Please wait while loading

IRG Working Set 2021v3.0

Consolidated Comments
Filter By Source: Sort By: Show Deleted:

Unification

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
01038
01038
宀 40.7
10 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00312
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Also see WS2021-00138 and 01060.

I still think it is dangerous to make the UCV for 宀 & 山 for our future encoding works.
01186
01186
山 46.13
16 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00343
𤲞
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
According to the pronunciation of ⿱山𤲞, it should be a variant of ⿰土𤲞.
04691
04691
鳥 196.4
15 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00324
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+6B4D
unify to 歍 (U+6B4D)?

The first evidence shows the relationship between this character and U+6B4D 歍. The meaning of this character is “口相就也”. 《説文解字》 and other ancient dictionaries show one of the meanings for 歍 is also “口相就也”.
03526
03526
虫 142.6
12 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00403
Unification
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
U+2726B
The right part seems like ⿱丿㘝 more. Maybe it is unifiable to 𧉫 (U+2726B).
03518
03518
虫 142.5
11 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00471
Unification
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
U+27283
Unifiable to 𧊃 (U+27283)?
02402
02402
犬 94.10
13 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00565
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+25855
Appears to be an error for U+25855 𥡕 in a single edition. Suggest postponing for additional evidence.
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with the UK.
02412
02412
犬 94.10
13 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00583
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with the UK.
02417
02417
犬 94.11
15 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00628
UCV
Henry CHAN
Individual
⿱𣪊X miswritten as ⿱殸X is quite common in historical documents, while 𣪊 and 殸 have different etymologies. I suggest adding a new Level 2 UCV ⿱𣪊X & ⿱殸X, where ⿱𣪊X also unifiable with ⿹
𣪊X.

If the UCV is added, this character should be unified to 㺉 (U+3E89).
01588
01588
手 64.16
19 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00651
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
U+64F8
Unify with 擸 (U+64F8) per China's 2021-09-15 comment?
01598
01598
手 64.18
21 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00749
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+270D4
Agree to unify to 𧃔 (U+270D4).

(宋)王懷隱編,《太平聖惠方》(烏絲欄鈔本)卷14
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree.
03226
03226
肉 130.6
10 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00770
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+8128
Unify to 脨 by UCV #422.

U+8128
Oppose Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
From the entry for 脨 in the Kangxi Dictionary (copied from zi.tools):
【未集下】【肉字部】 【集韻】趨玉切,音促。本作𦠁。弗𦠁。炙筯。或从肉。 又秦昔切,音籍。瘦也。 集韻(1039)

It appears that the shape for 朿 affects the pronunication and the meaning, so ⿰月朿 and 脨 (⿰月束) should be considered non-cognate.

Further sources from Jiyun are required.
Oppose Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]



They are two separate head characters, with the first head character in the same series as 促戚趨趣誎 (from phonetic 束) and the second head character in the same series as 籍耤藉莋葃膌 and also 刺洓 (from phonetic 朿).
04852
04852
鹿 198.6
17 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00802
鹿𣅀
Unification
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+2A2A8
𪊨
Unification
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with Eddie.

《康熙字典‧亥集下‧鹿部‧麂》:「【本草註】……本作𪊨。」
https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&file=77415&page=1509

According to the evidence, this character is related with 麂子. ⿸鹿𣅀 seems to be a misprint of 𪊨.
04823
04823
鳥' 196'.13
18 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00811
Unification
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+312A2
𱊢
accounding to the evidence. It should be 𱊢.
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It's not better to unify to 𱊢 (U+312A2), but we request the submitter changing the evidence or withdraw the character.
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Withdraw.
04106
04106
金 167.9
17 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00832
Unification
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
GKJ-00934
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
04108
金 167.9
17 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00934
unify to WS2021-04108:GKJ-00934

They are duplicates now.
04115
04115
金 167.10
18 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00839
Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+738B
U+8FD1
The posted evidence is 王琳. 近现代化学元素名称研究[D].辽宁师范大学,2015,P21-22


李丽:近代化学译著中的化学元素词研究,北京:中央民族大学出版社,2012年6月,P44

02746
02746
石 112.5
10 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00884
Unification
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Eddie's unification comment is moot as IRG Working Set 2017 02960 was postponed and therefore no longer in the encoding pipeline. This ideograph effectively replaces it with better evidence.
01955
01955
气 84.2
6 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00889
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+23C56
Unify to 𣱖 (U+23C56)?
Based on the text, it's a variant of U+6C23 氣. And U+23C56 𣱖 is also a variant of 氣.

《漢語大字典》,頁2155.
Unification
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+23C56
Agree to unify to 𣱖 (U+23C56).

A misprint of WS2021-01956.
Oppose Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Not misprint but another writing type.
04108
04108
金 167.9
17 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00934
Unification
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
GKJ-00832
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
04106
金 167.9
17 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00832
unify to WS2021-04106:GKJ-00832

They are duplicates now.
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Unify.
03492
03492
虍 141.4
10 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-01009
Unification
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+30C98
𰲘(U+30C98)
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+30C98
Unify to 𰲘 (U+30C98) 'female tiger' which is the correct transcription form of the oracle bone script character.
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree.
00655
00655
口 30.14
17 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-01024
UCV
L F CHENG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Add new UCV 頓~⿰击頁?

⿰击頁 https://glyphwiki.org/wiki/u2ff0-u51fb-u9801
⿲口击頁 https://glyphwiki.org/wiki/u2ff2-u53e3-u51fb-u9801
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Not a commonly used component, does not need to add new UCV for the time being.
Unification
KIM Kyongsok
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


According to the IRG suggestion on 2022-03-15 at IRG #58 , KR provides KR Normalization rule #77 (77-1 ~ 77-5).

Based on the examples in KR Norm. rule #77, Dr. CHO Sungduk suggests to unify WS2021-00655 (GKJ-01024) with 噸 (U+5678).
01520
01520
手 64.11
15 · ㇠ (5)
GZ-3902201
𨳝
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+648B
Unify to 撋 (U+648B)?

UCV #1 (IRGN2514)
00502
00502
口 30.8
11 · ㇒ (3)
KC-00452
Unification
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+54FF
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The title of this poem in the evidence is 《古意三首》. When we read this poem carefully, it's not hard to find out there are three parts based on the rhyme characters. The first part is 甕(옹)宋(송)洞(동)夢(몽), the second part is 隙(극)白(백)藥(약)獨(독) and the third part is 先(선)賢(현)全(전)年(년). The submitted character is in the second part. Notice that the real rhymes (vowels and the following consonants in the syllables) are different in Old Chinese, Middle Chinese (that means 平水韻 here) and Korean readings, maybe we should call it as 押鄰韻 (rhyme adjacently?). The previous verse “胡爲勞形役” is an interrogative question, so the verse with the submitted character should be the reply to the previous verse. This verse looks related to “哿矣富人,哀此惸獨。” in 《詩經·小雅·正月》. However, if we treated this character is the same as 哿 totally, the meaning is contrary to Confucian ideas and the spiritual style of this poem.

My suggestion to keep and encode this character as-is.
Unification
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
KR does not agree to unify.
01289
01289
彡 59.16
19 · ㇑ (2)
KC-05060
Unification
KIM Kyongsok
ROK
RE: WS2021-SN01289

- U+8668 虨 and WS2021-SN01289 (KC-05060) are two distinct chars.

- the two chars (one in a blue box, the other in red box) are two distinct persons' names

01413
01413
心 61.14
17 · ㇔ (4)
KC-05106
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+2AB3A
The glyph shown in the evidence is suspicious because no other encoded character has the component ⿱宷日. It is possibly an error for U+2AB3A 𪬺 (K5-01E2). Consider unifying to 𪬺 (U+2AB3A) if cognate.
03979
03979
辵 162.11
15 · ㇑ (2)
KC-05584
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+907B
unify to 遻 (U+907B)?

The word shown in the evidence looks like 相遻.
Unification
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
KR agrees to unify as suggested.
04130
04130
金 167.11
19 · ㇐ (1)
KC-05820
UK-20922
TE-3924
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
01898
01898
欠 76.5
9 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-04277
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Note: U+6B25 and SAT-04277 (eq. VN-F208B planned for the next Vietnam WS submission) are different in Nôm Tày usage and should not be unified. In the evidence provided by Eiso above, VN-F208B is read "hăn", meaning "to see". But U+6B25 is read "hất", which means "to work", "put effort into", etc.. Here is the entry for 欥 (U+6B25) from the same source (Hoàng Triều Ân: “Từ Điển Chữ Nôm Tày”, p 202):
03463
03463
艸 140.16
20 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-04384
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
According to CNS11643, 𫇑 is pronounced as zhēn. Same with ⿱艹臻 (從草臻聲). Consider unify to 𫇑 by UCV #307c. SAT can HE if the shape is preferred.

U+2B1D1
03246
03246
肉 130.10
14 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-05648
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+8173
Unify to 腳; change NUCV-343 to UCV-343.

Despite there being a NUCV-343 [卻, 郤], historically ⿰木郤 and ⿰木卻 have been unified at U+3B9D, until Unicode 12.0 where the G glyph was corrected from ⿰木卻 to ⿰木郤.

It is suggested to change NUCV-343 to a UCV rule, as it appears such variation is not rare. The non-cognate rule can be invoked to separately code characters with 郤 and 卻 when actually required.
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with the unification and new UCV rule suggested by Henry Chan.
01926
01926
歹 78.12
17 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-05686
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+6BAB
unify to 殫

The evidence has shown it is the variant of 殫 clearly.

Also see WS2021-01915:SAT-05862
01915
歹 78.4
9 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-05862
𠬛
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with Eiso.
01915
01915
歹 78.4
9 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-05862
𠬛
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+6B7F
unify to 歿

The evidence shows it is the variant of 歿 clearly.
UCV #149 for the right part.
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Add 歺 to UCV #92a as Level 2 when the component is the left part. Similar to UCV #397.
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with Eiso.
01610
01610
攴 66.9
13 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-05880
𰏘
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+655D
unify to 敝 (U+655D)

See Comment #2984 and #4868 from Huang Junliang and Conifer.
04497
04497
馬 187.6
16 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-05996
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+99DB
unify to 駛 (U+99DB)

The evidence shows the fanqies are 師利反 and 師事反, that means the variant of 駛.
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
史 vs 㕜 as Level 1
01239
01239
巾 50.15
18 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-06060
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+22933
The character on the same page is surely 𢤳 (U+22933), so SAT-06060 must be a wrong handwriting glyph.
01388
01388
心 61.13
17 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-06249
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
Consider adding UCV for 解~觧. See also TE-3773 (⿱觧虫) and VN-F1B70 (⿱觧会).
01377
01377
心 61.12
15 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-06250
𭁄
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+398D
00534
口 30.9
12 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-06968
𭁄
unify to 㦍 (U+398D) as the new UCV accepted under WS2021-00534:SAT-06968.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree to unify as per new UCV.
03123
03123
糸 120.15
21 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-06436
𦋺
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
U+261A2
𦆢 (U+261A2)
reading, sense and shape are similar. Kangxi entry for U+261A2 quotes Quangyun: 居例切,音罽。○按从网之字,或省作冈,或變作四。This appears to be a variant using a form of 四.
01335
01335
心 61.8
12 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-06518
𢩦
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+22677
unify to 𢙷 (U+22677)

The evidence has shown it is the variant of 恐, and the difference between the submitted character and U+22677 𢙷 is very slight.
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Add UCV for 丮, 𢩦, 𠃨 as Level 2.

In the traditional usage, 丮, 𢩦 and 𠃨 are undoubtful variants, but 𢩦 is also used as the Cantonese word zit1 (to tickle). It is better to treat it as Level 2 now.
00132
00132
人 9.3
5 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-06598
𠧒
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+4EE1
unify to 仡 U+4EE1?
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Add a new UCV between 𠧒 and 乞.

U+209D2 𠧒=U+4E5E 乞
U+21D4A 𡵊=U+5C79 屹
U+21D4B 𡵋=U+2AA23 𪨣
U+221D2 𢇒=U+221D3 𢇓
U+23C81 𣲁=U+6C54 汔
U+264EA 𦓪=U+43A2 䎢
U+26638 𦘸=U+8090 肐
U+2925F 𩉟=U+4A50 䩐
U+2968B 𩚋=U+4B23 䬣
U+29FA4 𩾤=U+29FA5 𩾥
U+2A5DA 𪗚=U+9F55 齕
U+2E782 𮞂=U+8FC4 迄

If these two components are not unifiable, we will meet more and more character with the component 𠧒 in future, because it is too common.
UCV
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
We don't have strong opinion; would like to consult IRG experts.
00851
00851
土 32.9
12 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-06613
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I suggest we add a level 1 UCV: 鹵/𠧸/⿱⺊⿵冂𠂭/⿱⺊⿵冂必, so it can be unified with 𪉖 (U+2A256).

The following UCV are related but not reflected on current comments, I can provide more evidences if we agree on some of these rules:

Level 1 UCV: 卥/⿱⺊⿴囗夕(卥+VS17)

Level 2 UCV: 𠧪卥鹵. 𠧪 ~ 卣, 𠧪卥 ~ 西, so they are level 2.
01089
01089
尸 44.6
9 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-06635
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
This character looks like U+21C53 𡱓, but the meanings are different. It is not better to unify them.
03741
03741
見 147.10
17 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-06662
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+25AB0
U+2785F
No meaning is given, but the evidence shows that the reading of this character is identical to that of 誩, for which the "Guang Yun" gives the fanqie reading 渠敬 (*gjængH), Mandarin "jìng". This suggests that it is related to 𥪰 (U+25AB0), which is also read 渠敬 = Mandarin "jìng" and defined in Kangxi as a variant of U+7AF6, 競 read "jìng". Also, given the graphic relationship between 並 and 竝, this also appears to be the full form to U+2785F, another variant of U+7AF6. Seems like a strong argument for semantic identity U+7AF6 and possible unification with one of the encoded forms.
02476
02476
玉 96.7
11 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-06673
𢌜
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+73FD
To be unified to 珽 (U+73FD) after applying new UCV rule 廷 and 𢌜 in IRG 57.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree to unify.
01168
01168
山 46.11
14 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-06890
𭦌
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
According to 直音篇, ⿰山𭦌 is a variant of 嶒. See MOE dictionary. The given evidence also support that.

According to 漢語大字典, the following 8 encoded pairs are variants, most of which come from 直音篇

𰂬 / 僧 p252
𰻹 / 鄫 p4044
𰯐 / 𦠇 p2261
𰦢 / 矰 p2769
𰧞 / 磳 p2626
𰷐 / 𧸑 p3898
𱄱 / 驓 p4872
𱋹 / 𪒟 p5070

The only exception is 𨶧, which is a Taiwan person name but ⿵門曾 is not encoded.

According to MOE dictionary, the following 25 unencoded pairs are variants, most of which come from 直音篇.

⿰口𭦌 / 噌 B00425-004
⿰山𭦌 / 嶒 B00881-006
⿰巾𭦌 / 𢅋 C03181-002
⿰忄𭦌 / 憎 A01437-003
⿰扌𭦌 / 𢴣 A00813-009
⿰土𭦌 / 增 A00813-004
⿰氵𭦌 / 潧 C06414-002
⿰𭦌彡/ 㣒 C03489-002
⿱山𭦌 / 𡼳 B00881-007
⿱艹𭦌 / 𦼏 C11864-002
⿰木𭦌 / 橧 B01837-004
⿰火𭦌 / 熷 C06843-004
⿰牛𭦌 / 𤛢 C07114-002
⿰王𭦌 / 璔 A02595-012
⿱𠔿𭦌 / 𦌘 B03527-007
⿱𠕀𭦌 / 罾 B03527-002 (龍龕)
⿱罒𭦌 / 罾 B03527-003 (玉篇)
⿰立𭦌 / 竲 C09457-002
⿰糹𭦌 / 繒 B03458-006
⿰𭦌羽 / 䎖 C10661-002
⿰貝𭦌 / 贈 A03976-006 (廣碑別字)
⿰金𭦌 / 鏳 A04315-006 or 璔 B02639-002 (玉篇)
⿱山⿰糸𭦌 / 𡾽 B00881-008
⿰黒𭦌 / 𪒟 C18127-002
⿳亠⿲刀丫⿸#(丿𠄌>)乀⿴囗𭦌 / 𪗐 C18268-001

The known exceptions are

⿱𭦌灬 (KC12396): a variant of 魯 according to http://www.koreanhistory.or.kr/newchar/list_view.jsp?code=161977
⿰𭦌盖: a variant of 嫌 A00956-005

Note that the component 𭦌 may also be a variant of the component 魯: ⿰口𭦌 / 噌 A00708-002 from 敦煌俗字譜.

Given that most of unencoded 𭦌 component is a variant of component 曾, consider

add a UCV 187b 曾/𭦌 with etymological link.
03400
03400
艸 140.12
16 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-06897
𣈆
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+26D7B
U+23206
U+6649
Unify to 𦵻 (U+26D7B) and extend UCV #388 to cover 𣈆 = 晉 = 𦵻.
01439
01439
手 64.5
8 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-06941
𰆰
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+6280
Unifiable to 技 (U+6280)?

In WS2015 𰆰 (00511, USAT09010, semantic variant of 支) was added, while in WS2017 ⿰虫𰆰 (03847, USAT07003, semantic variant of 蚑) was added. Are there more examples of characters using 𰆰 instead of 支, and if it is systematic, is it better to unify them as a new UCV?
00395
00395
卩 26.8
10 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-06950
Oppose Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
As we checked our database, characters with 阝~卩 distinction involved are only SAT-03126 (already encoded as U+2E884) and this. Both have few appearance in specific contexts. Hence we request to add it back as a peculiar variation.

U+2E884

03255
03255
肉 130.11
15 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-06958
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+81A0
Unify to 膠 (U+81A0); add new UCV ⿱羽尒 and 翏.
04457
04457
食 184.10
19 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-07068
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+992E
Unifiable with 餮 (U+992E)?

This looks like a strict transcripted form; it may be better to add a UCV 歹/歺.
03816
03816
貝 154.5
12 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-07087
𠆴
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+27D69
U+8CAC
U+258BC
SAT-07087 is used to illustrate the reading in the definition of another character. The character being defined, appears to be a variant of U+258BC. SAT-07087 appears to have the same relationship to 𧵩 (U+27D69) as U+27D69 has to U+258BC, strongly suggestion that they are variants. Both appear to be ancient forms of 責 (古文責字)
04744
04744
鳥 196.10
21 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-07198
𣪊
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+9DC7
unify to 鷇 (U+9DC7)

The evidence shows the fanqie is 口候反, and the Kangxi Dictionary shows the fanqies for 鷇 are 苦候切, 丘侯切 and so on, that means the readings are the same, and the meanings are the same as well.
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿱𣪊X vs ⿰⿳士冖X殳 vs ⿰⿳士冖⿱一X殳

They are used as the same characters in general.
00272
00272
冖 14.4
6 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-08359
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+758B
unify to 疋 U+758B

The evidence shows the book name is 《廣疋》 (aka 廣雅).

BTW, 鄧爾雅 wrote his name as 疋 not 雅 in his Chinese calligraphy works.

Oppose Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Needs discussion whether 冖 and 乛 are unifiable.
03775
03775
言 149.8
15 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-08440
𠩋
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+27A6F
The evidence suggests that this is a variant of U+27A6F, which, according to Kangxi, is in turn a variant of 訴. The reading shown is 素, Mandarin "sù", which is the same as U+27A6F and 訴. The variants given, U+27A9C and 愬 are also similar to 訴 in meaning. The definitions overlap with those of 訴 (吿, 論, 譖, etc.), and the context shown would make sense written as 訴諸鬼神, "appeal to / have recourse to demons and spirits".
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+5E7F
U+5382
I think the point here is whether we want to unify 广 and 厂.
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
If we need a UCV for this case, I suggest using 𠩋 and 㡿, which both of them share the same meaning.
01613
01613
攴 66.11
15 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-08475
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+2BFD3
U+22FE5
Appears to be a variant of U+2BFD3 and U+22FE5.
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+2BFD3
unify to 𫿓 (U+2BFD3)

Support Lee's Comment #3915. The evidence shows the left part is the variant of 番 without any doubt. 𫿓 (U+2BFD3) itself is the variant of 播, but it shares the same rationale (same semantic element and same phonetic element).
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It's better to add the followings as UCVs if they share the same rationale (same semantic element and same phonetic element).

(1)
e.g.
U+227F7 𢟷 vs U+61A3 憣
U+240F3 𤃳 vs U+2412B 𤄫
U+2839A 𨎚 vs U+8F53 轓
U+2E0EA 𮃪 vs U+2588C 𥢌

(2)
e.g.
U+2E2D2 𮋒 vs U+7FFB 翻

(3)
e.g.
U+2242E 𢐮 vs U+22432 𢐲
03225
03225
肉 130.5
9 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-08616
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+43E3
It seems to be an error for 䏣 in the head character only, and the entry actually uses 䏣 (肉中蟲謂之䏣蝇). Therefore this evidence is insufficient for encoding. Suggest unifying to 䏣.
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Support Andrew.
01919
01919
歹 78.6
11 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-08632
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+6B89
unify to 殉

Also see WS2021-01915:SAT-05862
01915
歹 78.4
9 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-05862
𠬛
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with Eiso.
04234
04234
門 169.11
19 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-08671
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
啟/啓

Unify to 闙.
01917
01917
歹 78.5
10 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-08699
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+6B84
unify to 殄

The evidence has shown it is the variant of 殄 clearly.

Also see WS2021-01915:SAT-05862
01915
歹 78.4
9 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-05862
𠬛
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with Eiso.
03293
03293
舌 135.9
15 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-08725
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+8213
This character appears to be an error for 舓 (this error form is also found in 蒙古字韻). As it is a common mistake to miswrite 易 as 昜 and vice versa, perhaps we should have a UCV rule for 易 and 昜 when cognate.
01238
01238
巾 50.13
16 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-08729
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+5E61
Unify to 幡, high similarity and cognate. Suggest encoding by IVD.
UCV
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
add a ucv of ⿱冖畨 and 番?
01084
01084
尸 44.1
4 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-08816
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
It is dangerous to add 尸, 戶, 戸, 户 as extended UCV #7.
00172
00172
人 9.9
11 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-08847
𠂉𧘇
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
Unify to 偯.

The right component is also similar to 𭈆, which is a variant of 哀 according to MOE dictionary.

I suggest adding a new UCV 哀/⿳𠂉口𧘇, similar to UCV 151b and 230a.

U+2D206
03965
03965
辵 162.6
10 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-08913
𭁄
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+9006
Unify to 逆 (U+9006), cf. UCV #447:
01754
01754
肉 130.12
16 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-08914
𭁄
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+2680D
00534
口 30.9
12 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-06968
𭁄
unify to 𦠍 (U+2680D) as the new UCV accepted under WS2021-00534:SAT-06968.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+2680D
Agree to unify to 𦠍 (U+2680D) as per the new UCV.
03822
03822
貝 154.7
14 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-08945
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+8CAC
U+27D69
U+27D8C
SAT-08945 and the similar characters U+27D69 and U+27D8C are all variants of what's now written 責.
01925
01925
歹 78.10
15 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-08985
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+6B9E
unify to 殞

The evidence has shown it is the variant of 殞 clearly.

Also see WS2021-01915:SAT-05862.
01915
歹 78.4
9 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-05862
𠬛
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with Eiso.
03763
03763
言 149.3
10 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-09285
𠧒
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+8A16
unify to 訖 U+8A16?

It's used as a 反切下字 in the evidence, but it's very easy to know it's really the variant of 訖.
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Add a new UCV between 𠧒 and 乞.

U+209D2 𠧒=U+4E5E 乞
U+21D4A 𡵊=U+5C79 屹
U+21D4B 𡵋=U+2AA23 𪨣
U+221D2 𢇒=U+221D3 𢇓
U+23C81 𣲁=U+6C54 汔
U+264EA 𦓪=U+43A2 䎢
U+26638 𦘸=U+8090 肐
U+2925F 𩉟=U+4A50 䩐
U+2968B 𩚋=U+4B23 䬣
U+29FA4 𩾤=U+29FA5 𩾥
U+2A5DA 𪗚=U+9F55 齕
U+2E782 𮞂=U+8FC4 迄

If these two components are not unifiable, we will meet more and more character with the component 𠧒 in future, because it is too common.
01262
01262
广 53.10
13 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-09314
广
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+34F9
unify to 㓹 (U+34F9)?

The evidence shows it is the bottom of 罽, and the real bottom of 罽 should be 㓹.



▲ 《説文解字》,藤花榭本,第七下
02005
02005
水 85.5
8 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-09363
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+6CD3
unify to 泓

When we read the glyph in the second evidence, we will see the glyph ⿰氵𪪺 (WS2017-01932:T13-324D). Two pieces of evidence both show it is also the variant of 泓 clearly, and ⿰氵𪪺 has been unified to 泓 in WS2017.
[ {{WS2017-01932}} ]
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with Eiso.
00506
00506
口 30.8
11 · ㇒ (3)
T9-7A3D
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+269D9
𦧙?
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Disunification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+6731
Disagree. The right part(尔 and 朱) of these two characters is totally different. The character is used as a name.
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
But there is only a block rather than a convincing evidence.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
About the comment #6065, TCA has submitted convincing evidences, please see TCA reply at WS2021-03083.
01265
01265
广 53.11
14 · ㇔ (4)
T9-7B39
广
Unification
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+222D0
Unify to 𢋐 (U+222D0). U+222D0 has the pronunciation jí according to CNS 11643, therefore might be miswriting of U+222D0.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TCA thoughts there is no need to discuss whether the name is miswriting, because it has been used extensively in official documents and systems.
Based on the shape, there is no UCV rule to judge unification.
04561
04561
鬼 194.8
18 · ㇐ (1)
T9-7B7C
Unification
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+4C2A
The glyph of 䰪 (U+4C2A) which shows in 《康熙字典》(同文書局) is similar to ⿰⿱夫月鬼.

https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&file=77415&page=1462
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+4C2A
Per Ng Hou Man's comment, 䰪 (U+4C2A) is printed in the Kangxi Dictionary as follows:



Another version gives this, where the dots are slightly more clearly separated:



Note this is filed under 10 strokes, so the character definitely has 脊 on the left.

The pronunciation of T9-7B7C in the CNS11643 website is also mèi, which matches the pronunciation of 䰪 (U+4C2A).
Disunification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+5EB7
Disagree to be unified. According to 康熙字典, SC is 10, so the strokes on the upper left should be divided. See another version(內府).
Disunification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+4C2A
U+5EB7
The meaning of 䰪(U+4C2A) from 康熙字典 is demon(鬼魅). No one's name will use a character with a ghostly meaning.
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
For reference: [ {{WS2017-02863}} ]
has been unified by "minor difference of strokes" with similar composition.
00283
00283
冫 15.8
10 · ㇔ (4)
TB-494F
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]

Actually, the radical is the cursive form of 氵.
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Disagree to be unified, there is no rule to judge unification.
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It's not a issue about unification rule, but basic literacy on handwriting characters.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TCA thoughts there is no need to discuss whether the name is miswriting, because it has been used extensively in official documents and systems.
03974
03974
辵 162.9
13 · ㇐ (1)
TB-4C60
Unification
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+48A5
U+28552
similar to 䢥(U+48A5) or 𨕒(U+28552).
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Disagree to be unified with 䢥 (U+48A5) and U+28552 (⿱正日 and 昰 are different part).
00137
00137
人 9.5
7 · ㇑ (2)
TC-282C
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+3438
Given the information is correct, can consider IVS to 㐸 (U+3438). cf. Annex S.1.5.i
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
From the MOE variant dictionary and UCV list, TCA could not find a similar example with one less stroke.
00374
00374
十 24.6
8 · ㇔ (4)
TC-2F48
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
康熙字典
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TCA thoughts there is no need to discuss whether the name is miswriting, because it has been used extensively in official documents and systems.
00280
00280
冫 15.7
9 · ㇑ (2)
TC-3761
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
漢書
詩氏族考
字彙補
All above are the wrong glyph of 浞.
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TCA thoughts there is no need to discuss whether the name is miswriting, because it has been used extensively in official documents and systems.
00462
00462
口 30.6
9 · ㇒ (3)
TC-3873
𠆢
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+54DA
Possibly unifiable with 哚 (U+54DA).
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Disagree to be unified, 人and几are different shape and no UCV rule.
00336
00336
力 19.8
10 · ㇑ (2)
TC-4466
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
00385
00385
卜 25.8
10 · ㇐ (1)
TC-447C
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+2A2FF
Although we believe that TC-447C should related to 𪋿, but no evidence can prove it.
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Disunification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Disagree to be unified. From the previous evidences are coded seperately.
00841
00841
土 32.8
11 · ㇔ (4)
TC-5371
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to the pronunciation, it should be a wrong glyph of 嗌.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Disagree to unify.
TCA thoughts there is no need to discuss whether the name is miswriting, because it has been used extensively in official documents and systems.
04300
04300
雨 173.5
13 · ㇒ (3)
TC-6332
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+290A8
Unify to 𩂨 (U+290A8)?

The pronunciation of 𩂨 is sè (色責切), too.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
These are the two UCV rules (176&177), should not be unified.
00188
00188
人 9.10
12 · ㇔ (4)
TD-2261
𠈌
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+209AC
Unify to 𠦬 (U+209AC)
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
From the shape, it could be unified if add a new UCV rule.
00545
00545
口 30.9
12 · ㇒ (3)
TD-2337
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
00558
00558
口 30.10
13 · ㇑ (2)
TD-366F
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
03818
03818
貝 154.6
13 · ㇐ (1)
TD-457B
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Similar shape and same reading as U+8CDA.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Disagree to be unified, there is no rule to judge unification.
01263
01263
广 53.11
14 · ㇐ (1)
TD-4B2A
广𤲅
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
The supplementary evidence provided by Eiso Chan shows the character to be a variant of 庵. It seems like 𤲅 is a common variant of 奄, and a possible candidate for a UCV.
01924
01924
歹 78.9
13 · ㇐ (1)
TD-4E3E
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+6B9B
Possibly Unifiable to 殛 (U+6B9B)
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Disagree to be unified, there is no rule to judge unification.
04070
04070
金 167.6
14 · ㇐ (1)
TD-572C
UCV
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
There is no evidence for the meaning, but the reading "zā" is identical with that of U+9254, suggesting that they might be variants. There is one other pair similar to this already encoded, U+2341D and U+23459. U+2341D is used in Nôm with the meaning "soft" but it's not clear what the semantic relation, if any, is in Chinese. Should we consider UCV for ⿷匚帀 and 木匝?
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Not sure about unification. Needs discussion.
02507
02507
玉 96.12
16 · ㇐ (1)
TD-6D41
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+3EF8
Unify with 㻸 (U+3EF8), and add a new UCV for 朁~替. See also SAT-06893 and TE-2F54.
Oppose Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The given pronunciation is tì, which would make it non-cognate with 㻸 (U+3EF8). The pronunciation is also plausible as a personal name character.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Disagree to unify, non-cognate.
03339
03339
艸 140.6
12 · ㇠ (5)
TD-7537
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Given that any character with a grass radical could be written with 艸 instead, I think it would be a good idea to define a UCV for 艸 = 艹 where cognate.
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
If UCV is added, TCA agree.
04018
04018
邑 163.12
15 · ㇐ (1)
TD-7E3F
UCV
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Possible variant of U+90FE. We should consider extension of UCV to cover 匽, ⿷匚晏, and ⿷匸晏 as components. There are already several possible pairs encoded, such as U+5043 and U+2037E. The proposed characters TB-5C5C and TD-7E57 are other examples
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Not sure about unification. Needs discussion.
UCV
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
After checking the component ⿷匚晏 or ⿷匸晏, there are U+2037E 𠍾 and U+236BC 𣚼. It’s easy to know U+2037E 𠍾 is the variant of U+5043 偃 and U+236BC 𣚼 is the variant of U+693B 椻. However, the quantities of the components are different. It’s not better to add this UCV between 匽 and ⿷匚晏 or ⿷匸晏.
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with Eiso.
01288
01288
彡 59.16
19 · ㇐ (1)
TE-2261
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
U+9726
If this ideograph's only use is in a personal name, then it is likely unifiable with 霦 (U+9726) according to the new rules (same components, different structure).
Unification
KIM Kyongsok
ROK
RE: WS2021-SN01288

- 1a: U+8668 虨 is NOT a variant of 霦 U+9726

- 1b: whether to unify WS2021-SN01288 and 霦 U+9726?
if two are cognate -> unify them and encode WS2021-SN01288 using IVD
if two are non-cognate -> disunify them and encode WS2021-SN01288.
03094
03094
糸 120.11
17 · ㇒ (3)
TE-2736
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+260AF
Unify to 𦂯 (U+260AF)
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
UCV #401
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Disagree to be unified, the right part is different from the case of UCV #401.
04023
04023
邑 163.15
18 · ㇐ (1)
TE-2931
𬥁
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+9139
Unify to 鄹 (U+9139).

Excerpt from Hanyu Dazidian shows that 鄹 (U+9139) can also be read as jù when used as a place name:


There is also a similar case in the UCV, with a single stroke difference:
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree to unify if added to UCV rules.
04387
04387
面 176.8
17 · ㇐ (1)
TE-2A23
UCV
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This appears to be a variant of U+9EB5 麵. There are other pairs already encoded, such as U+ 4D2C 䴬 and U+2D6A2 that show ⿺夌 as a simplification of 麥. Might be worth consideration of this component shape as UCV of the simplified form, U+9EA6 麦
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Disagree to be unified. From the previous evidences are coded seperately.
01195
01195
山 46.15
18 · ㇒ (3)
TE-2B6A
𬱃
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+2CC43
U+981F
U+984D
This is an issue that can be considered. Because Both 𬱃(⿰名頁) and 頟 are variants of 額, it is suggested that it can be added a new UCV rule.
03100
03100
糸 120.12
18 · ㇐ (1)
TE-2F54
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+26166
Unify with 𦅦 (U+26166), and add a new UCV for 朁~替. See also SAT-06893 and TD-6D41.
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According new UCV rule, TCA agree to unify.
00325
00325
刀 18.14
16 · ㇑ (2)
TE-7177
𦶝
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
03891
03891
足 157.10
17 · ㇑ (2)
TE-7262
𧾷𧆠
UCV
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
We might want to consider unification of 𧆠 and 虖 as components
UCV
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Needs discussion as there is no rule to judge unification now.
Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TCA agree to add a new UCV rule.
00361
00361
勹 20.15
17 · ㇔ (4)
TE-7276
𰍇
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
04001
04001
辵 162.17
21 · ㇔ (4)
TE-7B2D
𣁎
Unification
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+908E
similar to 邎(U+908E).
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Disagree. These two characters are different in two parts.
03770
03770
言 149.8
15 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20054
Unification
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+8A86
Is it a misprint of 誆?
02054
02054
水 85.9
12 · ㇠ (5)
UK-20083
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
Based on the second evidence provided by Eiso Chan, ⿰氵架 is not a misprint but a known variant of 深. Therefore keep in M-set.
01541
01541
手 64.12
15 · ㇔ (4)
UK-20385
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+22DB3
Unify to 𢶳 by UCV #62 and UCV IRGN2481-Item 3. Since 𢶳 is likely an error form, I suggest UK horizontally extends 𢶳 with ⿰扌棄.
00611
00611
口 30.12
15 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20407
VN-F16D1
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
雪鴻堂文集
古文苑
古音複字
02710
02710
目 109.12
17 · ㇑ (2)
UK-20425
𭦟
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+25291
Unify to 𥊑 (U+25291); consider new UCV 𭦟 = 曼.
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+25291
U+66FC
U+2D99F
U+2D997
Agree to unification with 𥊑 (U+25291) if new UCV is defined for 曼 = 𭦟 = 𭦗.
03467
03467
艸 140.16
20 · ㇒ (3)
UK-20437
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+2C7CF
The bottom component of U+2C7CF 𬟏 is obviously a turtle, so unification seems justified. Perhaps UCV #160 can be extended to include the bottom component of U+2C7CF 𬟏.
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+2C7CF 𬟏 is the modern transcription form of an oracle bone script character that means "autumn", and the original oracle bone script character it represents is thought to be a drawing of a grasshopper (which is active in autumn). The grass radical shown in the G-source glyph for U+2C7CF should correctly be 卝 as it actually represents the grasshopper's antennae.

On the other hand, UK-20437 is used in the evidence provided as an alternate way of writing the character 鱉 'softshell turtle' in the specific word 紫鱉, an ancient name for a type of plant. In this case it is obvious that the character is composed of a grass radical above a turtle.

Thus UK-20437 and U+2C7CF are non-cognate, and have significantly different glyph forms, and so cannot be unified.
01157
01157
山 46.9
12 · ㇠ (5)
UK-20468
Unification
Henry CHAN
Individual
U+2D5D9
Unify with 𭗙 (U+2D5D9).

𭗙 (U+2D5D9) is mapped to KC-05009, but the newest version of KC-05009 is ⿱山眉:


Suggest to update K glyph and also add new UCV 眉 ~ 睂.
00270
00270
冖 14.3
5 · ㇒ (3)
UK-20504
丿
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]

Normalized form from cursive script.
00766
00766
囗 31.4
7 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20544
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+211B6
Possibly unifiable with 𡆶 (U+211B6).
Is there explanation for the character why the inside should be exactly 旡 instead of 无?
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The G-Source reference shows 𡆶 U+211B6 is cited from the Kangxi Dictionary, which is the variant of 模. I checked other evidence, and I found it's the variant of 模 but only used in the variant form 𡆶𣔶 of the common Chinese word 模范.

As the new evidence in #5305, UK-20544 can't be identified as 模, and the new evidence in #5277 has shown it's the variant of 息 in Taoist text. Therefore, it's not better to unify it with 𡆶 U+211B6.
00034
00034
丿 4.10
11 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20576
𠈌
Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
[ WS2017-00744 ]
U+209AC
Per precedent of WS2017-00744, this could be unified to 𠦬 (U+209AC).
Oppose Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
#00034 is the variant of 垂, reads as chūi, and means to suspend.

𠦬 (U+209AC) is the variant of 乖, reads as gwȧi based on the Romanization system in this dictionary.
00265
00265
冂 13.2
4 · ㇠ (5)
UK-20678
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+361E
Unify to 㘞 (U+361E) as this is the form of the character shown several times in the source shown below:

《文帝全書》36:14B
03765
03765
言 149.4
11 · ㇑ (2)
UK-20679
Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
No reading is given, but shape and context suggests that this is identical to UK-20682 / SN03761 and could be unified
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree to unify UK-20682 / SN03761 to this character. The glyph shown for UK-20679 appears to be the correct form (cf. new evidence for UK-20704 and UK-20766).
03761
03761
言 149.3
10 · ㇑ (2)
UK-20682
𠃌
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Unify to UK-20679 (S/N 03765) as they appear to be glyph variants of the same character.
00491
00491
口 30.8
11 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20770
𫆀
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+35BF
U+2B180
U+8036
In other texts, ⿰口𫆀 is written as 㖿 in the same sequences of syllables (example shown below). Therefore, unify to 㖿 (U+35BF) and create a new UCV for 𫆀 = 耶.
04547
04547
鬼 194.4
14 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20786
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Attached PDF file

墨娥小錄(吳繼聚好堂明隆慶5年刊本)卷9 folio 3a gives the same spell 魑⿺鬼㫖𩲕𩲓⿺鬼尊⿺鬼勝.

Unify with 𩲓?

U+29C93
02068
02068
水 85.10
13 · ㇔ (4)
UK-20797
UCV
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
⿱宀王 should be add to UCV rule 4 in order to use this IDS.
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Extend UCV #4 to include ⿱宀王 and ⿱宀工. Here is an evidence of ⿰目𡧱 which is unifiable to 瞎.


Pelliot Chinois 4525(1) 20 (See ⿰目𡧱 on the top-right)
UCV
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Maybe adding a ucv of 𡧱 and 害 is better.
Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Is this to be unified per a new UCV or disunified? The discussion record is not clear, and I see no candidates for unification.
00764
00764
囗 31.3
6 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20835
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
U+211AE
Here are some evidences of 𡆮:


康熙字典(清內府刊本)丑集備考 folio 9b


五音篇海(明正德刊本)卷14 folio 4b

Per the GHZR evidence mentioned in my last comment, the kIRG_GSource of 𡆮 is incorrect because GHZR gives ⿴囗土. I suggest China update 𡆮's source reference to GKX.

From evidences above we know that ⿴囗土 and 𡆮 are homonyms. I guess ⿴囗土 is a variant of 𡆮 and might be unifiable to 𡆮 by UCV #312, although they are separated in 五音篇海. If we decide to unify, then I suggest UK to HE 𡆮 with ⿴囗土.
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+211AE
As 𡆮 (⿴囗士) is only listed in the "備考" section of KXZD, the KX glyph form cannot be considered to be authoritative, and KX should not be used as a source reference. The definitions "土入口也" and "沙土入口" clearly indicate that ⿴囗土 is the correct glyph form for this character. Given that GHZR (which supercedes the GHZ-10711.06 source reference) has corrected the glyph to ⿴囗土, the preferred solution is to correct the G glyph for U+211AE to ⿴囗土 and amend the source reference to GHZR-10766.06. If this solution is accepted then UK will agree to unification and withdraw UK-20835. Horizontal extension is only required if China is unwilling to change the glyph for U+211AE.
03525
03525
艸 140.8
12 · ㇠ (5)
UK-20848
Unification
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]

(汉语方言大字典 page 5293). misprint of 𬝋.
Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
U+2C74B
Agree to unify to 𬝋 (U+2C74B).
01719
01719
日 72.15
19 · ㇑ (2)
UK-20886
𡼙
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
Here are some evidences of ⿰日𦻏:


臨汾縣志(清乾隆刊本)卷7 folio 15


貴州通志(清乾隆刊本)卷8 folio 8 (⿰日𦻏/⿰目𦻏);

⿰日𦻏 is also a taboo character of 曄, if we accept these evidences, please also consider UCV 𦻏/𡼙.
02057
02057
水 85.9
12 · ㇠ (5)
UK-20902
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Consider add UCV 迴/廻/廽 so it can be unified to 𭱫.
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree to a new UCV for UCV 迴/廻/廽
Unification
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+8FF4
U+8FB6
U+5EF4
Disagree to a new UCV for 迴/廻. Although 辶 and 廴 hold similar meaning and shape, they are non-cognate.
00894
00894
土 32.12
15 · ㇔ (4)
UK-20907
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Add 富/冨 to UCV per new evidence.
Unification
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+2D3E8
Unify to 𭏨

U+2D3E8
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Here is the SAT evidence (SAT No. 1822 倶舍論疏 T1822_.41.0477c03 Note ⓴)

Based on this, the two characters appear to be non-cognate, therefore should not be unified according to the Non-cognate Rule ("Ideographs with different glyph shapes that are unrelated in historical derivation (non-cognate characters) are not unified no matter how similar their glyph shapes may be").
Oppose Unification
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
《顺昌县地名志》P62:


The pronounciation of ⿰土富 is fù, which is absolutely not cognate with ⿰土冨(a variant of 盐)
01255
01255
广 53.7
10 · ㇑ (2)
UK-20925
TC-4773
广
Unification
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+2AA98
Unify to 𪪘 (U+2AA98). U+2AA98 has the pronunciation yi4 according to CNS 11643, therefore might be cognate with this character.
Oppose Unification
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
UK-20925 has reading hù according to 《中华千家姓氏录》, so is not cognate with 𪪘 (U+2AA98) (reading yì). Therefore we oppose unification of UK-20925 with U+2AA98.
Oppose Unification
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Disagee to unify.
01172
01172
山 46.11
14 · ㇑ (2)
UK-20945
UCV
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Extend UCV #157 to include ⿳⿱甲卝一八?
01514
01514
手 64.11
14 · ㇔ (4)
UTC-00459
𡨴
Unification
Eiso CHAN
Individual
U+22D15
unify to 𢴕 (U+22D15)

For the Cantonese usage, there are two words, ning1 for “take” and “carry”, ning6 for “bring”, “turn” and “shake”. The ning1 usage is written as U+22D15 𢴕 in Prof. Hou’s book.


▲ 侯兴泉,吴南开:《信息处理用粤方言字词规范研究》,广州:广东人民出版社,2017.05,p. 277

This character was also used in the 庚辰本 of “A Dream of Red Mansions” (《紅樓夢》).


▲ 曹雪芹,無名氏,脂硯齋:《脂硯齋重評石頭記》,庚辰本,第八回

Other form was used in the other version in the same position.


▲ 曹雪芹,無名氏:《紅樓夢》,萃文書屋木活字本,第八回

The above evidence is not clear enough, and we check the same character in other position of the same version as below.


▲ 曹雪芹,無名氏:《紅樓夢》,萃文書屋木活字本,第二十八回

It is U+22D15 𢴕 in the above evidence.
00450
00450
口 30.4
7 · ㇠ (5)
UTC-03197
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+5463
UTC-03197 and 呣 (U+5463) share the same pronunciation.
According to the evidence, I doubt it means 不是(no), which is generally written as 唔是 or 唔系 in Cantonese, UTC-03197 and 唔 share the same pronunciation and meaning.
In addition, 呣 have a variant shape which is much more similar to UTC-03197.

On the whole, the characters are created for language, people could give a pronunciation multiple ways of writing. Considering the randomness of ordinary people's writing, it is not unreasonable to link UTC-03197 and 呣 (U+5463) as synonym in this case.
Oppose Unification
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
In Min, 母 does not have initial M and theoretically cannot be used as phonetic of this word.

Note that the Taiwanese Minnan Dictionary does list 呣 as a variant of 毋. https://twblg.dict.edu.tw/holodict_new/
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Still disagree to unify with 呣 (U+5463) per Henry's and SAT's comments.
00411
00411
厂 27.54
56 · ㇐ (1)
UTC-03221
Oppose Unification
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Given the large deviation between the six-有 and nine-有 form of this ideograph, in terms of the number of components, they cannot be unified. If others agree, the six-有 form must therefore be submitted as a separate ideograph.
00033
00033
丿 4.6
7 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F000F
Unification
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+6240
U+3ABD
U+20A44
U+2B742
U+2B826
U+2CED0
As Henry mentioned, there are 5 existing coded variant forms of 所 include 㪽 (U+3ABD), 𠩄 (U+20A44), 𫝂 (U+2B742), 𫠦 (U+2B826), 𬻐 (U+2CED0).
1. The quality of this character is questionable.
2. A similar glyph has already been encoded in 𫠦 (U+2B826).
3. There would be no end for this issue, for the discovery of variants would be a endless trip.
Oppose Unification
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Most of the CJK characters in Unicode are variants of another character as a large number of the characters proposed in WS2021. So, this is not an argument for unification. Neither is there new information added since the previous IRG #57 decision to not unify.
01535
01535
手 64.12
16 · ㇒ (3)
VN-F18A1
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
Given the large number of V source characters which show variation of 手~扌 on the left, could we consider adding a UCV for 手~扌 where cognate?
01510
01510
手 64.11
14 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F18C5
𦰟
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
Given the large number of V source characters which show variation of 手~扌 on the left, could we consider adding a UCV for 手~扌 where cognate?
03754
03754
角 148.12
19 · ㇔ (4)
VN-F1B70
UCV
Andrew WEST
UK
Consider adding UCV for 解~觧. See also TE-3773 (⿱觧虫) and SAT-06249 (⿱觧心).


Attributes

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
03363
03363
艸 140.10
14 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00320
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 10.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 14.
02941
02941
竹 118.10
16 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00360
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
00771
00771
囗 31.6
9 · ㇔ (4)
GDM-00365
IDS
HUANG Junliang
Individual
Update IDS to ⿴囗𰁜, since it is a simplification of 圝.
04626
04626
魚 195.11
22 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00216
𢛢
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
IDS=〾⿰魚𢛢

The current IDS suggested in #5926 doesn’t match the glyph. And Tao Yang has explained the reason.
04575
04575
魚 195.5
16 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00235
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=5, TS=16
03439
03439
艸 140.14
18 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00249
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 18.
01934
01934
魚 195.10
21 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00254
𣪊
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Per Kangxi, the majority of characters with ⿹𣪊X structure by default have X used as the radical, so the second radical 79.0 (殳) is not necessary.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Including 79.0 as a secondary radical will aid in discoverability.
04574
04574
魚 195.4
15 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00261
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
IDS=⿰魚天
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
FS=1
04579
04579
魚 195.5
16 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00262
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IDS=⿰魚卯 if Comment #4214 been accepted.

I support Henry's comment.
04608
04608
魚 195.9
20 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00268
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Add the second radical as 181 頁, and the second SC=11, the second FS=3.

The third piece of evidence shows it’s the definition of 鮉. Compared with different ancient dictionaries, it’s easy to know it’s also the variant of 鯛, so it’s OK to keep the current RS as the first RS.

As Mr. Huang mentioned in #934, it’s the variant of 顦 based on the 1st, 6th, 7th and 8th pieces of evidence. It’s better to add the second RS.

The fourth piece of evidence shows it’s the 反切上字 of 嶼. We can get 徐吕切 (唐韻), 象吕切 (集韻 etc.), 私吕切 (正字通) and 辭旅反 (篆隸萬象名義) as the fanqie of 嶼. The middle Chinese initials of 徐, 象 and 辭 are 邪, the one of 私 is 心. As we know, the current Putonghua pronunciation of 嶼/屿 (yǔ) does not match the middle Chinese. In the old Mandarin pronunciation, 嶼/屿 reads as xù, and the Cantonese pronunciation is zeoi6, which both match. 徐吕切, 象吕切, 辭旅反 all mean the same reading, 私吕切 means the other reading. As we know, 私吕切 (aka 胥上聲) is not a good fanqie for this character. The initial of 顦 is 從, the ones of 鯛 and 鮉 are 端, which do not match. It’s better to trust it is a character which the initial is 邪 and not the variant of 顦, 鯛, 鮉, 徐, 象, 辭, 私 in this evidence.

The second evidence is not complete, but it’s easy to get the sentence is cited from 爾雅, and it is the variant of 鮪. So, it is OK to keep the current RS in this case.

The fifth evidence does not match the glyph and not complete, please ignore it.
04606
04606
魚 195.9
20 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00280
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=9
04510
04510
鳥 196.10
21 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00299
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical 196.0 鳥, remove secondary radical 187.0 馬.
03487
03487
艸 140.21
25 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00306
𠂤
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 25.
00408
00408
鳥 196.8
19 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00315
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
May be better changing Radical to 196 鳥. What is the rationale below this text?
01408
01408
鳥 196.9
20 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00318
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical R=196.0 (鳥), remove secondary radical R(2)=61.0 (心).
02824
02824
鳥 196.13
24 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00336
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical 196.0 (鳥), remove secondary radical 112.0 (石).
04783
04783
鳥 196.14
25 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00349
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰截鳥
02153
02153
鳥 196.14
25 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00353
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
There should be no second radical as per Kangxi the character 鸂 which is a type of waterfowl has radical 鳥.
04184
04184
鳥 196.12
23 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00363
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical 196.0 鳥, remove secondary radical 167.0 金.
04709
04709
鳥 196.7
18 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00365
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1 or 3?
00409
00409
鳥 196.10
21 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00366
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 196 鳥
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=10 if the radical been changed to 196.0 鳥.
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1 if the radical been changed to 196.0 鳥.
04283
04283
鳥 196.8
19 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00368
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical 196.0 鳥, remove secondary radical 170.0 阜.
01587
01587
手 64.16
19 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00370
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 196.0 (鳥), SC=8, FS=1 per Eiso's 2021-05-31 comments?
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Agree with Ken.
04772
04772
鳥 196.12
23 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00388
IDS
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
⿰渺鳥
04814
04814
鳥' 196'.10
15 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00393
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=10, TS=15
04816
04816
鳥' 196'.12
17 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00395
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=12, TS=17
03617
03617
虫 142.12
18 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00399
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 12.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 18.
01050
01050
虫 142.8
14 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00408
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep R=142.0 (虫), remove second radical R(2)=40.0 (宀).
03594
03594
虫 142.11
17 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00421
VN-F0B36
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 11.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 17.
03618
03618
虫 142.12
18 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00438
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 12.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 18.
03551
03551
虫 142.9
15 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00469
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 9.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 15.
03665
03665
虫 142.18
24 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00475
IDS
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
⿱蟲虫
03959
03959
辵 162.4
8 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00483
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=8
04180
04180
金 167.15
23 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00485
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=15, TS=23
04188
04188
金 167.16
24 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00501
TE-4A5A
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
04146
04146
金 167.11
19 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00506
IDS
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
⿰鍏刂
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It's not better to update the IDS to ⿰鍏刂 because of the semantics based on the evidences. Please keep ⿲金韋刂.
04093
04093
金 167.10
18 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00508
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=10, FS=2, TS=18 according to IRGN954AR.
04200
04200
金 167.19
27 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00527
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=19, TS=27
04087
04087
金' 167'.8
13 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00531
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 167' 钅
04167
04167
金' 167'.13
18 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00532
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 167' 钅
01844
01844
木 75.12
16 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00575
𭸟
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰木𭸟. (𭸟=U+2DE1F)
02449
02449
犬 94.15
18 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00581
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
16
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
19
01793
01793
木 75.8
12 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00635
IDS
Henry CHAN
Individual
Per IRGN1183 Revised IDS decomposition principles, the IDS should be reverted to ⿲木犬木:
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with Henry.
04836
04836
鹿 198.4
15 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00674
鹿
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 72 日

The evidence shows this character is the variant of 暴, and the radical of 暴 is 72.0 日.

U+66B4
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=11 if the radical been changed to 72.0.
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=4 if the radical been changed to 72.0.
04872
04872
鹿 198.10
21 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00712
鹿
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=10, TS=21
03569
03569
虫 142.8
14 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00722
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 8.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 14.
04810
04810
鳥' 196'.9
14 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00756
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=9
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=14
01935
01935
目 109.4
9 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00775
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical 109.0 目 only, remove secondary radical 81.0 比.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Keeping 109.0 as a secondary radical will aid in discoverability.
00400
00400
鳥' 196'.4
9 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00801
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 196' 鸟
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=4
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
04171
04171
金' 167'.13
18 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00849
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=18
04213
04213
金 167.12
20 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00850
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 167 金
04139
04139
金' 167'.11
16 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00851
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 167' 钅
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 167' 钅
00447
00447
口 30.5
8 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00910
IDS
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
⿰口⿱𠘧口
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The current IDS is OK, there is no need to change.
03694
03694
行 144.14
20 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00920
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿲彳绿亍.
03684
03684
行 144.6
12 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00921
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿲彳红亍.
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC = 6
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TC = 12
04031
04031
酉 164.6
13 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00946
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
as the glyph and IDS changed, SC=6, TS=13
00640
00640
口 30.13
16 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00956
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=4
02039
02039
水 85.9
13 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00957
𠫴
IDS
Henry CHAN
Individual
The IDS should be reverted to ⿰法少 because the character is composed of 法 + 少.
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
Keep IDS as ⿰氵𠫴 because the IDS is purely descriptive of the character's shape, and is not intended to provide any semantic information.
00113
00113
口 30.4
7 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00962
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=4 if the radical been changed to 30.0.
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=4
04521
04521
骨 188.3
13 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00972
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=13
03410
03410
艸 140.12
16 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00983
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 16.
03743
03743
見 147.14
21 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00995
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
04555
04555
鬼 194.6
16 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00998
UK-20785
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1



▲ IRGN954AR
04567
04567
鬼 194.12
22 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-01004
UK-20788
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3
04117
04117
金' 167'.10
15 · ㇒ (3)
GXM-00433
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 167' 钅
04572
04572
魚 195.4
15 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-0061201
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=4
00495
00495
刀 18.9
11 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-0082102
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=9 if the radical been changed to 18.0
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 18 刀

品 is the phonetic element.
01732
01732
肉 130.5
9 · ㇐ (1)
GZ-0092201
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical 130.0 肉 only, remove secondary radical 74.0 月.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with Henry.
03355
03355
艸 140.8
12 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-0101302
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 12.
00727
00727
鳥 196.9
20 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-0252103
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical R=196.0 (鳥), remove second radical R(2)=30.0 (口).
01746
01746
肉 130.9
13 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-0381205
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 130 肉

The radical should be the same as 肥.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Remove secondary radical.
03895
03895
足 157.10
17 · ㇔ (4)
GZ-1101103
𧾷
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
01753
01753
肉 130.12
16 · ㇐ (1)
GZ-1152104
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 130 肉

The radical should be the same as 肫 and 胗.
Radical
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree, change radical to 130 肉.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Remove secondary radical.
01748
01748
肉 130.10
14 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-1221201
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 130 肉

The meaning is related to human and animal.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Remove secondary radical.
01741
01741
肉 130.8
12 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-1442201
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 130 肉

~⿰月口 (duzgaeuh) is a stable word meant "knee" on the evidence.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Secondary radical should be removed.
01620
01620
牙 92.4
8 · ㇔ (4)
GZ-1521506
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical R=92.0 (牙), remove secondary radical R(2)=67.0 (文).
03878
03878
足 157.5
12 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-1651304
𧾷
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=5, FS=3
02376
02376
犬 94.8
11 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-1691202
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The glyph and IDS should be changed to ⿰犭𮌈.
U+2E308 𮌈
01911
01911
齒' 211'.7
15 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-1702102
齿
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 211' 齿
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=7
03326
03326
艸 140.6
10 · ㇐ (1)
GZ-1721202
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 10.
03726
03726
衣 145.11
16 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-2041101
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 11.
03500
03500
虍 141.12
18 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-2072307
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 12.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 18.
01735
01735
肉 130.6
9 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-2081109
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical 130.0 肉 only, remove secondary radical 74.0 月.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with Henry.
03868
03868
足 157.4
11 · ㇠ (5)
GZ-2322101
𧾷
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=4
03377
03377
艸 140.10
14 · ㇐ (1)
GZ-2352411
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 14.
01736
01736
肉 130.6
10 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-2382307
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 130 肉

胬~ (noh haeu) is a stable word according to the evidence.
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical 130.0 肉 only, remove secondary radical 74.0 月.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with Henry.
03160
03160
羊 123.8
14 · ㇔ (4)
GZ-2471202
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
00419
00419
又 29.7
8 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-2902802
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=4
03991
03991
辵 162.12
16 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-3001305
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=16
01628
01628
木 75.8
12 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-3041104
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 75 木

The semantic element is 果, and the phonetic element is 文.
00398
00398
厂 27.6
8 · ㇔ (4)
GZ-3231202
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
02920
02920
立 117.18
23 · ㇐ (1)
GZ-3321510
IDS
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS from ⿰亲墓 to ⿰亲暮.
01950
01950
毛 82.9
13 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-3361201
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Add the second radical as 86.0, because the radical of U+70B9 点 is 86.0, which U+70B9 点 is the semantic element.
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3 with the second radical as 86.0.
01083
01083
儿 10.16
18 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-3382201
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 10 儿

The radical of 光 is 10.0
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=16
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
01749
01749
肉 130.10
14 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-3461207
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 130 肉

The meaning is related to "face".
Radical
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree change radical to 130 肉.
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Remove secondary radical.
04940
04940
鼻 209.10
24 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-3511102
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=5
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=5
00487
00487
日 72.8
12 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-3712208
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 72 日
Radical
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree, change radical to 72 日.
01742
01742
肉 130.8
12 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-3721101
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 130 肉

~⿰手蒙 (ngamz mungz) is a stable word meant the space between the fingers, which is related to the human body.
01733
01733
肉 130.6
10 · ㇐ (1)
GZ-3781201
FS
Henry CHAN
Individual
FS=2
00969
00969
肉 130.3
9 · ㇠ (5)
GZ-3881102
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 130 肉 as the right side is the semantic.
00218
00218
面 176.8
17 · ㇐ (1)
GZ-4122102
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 176 面

The semantic element is 面, which is also more intuitive, and the phonetic element is 來.
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=8 if the radical been changed to 176 面.
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=17
00123
00123
風 182.6
15 · ㇔ (4)
GZ-4162103
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 182 風 as semantic.
00469
00469
囗 31.7
10 · ㇐ (1)
GZ-4341508
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 31 囗
Radical
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree, radical 31 囗.
01747
01747
肉 130.10
14 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-4411201
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 130 肉

The RS for the semantic element 背 is 130.5.
04122
04122
金 167.10
18 · ㇔ (4)
GZ-4532602
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=18
04030
04030
酉 164.7
14 · ㇔ (4)
GZ-4622501
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
00460
00460
囗 31.6
9 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-4711408
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 31 囗

The radical should be as the same as U+2D375 𭍵, U+56ED 园 and so on.
Radical
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree, radical 31 囗.
04397
04397
革 177.8
17 · ㇐ (1)
GZ-5002401
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=8, FS=1
00071
00071
乙 5.7
8 · ㇠ (5)
KC-00043
IDS
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿸尾乙 describes the glyph better.
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
KR will modify the glyph to match the original IDS.
00085
00085
乙 5.11
13 · ㇐ (1)
KC-00081
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=12
Total Stroke Count
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
KR does not agree to change TS=12. Keep TS=11. The middle component has 6 strokes. See U+7D2F below.
00732
00732
口 30.17
20 · ㇔ (4)
KC-00568
IDS
Kushim JIANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to evidence, ⿸廣叱 would be better.
00180
00180
人 9.10
12 · ㇐ (1)
KC-04818
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
With normalization, IDS should be ⿰亻卨
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Since KR already proposed to change glyph ( ⿰亻卨), KR will also change IDS accordingly.
01162
01162
山 46.10
13 · ㇔ (4)
KC-05014
IDS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
D10-01 in IRGN2225 maybe can applied to this issue.
IDS can be ⿱ D10-01山, instead of ⿳亠⿲刀丫?山, which contain a question mark "?".
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Consider using ⿱&D10-01;山
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
KR would rather keep the current IDS.
01338
01338
心 61.8
12 · ㇒ (3)
KC-05079
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱𢼄心
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
IDS is not necessarily unique.
The suggested IDS could be added (not replace the original IDS).
02482
02482
玉 96.8
13 · ㇒ (3)
KC-05388
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱𢼄玉
IDS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
IDS is not necessarily unique.
The suggested IDS could be added (not replace the original IDS).
04169
04169
金 167.13
21 · ㇒ (3)
KC-05828
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=5
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
KR does not agree.
04489
04489
香 186.9
18 · ㇒ (3)
KC-07352
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
KR does not agree.
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Does ROK mean the first stroke of 咸 is 3 (撇) in the ROK conventions?
FS
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
KR agrees to chagne FS=1.
03394
03394
艸 140.11
15 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-04272
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 15.
03773
03773
言 149.8
15 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-04274
𠮷
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3
03463
03463
艸 140.16
20 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-04384
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 20.
03774
03774
言 149.8
15 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-04579
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3
04265
04265
阜 170.8
11 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-04584
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
04523
04523
骨 188.6
16 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-04597
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Change Radical to 139.0 (色), SC=10, FS=2

According to the evidence, the best radical should be 色 not 骨.
04941
04941
齊 210.4
16 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-04670
&D10-01;丿
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Two horizontal strokes for the outside component 齊 is missing in this character, so, is it OK to use 齊 as the radical? If yes, the RS values for this character and 齌 are the same, but the TS values are different, that looks not better; if not, I suggest using 火 86.0 as the radical, and SC=12, and keep FS without change.
03079
03079
糸 120.8
14 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-04673
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 8.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 14.
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰糸⿱亠糸.
03341
03341
艸 140.7
11 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-05063
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 11.
03373
03373
艸 140.9
13 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-05114
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 13.
01252
01252
广 53.4
7 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-05684
广廿
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1.
03762
03762
言 149.4
11 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-05834
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=4 to follow KX
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=11 to follow KX
01931
01931
殳 79.7
11 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-05865
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
⿰⿱⿷匚二几殳
01239
01239
巾 50.15
18 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-06060
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=15.
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TC=18.
03806
03806
豸 153.5
12 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-06072
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
01066
01066
寸 41.5
8 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-06222
Radical
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to the evidence submitted,”𧴫”, ”⿱罒寸”, “䙷” are variants of headword “𢔶”. Radical Information of ”𧴫”, “䙷” are as below recorded in Kangxizidian.
𧴫 【酉集中】【貝 154】TS : 10 · SC : 3
䙷 【酉集上】【見 147】 TS : 10 · SC : 3
From this, radical of “⿱罒寸” should be 109 目.
03496
03496
虍 141.10
16 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-06257
𠔃
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 10.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 16.
03219
03219
肉 130.3
9 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-06374
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
01254
01254
广 53.5
8 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-06420
广
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1.
01421
01421
火 86.8
12 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-06465
𤆰
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical 86.0 (火), remove secondary radical R(2)=62.0 (戈).
03364
03364
艸 140.9
13 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-06470
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 13.
03851
03851
走 156.4
11 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-06508
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
02345
02345
犬 94.5
8 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-06646
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰犭⿱大刀
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Per comment #1643, change IDS to ⿰犭⿱大刀.
01258
01258
广 53.8
11 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-06647
广
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3.
03741
03741
見 147.10
17 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-06662
Radical
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with Lee, and suggest changed radical to 117 立 if it needs to be coded.
03405
03405
艸 140.12
16 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-06794
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 16.
02287
02287
爿 90.2
6 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-06795
IDS
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿰爿𠤎
01206
01206
巛 47.9
12 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-06796
𭗾
Radical
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Consider adding second radical 40.0 宀, because U+5B81宁 is also the semantic element.
04024
04024
酉 164.5
12 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-06822
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
01270
01270
广 53.20
23 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-06884
广
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3.
01168
01168
山 46.11
14 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-06890
𭦌
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3.
03400
03400
艸 140.12
16 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-06897
𣈆
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 16.
02132
02132
水 85.17
20 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-07026
𣽨
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰氵𣽨.
03607
03607
虫 142.11
17 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-07153
巿
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The SC value of 11 suggests that the upper-right component is 市 (⿱亠巾), but the IDS uses 巿 (⿻一巾). Change IDS to ⿱⿰臣市虫?
03395
03395
艸 140.11
15 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-07170
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 15.
04229
04229
門 169.8
16 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-08310
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1
03945
03945
車 159.9
16 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-08372
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱⿲幺車幺⿺𠃊㐅
02243
02243
火 86.13
17 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-08382
𮘎
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
⿱⿲幺言幺灬
01715
01715
日 72.14
18 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-08386
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
⿰日⿻𰰜⿱从丛
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
SC=15, FS=2, TS=19
03775
03775
言 149.8
15 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-08440
𠩋
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1
01947
01947
毛 82.7
11 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-08488
IDS
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿱⿰己殳手
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
We prefer the current one.
02083
02083
水 85.12
15 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-08498
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
13
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
16
01802
01802
木 75.9
13 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-08553
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change SC to 10.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change TC to 14.
01504
01504
手 64.11
14 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-08577
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
If the current glyph is kept, the IDS should be 〾⿰扌莎
03451
03451
艸 140.15
19 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-08621
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 19.
00125
00125
衣 145.11
17 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-08636
𰠀
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 145 衣
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=11
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
⿳亠𰠀𧘇
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree to change Radical to 145 衣
03368
03368
艸 140.9
13 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-08693
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 13.
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿱艹⿷見厶.
01233
01233
巾 50.10
13 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-08700
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1.
01238
01238
巾 50.13
16 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-08729
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=13.
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=4.
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TC=16.
03391
03391
艸 140.11
14 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-08830
𧆨
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 15.
01261
01261
广 53.10
13 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-08895
广𭮀
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Add the secondary radical as 61.0 心 if my comment #6747 is right. And then, SC=9, FS=4.
01754
01754
肉 130.12
16 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-08914
𭁄
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 130 肉

The evidence shows this character "從肉" clearly.
03601
03601
虫 142.12
18 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-08954
𦯧
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 12.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 18.
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Add the second IDS as ⿰虫⿱芸木 or ⿰虫⿱艹𣐂 based on the current glyph.
02674
02674
皿 108.7
12 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-09012
FS
Henry CHAN
Individual
FS=2 for 艹.
04002
04002
辵 162.18
22 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-09259
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=1
03763
03763
言 149.3
10 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-09285
𠧒
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
03393
03393
艸 140.11
15 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-09362
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 15.
03841
03841
貝 154.18
25 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-10196
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
04012
04012
阜 170.11
14 · ㇑ (2)
T9-7544
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 170 阜
Radical
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree. Change Radical to 170 阜.
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The radical has not been changed to 170 阜.
02181
02181
火 86.7
11 · ㇒ (3)
T9-783E
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IDS should be changed to ⿰火肜; 〾 is not needed as 肜 can be both ⿰月彡 and ⿰⺼彡. Plus there is UCV rule 53.
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Per the Version 2.0 comment, the IDS should be changed to ⿰火肜 (no need to prefix with 〾).
04214
04214
長 168.8
15 · ㇒ (3)
T9-7D76
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=8
03974
03974
辵 162.9
13 · ㇐ (1)
TB-4C60
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿺辶⿱正曰(U+66F0).
00375
00375
十 24.7
9 · ㇒ (3)
TC-3051
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=4
01770
01770
木 75.4
8 · ㇒ (3)
TC-3452
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Change Radical to 88.0 (父), SC=4 (no change), FS=1

If the reading is mù provided by TCA, the better radical should be 父 not 木.
01737
01737
月 74.6
10 · ㇒ (3)
TC-4A25
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Could Lee or Eiso confirm that VN-F195D uses R74 'moon' radical?
04009
04009
邑 163.3
6 · ㇠ (5)
TC-766C
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IDS should be ⿰孑阝

The left component is 孑, not a 孑-like component for 子.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Keep ⿰子阝, like U+273C4, U+2EB2A.
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
At least, this case is different from U+273C4 𧏄. The Kangxi Dictionary shows the left part is the real 子. So, it’s OK to use 子 as the left component in the IDS.

For U+2EB2A 𮬪, the current source reference is cited from 大正藏, I can’t understand the contextual meaning. Maybe SAT knows if the left component is 子. I also find out U+2EB2A is used as a place name character in 广东德庆, which is near to Xijiang River (西江), but it’s a pity that I don’t know the meaning as well.

According to the pronunciation provided by TCA, jié means the phonetic element should be 孑 not 子, so I still think ⿰孑阝 will be better. If TCA hopes to keep ⿰子阝, maybe we should use two IDSes for this case.
01790
01790
木 75.7
11 · ㇒ (3)
TC-7E60
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change IDS to ⿲木彡木, because the first and third components are the same.
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Add the secondary radical as 59.0 (彡), SC=8, FS=1 based on the new evidence under #5339.
04487
04487
香 186.6
15 · ㇐ (1)
TD-665D
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Change Radical to 135.0 (舌), SC=9, FS=3

The pronunciation is xiāng.
01392
01392
心 61.13
17 · ㇔ (4)
TE-2562
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Change Radical to 130.0 (肉).

The pronunciation is sī provided by TCA, so the semantic element should be 育.
03416
03416
艸 140.13
17 · ㇐ (1)
TE-275B
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿱艹⿺煮丶.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IDS is 〾⿱艹煮, it will feel easier to find.
04710
04710
鳥 196.6
17 · ㇐ (1)
TE-2A50
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=6, TS=17.
03437
03437
艸 140.14
18 · ㇑ (2)
TE-2F7C
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The IDS should at least be normalized to ⿱艹閣. If not, there is a danger that ⿱艹閣 may be separately encoded in the future.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to UCV#152, ⿱艹閣 should not be separately encoded in the future. Could IDS have two kinds? Make ⿱卝閣 the primary IDS and ⿱艹閣(or 〾⿱艹閣) as the secondary IDS.
03450
03450
艸 140.14
18 · ㇠ (5)
TE-3024
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The IDS should at least be normalized to ⿱艹綾. If not, there is a danger that ⿱艹綾 may be separately encoded in the future.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to UCV#152, ⿱艹綾 should not be separately encoded in the future. Could IDS have two kinds? Make ⿱卝綾 the primary IDS and ⿱艹綾(or 〾⿱艹綾) as the secondary IDS.
03440
03440
艸 140.14
18 · ㇒ (3)
TE-302C
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The IDS should at least be normalized to ⿱艹毓. If not, there is a danger that ⿱艹毓 may be separately encoded in the future.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to UCV#152, ⿱艹毓 should not be separately encoded in the future. Could IDS have two kinds? Make ⿱卝毓 the primary IDS and ⿱艹毓(or 〾⿱艹毓) as the secondary IDS.
03441
03441
艸 140.14
18 · ㇒ (3)
TE-302D
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The IDS should at least be normalized to ⿱艹𥠺. If not, there is a danger that ⿱艹𥠺 may be separately encoded in the future.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to UCV #152 & #320, ⿱艹𥠺 should not be separately encoded in the future. Could IDS have two kinds? Make ⿱卝⿰禾昷 the primary IDS and 〾⿱艹𥠺 as the secondary IDS.
03445
03445
艸 140.14
18 · ㇔ (4)
TE-3048
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The IDS should at least be normalized to ⿱艹旗. If not, there is a danger that ⿱艹旗 may be separately encoded in the future.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to UCV#152, ⿱艹旗 should not be separately encoded in the future. Could IDS have two kinds? Make ⿱卝旗 the primary IDS and ⿱艹旗(or 〾⿱艹旗) as the secondary IDS.
04463
04463
食 184.12
20 · ㇠ (5)
TE-3A7C
𩙿
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=20
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Based on Comment #4029, I suggest IRG using 8 as the recommended stroke count for 飠 and 𩙿 as the components.

I support Mr. NG in this case.

IRGN954AR and IRGN2171 have not included 飠 and 𩙿 yet.
Total Stroke Count
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree.
04334
04334
雨 173.12
20 · ㇑ (2)
TE-3E6E
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=12, TS=20
04292
04292
隹 172.16
24 · ㇑ (2)
TE-4869
Radical
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
it looks like the radical should be 40 宀 such as 觀(U+89C0).

U+89C0
Radical
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Add 40.0 宀 as the second radical?
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
For U+89C0 觀, the semantic element is 見, so the it’s the best to use 見 as the radical. However, the reading for 04292 provided by TCA is ān that means 安, the right part is the phonetic element. It’s better to keep the current RS without any change for the second radical.
00963
00963
大 37.13
16 · ㇔ (4)
TE-7141
𦥯
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
03742
03742
見 147.14
21 · ㇑ (2)
TE-7B35
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
Change Radical to 128.0 (耳), SC=15, FS=2
supposed from the pronunciation.
04944
04944
齒 211.7
22 · ㇐ (1)
TE-7B41
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=7 according to IRGN2221.
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=22
04049
04049
田 102.17
22 · ㇒ (3)
TE-7B76
Radical
Henry CHAN
Individual
Keep primary radical 102.0 田, remove secondary radical 165.0 釆.
04020
04020
邑 163.12
15 · ㇑ (2)
UK-10803
IDS
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Based on the 魏書 evidences, I think we should encode ⿰⿱旦來阝 instead, with ⿰⿱日來阝 being a unifiable variant of ⿰⿱旦來阝.

Change IDS to ⿰⿱旦來阝and update the glyph accordingly.
03799
03799
豆 151.9
16 · ㇒ (3)
UK-20024
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=4 According to IRGN954AR.
01106
01106
山 46.4
7 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20038
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3.
00810
00810
土 32.6
9 · ㇔ (4)
UK-20059
𣲆
IDS
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Based on the evidences mentioned above. I think we should encode ⿱氾土, with ⿱𣲆土 and ⿱汜土 being its variants.

The original has ~銅爲之, ⿱氾土 is likely a variant of 笵. 「範銅爲之」appears in 清史稿:

Attached PDF file

清史稿(1942) pp. 211

change IDS to ⿱氾土 and update the glyph accordingly.
02499
02499
玉 96.10
14 · ㇔ (4)
UK-20113
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
The glyph and IDS shown are for 宫, which TC=9. SC=10, is this a conscious normalization of the stroke count, or should it be SC=9?
00931
00931
士 33.8
11 · ㇔ (4)
UK-20161
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
In this case we might need discussion whether to change Radical to 18 刀 under general convention of phonetic ligatures.
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I am not aware of any "general convention of phonetic ligatures". 士 is the obvious and intuitive radical, and I would oppose a change to Radical 18.
04885
04885
麥 199.5
16 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20183
SAT-09217
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3
04016
04016
邑 163.11
14 · ㇑ (2)
UK-20206
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=11, TS=14
03900
03900
足 157.11
18 · ㇒ (3)
UK-20221
𧾷
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=4 according to IRGN954AR.
01829
01829
木 75.11
15 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20223
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change IDS to ⿲木豆木, because the first and third components are the same.
01752
01752
月 74.11
15 · ㇔ (4)
UK-20238
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Keep R74 'moon'
04515
04515
馬 187.19
29 · ㇔ (4)
UK-20405
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=19, TS=29 according to IRGN2221.
04417
04417
頁 181.10
19 · ㇔ (4)
UK-20410
𠂤
FS
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3
02709
02709
目 109.12
17 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20411
𣈆
IDS
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰目晉 per new evidence and the new UCV 晉/𣈆 discussed in IRG #58, update the glyph accordingly.
02650
02650
豆 151.9
16 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20414
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 151 豆 (more intuitive).
01110
01110
山 46.4
7 · ㇒ (3)
UK-20417
FS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2.
03018
03018
米 119.9
15 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20439
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 9 due to the representative glyph change.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 15 due to the representative glyph change.
02793
02793
石 112.12
17 · ㇒ (3)
UK-20457
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 12.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 17.
04527
04527
骨 188.12
22 · ㇠ (5)
UK-20461
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=12, TS=22
01760
01760
月 74.14
18 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20488
UTC-03203
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 130.0 (肉), SC=14, FS=1
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
Agree to change to R130 'meat'
01988
01988
水 85.1
5 · ㇑ (2)
UK-20514
𰛅
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
⿻水丨
01280
01280
用 101.5
10 · ㇠ (5)
UK-20516
Radical
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Suggest change radical to 101 用, which is more intuitive.
00142
00142
人 9.6
8 · ㇐ (1)
UK-20541
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Given the meaning, it is highly probable that the structure is meant to be ⿰亻⿱𠤎天 (i.e. ⿸化天)
00935
00935
夕 36.3
6 · ㇑ (2)
UK-20567
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Given the glyph based on comment #4927, ⿹⺄⿺𠃊夕?
00050
00050
乙 5.4
5 · ㇠ (5)
UK-20571
𭙉
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
⿱⺄𭙉
01799
01799
木 75.8
12 · ㇠ (5)
UK-20573
𠃛𠃛
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
〾⿲木𠃛𠃛
04654
04654
魚 195.15
26 · ㇔ (4)
UK-20591
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=14 as there is 龷, which isn't 廿, in the first piece of evidence and the glyph.
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=25
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
All 廣 components (with 黃 or 黄) should be counted as 15 in IRG WS to KX. The real glyph shapes and the regional conventions are not important for the stroke counts. The SC and TS should be kept as the submitted ones.
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please see #4105.
01295
01295
隹 172.3
11 · ㇒ (3)
UK-20601
Radical
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Suggest change Radical to 172 隹.
According to the Source 1, the character belongs to 隹部, and it is the name of a kind of bird.
01114
01114
山 46.5
8 · ㇒ (3)
UK-20626
IDS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
⿱山冊.
04471
04471
食' 184'.8
11 · ㇔ (4)
UK-20859
IDS
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I agree with Eddie that ⿰饣穸 is an error form, 穸 and 𡨝 is non-cognate.



▲ 汉字海(华语教学出版社, 2018) pp. 691 quotes 汉语方言大词典 but changes the glyph to ⿰饣⿳穴人又, which is the simplified form from the T-glyph of 𩜯 (康熙字典). I don't have 汉语方言大词典 but I guess the original evidence is likely where 汉字海 quotes. More evidences from 汉语方言大词典 will be appreciated.

汉字海 also gives a simplified form from the G-glyph of 𩜯 (廣韻): ⿰饣叜.

I suggest we encode ⿰饣叜 instead per new evidence, change IDS to ⿰饣叜 and update the glyph accordingly.

U+2972F
02111
02111
水 85.15
18 · ㇑ (2)
UK-20910
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3
00286
00286
戈 62.9
12 · ㇒ (3)
UK-20930
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 62 戈, for the whole surrounding component.
01644
01644
方 70.9
13 · ㇒ (3)
UK-20961
𮕦
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IDS could be ⿰方⿱𮕦一. (𮕦=U+2E566)
00450
00450
口 30.4
7 · ㇠ (5)
UTC-03197
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 4.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 7.
04242
04242
門 169.14
22 · ㇠ (5)
V0-4925
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=14, TS=22
01212
01212
工 48.9
11 · ㇠ (5)
V4-4725
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TC=12.
02566
02566
生 100.5
10 · ㇔ (4)
V4-4E2B
Total Stroke Count
Henry CHAN
Individual
TS=11

According to IRGN954AR #13, the left part of 礼 is counted as 5 strokes:
03285
03285
臼 134.13
19 · ㇒ (3)
V4-525E
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
03389
03389
艸 140.11
15 · ㇐ (1)
V4-532B
𫇰
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
04281
04281
阜 170.14
17 · ㇔ (4)
V4-5657
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=17
00086
00086
乙 5.11
12 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F0013
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2 is correct
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
00104
00104
二 7.8
10 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F0019
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3 according to IRGN954AR

FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=3 according to IRGN954AR
00153
00153
人 9.7
9 · ㇠ (5)
VN-F0026
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1 or 4
00556
00556
口 30.10
13 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F00AA
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=5
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree FS=5
00977
00977
女 38.8
11 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F012C
𭁈
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 12 八 as the right side is the semantic.
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
女 is the phonetic, but it is such an obvious radical that no one would every look for this under radical 12.
01269
01269
广 53.14
17 · ㇒ (3)
VN-F0191
广
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿸广⿱殸夊 will be better

This character is the variant of 慶, and the bottom of 慶 is 夊 not 夂.
IDS
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
I think the IDS should be keep as ⿸广⿱殸夂 based on the glyph.
IDS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with #1531.
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
Agree with #1531.
01365
01365
心 61.11
14 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F01CC
𭁈𰀁
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
Change IDS to ⿰忄𱑏 once Unicode 15.0 is released.
02137
02137
水 85.18
21 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F0304
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IDS should be changed to ⿰氵𧢄.
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Not opposed to changing IDS, but it's not clear what the benefit is. The current IDS, 漂見, follows the analysis of the dictionary compiler, as he notes "(phiêu kiến)". Historically, 漂 was used first alone, then the component 見 was added to distinguish it.
02645
02645
疒 104.15
20 · ㇔ (4)
VN-F038F
广
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
⿸疒廠
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Evidence shows 欠 on the right side of 尚, so ⿸疒廠 is not an accurate IDS
02688
02688
目 109.4
9 · ㇒ (3)
VN-F03A0
𫜵
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰目𫜵.
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The IDS mentioned by Ken is reasonable.
IDS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Agree to change of IDS.
02796
02796
石 112.13
18 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F03D3
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 13.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 18.
03053
03053
糸 120.5
11 · ㇒ (3)
VN-F043B
Residual Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC = 5
Total Stroke Count
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TC = 11
03755
03755
角 148.12
19 · ㇠ (5)
VN-F0547
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=12, FS=5
03874
03874
足 157.4
11 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F0577
𧾷
Residual Stroke Count
Henry CHAN
Individual
SC=5, TS=12.
以 is counted as 5 strokes by Kangxi.
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Agree with Henry, I thought we were following Kangxi.
04043
04043
酉 164.21
28 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F05BC
𧃲
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
04456
04456
食 184.10
18 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F063B
𭓇
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=10
04552
04552
鬼 194.4
14 · ㇠ (5)
VN-F0652
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=14
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree: TS=14
04703
04703
鳥 196.6
17 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F0694
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=4
04779
04779
鳥 196.13
24 · ㇒ (3)
VN-F06AE
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=12, TS=23
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The SC should be counted as 粵 U+7CB5 not 粤 U+7CA4, so keep the current data for SC and TS.
04828
04828
鹵' 197'.11
18 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F06B7
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 197' 卤
00388
00388
卜 25.16
18 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F0722
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 194 鬼
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
While I agree that 194 鬼 is more intuitive, current IRG rules require using a radical found in the semantic element. This character means "to divine" and represents a word that is probably an ancient borrowing of 卦 from Chinese, so the radical for 卦 is more appropriate. 194 鬼 can be a secondary radical.
02042
02042
水 85.9
12 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F0732
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
Change IDS to ⿰汫⿱⿵𠆢丶𰆊 if the rhs is not 令. If the rhs is a form of 令 then normalize the glyph to use the standard V form of 令.
00530
00530
口 30.9
13 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F077D
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Might be ⿰口⿷匚⿱口田?
03448
03448
艸 140.13
17 · ㇔ (4)
VN-F092B
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 13.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 17.
01074
01074
小 42.5
8 · ㇠ (5)
VN-F0B84
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=4.
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
According to the Unihan data, 巴 is 4 strokes and 少 is the radical 42 with 1 residual stroke, so it seems that SC=5 is correct.
00036
00036
丿 4.11
12 · ㇠ (5)
VN-F0BE9
𠂊丿𰀁
IDS
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Suggest alternatively ⿳⺈𠔿𠂡
02604
02604
疒 104.4
9 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F0CFD
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿸疒內.
02992
02992
竹 118.22
28 · ㇒ (3)
VN-F1600
Residual Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change SC to 22.
Total Stroke Count
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change TC to 28.
03872
03872
足 157.4
11 · ㇠ (5)
VN-F1629
𧾷
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
〾⿰𧾷弔 will be better.
00130
00130
人 9.2
4 · ㇠ (5)
VN-F163D
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=3 according to IRGN954AR

00109
00109
戈 62.11
15 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F1650
Radical
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 62 戈 following 我. This is a basic Vietnamese first person pronoun.
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with radical 62.
00339
00339
力 19.10
12 · ㇒ (3)
VN-F169D
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Agree, FS=2
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FS=2
04217
04217
門' 169'.4
7 · ㇒ (3)
VN-F16AA
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 169' 门
01079
01079
小 42.9
12 · ㇔ (4)
VN-F16AB
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=8.
03257
03257
肉 130.11
15 · ㇠ (5)
VN-F175F
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change Radical to 30 口?
03296
03296
舛 136.4
10 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F17AF
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS should be 3
01077
01077
小 42.9
12 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F17F7
IDS
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IDS should be ⿱小⿰扌⿻冘二.
01221
01221
己 49.13
16 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F1828
Residual Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=10.
Total Stroke Count
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TC=13.
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
爲 and 為 are unifiable, and they should be counted as 爲 for SC. There is no need to change.
03995
03995
辵 162.14
18 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F1843
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=18
01329
01329
心 61.6
10 · ㇠ (5)
VN-F1871
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
U+21756 𡝖 (entry above in the evidence) is under R38 女 so it would make sense for this character to also be under R38.
01249
01249
幺 52.16
19 · ㇒ (3)
VN-F187B
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
Change IDS to ⿰𱥯幾 once Unicode 15.0 has been published.
04773
04773
鳥 196.12
23 · ㇔ (4)
VN-F1898
𢧐
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=23
Total Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Based on Unihan data, 鳥 is TC=11 and 𢧐 is TC=12, so TC for this character should be 23.
01809
01809
木 75.9
13 · ㇒ (3)
VN-F1987
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
04438
04438
風' 182'.8
12 · ㇒ (3)
VN-F1992
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=1
01912
01912
止 77.15
19 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F199F
Radical
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
Change Radical to 51 干

The radical of 年 is 51.0, which is the semantic element, and the phonetic element is 歲.
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
SC=16
FS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS=2
02031
02031
水 85.8
11 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F19B9
IDS
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Could the IDS be ⿲氵扌⿻冖丸 despite the position of the dot?
02679
02679
皿 108.10
15 · ㇔ (4)
VN-F1A5C
Residual Stroke Count
Henry CHAN
Individual
盗 and 盜 are unifiable, it may be better to count by 盜 per Kangxi for consistency. In that case, SC=11, TS=16.
02683
02683
皿 108.19
24 · ㇔ (4)
VN-F1A5D
Residual Stroke Count
Henry CHAN
Individual
盗 and 盜 are unifiable, it may be better to count by 盜 per Kangxi for consistency. In that case, SC=20, TS=25.
03066
03066
糸 120.7
13 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F1AD0
FS
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
FS should be 5
03114
03114
糸 120.13
19 · ㇠ (5)
VN-F1AD7
IDS
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Change IDS to ⿰糹𦁀.
IDS
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It's better to keep the current IDS because of the rationale, which the semantic element is 絲 and the phonetic element is 貝.

If the we use ⿰糹𦁀 as the IDS, it will make the people think the semantic element is 糹(糸), the phonetic element is 𦁀, and the shape of the middle element should be near to 糹 not current 糸.
02669
02669
皮 107.12
17 · ㇔ (4)
VN-F1B65
Residual Stroke Count
Henry CHAN
Individual
SC=13, TS=18.

According to IRGN954AR, the left hand side of 補 should be counted as 6 strokes, so SC=13, TS=18.
Residual Stroke Count
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Our original submission was SC=13. Suggest changing back.
03794
03794
谷 150.15
22 · ㇔ (4)
VN-F1B77
Residual Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=15
03803
03803
牙 92.11
15 · ㇒ (3)
VN-F1B7E
Residual Stroke Count
Henry CHAN
Individual
SC=12, TS=16.
03981
03981
辵 162.11
15 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F1B85
Radical
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
it looks like the radical should be 154 貝, which “近” is the phonetic component.
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character means "near", so 近 is actually semantic and phonetic. The text in the evidence describes this as an E1 structure. This is what Prof. Hồng calls "đẳng lập hội ý" (等立會意). In this case, the character is compounded of 近 for its primary meaning and, by assimilation, the radical of 賒 "xa", which means "far". The assimilation reflects the fact that the 2 characters often appear together in the word "gần xa" (near and far, here and there, etc.). 154 貝 would be appropriate as a second radical, but based on the semantic, the primary radical should remain 162 辵
03838
03838
貝 154.16
23 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F1B89
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=23
03795
03795
谷 150.17
24 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F1BBE
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=24
04237
04237
門 169.11
19 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F1BD9
𭁈𰀁
IDS
Andrew WEST
UK
Change IDS to ⿰門𱑏 once Unicode 15.0 is released.
01904
01904
欠 76.10
14 · ㇔ (4)
VN-F1BDD
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 169.1 (门), SC=11, FS=3
04483
04483
首 185.12
21 · ㇠ (5)
VN-F1C13
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=21
04539
04539
髟 190.12
22 · ㇠ (5)
VN-F1C1C
Total Stroke Count
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=22
04903
04903
鼎 206.14
27 · ㇑ (2)
VN-F1CD9
Residual Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
SC=14
Total Stroke Count
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
TS=27

鼎 was counted as 13 in KX.
01278
01278
弋 56.8
11 · ㇐ (1)
VN-F1CFE
Radical
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Change Radical to 126.0 (而), SC=5, FS=1
Radical
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
126.0 (而) would be a natural way to look this up and should be an alternate radical. However, the meaning of this character is "two" and 而 is phonetic, so based on IRG rules, the best radical might be 7.0 (二), SC=9, FS=1
Radical
Andrew WEST
UK
I'm not sure what IRG rules you are referring to. However, IRG PnP §2.2.1 d. (5) c) states:

"If the technically correct (aka semantic) radical for an ideograph hampers its discoverability, or is region-dependent, the primary radical shall be assigned as though made by an ideograph expert who is neither a specialist in the history of the Han script nor familiar with ideograph etymology. The technically correct radical can be assigned as a second radical. Both are shown in the code charts, though the primary one serves as the basis for ordering within a CJK Unified Ideographs block."

Therefore, in this case the primary radical should be R126 而.


Evidence

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
02871
02871
禾 115.7
12 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00228
Unclear evidence response
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Luckily, I get one copy of the book and scan it myself. It is very clear that the character is ⿰禾岙:

02878
02878
禾 115.8
13 · ㇠ (5)
GDM-00230
𭖔
Unclear evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Evidence is unclear. I cannot make out whether the right side is 𭖔 or not, and as 𭖔 is not a component used in any other character it is not obvious that it should be 𭖔 here. Please provide additional evidence showing clearer images of the character.
Unclear evidence response
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The zoomed picture:

and page 450 of the same book:

01792
01792
木 75.8
12 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00239
𰿖
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
Please provide the source for the evidence image (title, publisher, year, page)
01810
01810
木 75.9
13 · ㇔ (4)
GDM-00240
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please confirm the source names.
01811
01811
木 75.9
13 · ㇔ (4)
GDM-00242
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
Isn't there some question about the suitability of 汉字海 as a reliable source? I think it can be used as secondary evidence, but I would prefer to see additional evidence for ⿰木弯 as a place name.
01008
01008
女 38.13
16 · ㇠ (5)
GDM-00244
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please correct the source name. The evidence is not cited from 《全宋文》.
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
吉巷乡 and 卓洋乡 are both in 福建省宁德市古田县.
02065
02065
水 85.10
13 · ㇔ (4)
GDM-00248
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
Add image of web page cited in #5128

01119
01119
山 46.6
9 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00249
Misidentified glyph
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This is not a 八辅 charactor.
01109
01109
山 46.4
7 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00250
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
《湖北省郧县地名志》 will be better as the evidence.
01146
01146
山 46.8
11 · ㇔ (4)
GDM-00251
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The place mentioned in the evidence should be 山底村.

The evidence mentioned a road / highway in Liquan County, Xianyang City, Shaanxi Province (陕西省咸阳市礼泉县). This road / highway is similar to current 凤凰大道.


▲ 仪门寺 to 山底村 (AMAP)


▲ 仪门寺 to 赵镇 (AMAP)


▲ 赵镇 to 山底村 (AMAP)

The National Database for Geographical Names of China provides the naming reason of 山底村 is to live at the south foot of Mountain Jiuzong (以居九嵕山之阳山底得名).


▲ National Database for Geographical Names of China


▲ National Database for Geographical Names of China

So, I suspect it is a non-existent character based on the evidence.
00901
00901
土 32.13
16 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00293
𤲞
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
《江西地名》1996年第2期,江西省地名方言用字读音、含义及区域表,P37

04672
04672
魚' 195'.8
16 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00300
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Where does the only one evidence cite from? 闽侯县地名录 or 福建省地名全册?

Note that the current evidence is acceptable, and this character should be encoded. The reason why I need to know the real source is that I want to add the language usage label. If this character is used in 闽侯县, it should be a character used for 闽东方言.
00951
00951
大 37.5
8 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00306
Unclear evidence
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The right hand side of the evidence shows ⿱⿵大一目.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It's 日, not 目.
01038
01038
宀 40.7
10 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00312
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
It looks the variant of 崁.

The evidence shows the character is used for the geographic name in the southern end of Taiwan Island. As the famous historical and cultural site, 赤崁樓 / 赤嵌樓, 崁 and 嵌 are common in Taiwan. If one character used for the common geographic names in Taiwan, TCA should handle this character well. In fact, this character has not been included in CNS 11643 yet.
03825
03825
貝 154.9
13 · ㇐ (1)
GDM-00316
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
陆丰文史 第九辑,p130
01186
01186
山 46.13
16 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00343
𤲞
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
江西省广昌县地名志,P226-227

According to the evidence, ⿱山畬 and ⿱山𤲞 has the meaning of 斜坡. They are congnate but have the different meaning of 畬.
In place names, 畬、畲 and 𤲞 can be used as each other. But there are not too many pairs.
As I know,
For radical 土, there are 𰊮(U+302AE), ⿰土畲 and ⿰土𤲞;
For radical 山, there are ⿰山畬、⿰山𤲞、⿱山畬(WS2017)、⿱山𤲞.
However, 𤲞 is also a variant of 番 which means ⿰土𤲞 can be a variant of 墦, ⿰山𤲞 can be a variant of 嶓.
Considering people will more likely to think 余 and ⿱人米 as different characters, I suggest we encode them seperately.
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
http://www.koreanhistory.or.kr/newchar/list_view.jsp?code=70922
I think here is a case that ⿰土𤲞 is a variant of a 墦 (坟):
00367
00367
十 24.2
4 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00344
Evidence
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Evidence apparently not 集韻考正. Where is it from?
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I really don't think this is sufficient evidence for encoding. I would like to see evidence of actual use in printed text, demonstrating that there really is a need to encode this character. If IRG considers that local-use vulgar simplifications can be encoded on the basis of unverified second-hand evidence such as this, then there are hundreds and hundreds of Part 2 second stage simplified characters for which there is a stronger case for encoding.
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence posted is from
江西省公安厅一处 编纂:《江西方言土语汇集》第五册,1991年3月,P224
⿱十八 is a common character used widely in the Sourth of China.
Another evidence:
江苏省公安厅江苏方言总汇编写委员会:江苏方言总汇 上卷,北京:中国文联出版公司,1998年9月,P1860
00368
00368
十 24.2
4 · ㇒ (3)
GDM-00350
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
古今錢略
02989
02989
竹 118.17
23 · ㇑ (2)
GDM-00358
𨗩
Unclear evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Evidence is not clear.
Unclear evidence response
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I think it is clear enough; please zoom the image by clicking it.
Unclear evidence response
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
02927
02927
竹 118.6
12 · ㇠ (5)
GDM-00359
Unclear evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
The image is not clear, though the reading "lèi", does suggest the component 厽. Is it possible to get clearer evidence?
00771
00771
囗 31.6
9 · ㇔ (4)
GDM-00365
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Additional evidence from a Japanese source noted on twitter :

The character here is also a simplification for U+571D 圝.
04633
04633
魚 195.11
22 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00213
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please show the whole page of this evidence.
04628
04628
魚 195.11
22 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00214
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 《通州志》,天一閣藏明萬曆刻本,第四卷

Note that 通州 here means current Nantong City (南通市) in Jiangsu Province, not Tongzhou District in Beijing City.
04621
04621
魚 195.10
21 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00219
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Reposted from #2156:

I suspect it is a misprint of 鰈. The evidence has 西鶼東~. 《文心雕龍·封禪》has 西鶼東鰈.



文心雕龍(四部叢刊景上海涵芬樓藏明刊本)卷5 folio 1

Suggest pending more evidences.
04581
04581
魚 195.6
17 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00223
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
It is the the variant of 鯁 based on Evidence 1, 鮫 based on Evidence 2.


▲ 張芹:《備遺錄》,豫章叢書


▲ 張芹:《備遺錄》,四庫全書本


▲ 《續文獻通考》,明萬曆刻本,卷二百三十六


▲ 《松江府志》,嘉慶二十二年明倫堂刻本,卷六
04599
04599
魚 195.8
19 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00225
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Reposted from #2158



太平御覽(四部叢刊中華學藝社借照日本帝室圖書寮京都東福寺東京靜嘉堂文庫藏宋刊本)卷937 folio 1

太平御覽 gives very similar text

「《毛詩義疏》曰:鱮,似魴而大頭,魚之不美者。故里語曰:『買魚得鱮,不如啖茹。』」

Suggest pending more evidences.
04630
04630
魚 195.11
22 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00231
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please show the whole page of the evidence.
04607
04607
魚 195.9
20 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00233
New evidence
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


《忠肅集》,光緖乙卯[1879],王氏謙德堂校刊本。
https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&file=106745&page=577
04660
04660
魚 195.17
28 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00236
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The second source should be 《野記》 written by 祝允明 (aka 祝枝山).

He recorded the seafood he had eaten in the Lingnan (嶺南) in this book. Maybe Lingnan here means Guangdong.
04637
04637
魚 195.12
23 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00239
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Under the entry of 鰈 in 《正字通》, the other name of 水晶魚 should be 鱵 which is cited from 《臨海志》. It looks it is a modern type for 鱵.


▲ 張自烈:《正字通》,清畏堂原板,卷十二

Note that 水晶魚 means 銀魚 (salangid) currently, and which is called as 白飯魚 in HKSAR. It is different from 水晶魚 mentioned in 《正字通》.
04659
04659
魚 195.17
28 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00240
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please show the whole page of the evidence.
04642
04642
魚 195.12
23 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00242
𰕎
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The poem mentioned in the evidence means the 梁太子蕭統’s work 《大言》: “觀脩鯤其若轍鮒,視滄海之如濫觴。經二儀而跼蹐,跨六合以翱翔。” All the version of this poem in the ancient books show that position is 轍. Here is a modern typo, so we should remove this character.


▲ 謝榛:《詩家直説》,明萬曆刻本,卷二


▲ 謝榛:《詩家直説》,清光緒刻本,卷二
04634
04634
魚 195.11
22 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00243
宿
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
類化字 of 縮?


▲ 劉學箕:《方是閒居士詞》,民國彊村叢書,一卷

The whole poem is shown as below.

漁家傲 白湖觀捕魚

漢水悠悠還漾漾,漁翁出没穿風浪,千尺絲綸垂兩槳,收又放,月明長在煙波上。
釣得活鱗鯿縮項,篘成玉液香浮盎,醉倒自歌歌自唱,輕嫋纜,碧蘆紅蓼清灘傍。

鯿縮項 means 縮項鯿, which is 武昌魚 (Bluntnose black bream) in modern Chinese.
04588
04588
魚 195.7
18 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00244
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The evidence shows this kind of fish is related to 鮓魚, so it should be related to 海蜇 (jellyfish) as well.

Maybe it is a modern typo for 蜇.
04631
04631
魚 195.11
22 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00246
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please show the whole page of the evidence.
03439
03439
艸 140.14
18 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00249
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Error form for U+8613 蘓. Do not encode on the basis of this evidence.
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
03651
03651
虫 142.14
20 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00252
Evidence
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Kangxi gives a different form:


Which one is correct?
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
五音集字 is authored by 汪朝恩, the earliest known published version is 道光十三年(1833年)刊本. The text probably comes from 字彙補 but 字彙補 gives 𧑳, as is quoted in 康熙字典:



{{https://ia600307.us.archive.org/15/items/02076809.cn/02076809.cn.pdf 字彙補}} 51/52

I suspect ~ is a misprint of 𧑳, consider pending more evidences.
04640
04640
魚 195.12
23 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00258
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the full unclipped evidence, especially where is the text quoted from.
04597
04597
魚 195.8
19 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00259
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the full unclipped evidence, especially where is the text quoted from.
04574
04574
魚 195.4
15 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00261
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The full page is shown as below for Evidence 1 & 2. It is easy to know the right phonetic component is 天 not 夭, because the pronunciation is 填. So the glyph should be changed to ⿰魚天 not ⿰魚夭.

𤘠 for 牛, ⿰馬天 for 馬, ⿰魚天 for 魚.



⿰魚天 is also a Japanese character, but I have not found the original source for the Japanese use.

04680
04680
魚' 195'.11
19 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00288
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Chongwu is a town under Hui’an County, Quanzhou City (泉州市惠安县). I don’t have the materials on the Chongwu dialect, but we can see the Nan’an dialect which is one Min nan dialect of Nan’an City, Quanzhou City (泉州市南安市).

In Nan’an dialect, “吻” reads as bun⁵⁵, “本” reads as pun⁵⁵. It is acceptable for me that the local people use 笨 as the phonetic element.
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
My friend whose mother comes from Hui’an County and has always lived in Minnan dialect area tole me that 笨 reads as pun¹¹ there. This character shares the same pronunciation.
01586
01586
鳥 196.8
19 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00293
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please show the full page of the evidence.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
The evidence is insufficient. Firstly, please show the full page of the evidence. Secondly please show the original source that is being quoted so we can be sure that character shown in the modern source is not a mistake.
04757
04757
鳥 196.11
22 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00294
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+9D85


Variant/misprint of 鶅? Note that 笛 is very similar to ⿱𡿧田 (甾 + VS19).

See 鶅 on ctext:

太平御覽(靜嘉堂藏宋刊本)卷917 folio 5:「西方曰鷷,東方曰緇(音緇衣之緇)」緇/鶅 share the same phonetic element.

春秋左傳正義(清同治刊本)卷48 folio 8:「西方曰鷷雉,東方曰鶅雉,南方曰翟雉」

An original evidence from 寶慶本草折衷 would help to ensure it is not a modern misprint.
04759
04759
鳥 196.11
22 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00297
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The evidence is insufficient to judge if it's a typo.
04770
04770
鳥 196.12
23 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00304
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
What does the second evidence cite from?
04739
04739
鳥 196.9
20 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00309
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The character is not included in the first evidence. The scholar mentioned the second evidence was a famous historian in Japan. The followings are his books.


The name was written as 桑原𨽥藏 by 岩波書店 in 1935.
https://book.kongfz.com/535541/4390005805/


The name was written as 桑原隲藏 by 商務印書館.
https://book.kongfz.com/565592/4500160884/


The name was also written as 桑原隲藏 by 岩波書店 in 1968.
https://book.kongfz.com/271942/4788602597/


The name was also written as 桑原𨽥藏 by 臺灣商務印書館 in 1971.
https://book.kongfz.com/446938/4381053120/


The name was written as 桑原骘藏 by 中華書局 in 2007.
https://book.kongfz.com/517/4421072712/


The name was also written as 桑原隲藏 by 中華書局 in 2009.
https://book.kongfz.com/351791/4657623042/


The name was written as 桑原骘藏 by 科学出版社 in 2019.
https://book.kongfz.com/268892/3685037725/

All the books are not related to the submitted character, so it is not better to encode it.
03499
03499
虍 141.11
17 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00314
Misidentified glyph
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The annotated ideograph in the evidence looks like it includes 烏 as a component, whereas the ideograph below it definitely includes 鳥 as a component.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the whole page of this evidence, as it difficult to understand the meaning of the character from this small extract.
01408
01408
鳥 196.9
20 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00318
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
It is difficult to trust the modern edition of the text as experience shows that modern editions often introduce glyph errors or create imaginary characters. Therefore, please show an image of the original text, apparently from 《明憲宗純皇帝實錄卷之六十八》.
04768
04768
鳥 196.12
23 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00320
&P9-01;
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
12 pieces of evidence but only one source name.
04691
04691
鳥 196.4
15 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00324
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Evidence 2 and Evidence 3 are one piece.

4 pieces of evidence, but only one source.
00217
00217
鳥 196.6
17 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00326
Evidence
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
misprint of “鵝” ?
“天鵝,鵠也。”
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The supplementary evidence for Comment #3020 is showed as below.



▲ 《字課圖説》,光緒三十年澄衷蒙學堂石印本,卷三
Evidence
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Very probable that it is a misprint of 鵝 from the evidence.
04731
04731
鳥 196.9
20 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00327
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The character looks like the variant of 鰂 in the first evidence, which the word means 烏賊/烏鰂 (squid). It is not related to the Cantonese word zak1 (e.g. 鰂魚涌 in HKSAR). If my understand is reasonable, the current radical is questionable.

In the second evidence, the head character should be the variant of 鷺. When I check the relative sentences of 鷺 in the ancient books, I found the following in 爾雅. So many books cited this sentence to explain 鷺. Maybe they are two characters there.


▲ 《爾雅疏》,四部叢刊本,卷第十
03179
03179
羽 124.11
17 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00328
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]

宋版史记一百三十卷本
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The new evidence shows an error form. The quoted poem actually has "白鳥翯翯". My personal rule is not to accept for encoding error forms only attested in a single edition (cf. my comment to UK-20004). I would only accept this character for encoding if additional evidence could be supplied that demonstrates that it is not an error form or that it is an error form that has been transmitted widely enough to be considered a "stable error".
04775
04775
鳥 196.13
24 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00335
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
4 pieces of evidence, but only one source name.
04752
04752
鳥 196.10
21 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00369
Evidence
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=9021&page=135
《埤雅》,《四庫全書》
04707
04707
鳥 196.6
17 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00376
Unclear evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
While the image is clear, it would be helpful if we could see more of the context. Is there more text in the commentary, or does it just say 音鴙? If that's all, then, given the similar shape and reading, is this in fact a variant of 鴙?
04516
04516
馬 187.20
30 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00378
New evidence
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇海
https://archive.org/details/02076730.cn/page/n42/mode/2up
00675
00675
口 30.15
18 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00385
UK-20677
New evidence
L F CHENG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
華英通語

https://dcollections.lib.keio.ac.jp/sites/all/libraries/uv/uv.php?archive=FKZ&id=F7-A01-02#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=47&r=0&z=1048.314%2C1832.5365%2C691.408%2C531.18
https://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/898727/147

04814
04814
鳥' 196'.10
15 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00393
Evidence
Henry CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Misprint of 骘? What is the main entry for 陰~ in this source?
03519
03519
虫 142.5
11 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00401
New evidence
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
CNS11643 中文全字庫
03526
03526
虫 142.6
12 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00403
Unclear evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Can clearer evidence be supplied?
03604
03604
虫 142.11
17 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00404
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It would be useful to see the complete image of the evidence, not just a tiny clip.
03606
03606
虫 142.11
17 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00425
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+8729


Misprint of 蜩?

Attached PDF file

宋景文公筆記(文淵閣四庫全書本)卷下葉6:「鶬鶊鳴春,蟋蟀唫夏,蜩蟧喝秋,螘子戰隂。」
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Seems to be an error form for 蜩 (cf. https://baike.baidu.hk/item/%E8%9C%A9%E8%9F%A7/4697910). DO not encode without additional evidence that the character is correct or is a stable error.
03516
03516
虫 142.5
11 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00428
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the full page for the evidence in order to better understand the meaning of the proposed character.
03608
03608
虫 142.11
17 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00430
Unclear evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Can clearer evidence be supplied?
Unclear evidence response
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
只恐双溪舴艋舟,载不动许多愁。
——李清照《武陵春》
03559
03559
虫 142.8
14 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00435
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The Ningpo Syllabary(宁波方言音节),P28
03666
03666
虫 142.19
25 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00448
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It would be helpful if the complete evidence was provided, not just a tiny clip.
03518
03518
虫 142.5
11 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00471
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the full page for the evidence in order to better understand the meaning of the proposed character.
03660
03660
虫 142.16
22 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00473
Unclear evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Can clearer evidence be supplied?
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The character is obviously a mistake/variant of U+8811 蠑 in the word 蠑螈 'salamander'. Is this single piece of evidence sufficient for encoding?
03667
03667
虫 142.19
25 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00477
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It would be helpful to see the whole page of the evidence, in order to better understand the meaning of the character.
04074
04074
金 167.7
15 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00492
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Please confirm the source name.
04068
04068
金 167.5
13 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00494
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
6 pieces of evidence, but only one source name. At lease, the last one evidence is cited from 《補註洗冤録集證》.
04181
04181
金 167.14
22 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00497
𮭲
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The first piece of evidence is wrong.
04069
04069
金 167.6
14 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00504
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The first evidence is not cited from 《中華字海》.
02370
02370
犬 94.8
11 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00546
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


▲ 三晋文字编. pp. 616

The character is a transcription of the seal script form from 《中國古印:程訓義古璽印集存》.
02423
02423
犬 94.12
15 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00552
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
The full reference for the source should be provided (author, title, publisher, year), as well as the name of the author and title for the piece in which this character occurs.
02390
02390
犬 94.9
12 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00555
TB-5027
Unclear evidence
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Missing Evidence.
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
This character occurs in Japanese sources for the name of the Chuja Islands 楸子群島 in Korea (source twitter):

02400
02400
犬 94.9
12 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00557
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is also used for Taiwanese Hokkien as shown in {{https://xiaoxue.iis.sinica.edu.tw/download/files/WSL_TPS_Huibian.pdf 新編台灣閩南語用字彙編}} p. 196:
02410
02410
犬 94.10
13 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00558
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
Complete reference for the source (author, title, publisher, year) would be useful. It would also be interesting to see the complete page, and not just a tiny extract.
02391
02391
犬 94.9
12 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00559
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
五音集字 is authored by 汪朝恩, the earliest known published version is 道光十三年(1833年)刊本.

The text possibly comes from 康熙字典. 康熙字典(清康熙內府刊本) gives



𤠏……本作㺁或作𧳦𧳺, quoted from 集韻.

I suspect ⿰犭⿱册止 is a misprint of 𤠏, consider pending more evidences.
02457
02457
犬 94.16
19 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00560
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Can you provide the full evidence? The only complete text is 「……包肚皮,係用~皮所製」, what is made of ~皮? Which year of 中国经济年鉴?
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
Current evidence is insufficient. Please provide complete page of the evidence so we can properly evaluate the proposed character.
02402
02402
犬 94.10
13 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00565
New evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
集韻卷五 has U+25855 𥡕

02335
02335
犬 94.5
8 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00566
𡗕
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
The wrong ideograph is highlighted in Evidence 3.
New evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
02458
02458
犬 94.17
20 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00572
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence is quote from 《禮記・樂記》, however I didn't find any version of 禮記 that gives ⿰犭優.

Attached PDF file
附釋音禮記註疏(元泰定, 致和間刊 明遞修)卷39葉1 gives 獶.

Attached PDF file
纂圖互註禮記(南宋刊 (建安))卷11葉16 gives 優, in the annotation it gives 獶.

Attached PDF file
禮記注䟽挍勘記(清嘉慶刊本)卷39葉1

Furthermore, 阮元's 禮記注䟽挍勘記 does not mention ⿰犭優. He notes that 「各本同石經」and gives 獶, so we can conclude that he didn't see any 禮記 version giving ⿰犭優.

I suggest pending original evidences from a specific version of 禮記, in order to rule out the possibility that ⿰犭優 is a modern misprint of 獶.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
The current evidence is insufficient. Please provide an image from an edition of 禮記 which shows this character. Otherwise it should be postponed pending additional evidence.
02434
02434
犬 94.13
16 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00573
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Any update?
01844
01844
木 75.12
16 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00575
𭸟
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
Is it possible to see what other editions of 集韻 give? My suspicion is that ⿰木𭸟 is a corrupt form of some other character, perhaps U+23682 𣚂.
02430
02430
犬 94.12
15 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00579
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
U+733C


I suspect it is a misprint of 猼.

The evidence is quote from 《史記·司馬相如列傳》. 說文字母集解 is authored 井上夬菴 by published in 寬保01年(1741).

Attached PDF file
史記(南宋建安黃善夫家塾刊本)卷117 folio 6 gives 猼.

Attached PDF file
史記(宋刊本)卷117 folio 4 gives 猼.

史記(清武英殿刊本) also gives 猼.

According to the evidence, ⿰犭尊且 is synonym of 巴且. Assuming the phonetic component is 尊, 尊/巴 are pronounced very differently, while 尃/巴 are much more similar.

Consider pending more evidences.
02412
02412
犬 94.10
13 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00583
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Which version of 廣雅 does the evidence come from? I checked both 畢效欽明刊本、文淵閣四庫全書本、寶曆07年刊本, all of them give 嫁.

Attached PDF file
廣雅(畢效欽明刊本)卷3 folio 2

Attached PDF file
廣雅(文淵閣四庫全書本)卷3 folio 3

Attached PDF file
廣雅(寶曆07年刊本)卷3 folio 15

BTW, the character is used in 反切, which should be a common character.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
This appears to be a one-off error for 嫁. Therefore suggest to postpone pending additional evidence.
02407
02407
犬 94.10
13 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00590
New evidence
KWAN Ching Kit
Individual Contributor
Found in https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/稲荷山古墳出土鉄剣.
(Extract from a textbook: https://twitter.com/tubatuubaa/status/1508748190094278661)
02450
02450
犬 94.15
18 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00599
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The third evidence does not match IDS, instead it gives ⿰犭腎. Based on current evidence, ⿰犭腎 is a variant of ⿰犭賢.
02443
02443
犬 94.14
17 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00621
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual


▲ 乾隆大理府志卷12 folio 7 // 故宮珍本叢刊 v. 230

玀⿰犭舞 is same with 玀⿰犭武(雍正廣西通志90:2). Alternative words are 羅武(康熙楚雄州志1:40) and 羅婺(乾隆雲南通志24:30).
02371
犬 94.8
11 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00582
Evidence accepted, IRG 57.
03279
03279
至 133.8
14 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00626
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence appears to show that these three characters are vulgar forms of some other character, but the extract does not show what it is. Can the full page for the evidence be provided so we can better understand the meaning of these characters ?

Also, why are ⿰至及 and ⿰至支 not also proposed for encoding? It seems pointless to encode ⿰至戾 but not the two other characters in the same extract.
04825
04825
鹵 197.4
15 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00631
New evidence
NG Hou Man
University of Macau
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


成化丁亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇海
https://archive.org/details/02076735.cn/page/n46/mode/2up
03132
03132
缶 121.4
10 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00633
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with Huang Junliang that this is probably a corruptyed form of 缺. Suggest to postpone pending additional evidence.
04935
04935
鼠 208.10
23 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00636
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Per IRG PnP 2.1.1: "The supporting evidence for submitted characters in printed form
must be in regular scripts (楷書). Other styles cannot be used as evidence for encoding such
as clerical style, small seal, etc.."

IMO the left component of ⿰鼠鬲 is not in regular scripts.

Consider provide a new evidence of ⿰鼠鬲 in regular script.
04922
04922
鼠 208.7
20 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00643
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
There are two pieces of evidence, but there is only one book name. Please confirm the sources.
01954
01954
毛 82.13
17 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00649
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The context in the evidence looks incomplete and incorrect.


▲ 《邊裔典》,古今圖書集成,第八十四卷
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
Experience suggests that the modern edition may have an incorrect character, so please provide an image of the original text that is quoted here.
04927
04927
鼠 208.8
21 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00656
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The submitted evidence shows the glyph is ⿰鼠戻. In PRC rule, 戾 and 戻 are different characters based on 《说文解字》, which is different from Japan. It looks a typo, because the real ⿰鼠戾 is shown in the same page. The following is a piece of new evidence for normalized ⿰鼠戾.


▲ 李昉:《太平御覽》,四庫全書本,卷四十
04933
04933
鼠 208.9
22 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00657
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The evidence shows “或讹作”, so, is there any another more sufficient evidence for this character?
03813
03813
豸 153.13
20 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00659
Unclear evidence
WANG Yifan
SAT
Since this is a modern book, it is probably a misprint of 貔.
《史記》「軒轅乃修德振兵,治五氣,藝五種,撫萬民,度四方,教熊羆貔貅貙虎」
04928
04928
鼠 208.8
21 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00660
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
04924
04924
鼠 208.7
20 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00662
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Is there any other evidence for this character? We have found so many typos in 《中华大典》 during the previous meetings.
04932
04932
鼠 208.9
22 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00667
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


廣韻(四部叢刊景海鹽張氏涉園藏宋刊巾箱本)卷3 folio 10

廣韻 has 「鸓。飛生鳥。名飛且乳。一曰鼯䑕。毛紫赤。色似𮕙蝠而長」



重修政和證類本草(四部叢刊景上海涵芬樓藏金刊本)卷18 folio 14

本草 has 「陶𨼆居云。鼺是鼯䑕。一名飛生」

I suspect it is a misprint of 鼺, suggest pending more evidences.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 陳耆卿:《嘉定赤城志》,四庫全書本,卷三十六


▲ 陳耆卿:《嘉定赤城志》,清嘉慶刻本,卷三十六

The glyph looks stable in 台州.
01301
01301
彳 60.11
14 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00668
鹿
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
《八編類纂》 shows the name is 徐應鏕.


▲ 陳仁錫:《八編類纂》,明刻本,卷之二百六十
04881
04881
鹿 198.15
26 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00669
鹿
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Other evidence shows the character should be 麌 as well.


▲ 《御製詩四集》,四庫全書本,卷九十二


▲ 董誥:《皇清文穎續編》,武英殿刻本,卷首二十六(高宗純皇帝聖製詩)

BTW, does the evidence cite from 《道光承德府志》 really?
04851
04851
鹿 198.6
17 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00678
鹿𠂎
Evidence
Henry CHAN
Individual
Corrupted form of 麑? Consider withdrawing or encoding via IVS.
03789
03789
言 149.19
26 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00680
鹿
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Corrupted form of 讒. The original evidence is from 宋四名家詩選 published in 1875.



劎南詩稾(明崇禎汲古閣刊本) 卷9 folio 7b gives 讒.

Consider pending more evidences.
03483
03483
艸 140.19
22 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00681
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It would be nice to see the whole page for the evidence in order to better understand the usage of this character.
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Likely a misprint of 麕. 隨五草 is authored by 尹嘉銓(1711-1781).

The evidence has 「江汜野⿱艹麕諸篇……」, where 江汜 is 《召南·江有汜》 and 野⿱艹麕 is 《召南·野有死麕》. Consider pending more evidences.
02127
02127
水 85.17
20 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00684
鹿
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence is from 竹齋詩集(清嘉慶刊本) authored by 王冕.



▲ {{https://www.kanripo.org/text/KR4e0061/002#1a 竹齋集(文淵閣本)卷中 folio 42a}} gives 灑. I suspect ⿰氵⿱曲鹿 is a corrupted form of 灑, consider pending more evidences.
03782
03782
言 149.11
18 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00696
鹿
Unclear evidence
WANG Yifan
SAT
This is from another unknown version of 正字通, where the character at this position is 註 and looks reasonable.
http://codh.rois.ac.jp/pmjt/book/200020612/
Could you check if the text in the original evidence is authentic?

01307
01307
彳 60.14
17 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00721
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence has 「⿰巾晝,霍𱶎切,音⿰彳蒦,裂帛聲」*

⿰巾晝 should be ⿰巾畫 = 𢄶

⿰彳蒦 should be ⿰犭蒦 = 獲

The source seems to come from an ancient dictionary, however it misprints 畫 as 晝. I doubt if it is an authoritative source. Consider pending more evidences.

* 𱶎 is [ {{WS2017-03148}} ]
.
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Per Huang's 2022-01-03 comment, I agree that more evidence should be provided.
00288
00288
冫 15.11
13 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00732
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
同音字辨
石笥山房文集
皇朝文典
南湖詩文集
04824
04824
鳥' 196'.16
21 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00738
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Agree with Huang Junliang's comment (#2650). If we don't have other evidence, it's not better to encode this character.
04730
04730
鳥 196.9
20 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00739
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
As Hou Man mentioned, this character is related to U+2A13B 𪄻. The followings are the relative entries in different version of 《廣韻》



符山堂藏板 shows 䮷𪄻 and 𪇆鶺.


龍谷大學藏至正南山書院刊本 shows 𪇆鶺.


覆元泰定本 shows 𪇆𪂹.


宋乾道五年刻本 shows 𪇆&⿰眷鳥;, which the second character has been included in CNS 11643 as TB-4917.


古逸叢書覆宋本 shows 𪇆&GKJ-00739;.


四部叢刊巾箱本 shows 𪇆&GKJ-00739;.

However, the second character is under 鍾韻, and the reading is the same as 舂, so the most proper glyph should be 𪄻.
04475
04475
食' 184'.12
15 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00743
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
What the evidence described is related to 岳王庙 in Hangzhou City (杭州市). The four sinners in front of Yue Fei’s (岳飛) tomb are 秦桧/秦檜, 王氏, 张俊/張俊 and 万俟𫧯/万俟卨. ⿰饣善 is a typo here. The current evidence is insufficient for the encoding.

I don’t believe the current evidence is cited from 《中药大辞典》. If 《中药大辞典》 includes this character, please change the evidence.
03226
03226
肉 130.6
10 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00770
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]

集韵

合併字學篇韻便覽

嚴氏詩緝補義
04536
04536
髟 190.9
19 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00776
Unclear evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please identify the proposed character. It's hard to tell where it appears in the document.
03366
03366
艸 140.9
13 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00780
𣆀
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Error form for U+451C 䔜. Do not encode on this evidence.
03322
03322
艸 140.4
8 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00787
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
A quick search on the internet confirms that "黄芪" is also known as "芰草", therefore it is extremely likely that the proposed character is an error form for 芰. In this light, the evidence shown is not sufficient for encoding, and the character should be withdrawn.
02625
02625
疒 104.9
14 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00800
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


▲ {{https://repository.lib.cuhk.edu.hk/en/islandora/object/cuhk%3A655073 本草求原(清道光刊本)卷1}}
04852
04852
鹿 198.6
17 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00802
鹿𣅀
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The current evidence is not clear enough.
Unclear evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Pending for original version.
04916
04916
鼠 208.6
19 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00804
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence is certainly not from 類音/集韻. Please provide the 類音 / 集韻 evidence, I suspect ⿰鼠回 is a misprint of 𪕍. I do find 𪕍 in 集韻:



集韻(南宋潭州刊本)卷4 folio 13 平聲十五青.

U+2A54D
04661
04661
魚' 195'.2
10 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00806
Unclear evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It's hard to make out the 鱼 radical in the image provided. It's probably 鱼 given the fish name, but a clearer image would help.
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual

Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The name of this kind of fish sounds like 沙丁鱼/沙甸鱼 (Sardine) in Chinese. The current Chinese name of Herklotsichthys punctatus should be 斑点翠鳞鱼, and Sardine and “Herklotsichthys punctatus” are both included in Clupeidae (鲱科), but one is included in Sardinella (沙丁鱼属/小沙丁鱼属), the other one is included in Herklotsichthys (翠鳞鱼属).

We should pay more attention to judge if it's suitable to encode this character.
04685
04685
魚' 195'.17
25 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00807
Unclear evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It's hard to make that image out as 霜
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
P236 of the same book.

If experts think this to be unclear, I'd like to buy a hard copy and take a picture myself.
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The online Bing dictionary shows Microgadus tomcod is 大西洋霜鳕, so the current glyph looks reasonable for me.

https://cn.bing.com/dict/tomcod
03130
03130
糸' 120'.4
7 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00808
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The ideograph appears in the fourth column on the first page of the first piece of evidence, but is not highlighted.
04182
04182
金 167.14
22 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00821
Unclear evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence from 近代化学译著中的化学元素词研究 is very blurry, can you provide better evidence?
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
From 《化学阐原》,民国上海同文馆出版
04201
04201
金 167.20
28 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00822
Unclear evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence from 近代化学译著中的化学元素词研究 is very blur, can you provide better evidence?
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
From 《化学阐原》,民国上海同文馆出版
04205
04205
金 167.29
37 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00828
Unclear evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence from 近代化学译著中的化学元素词研究 is very blurry, can you provide better evidence?
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
From 《化学阐原》,民国上海同文馆出版

The glyph should be changed accordingly.
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
From 《化学阐原》,民国上海同文馆出版
04114
04114
金 167.10
18 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00830
Unclear evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence from 近代化学译著中的化学元素词研究 is very blurry, can you provide better evidence?
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
From 《化学阐原》,民国上海同文馆出版
04107
04107
金 167.9
17 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00833
Evidence
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Missing Evidence
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
If the evidence won't be provided, this character should be removed.
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I believe this character should be 𬒘(U+2C498)
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
化学原质新表(附表),《亚泉杂志》1900 年,第1期,P3
04204
04204
金 167.28
36 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00836
Unclear evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence from 近代化学译著中的化学元素词研究 is very blurry, can you provide better evidence?
Unclear evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Same comment as above
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The IDS and glyph should changed accordingly.
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
化学原质大同表,《商务报》,1900 年第10期,P6
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
化学原质新表(附表),《亚泉杂志》1900 年,第1期,P3
04071
04071
金 167.6
14 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00837
Unclear evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence from 近代化学译著中的化学元素词研究 is very blurry, can you provide better evidence?
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
From 《化学阐原》,民国上海同文馆出版
04115
04115
金 167.10
18 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00839
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The current evidence is not cited from 《化學初皆》(化學初階?).
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
As above.
04100
04100
金 167.9
17 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00840
Unclear evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence from 近代化学译著中的化学元素词研究 is very blurry, can you provide better evidence?
New evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
From 《化学阐原》,民国上海同文馆出版
02797
02797
石 112.12
17 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00880
Unclear evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
It's very difficult to make out what this character is. Is it possible to get a larger / clearer image?
00434
00434
口 30.4
7 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00911
Unclear evidence
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Did the character exist? Current Taiwanese terminology seem to use 唉.
https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/2288138/
https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/2293439/
https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/2296337/
02915
02915
立 117.9
14 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00955
Unclear evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
It's difficult to make out the shape from the image provided. It would help to get a clearer image.
03280
03280
至 133.11
17 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00973
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
As far as I can tell, the original quote given in all other sources is 至於桑野,是謂晏食。至於衡陽,是謂隅中。What is the reason that 至 is here written as ⿰至竟? Is this a weird mistake, or is there some reason for writing it this way.
01409
01409
心 61.18
22 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-00975
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The text is a list of movable types (活字), which should only consist of common characters.



農書(四庫全書本)卷22 gives 鬷.

U+9B37


As we tend to reject unencoded characters in telegraph code books, I think we should consider pending more evidences of ⿰愚㚇.
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The submitted evidence is a character list, but it's not used by the movable types. This has been confirmed by the typography history scholar Prof. Sun Mingyuan who is from Macao Polytechnic Institute.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
(元)王禎撰,《農書.農器圖譜卷二十二》(明嘉靖九年(1530)山東布政司刊本) gives ⿰愚㚇.
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
> The submitted evidence is a character list, but it's not used by the movable types.

I don't think so. The text before this list clearly indicates that it is a list of samples of movable types (活字板式):

「今載立號監韻活字板式于後。其餘五聲韻字俱要倣此」



農書(文淵閣四庫全書本)卷22
01636
01636
斤 69.8
12 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00976
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The text is quote from 《農書》. 三農紀 was published in 乾隆25年.



農書(明嘉靖刊本)卷1 folio 28 (p30) gives 斸.



農書(四庫全書本)卷2 folio 14 also gives 斸.

Based on these evidences, I guess ⿰屈斤 is a variant of 𣃁/𰕟, more evidences would be helpful.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
Based on the additonal evidence produced by Huang Junliang, it would seem that the submitted character is an error for 斸. Therefore suggest to postpone pending additional evidence.
01243
01243
干 51.9
12 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00977
𠮷
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The text is quote from 《至正河防記》. 三農紀 was published in 乾隆25年.

Attached PDF file

河防一覽(明萬曆刊本)卷6 folio 5 gives 舡.

Attached PDF file

至正河防記(中國水利工程協會, 1936) gives 舡.

Attached PDF file

新元史(中国书店, 1988)志 pp. 269 gives 船, variant of 舡.

See also {{https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=%E7%9F%B3%E8%88%B9%E5%A0%A4 Google books search results: 石船堤}}.

I guess 并 is a corrupted form of 舟, and 𠮷 may be corrupted form of 㕣. Based on these evidences, I suggest pending more evidences of ⿰并𠮷.
03372
03372
艸 140.9
13 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00978
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
From context this appears to be an error form of 葉. 《三農紀》 seems to have many error forms, and so is not a reliable source. I would not like to see this character encoded on the basis of this evidence alone.
03410
03410
艸 140.12
16 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-00983
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The text is a quote from 《管子》(See 農政全書(明崇禎初刊本)卷1 folio 6)



管子(四部叢刊景常熟瞿氏鐵琴銅劍樓藏宋刊本)卷19 folio 4 has 蘟.



▲ The evidence also gives 蘟 in subsequent text.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Error for U+861F 蘟. Do not encode on this evidence.
02313
02313
牛 93.7
11 · ㇠ (5)
GKJ-00987
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Any update?
02874
02874
禾 115.8
13 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-00989
Evidence
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Missing Evidence
02555
02555
瓦 98.11
15 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-00997
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It seems that both 𤭌 and ⿰第瓦 are used in different sources, and as 弟 and 第 are not unifiable, it is acceptable to encode ⿰第瓦 based on the original evidence and the additional evidence provided by Huang Junliang.
04486
04486
香 186.5
14 · ㇑ (2)
GKJ-01001
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
Maybe it is the variant of U+9ECF 黏.


▲ 周嘉胄:《香乘》,四庫全書本,卷二十
04036
04036
酉 164.11
18 · ㇐ (1)
GKJ-01005
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The submitted evidence looks like 《居家必用事類全集》(明隆慶二年飛來山人刻本).

This character is the variant of U+9175 酵.


▲ 朱翼中:《北山酒經》,清知不足齋叢書本,卷下


▲ 朱翼中:《北山酒經》,續古逸叢書本,卷下

This form is stable in 《居家必用事類全集》, it is OK to encode it.


▲ 《居家必用事類全集》,明隆慶二年飛來山人刻本,巳集
01612
01612
攴 66.10
14 · ㇔ (4)
GKJ-01011
𰗣
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
敘?

《新鋟抱朴子內篇四卷外篇四卷.釋滯卷八》(明萬曆間刻本)


抱朴子內篇(《平津館叢書》本)
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
The glyph in the original evidence is unclear, and the evidence produced by Conifer Tseng indicates that the character should be 敘. Therefore suggest to postpone pending additional evidence that this is not a one-off error for 敘.
04424
04424
頁' 181'.6
12 · ㇒ (3)
GKJ-01020
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
This character should be U+310A5 𱂥 according to the original context in 《方言》.


▲ 揚雄:《輶軒使者絕代語釋別國方言》,四部叢刊本,卷第十

Macao SAR submitted U+2CC43 𬱃 based on the Macao telecode book. I once clarified this issue in my further comments on IRGN2197.
https://appsrv.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/~irg/irg/irg50/IRGN2197EisoCommentsU2CC43.pdf
04259
04259
阜 170.7
10 · ㇑ (2)
GXM-00303
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
汉印文字征·卷十 P1
04117
04117
金' 167'.10
15 · ㇒ (3)
GXM-00433
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The second piece of evidence is lost in Internet.
Evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
See {{https://web.archive.org/web/20151212165149/http://fj.sina.com.cn/news/s/2015-12-05/detail-ifxmhqaa9963366.shtml Web Archive}} and {{http://dzb.hxnews.com/2015-12/05/content_334883.htm 海峽都市報}} for the second evidence.
01798
01798
木 75.8
12 · ㇒ (3)
GZ-1522413
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
The wrong ideograph is highlighted in the evidence image.
02376
02376
犬 94.8
11 · ㇑ (2)
GZ-1691202
New evidence
John Knightley
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The top of the LHS should be 止

00055
00055
乙 5.5
5 · ㇑ (2)
KC-00020
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


段甜: 《韩国固有汉字分析》, 洛阳: 中国人民解放军外国语学院(Luoyang: PLA University of Foreign Language), 2007, P. 14
New evidence
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Thanks for your additional evidence.
Evidence
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It is different glyph to U+3414 㐔.
We consider that 㐔 is changed from 高/乙
00808
00808
土 32.6
9 · ㇒ (3)
KC-00623
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
New evidence
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Thanks for your additional evidence.
01720
01720
日 72.15
19 · ㇒ (3)
KC-05180
Unclear evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
The left side of the glyph is unclear. Is there any additional evidence?
02004
02004
水 85.5
8 · ㇒ (3)
KC-05231
TC-3E43
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ 《嘉靖青州府志》,天一閣藏本,卷十

This evidence is copied from Comment #1235 on WS2021-02011
03979
03979
辵 162.11
15 · ㇑ (2)
KC-05584
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Attached PDF file

戰國策(平江路儒学元至正二十五年刊、明重修本)卷7 folio 30 (also in 四部叢刊)

The evidence supports that 逜、~、捂、梧、牾、啎、𠵦 are 假借字 among each other. I agree with Eiso on unifying ~ with 遻.
03361
03361
艸 140.8
12 · ㇠ (5)
KC-05646
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


白氏長慶集(四部叢刊景江南圖書館藏日本活字本)卷64 folio 5

The text gives 九~燈炫轉,七寳帳熒煌. A more popular version to date is 九微燈炫轉,七寳帳熒煌, yet I don't think ~ is a variant of 微.
New evidence
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
KR will provide a new evidence showing that SN 03361 is not unifiable U+5FAE 微.
~夷爭笑.
03858
03858
走 156.9
16 · ㇔ (4)
KC-05746
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
ROK said "KR will add a new KR Norm rule regarding the middle component" in #2716, but maybe it is better to normalize the whole inside component (⿰扌⿱𠂉子) to 斿, not normalize 扌 to 方.
Evidence
ROK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
KR agrees to add a new Norm rule as suggested by Eiso CHAN.
04578
04578
魚 195.5
16 · ㇑ (2)
KC-05933
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
It looks the variant of U+9B67 魧. The fanqie 何廣切 mentioned in the evidence matches 魧 basically.


▲ 《爾雅注》,四庫全書本,卷下
00115
00115
亠 8.9
11 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-04260
Unclear evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Wrong citation, the original glyph should be 褢 U+8922 in every version of 说文.


00599
00599
口 30.11
14 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-04265
𠙼
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
说文解字
01898
01898
欠 76.5
9 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-04277
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual

▲ Hoàng Triều Ân: “Từ Điển Chữ Nôm Tày”, p. 410
04267
04267
阜 170.9
12 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-04369
𡿺
Evidence
Eddie LI
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
pic2 shows ⿰阝𡿺, but pic1 shows ⿰阝⿱巛㐫 which is not matched the IDS.
Unclear evidence response
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
We believe those shapes are unifiable under Annex S.1.5.c and common in this literature, and we take the printed form as a glyph.
00249
00249
儿 10.15
17 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-04406
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Wrong citation from 爾雅.
00266
00266
冂 13.6
8 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-05651
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]

慧琳一切經音義

希麟一切經音義
03071
03071
糸 120.7
13 · ㇠ (5)
SAT-05666
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
New evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
Vietnamese character with identical shape, meaning a reel, device used in handicrafts, from "Giúp đọc Nôm và Hán Việt", p. 436



03762
03762
言 149.4
11 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-05834
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Other meaning in Chinese ancient books as below.



▲ 黄道周:《遵古本正韻石齋海篇》,崇禎藜光堂刻本,卷之十五
01610
01610
攴 66.9
13 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-05880
𰏘
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
01610 is a varuant of 敝.
龍龕手鑑(《欽定四庫全書》本)

https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=56026&page=182
00341
00341
力 19.11
13 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-06152
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
慧琳一切經音義

玄應一切經音義
01254
01254
广 53.5
8 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-06420
广
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
慧琳一切經音義
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The glyphs on the new evidence in Comment #5013 are all related to 㽽 (U+3F7D), which are not suitable for this character.
00851
00851
土 32.9
12 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-06613
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
合併字學篇韻便覽
大明正德乙亥重刊改併五音類聚四聲篇
00258
00258
八 12.7
9 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-06676
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]

Quite different in 說文.
01047
01047
宀 40.9
12 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-06842
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
慧琳 一切經音義

The glyph looks so strange, evidence 1 is not a good source.
01168
01168
山 46.11
14 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-06890
𭦌
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidences are not clear enough.The annotation is even clearer than the text.
慧琳一切經音義
玄應一切經音義
00251
00251
儿 10.18
20 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-06900
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Citation may come from two sources, 說文 or 聲類. 䰫 is not exist in the current versions of 說文, it is speculated that it is from the version of the Tang Dynasty, analysed by 說文逸字. According to
the versions of 一切經音義 the author saw at the time, 廣雅疏證 records quotations from 聲類.
No matter what source is the original one, SAT-06900 is a wrong glyph of 䰫 (U+4C2B) indeed.

廣潛研堂說文答問疏證

小學盦遺書

說文逸字

廣雅疏證
01439
01439
手 64.5
8 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-06941
𰆰
Evidence
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Characters using the component 𰆰 in our database are:

𰆰 (6 occurrences) < 支
⿰豈𰆰 (3 occurrences) < 鼓
⿰山𰆰 (1 occurrence) < 岐
⿰止𰆰 = [ {{WS2017-01820}} ]
(5 occurrences) < 歧
⿰虫𰆰 = [ {{WS2017-03847}} ]
(1 occurrences) < 蚑
⿰扌𰆰 (this) (1 occurrence)

Except for 𰆰 itself, they only appear in 1 or 2 entries but as headwords, and 𰆰 usually occurs in description of characters using it. They are all variants of common characters so that their standard forms are overwhelmingly prevalent.

Actually, the majority of occurrences in our DB is already shown in the comments of [ {{WS2017-01820}} ]
, with remaining ones attached here.


Evidence
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
We originally believed that this character stands for 技, but the corresponding text in 一字佛頂輪王經 (T0951) reads 枝掛, so this should be 枝 in this context.

Evidence
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
It may be true that this word strongly reminds 投挂 which might have triggered the alteration of radical. For example 一切經音義三種校本合刊:

Attached PDF file
00145
00145
人 9.6
8 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-07051
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Wrong citation from 说文.


04449
04449
食 184.8
16 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-07200
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The current evidence is OK, and I found this character used in other books. I still have a question. What book is 説文聲集 mentioned in the evidence? Does it mean 《説文聲系》 written by 姚文田?
03769
03769
言 149.7
14 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-08272
𠯓
New evidence
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
《和製漢字字典》
00272
00272
冖 14.4
6 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-08359
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]

常華館經說

淮南子
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]

皇清經解

新集藏經音義隨函錄
Evidence
Xieyang WANG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
FYI, this is a 钞本 I found a few days before, which may be not reliable enough. But maybe they can all be used as each other.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
疋 have 2 meanings, 匹 and 雅. The new evidence looks like a childish literacy textbooks written by a rural teacher. These kind of books are not authoritative.
03225
03225
肉 130.5
9 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-08616
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
龍龕手鏡
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]

群書校補三十九種
Still needs to confirm the meaning of the character in this new evidence.
00763
00763
囗 31.2
6 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-08642
丿
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
玄應一切經音義
01299
01299
彳 60.9
12 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-08688
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence mentions “說文(⿰彳待)待也儲(⿰彳待)具也”. Based on any version of 說文解字 gives 偫 (U+506B) .
《說文解字》藤花榭本.卷八上
(http://www.guoxuedashi.net/kangxi/pic.php?f=swjzzb&p=270)



I think it is a variant of 偫(U+506B), and suggest pending other evidence.
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
Agree with TCA's comment dated 2022-01-05.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》 includes all three characters at the same time. 《國語辭典》 also includes the submitted one.


▲ 黄道周:《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》,明崇禎刻本,第一卷


▲ 黄道周:《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》,明崇禎刻本,卷之十六


▲ 黄道周:《新刻洪武元韻勘正切字海篇群玉》,明崇禎刻本,卷之四


▲ 《國語辭典》,民國37年重印本,p. 42
01238
01238
巾 50.13
16 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-08729
New evidence
BAI Yi
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]

In this glyph right hand side is ⿱冖番, apparently 冖 represents "cover" mean in a word meaning "flag". Thus I oppose to unification.
00252
00252
入 11.12
14 · ㇒ (3)
SAT-08844
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]

玄應一切經音義
00581
00581
口 30.11
14 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-08851
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Derivative of ⿰口盖. According to the words 方言厮⿰口盖噎楚曰厮 on the left, SAT-08851 must be redundant.
玄應一切經音義
01261
01261
广 53.10
13 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-08895
广𭮀
Evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
The entry of 揭路荼 (गरुड/𑖐𑖨𑖲𑖚?) in 《一切經音義》(獅谷蓮社刻本) shows the name of this bird is 龍惌 (⿱𭓩心 could be unified to 惌). The entry of 金翅鳥 shows 龍怨.



▲ 釋慧琳:《一切經音義》,獅谷蓮社刻本,卷第一


▲ 釋慧琳:《一切經音義》,獅谷蓮社刻本,卷第五十三

Please confirm which one is the proper one.
03965
03965
辵 162.6
10 · ㇔ (4)
SAT-08913
𭁄
New evidence
L F CHENG
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
00535
00535
口 30.9
12 · ㇑ (2)
SAT-09431
𦮰
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Variant glyph of 嚇. Minor differences from 𠵢 (U+20D62).
玉篇殘卷
大方便佛報恩經·惡友品第六
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
慧琳一切經音義
玄應一切經音義
00373
00373
十 24.6
8 · ㇐ (1)
SAT-10114
𪢴
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
慧琳一切經音義
04244
04244
門 169.14
22 · ㇠ (5)
T11-2123
Evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I wish to echo the point made by Ken Lunde elsewhere regarding this particular evidence:
"The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable."
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
03474
03474
艸 140.17
21 · ㇒ (3)
T9-755C
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
00968
00968
女 38.5
8 · ㇠ (5)
T9-7569
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
說文長箋
古文字诂林
02270
02270
火 86.20
24 · ㇔ (4)
T9-757C
𩕆
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
03387
03387
艸 140.11
17 · ㇐ (1)
T9-7658
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
04541
04541
髟 190.13
23 · ㇔ (4)
T9-7661
Evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I wish to echo the point made by Ken Lunde elsewhere regarding this particular evidence:
"The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable."
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
03281
03281
至 133.13
19 · ㇑ (2)
T9-772B
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
01684
01684
日 72.10
14 · ㇐ (1)
T9-7734
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
02043
02043
水 85.9
12 · ㇑ (2)
T9-773B
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
02180
02180
火 86.7
11 · ㇒ (3)
T9-7756
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01875
01875
木 75.15
19 · ㇒ (3)
T9-782D
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
00484
00484
口 30.7
10 · ㇠ (5)
T9-783F
𡥘
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
03207
03207
耳 128.11
17 · ㇔ (4)
T9-7847
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
04355
04355
雨 173.14
22 · ㇔ (4)
T9-784F
Evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I wish to echo the point made by Ken Lunde elsewhere regarding this particular evidence:
"The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable."
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
00128
00128
亠 8.16
18 · ㇠ (5)
T9-7869
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
02059
02059
水 85.10
14 · ㇐ (1)
T9-7925
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
00140
00140
人 9.5
7 · ㇠ (5)
T9-7971
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
03072
03072
糸 120.8
14 · ㇐ (1)
T9-7A38
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
03101
03101
糸 120.12
18 · ㇑ (2)
T9-7A52
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
01532
01532
手 64.12
16 · ㇒ (3)
T9-7A70
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
02152
02152
水 85.21
25 · ㇠ (5)
T9-7A7B
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01445
01445
手 64.5
9 · ㇒ (3)
T9-7B30
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01265
01265
广 53.11
14 · ㇔ (4)
T9-7B39
广
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01622
01622
文 67.6
10 · ㇐ (1)
T9-7B5D
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
00380
00380
十 24.11
13 · ㇔ (4)
T9-7C26
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546
03176
03176
羽 124.9
15 · ㇑ (2)
T9-7C2A
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
03381
03381
艸 140.10
16 · ㇒ (3)
T9-7C3F
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
03453
03453
艸 140.15
19 · ㇐ (1)
T9-7C4F
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
02839
02839
示 113.8
13 · ㇒ (3)
T9-7C74
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
03458
03458
艸 140.15
21 · ㇔ (4)
T9-7C7C
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
03336
03336
艸 140.6
10 · ㇔ (4)
T9-7D28
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
01990
01990
水 85.2
6 · ㇑ (2)
T9-7D2E
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
02833
02833
示 113.6
11 · ㇑ (2)
T9-7D30
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
03084
03084
糸 120.10
16 · ㇑ (2)
T9-7D3A
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
04708
04708
鳥 196.6
17 · ㇠ (5)
T9-7D48
𢆶
Unclear evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Shape and reading, "sī", suggest this may be a variant of U+9DE5 鷥. But, what is the evidence that justifies this reading? In other cases, such as U+2A028 𪀨 , a variant of 鴉 according to Kangxi, the component 𢆶 represents another phonetic.
Unclear evidence response
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card. According to ancient book(重訂直音篇), this character is a variant of 鷥.


(or https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=18582&page=133)
01189
01189
山 46.14
17 · ㇑ (2)
T9-7D51
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
02210
02210
火 86.10
14 · ㇔ (4)
T9-7D53
𤇾
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
03459
03459
艸 140.15
19 · ㇔ (4)
T9-7D74
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
01070
01070
寸 41.11
14 · ㇒ (3)
T9-7D7B
New evidence
LI Yuan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Evidence shown is not primary source. Need new evidence.
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
03297
03297
舟 137.3
9 · ㇒ (3)
T9-7E3E
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
02266
02266
火 86.17
21 · ㇑ (2)
T9-7E7D
𰌼
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
00247
00247
儿 10.13
15 · ㇑ (2)
TB-4945
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
00723
00723
口 30.17
20 · ㇐ (1)
TB-4978
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
04268
04268
阜 170.10
13 · ㇔ (4)
TB-4B2C
Evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I wish to echo the point made by Ken Lunde elsewhere regarding this particular evidence:
"The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable."
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
01623
01623
文 67.6
10 · ㇐ (1)
TB-4B39
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01695
01695
日 72.11
15 · ㇒ (3)
TB-4B46
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01824
01824
木 75.10
14 · ㇠ (5)
TB-4B6E
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
03411
03411
艸 140.12
16 · ㇔ (4)
TB-4C58
𣸹
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
03401
03401
艸 140.12
16 · ㇐ (1)
TB-4C5C
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
01001
01001
女 38.11
14 · ㇔ (4)
TB-4E63
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
03426
03426
艸 140.13
17 · ㇔ (4)
TB-4F2D
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
01018
01018
子 39.6
9 · ㇒ (3)
TB-4F75
𠂢
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
古文奇字
水仙亭詞集
02072
02072
水 85.11
14 · ㇑ (2)
TB-5021
浿
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01312
01312
心 61.4
7 · ㇐ (1)
TB-5067
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
00985
00985
女 38.9
12 · ㇑ (2)
TB-522D
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
01828
01828
木 75.11
15 · ㇐ (1)
TB-527D
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
03013
03013
米 119.7
13 · ㇐ (1)
TB-5440
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
03613
03613
虫 142.11
17 · ㇔ (4)
TB-5453
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


▲ 古壮字字典, p. 329
01126
01126
山 46.6
9 · ㇑ (2)
TB-584A
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
00987
00987
女 38.9
12 · ㇔ (4)
TB-597A
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
01043
01043
宀 40.9
12 · ㇐ (1)
TB-597D
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
03002
03002
米 119.4
10 · ㇑ (2)
TB-5A6E
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]


▲ 古壮字字典, p. 366
00999
00999
女 38.11
14 · ㇑ (2)
TB-5B46
𮏄
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
02168
02168
火 86.5
9 · ㇑ (2)
TB-5B64
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
00728
00728
口 30.17
20 · ㇑ (2)
TB-5C54
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
00496
00496
口 30.8
11 · ㇑ (2)
TB-5C55
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Unclear evidence
WANG Yifan
SAT
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I suspect that this is mistranscription of U+8117 脗.
U+8117
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.

日 and ⺼ is not a common combination mixed up because of similar shapes, so I don't think it's a mistranscription of 脗.
00886
00886
土 32.12
15 · ㇐ (1)
TB-5C5C
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
(乾隆)甘肅通志
02441
02441
犬 94.14
17 · ㇐ (1)
TB-5D38
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01657
01657
日 72.4
8 · ㇒ (3)
TB-5D3F
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
New evidence
Eiso CHAN
Individual
also as KC-10920
http://www.koreanhistory.or.kr/newchar/list_view.jsp?code=160502
02851
02851
示 113.11
16 · ㇒ (3)
TB-5D73
𢚩
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
02840
02840
示 113.8
13 · ㇒ (3)
TB-5D77
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
02025
02025
水 85.8
12 · ㇐ (1)
TB-5E6F
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01593
01593
手 64.17
20 · ㇒ (3)
TB-6049
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
02102
02102
水 85.14
17 · ㇐ (1)
TB-606C
𬚟
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01838
01838
木 75.12
16 · ㇐ (1)
TB-614C
𭔰
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
03061
03061
糸 120.6
12 · ㇒ (3)
TB-623F
𫥞
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
02792
02792
石 112.11
16 · ㇒ (3)
TB-6250
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
Evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
It would be good to have additional evidence to support the reading given, "dùn". The phonetic is 貭, which is a variant of 質, so I would expect a different reading, such as "zhì". Otherwise, this would appear to be a variant of U+78B7 碷 "dùn"
03942
03942
車 159.8
15 · ㇐ (1)
TB-6337
New evidence
HUANG Junliang
Individual
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
04325
04325
雨 173.10
18 · ㇒ (3)
TB-672B
Evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I wish to echo the point made by Ken Lunde elsewhere regarding this particular evidence:
"The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable."
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
01223
01223
巾 50.4
7 · ㇐ (1)
TB-675A
New evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
御定佩文韻府
But it's a wrong shape of 岏.
御定佩文韻府
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The name of a living person is the different issue with ancient character.
02761
02761
石 112.7
12 · ㇒ (3)
TB-696C
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
02942
02942
竹 118.10
16 · ㇐ (1)
TB-6973
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable.
Evidence
Andrew WEST
UK
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree with comment by Ken Lunde.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
01750
01750
月 74.10
14 · ㇒ (3)
TB-6A65
𠂉
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01833
01833
木 75.11
15 · ㇔ (4)
TB-6D6E
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
02227
02227
火 86.12
16 · ㇔ (4)
TB-714B
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
04294
04294
雨 173.4
12 · ㇐ (1)
TB-7157
Evidence
Lee COLLINS
Vietnam
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
I wish to echo the point made by Ken Lunde elsewhere regarding this particular evidence:
"The evidence image, which is simply a code chart excerpt, is insufficient. While the link to the CNS 11643 website is better, it also is insufficient. A dictionary entry or book excerpt that explains its meaning or shows the ideograph in context is desirable."
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
IRGN2486 (TCA's submission for WS2021) indicates that the evidence image is from the household service database, from which the name on each person's ID card is printed. It is not simply a code chart; it is an official government document with legal effect. For further explanation, please see IRGN2546.
02272
02272
火 86.21
25 · ㇔ (4)
TB-7168
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
00133
00133
人 9.4
6 · ㇐ (1)
TC-2460
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
00134
00134
人 9.4
6 · ㇐ (1)
TC-2471
𠆢
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
01937
01937
毛 82.2
6 · ㇑ (2)
TC-2725
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
00137
00137
人 9.5
7 · ㇑ (2)
TC-282C
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
About the comment #4393, the meaning is a personal name, like 康熙字典.
It used in ID cards, schools, banks, insurance, health insurance, etc.
01086
01086
尸 44.4
7 · ㇔ (4)
TC-2A64
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
01251
01251
广 53.4
7 · ㇒ (3)
TC-2B30
广
Evidence
TAO Yang
China
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Please provide the evidence include the glyph how it is used or what it means.
Evidence
Conifer TSENG
TCA
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
This character is a name character. The source of the glyph is the name field on the ID card, and some of the characters are not found in the pronunciation section.
For further explanation on the issue, please see IRGN2546.
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01651
01651
无 71.3
7 · ㇒ (3)
TC-2C25
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01654
01654
日 72.3
7 · ㇐ (1)
TC-2C27
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01995
01995
水 85.4
7 · ㇐ (1)
TC-2C5A
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 standard, such evidence alone is insufficient. Their presence in the CNS 11643 standard can certainly serve as supplementary evidence, but it should not be the sole evidence. Other member bodies submit evidence that either shows the ideographs in actual use or in a published dictionary.
01996
01996
水 85.4
7 · ㇐ (1)
TC-2C5B
𠤭
Evidence
Ken LUNDE
UTC
For all TCA-submitted ideographs that include only this type of evidence, which is effectively an excerpt from the CNS 11643 sta