(v5.0) (v1.0) VN-F0238 |
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #66 2026-03-18 (Wed) 8:47 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | no change. |
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 5.0 | For 01677, add Discussion Record "No change, IRG 66." |
| 5.0 | For 01677, add Discussion Record "Glyph updated, SC=14, TS=17, IDS=⿰抻爰, 2026-05." |
| 5.0 | For 01677, change IDS to ⿰抻爰 |
| 5.0 | For 01677, change Stroke Count to 14 |
| 5.0 | For 01677, change Total Stroke Count to 17 |
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| VN-F0238 | 🢂 |
| Character Reference | VN-F0238 |
| Codepoint | F0238 |
| Radical | 64 |
| Stroke Count | 15 |
| First Stroke | 2 |
| Total Stroke | 18 |
| IDS | ⿰抻爱 |
| Variants | N/A |
| Pronunciation | vươn |
| Total No. of Evidences | 1 |
| Notes | N/A |
| Radical 2 | N/A |
| Stroke Count 2 | N/A |
| First Stroke 2 | N/A |
Review Comments
or something similar. The phonetic component 爱 is not very convincing. Is there any image of the original material?
As you can see in this image from "Khó Chữ Hán Nôm Mã Hoá" p. 613, all other characters with the "vươn" phonetic show 爰: