A bit late but we are truly unsure how the middle shape should be rendered. We assume that this shape is the result of normalization (at that time) to 䜌, but any insights will be welcome.
We have 4 characters in DB that involves 𡿺/⿱巛㐫:
SAT-07072 𰈐 (U+30210)
SAT-01917 𮝟 (U+2E75F)
SAT-04369 ⿰阝𡿺
SAT-03275 𮪱 (U+2EAB1)
Of which SAT-03275 is only taken from a re-created glyph in reprint (the original paper molds were lost during war), so basically 㐫 is the stable choice for any newly cut glyph of this kind in Taisho, which we'd like to follow.
As long as both shapes are unifiable, we prefer keeping current glyph.
IRGN2632WS2021v6.0Unified&Withdrawn Unified to 𤠼 U+2483C, add a new UCV rule ⿱𣪊X and ⿱殸X and ⿹ 𣪊X, level 2, IRG 59.
Not unified to 𤠼 U+2483C, evidence accepted, IRG 58.
has already unified according to UCV #312d, this rule is not actually applied to that character. Therefore, the UCV has had no effective precedent in IRG, and the discussion of its viability seems still live. We might have to revisit WS2021-02417 to correctly understand its outcome if necessary.
IRG Working Set 2021v6.0
Source: WANG Yifan
Date: Generated on 2024-04-20
Unification
Only for record, but unified to 鷇 (U+9DC7) as a result of UCV #312d.
Evidence
In the SAT Text Database we have recorded 7 characters where 殸-𣪊 merger involved, of which 5 are already encoded.
- 𤛗 (U+246D7) = 𤚼 U+246BC
- SAT-02788 𭯅 (U+2DBC5) = 𣫪 U+23AEA
- SAT-04036 𮭑 U+2EB51 = 鷇 U+9DC7
- SAT-06015 ⿱殸羊 = 𦎯 U+263AF
- SAT-08291 ⿱殸豕 = 𣫔 U+23AD4 (actually not 豰 U+8C70)
- SAT-90152 𮡞 (U+2E85E) = 轂 U+8F42
- SAT-06427 𰔕 (U+30515) = 撀 U+6480
Glyph Design & Normalization
SAT-07072 𰈐 (U+30210)
SAT-01917 𮝟 (U+2E75F)
SAT-04369 ⿰阝𡿺
SAT-03275 𮪱 (U+2EAB1)
Of which SAT-03275 is only taken from a re-created glyph in reprint (the original paper molds were lost during war), so basically 㐫 is the stable choice for any newly cut glyph of this kind in Taisho, which we'd like to follow.
As long as both shapes are unifiable, we prefer keeping current glyph.
Editorial
Other