Character Info
Similar To: Semantic Variant圞 (U+571E)
Attributes:
Meeting Minutes
| Date | Description |
|---|
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| GCW-00240 |  1.0 |
Raw Info
| Character Reference | GCW-00240 |
| Codepoint | E110 |
| Radical | 169'.9 |
| Stroke Count | 9 |
| First Stroke | 4 |
| Total Stroke | 12 |
| IDS | ⿵门奕 |
| Variants | Semantic Variant圞 |
| Pronunciation | luan2 |
| Total No. of Evidences | 2 |
| Notes | N/A |
| Secondary Radical | N/A |
| Secondary Stroke Count | N/A |
| Secondary First Stroke | N/A |
Review Comments
▲ SJ/T 11239—2001, 29-52
Based on three pieces of evidence (2 submitted and 1 new), the glyph should be ⿵门⿱𰁜大 not ⿵门奕. Evidence 1 shows the Putonghua reading is luán, that means the top of the inside part is 𰁜, the variant of 䜌 not 亦.
In PRC conventions, 𰁜 and 亦 are not the same. So, the theoretical traditional form should be ⿵門⿱䜌大 not ⿵門奕.
We can find 峦塘 and 栾塘 in 永福县.