019.7, ISBN 978-7-5008-7227-6, p. 44

Note that 《京师坊巷志稿》 is the authoritative material to study the local history of Beijing, and you will see this book is mentioned in so many guideboards inside Beijing Second Ring Road. 朱一新 came from 浙江义乌, but he collected the first-hand materials of the geographical names of hutongs in Beijing when he was an official in Beijing. He also became the head of 端溪书院 (current 肇庆中学) and 广雅书院 (current 中山大学) in Guangdong later.

小仓~衕 and 寺~衕 mentioned in the evidence are at 安徽省阜阳市, but I can’t find any more materials on them. It looks this character is the misprint form of 衚.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
崔恒昇:中国古今地理通名汇释,合肥:黄山书社,2003年6月,P405
00778
00778
囗 31.10.4
GDM-00364
TS 13 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Is it mentioned as the geographical name in other materials?
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual

中国测绘科学研究院:地名库外字代码对照表
00771
00771
囗 31.6.4
GDM-00365
TS 9 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please confirm the source name. The current two ones are both not right.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
邵阳县人民政府:湖南省邵阳县地名录,1984年12月,P236
04246
04246
門' 169'.4.1
GDM-00366
TS 7 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Is it mentioned as the geographical name in other materials?
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual

SJT 11239-2001 信息技术 信息交换用字符集 第八辅助集
04247
04247
門' 169'.5.2
GDM-00367
TS 8 · IDS
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
SJT 11239-2001 信息技术 信息交换用字符集 第八辅助集
01250
01250
广 53.4.1
GDM-00372
TS 7 · IDS 广
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please confirm the source name of the evidence mentioned in #1049.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual


▲ 骆国和: 《湛江掌故》 , 北京: 中国文联出版社, 2006.12, ISBN 7-5059-4369-3, pp. 112-113
01253
01253
广 53.5.1
GDM-00373
TS 8 · IDS 广
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please confirm the source name of the submitted evidence.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
江西省公安厅一处:江西方言土语汇集 第五册,1991年3月,P213
02582
02582
田 102.4.3
GDM-00374
TS 9 · IDS &P4-05;
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
This character could be treated as the vendor requirement of Hanyi Fonts. Note that there are quite a lot of wrong factual statements about the encoding and font in the following video, and “生僻字” is still not a well term for our encoding works, but easy to understand for the public accompanied by many unnecessary misunderstandings at the same time.


▲ 汉仪字库: 《中文上万个“生僻字”,都能打出来吗? | 字体研究院》, https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1v84y1J7GY
00051
00051
乙 5.5.1
GDM-00376
TS 6 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
It looks the place should be 氹塘.




▲ National Database for Geographical Names of China

On the other hand, this place is under 清新区, and 氹塘/凼塘 is a common stable word in 清远市.


▲ 广东省地理学会科普组: 《广东农谚》, 广州: 科学普及出版社广州分社, 1983.2, 统一书号: 16051·60185, p. 77
04620
04620
魚 195.10.2
GKJ-00215
TS 21 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please provide the full page and the book information. If not, this character should be withdrawn based on the editing and proofreading quality of 中华大典.
04605
04605
魚 195.8.5
GKJ-00217
TS 19 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The submitted evidence is 清康熙刻本.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
The small seal on the next page.
I understand according to the small seal and Fanqie, it should be transfered into 䱤, but as it has been defined as a head character, what we should do is to encode it instead of correcting the original book.
04595
04595
魚 195.8.1
GKJ-00221
TS 19 · IDS &S8-01;
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
畢沅,《山海經新校正》(清光緒3年[1877],浙江書局),卷八

04652
04652
魚 195.15.4
GKJ-00230
TS 26 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The name of the second piece of evidence has not been showed yet.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
The second one is 續通志.
04634
04634
魚 195.11.4
GKJ-00243
TS 22 · IDS 宿
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 葉廷珪: 《海録碎事》, 萬歷刻本, 卷二十二上


▲ 葉廷珪: 《海録碎事》, 四庫全書本, 卷二十二上

According to the new evidence, this character is also the variant of 䱤, but it is better to move it back to M-set for not only one piece of evidence.
Evidence
John Knightley
Individual
Agree return to M-set
04631
04631
魚 195.11.3
GKJ-00246
TS 22 · IDS
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
02117
02117
水 85.16.3
GKJ-00255
TS 19 · IDS
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The submitted evidence is cited from the work written by 夏言 (aka 桂洲夏文愍公, 夏言, 號桂洲, 1482-1548), who lived in Ming Dynasty. In the history of China, there are so many places named as 安州, but 安州 means current 保定 or 安新 (both in Hebei) at that time. There is one river named 瀑河 (Bàohé) now, which there were the old names as 雹河 and 鮑河. Note the river flows through 徐水, 易县, 安新, and 瀑河乡 is in 徐水. The submitted character comes from 瀑 and the phonetic element was changed to 鮑.

Therefore, it could be moved back to M-set based on the full-page evidence and my analysis.
04653
04653
魚 195.15.4
GKJ-00256
TS 26 · IDS
New evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Twitter user @Kesuuko_0826 found this ideograph at the top of page 8 in the following document prepared by Professor Yasuoka that shows it as entry 13120 of the revised new edition of Kadokawa's 新字源 kanji dictionary: http://kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~yasuoka/publications/2018-03-09.pdf

New evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
This is the same evidence from the iOS version of Kadokawa's 新字源 dictionary.

04597
04597
魚 195.8.1
GKJ-00259
TS 19 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 《霸州志》, 天一閣藏明嘉靖刻本, 卷之五

Also see WS2021-04607:GKJ-00233.
04607
魚 195.9.1
GKJ-00233
TS 20 · IDS
Evidence accepted, IRG 58.
04608
04608
魚 195.9.1
頁 181.11.3
GKJ-00268
TS 20 · IDS
Evidence
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
As mentioned in the comments by Huang Junliang and Eiso, Evidence 1, 6 7 and 8 for this character appears to be for 顦 (U+9866). It should be removed.

Also, the source names for the remaining evidences should be given.
Evidence
Henry CHAN
Individual
Can Tao Yang please provide the correct source names for evidence 2, 3, 4, 5.
02993
02993
竹 118.24.3
GKJ-00271
TS 30 · IDS
Evidence
TAO Yang
China

New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual

泰和五音新改並類聚四聲篇(金刊元修本)卷5 folio 9a 竹部/20+畫, quotes 會玉川篇.
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
大明成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇
大明正德乙亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇海
04656
04656
魚 195.16.4
GKJ-00275
TS 27 · IDS 𤇾
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual

泰和五音新改並類聚四聲篇(金刊元修本)卷3 folio 11b,魚部/14畫, quotes 搜真玉鏡


成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇(明成化刊本)卷3 folio 17b,魚部/17畫.

It is interesting that although 泰和五音新改並類聚四聲篇(金刊元修本) gives the shape ⿰魚⿱𤇾交, the character is categorized as 魚部/14畫, which would make sense if it were ⿰魚熒. Since then editors of later revisions respected the current shape and moved to 魚部/17畫, which does not make sense either as it should be in 魚部/16畫.
00127
00127
亠 8.16.2
魚 195.7.4
GKJ-00279
TS 18 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 方以智: 《通雅》, 文淵閣四庫本, 卷四十七
04592
04592
魚 195.7.3
GKJ-00282
TS 18 · IDS
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
04678
04678
魚' 195'.11.1
GKJ-00284
TS 19 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The submitted evidence mentioned Chongqing City. There is no 戚鱼 or ⿰鱼戚鱼 as the local name in Chongqing. Maybe it is the error of 鳡. 鳡鱼 (local name: 水老虎/tiger in the river, Elopichthys bambusa). This character should be withdrawn.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
No more evidence could be found, it's really hard to know what kind of fish it is. Withdraw should be better.
04681
04681
魚' 195'.11.5
GKJ-00286
TS 19 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The submitted evidence shows the glyph is ⿱郷鱼 not ⿱鄉鱼.

The submitted evidence is the modern publishing book in the traditional Chinese with mainland China conventions, that means 鱼 should not be used as the component in the running text and it must be the editing and proofreading error based on the current editing and proofreading rules in mainland China. It is better to withdraw the character for China.
04718
04718
鳥 196.8.2
GKJ-00291
TS 19 · IDS
Evidence
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
In order to confirm the details, Please show the whole page of this evidence1.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
01586
01586
鳥 196.8.1
手 64.16.2
GKJ-00293
TS 19 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Please show the full page of the evidence.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The evidence is insufficient. Firstly, please show the full page of the evidence. Secondly please show the original source that is being quoted so we can be sure that character shown in the modern source is not a mistake.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 《略陽縣志》, 天一閣藏明嘉靖刻本, 卷之三

略阳县 is under 陕西省汉中市 now.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual


Some one posted the picture of 青⿰拐鳥 on https://tieba.baidu.com/p/2077973832. It looks this kind of bird is also common in 汉中.
04757
04757
鳥 196.11.3
GKJ-00294
TS 22 · IDS
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+9D85


Variant/misprint of 鶅? Note that 笛 is very similar to ⿱𡿧田 (甾 + VS19).

See 鶅 on ctext:

太平御覽(靜嘉堂藏宋刊本)卷917 folio 5:「西方曰鷷,東方曰緇(音緇衣之緇)」緇/鶅 share the same phonetic element.

春秋左傳正義(清同治刊本)卷48 folio 8:「西方曰鷷雉,東方曰鶅雉,南方曰翟雉」

An original evidence from 寶慶本草折衷 would help to ensure it is not a modern misprint.
Evidence
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
In order to confirm the details, please show the whole page of Evidence1.
Evidence
John Knightley
Individual
No response given so far to comments #3005 and #8479.
04759
04759
鳥 196.11.5
GKJ-00297
TS 22 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The evidence is insufficient to judge if it's a typo.
Evidence
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
In order to confirm the details, please show the whole page of Evidence1.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 《銅陵縣志》, 天一閣藏明嘉靖刻本, 卷之一
01878
01878
木 75.16.3
GKJ-00298
TS 20 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The followings are eight editions of 《集韻》 at the same entry. At the same position, some are the submitted one (red), some are ⿰木⿱鳥𠔿 (blue) and 𣝼 U+2377C (orange), which mean the same character. ⿰木⿱鳥𠔿 could be unified to this character.



▲ 《集韻校本》, 卷之一


▲ 方成珪: 《集韻考正》, 光緒刻本, 卷之一



▲ 《集韻》, 新興書局影四部備要本, 卷之一


▲ 《集韻》, 文淵閣四庫本, 卷一


▲ 《集韻》, 日本天保九年重刊顧廣圻補刻本, 卷一


▲ 《集韻》, 曹氏楝亭本, 卷一


▲ 《集韻》, 寧波明州述古堂影宋鈔本, 卷一


▲ 《集韻》, 潭州宋刻本, 卷一
04735
04735
鳥 196.9.4
GKJ-00300
TS 20 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
6 pieces of evidence but only one book name.
04937
04937
鼠 208.11.3
鳥 196.13.3
GKJ-00302
TS 24 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
獐头鼠目/獐頭鼠目 is a stable idiom (成语/成語) in China, so maybe the character is a typesetting extra character. It is better to withdraw it without other sufficient evidence.


▲ 王朋, 钟鸣: 《通用成语词典》, 长沙: 湖南人民出版社, 2000.9, ISBN 7-5438-0949-4, p. 834
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
On the other hand, WS2017-04940 provided the totally different meaning and use, but IRG should accept the character based on the evidence first, not the rationale and explanation.
04770
04770
鳥 196.12.4
GKJ-00304
TS 23 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
What does the second evidence cite from?
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
鶷𪆰 is a stable bird name used in 集韻 and 玉篇, which is similar to 伯劳 (Lanius). Maybe this character is the variant of 鶷 U+9DB7.


▲ 《集韻》, 金州軍刻宋本, 卷之九
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
The second evidence is cite from 五音集字.
New evidence
TAO Yang
China

五音集字
Evidence
TAO Yang
China

经籍籑诂
Evidence
TAO Yang
China

辞通 卷二十二
03487
03487
艸 140.21.3
GKJ-00306
TS 25 · IDS 𠂤
Evidence
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The comment from Huang Junliang suggests that this character should be withdrawn.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
Agree to withdraw.
04753
04753
鳥 196.11.1
GKJ-00308
TS 22 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
4 pieces of evidence but only one book name.
04739
04739
鳥 196.9.5
GKJ-00309
TS 20 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The character is not included in the first evidence. The scholar mentioned the second evidence was a famous historian in Japan. The followings are his books.


The name was written as 桑原𨽥藏 by 岩波書店 in 1935.
https://book.kongfz.com/535541/4390005805/


The name was written as 桑原隲藏 by 商務印書館.
https://book.kongfz.com/565592/4500160884/


The name was also written as 桑原隲藏 by 岩波書店 in 1968.
https://book.kongfz.com/271942/4788602597/


The name was also written as 桑原𨽥藏 by 臺灣商務印書館 in 1971.
https://book.kongfz.com/446938/4381053120/


The name was written as 桑原骘藏 by 中華書局 in 2007.
https://book.kongfz.com/517/4421072712/


The name was also written as 桑原隲藏 by 中華書局 in 2009.
https://book.kongfz.com/351791/4657623042/


The name was written as 桑原骘藏 by 科学出版社 in 2019.
https://book.kongfz.com/268892/3685037725/

All the books are not related to the submitted character, so it is not better to encode it.
Evidence
Henry CHAN
Individual
Suggest to withdraw this character along with 04814, as the evidence for 04739 suggests that it is a misprint.

Otherwise, if the evidence for the simplified character is accepted, keep both.

04739
鳥 196.9.5
GKJ-00309
TS 20 · IDS

04814
鳥' 196'.10.5
GKJ-00393
TS 15 · IDS
SC=10, TS=15, IRG 58.
Evidence
WANG Yifan
SAT
We checked books by 桑原隲藏 dated before the publishing of 桑原隲蔵全集 (1968) in the University of Tokyo library. As far as we have found, his personal preference is apparently 隲, as well as the most of its typed representation. In the scope of his Japanese works, 𨽥 appears in limited instances as calligraphic stylized title on the cover or the title page, but we are unable to find it in the text body.





Among those books, 支那の孝道 and 東西交通史論叢 contain photocopy of his manuscript, clearly showing the 隲 variant in his handwriting.




On the contrary, Chinese translations appears to more eagerly employ 𨽥.

《張騫西征考》 consistently uses it:


and 《唐宋貿易港研究》 uses it partially in the colophon and a couple of chapter headings, while 隲 in elsewhere:




Aside from that, the government gazette records his name around 30 times, but except for his obituary, which also uses variant of 桑, no evidence that other variants than 隲 were used during his lifetime.
https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/2957791/1/5


We did not find any evidence 桑原隲藏 has been written with the 鳥 component.
Evidence
WANG Yifan
SAT
The fifth image of #9693 is wrong. Please see the following instead:
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
The former evidences show the wrong glyph of 騭 and 隲, withdraw would be better.
03499
03499
虍 141.11.3
GKJ-00314
TS 17 · IDS
Misidentified glyph
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The annotated ideograph in the evidence looks like it includes 烏 as a component, whereas the ideograph below it definitely includes 鳥 as a component.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the whole page of this evidence, as it difficult to understand the meaning of the character from this small extract.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
00408
00408
鳥 196.8.1
厂 27.17.2
GKJ-00315
TS 19 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please provide the full page of the evidence.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
Current evidence is insufficient to evaluate this character. Please provide full page image of the evidence.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
04768
04768
鳥 196.12.3
GKJ-00320
TS 23 · IDS &P9-01;
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
12 pieces of evidence but only one source name.
04719
04719
鳥 196.8.2
GKJ-00325
TS 19 · IDS
Evidence
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
In order to confirm the details, Please show the whole page of this evidence1.
04731
04731
鳥 196.9.2
GKJ-00327
TS 20 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The character looks like the variant of 鰂 in the first evidence, which the word means 烏賊/烏鰂 (squid). It is not related to the Cantonese word zak1 (e.g. 鰂魚涌 in HKSAR). If my understand is reasonable, the current radical is questionable.

In the second evidence, the head character should be the variant of 鷺. When I check the relative sentences of 鷺 in the ancient books, I found the following in 爾雅. So many books cited this sentence to explain 鷺. Maybe they are two characters there.


▲ 《爾雅疏》,四部叢刊本,卷第十
03179
03179
羽 124.11.3
GKJ-00328
TS 17 · IDS
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
In the new ⿱羽鳥 evidence, the text is from 史記索隱. Can China post the exact version?

I have checked three versions, all of them give 翯.

▲ 史記(集解、索隱)(宋乾道七年蔡夢弼東塾刻本)卷117 folio 9a // 中華再造善本


▲ 史記(集解、索隱)(宋淳熙三年張杅桐川郡齋刻八年耿秉重修本)卷117 folio 8b // 中華再造善本


史記(三家注)(南宋建安黃善夫家塾刊本)卷117 folio 14a
04695
04695
鳥 196.5.1
GKJ-00329
TS 16 · IDS
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
Here is the full evidence:


陳明卿太史考古詳訂遵韻海篇朝宗(明崇禎刊本)卷7 23b/24a

As we can see, ⿰世鳥 is categorized as 鳥部/六畫, which does not make sense because 世 has only 5 strokes and in the very same book, 泄 is categorized as 水部/五畫, so if ⿰世鳥 were indeed ⿰世鳥, it should have been placed after 鳥部/五畫.

Here is 鳥部/六畫 from 成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇(明成化刊本)卷4 folio 9b/10a:



Here is a summary by comparing the characters in 泰和五音新改並類聚四聲篇 (abbr. SSP) with all 鳥部/六畫 characters in 陳明卿太史考古詳訂遵韻海篇朝宗 (abbr. HPCZ):

Characters in HPCZ but not in SSP: ⿰关鳥、⿰世鳥、⿰鳥麦、⿰召鳥.
Characters in SSP but not in HPCZ: 𪁾、䳄、𩿮、𪀺、⿰𡰪鳥.

Here ⿰世鳥、⿰召鳥 have 5 strokes, ⿰鳥麦 has 7 strokes. ⿰召鳥 is misprint of ⿰𡰪鳥, ⿰鳥麦 is misprint of 𪀺. ⿰关鳥 is likely variant of 𪁾. And by exclusion, ⿰世鳥 is likely a misprint of 䳄, otherwise HPCZ would not have removed 䳄, a common character imo.

I am worried about the overall quality of 海篇朝宗. Should it happen to have correct strokes I may not find out that it is likely a misprint of another character. I suggest we treat 海篇朝宗 like 中華字海, it should not be the only supporting evidences without evidences from other dictionaries or running text.

Appendix:

Characters in HPCZ/鳥部/六畫: 𪀢,鴿,鵃,鴶,𪀖,鵧,鴻,鴰,鴷,䳑,鴛,䳋,鵀,𪀓,鵂,䳏,⿰𣅀鳥(鴲),鵅,⿰幵鳥(鳽),𪁋,鴸,鵁,𪁉,鴜,䳐,鴯,𪀣,𪀸,𪀽,𪀠,鴴,鴹,𪀟,𪀔,鴺,𪀚,𩿩,𪀝,鴳,⿰关鳥(WS2021-04707),𪁑,鵄,鴽,鵏,鴾,䳌,𪀤,𪁖,鴼,𪀒,翵,𪀕,𪁠,𪀡,𪀛,⿰世鳥,𪀹,𪀥,䳃,䳍,鴭,鴵,⿰夹鳥(鵊),𪀫,⿰鳥麦,𪀬,⿰㞪鳥,𪀼,鴲,䙚,𪀿,鵢,𪁥,⿰⿱䒑𫜹鳥(𩿮),𪀭,𪁀,䳂,𪀨

Characters in SSP/鳥部/六畫: 𪀢,𪀖,鴿,鵃,鴶,鴻,鴛,鴰,鵧,鴷,䳋,䳑,鵀,鵂,䳏,⿰𣅀鳥(鴲),鵅,⿰幵鳥(鳽),𪀓,鴸,鵁,𪁉,鴜,䳐,𪀣,𪀸,𪀽,𪀠,鴯,鴴,鴹,𪀟,𪀔,𪁋,𪀚,鴺,𩿩,𪀝,鴳,𪁾,𪁑,鴽,鵄,鵏,鴾,䳌,𪁖,𪀤,鴼,𪀒,翵,𪀕,𪁠,𪀡,𪀛,䳍,䳄,𪀹,𪀥,䳃,鴭,鴵,⿰夹鳥(鵊),𩿮,𪀩,𪀺,𪀬,⿰㞪鳥,𪀼,鴲,裊(䙚),𪀿,鵢,𪁥,⿰⿱䒑𫜹鳥(𩿮),𪀫,𪀭,𪁀,⿰𡰪鳥,𪀨
04775
04775
鳥 196.13.1
GKJ-00335
TS 24 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
4 pieces of evidence, but only one source name.
04763
04763
鳥 196.12.2
GKJ-00337
TS 23 · IDS
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
《蠕範》 8:15b has ⿰畨鳥 = 鷭. 畨 is easy to mistake for 黹.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
Withdraw.
04743
04743
鳥 196.11.2
GKJ-00345
TS 22 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Maybe this kind of bird means 苍鹭 (Ardea cinerea). It is a common kind of waterfowl. WS2021-04714:GKJ-00379 means the same bird.
02664
02664
皮 107.11.3
GKJ-00348
TS 16 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
It is better to show the full page.

Evidence 2 shows this character is under 祲 with 子. It looks like fanqie. If yes, it should be the variant of 鴆 and the radical should be changed.
04725
04725
鳥 196.8.3
GKJ-00356
TS 19 · IDS
Evidence
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Pictures of Evidence1 and Evidence2 are reversed.
04786
04786
鳥 196.15.1
GKJ-00361
TS 26 · IDS
Unclear evidence
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
In order to confirm the details, please show the whole page of Evidence1.
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
鳬鷖 is a stable word cited from 《詩·大雅·鳬鷖》. This character must be the typo of 鷖 because of the importance for the men of literature and writing in ancient China.

It is better to withdraw this character without additional evidence.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
Withdraw.
04752
04752
鳥 196.10.5
GKJ-00369
TS 21 · IDS
Evidence
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=9021&page=135
《埤雅》,《四庫全書》
01587
01587
鳥 196.8.1
手 64.16.2
GKJ-00370
TS 19 · IDS
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual

泰和五音新改並類聚四聲篇(金刊元修本)卷4 folio 7b, 鳥部/8畫, quotes 搜真玉鏡.
04713
04713
鳥 196.7.5
GKJ-00371
TS 18 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Is Evidence 3 cited from 《篇海》?
04776
04776
鳥 196.13.2
GKJ-00372
TS 24 · IDS
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual

▲ 張湧泉. 漢語俗字叢考(2000)pp. 1162


▲ 泰和五音新改並類聚四聲篇(臺北故宮藏金刊元修補本. 故善004077-004086)卷4 folio 7b,鳥部/8畫, quotes 搜真玉鏡, 音賢.


▲ 改併五音類聚四聲篇(臺北故宮藏明刊本. 故善012362-012371)卷4 folio 8a.

In 成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇, the character was changed to ⿰⿱匕貝鳥, with its definition changed to "音田,鳥名". (I have checked the whole 鳥部 section and can't find ⿰貲鳥. And 張湧泉 would have quoted should it appear in 成化 or later revisions.)


成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇(明成化刊本)卷4 folio 12b.

This shape has been adopted by later 四聲篇海 editions since then. Since 貲 is well more than 8 strokes, the editors of 成化 might questioned the shape and revised it to ⿰⿱匕貝鳥.
04785
04785
鳥 196.14.4
GKJ-00373
TS 25 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
This character is really questionable, but it is also stable in different edition of 《直音篇》. Maybe it is valuable to encode.


▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 燕京藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第六


▲ 章黼: 《直音篇》, 日藏萬曆戊寅本, 卷第六
04706
04706
鳥 196.6.4
GKJ-00374
TS 17 · IDS
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Please provide the whole evidence, as the author may have stated the relationship between ⿰宇鳥 and 𪁔.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
This character looks related to 𪁔 without any doubt, but it is also common. It is better to keep it.


▲ 李昉、李穆、徐鉉:《太平御覽》,嘉慶仿宋刻本,卷第九百二十八


▲ 穆希文:《蟫史集》,萬曆刻本,卷之三
04707
04707
鳥 196.6.4
GKJ-00376
TS 17 · IDS
Unclear evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
While the image is clear, it would be helpful if we could see more of the context. Is there more text in the commentary, or does it just say 音鴙? If that's all, then, given the similar shape and reading, is this in fact a variant of 鴙?
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The following evidence shows other meanings, pronunciations or uses. Lee's comment is reasonable, but it could also be used for other meaning based on the first following. So, it is better to keep it in M-set.


▲ 黄道周:《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》,明崇禎刻本,十二卷


▲ 《新校經史海篇直音》,明嘉靖刻本,卷之三
04698
04698
鳥 196.5.2
GKJ-00377
TS 16 · IDS
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
MOE Variant Dictionary
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual

新修絫音引证群籍玉篇(金刊本)卷24 folio 23a, 鳥部/5畫, quotes 類篇.

鴞 is already included in this dictionary (folio 22b), so ⿰另鳥 is placed here intentionally. I suggest to encode it as-is.
04516
04516
馬 187.20.1
GKJ-00378
TS 30 · IDS
New evidence
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇海
https://archive.org/details/02076730.cn/page/n42/mode/2up
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
An earlier evidence gives different fanqie(色寬切,色瓦切):


泰和五音新改並類聚四聲篇(金刊元修本)卷7 folio 14b. 馬部/20+畫, quotes 搜真玉鏡.
04726
04726
鳥 196.8.3
GKJ-00383
TS 19 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 愛新覺羅·玄燁: 《御定駢字類編》, 四庫全書本, 卷二百九

Compared with other books related to 《天目山賦》 written by 盧柟, this character must be the variant of 鵹.
03277
03277
自 132.11.3
GKJ-00384
TS 17 · IDS
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
《重刊詳校篇海》is derived from 改併四聲篇海.


成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇(明成化刊本) 鳥部/7畫 also gives 䳎, and the characters around 䳎 in 重刊詳校篇海 are not changed too much compared to 改併四聲篇海: ...𪀞𪁎𪁓𪀕(䳎)䳖鵛鵜... except that 䳎 printed as ⿰自鳥.
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
精選黃眉故事
詞林韻釋
00675
00675
口 30.15.1
GKJ-00385
UK-20677
TS 18 · IDS
New evidence
L F CHENG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
華英通語

https://dcollections.lib.keio.ac.jp/sites/all/libraries/uv/uv.php?archive=FKZ&id=F7-A01-02#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=47&r=0&z=1048.314%2C1832.5365%2C691.408%2C531.18
https://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/898727/147

04777
04777
鳥 196.13.2
GKJ-00387
TS 24 · IDS
Evidence
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The glyph does not match the evidence4.
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual

泰和五音新改並類聚四聲篇(金刊元修本)卷4 folio 9b, 鳥部/12畫, quotes 搜真玉鏡.
04814
04814
鳥' 196'.10.5
GKJ-00393
TS 15 · IDS
Evidence
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Misprint of 骘? What is the main entry for 陰~ in this source?
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
not misprint, but variant
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
The same book gives 阴” 骘” (the lower part is 马).


陳永正編,《中國方術大辭典》(廣東:中山大學出版社, 1991年)




p.369
03657
03657
虫 142.16.1
GKJ-00397
TS 22 · IDS
Unclear evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Could this be a variant of 鱷 (U+9C77)? It's paired with another dangerous aquatic creature, 蛟. It would be good to see more of the context in the evidence.
Evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
This is what Baidu says about 蛟鱷:
蛟鱷是漢語詞彙,讀音為jiāo è,出自《寧德縣重修城隍廟記》,解釋蛟龍與鱷魚。亦泛指兇猛的水中動物。

They quote a passage from 宋·陸游《寧德縣重修城隍廟記》: “濤瀾洶湧,蛟鱷出沒。”
03519
03519
虫 142.5.4
GKJ-00401
TS 11 · IDS
New evidence
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
CNS11643 中文全字庫
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
十三經注疏
群書校補三十九種
永嘉叢書十三種
03604
03604
虫 142.11.2
GKJ-00404
TS 17 · IDS
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It would be useful to see the complete image of the evidence, not just a tiny clip.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
03521
03521
虫 142.6.1
GKJ-00410
TS 12 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]

▲ 張璐:《本經逢原》,清康熙長洲張氏刻本,卷三

It looks the variant of 虺.


▲ 張璐:《本經逢原》,醫學初階本,卷三
03527
03527
虫 142.6.3
GKJ-00411
TS 12 · IDS 𦘭
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The evidence is cited from 《野記》 written by 祝允明 (祝枝山).
03548
03548
虫 142.8.1
GKJ-00415
TS 14 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
In Evidence 1, the character is the error form of 啞.


▲ 《職方典》,古今圖書集成本,第六百八十一卷(《蘇州府物産考》)
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual

婺源縣志(民國刊本)卷11 folio 19b

I agree with Eiso that in evidence 1 ⿰虫亞 is a variant of 瘂. Can China provide the full page of evidence 2.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China

Yes it's a variant form of 啞, but stable enough to be encoded.
03570
03570
虫 142.9.2
GKJ-00416
TS 15 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Please show the full page.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The following evidence shows the unencoded simplified form. The space after the character in the submitted evidence is redundant.


▲ 孙应时, 鲍廉, 卢镇, 陈其弟, 常熟市地方志编纂委员会办公室: 《至正重修琴川志》, 北京: 方志出版社, 2013.1, ISBN 978-7-5144-0793-8/K·642, p. 95
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual

重修琴川志(明汲古閣刊本)卷9 folio 10b

In this evidence, ⿰虫貞 and 橫魚 are different species.
03572
03572
虫 142.9.3
GKJ-00417
TS 15 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 《本草匯箋》//朱大年: 《歷代本草精華叢書 七》, 上海: 上海中醫藥大學出版社, 1994.6, ISBN 7-81010-206-0, p. 431
03594
03594
虫 142.11.5
GKJ-00421
VN-F0B36
TS 17 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
I still hope to see the full page of China submitted evidence.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
The evidence shown by China derives from 爾雅注 which has "蜪蚅(未詳)". ⿰虫陶 in the evidence could be a font error for 蜪, so China should supply an image of the original woodblock edition of 郝懿行集 to confirm that ⿰虫陶 is shown in the original text.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 郝懿行: 《爾雅義疏》, 郝氏家刻本, 下之四
03605
03605
虫 142.11.2
GKJ-00422
TS 17 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Please show the full page.
03606
03606
虫 142.11.2
GKJ-00425
TS 17 · IDS
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+8729


Misprint of 蜩?

Attached PDF file

宋景文公筆記(文淵閣四庫全書本)卷下葉6:「鶬鶊鳴春,蟋蟀唫夏,蜩蟧喝秋,螘子戰隂。」
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Seems to be an error form for 蜩 (cf. https://baike.baidu.hk/item/%E8%9C%A9%E8%9F%A7/4697910). DO not encode without additional evidence that the character is correct or is a stable error.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
Withdraw.
03586
03586
虫 142.10.3
GKJ-00426
TS 16 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
It looks the error form of U+874D 蝍. 蝍蛆 means 蜈蚣 (centipede).

Please show the full page.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
Withdraw.
03516
03516
虫 142.5.2
GKJ-00428
TS 11 · IDS
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the full page for the evidence in order to better understand the meaning of the proposed character.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
03549
03549
虫 142.8.1
GKJ-00429
TS 14 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Please confirm the evidence source name.
03608
03608
虫 142.11.3
GKJ-00430
TS 17 · IDS
Unclear evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Can clearer evidence be supplied?
Unclear evidence response
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
只恐双溪舴艋舟,载不动许多愁。
——李清照《武陵春》
Unclear evidence response
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
For the submitted evidence, the current common form is 蚱蜢 (grasshopper, also 蝗虫, 蚂蚱), so the submitted form is acceptable.

For #6032, 舴艋 is different from 蚱蜢, that 舴艋 is a kind of boat, but both of them share the “small / tiny” meaning. 舴艋 is one important imagery in Chinese ancient poems. Sometimes, people also used 蚱蜢舟 (“蚱蜢舟中魚换酒”, 《暮春晚步蘇隄書事因憶杜黄鸝》 by 馮景), but 舴艋舟 is a better and common form.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
I think ti's clear to show this is a variant vocabulary of 蚱蜢.The glyph is good.
03641
03641
虫 142.13.3
GKJ-00434
TS 19 · IDS
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
03559
03559
虫 142.8.3
GKJ-00435
TS 14 · IDS
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The Ningpo Syllabary(宁波方言音节),P28
03550
03550
虫 142.8.1
GKJ-00439
TS 14 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
The evidence shows this character is cited from 《蒼頡篇》. It is better to check the original source.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
宸垣識畧
倉頡篇
03587
03587
虫 142.10.3
GKJ-00442
TS 16 · IDS
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Where is the other evidences?
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Source of evidence image is 《多歲堂詩集》卷二
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
重修南嶽志
多歲堂詩集
簣山堂詩鈔
孟東野文集
现代文学𠎖作全集
03563
03563
虫 142.8.4
GKJ-00443
TS 14 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
螟&⿰虫府; looks like the the other form of 螟蜅, which the current name is 墨鱼鲞 (salted dried cuttlefish). The variant is acceptable.

Please confirm the evidence source name.
03634
03634
虫 142.12.5
GKJ-00445
TS 18 · IDS
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 上海市虹桥宾馆: 《江南名菜名点丛书 宁波菜》, 上海: 上海科学技术文献出版社, 2000.9, ISBN 7-5439-1629-0, p. 39


▲ 上海市虹桥宾馆: 《江南名菜名点丛书 宁波菜》, 上海: 上海科学技术文献出版社, 2000.9, ISBN 7-5439-1629-0, p. 42

This is a common character used in Ningpo cuisine.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 徐秉潮: 《宁波家常菜》, 宁波: 宁波出版社, 2007.3, ISBN 978-7-80743-073-5, p. 106
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 傅国通, 郑张尚芳: 《浙江省语言志》, 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 2015.11, ISBN 978-7-213-06955-0, p. 245
03666
03666
虫 142.19.3
GKJ-00448
TS 25 · IDS
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It would be helpful if the complete evidence was provided, not just a tiny clip.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
永嘉叢書十三種·韻正
集韻
集韻編雅
03553
03553
虫 142.8.2
GKJ-00455
TS 14 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
It is better to provide more evidence. The current one is not easy to understand.
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
《粤西十縣市粤方言調查報告》 (1998) P533:

New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual

大明成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇卷13 folio 5b 虫部/6畫 (長隆切), quotes 會玉川篇.

叔 has 8 strokes. Maybe the character was normalized from ⿰虫尗 or it is misprint of some known character.
03599
03599
虫 142.11.1
GKJ-00464
TS 17 · IDS
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
Here is the original ⿰虫聊 evidence in 蠕范, quoted in the evidence 3:



蠕范(清同治刊本)卷8 folio 28a

The evidence also presents an unencoded character ⿰虫野 (surrounded by a blue rectangle), presumably a variant of 𧐓.
03522
03522
虫 142.6.1
GKJ-00465
TS 12 · IDS
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The submitted character is a misprint form of 蛚. 蜻蛚 is a stable word in 《輶軒使者絶代語釋别國方言》.