Please wait while loading

IRG Working Set 2024v5.0

Source: WANG Yifan
Date: Generated on 2026-07-17

Show Deleted | Show comments from version: 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 | Show comments with status: Show All New Only Unresolved Only

Attributes

Showing 13 comments.

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00037
00037
丨 2.4.2
见 147′.1.2
GCW-00005
TS 5 · IDS
IDS
Support comment #239, ⿽见丨. Being a variant of 兒, 丨and 见 should not be put truly side by side.
00578
00578
口 30.12.1
GZ-3702301
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
Change Radical to 72.0 (日), SC=11, FS=2
02299
02299
火 86.22.3
SAT-08790
TS 26 · IDS &P15-01;
Radical
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
Agree to have 164.0 (酉) as the primary radical. 86.0 (火) to be the secondary.
02960
02960
米 119.15.4
SAT-09261
TS 21 · IDS
IDS
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
We prefer ⿸麻粊.
02050
02050
毛 82.11.2
SAT-09392
TS 15 · IDS
IDS
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agree to change IDS to ⿰⿱罒𠦂毛.
02732
02732
示 113.5.5
SAT-09820
TS 10 · IDS 𠃌
FS
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Agree that FS should be 5.
04325
04325
鬼 194.7.5
SAT-09860
TS 17 · IDS
IDS
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Agreed. IDS=⿺鬼矣.
01469
01469
心 61.8.2
SAT-10074
TS 11 · IDS 𡴋
IDS
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
I think the component on the right side is apparently cognate and unifiable with 𡴋.
01121
01121
小 42.4.4
SAT-10433
TS 7 · IDS
IDS
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
Per #11370, the IDS should be changed to ⿱𠫓小.
00054
00054
丿 4.4.4
SAT-10582
TS 5 · IDS
IDS
Agree to change IDS to ⿻义丷 as per comment #13697.
00790
00790
口 30.21.4
T13-3D75
TS 24 · IDS
IDS
⿰口𤄞
00716
00716
口 30.16.2
UK-30722
TS 19 · IDS
Radical
Add Secondary Radical 21.0 (匕), SC=17, FS=2
01800
01800
日 72.11.4
VN-F070E
TS 15 · IDS
Radical
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
Suggest (secondary) radical 40.0 (宀), SC=12, FS=2

Evidence

Showing 15 comments.

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00385
00385
口 30.5.1
GCW-00022
TS 8 · IDS
Evidence
The structure does not explain much about the pronunciation, biao1. Do you know what it means?
00891
00891
土 32.8.5
GCW-00063
TS 11 · IDS
Evidence
The reading "ao" looks unintuitive. Is there any explanation for it?
00242
00242
冫 15.7.4
GZ-4231104
TS 99 · IDS
Evidence
With other synonymous characters in the entry having 氵, it allows a suspicion that this character might be a typo of 涕. Do you have any usage example?
00188
00188
人 9.20.1
GZ-4302401
TS 22 · IDS
Evidence
Is there any possible explanation why this character should mean 抓起? The pronunciation hardly justifies the components either.
00176
00176
人 9.15.3
GZHSJ-0159
TS 17 · IDS
Evidence
The current evidence only shows modern typeset glyphs. Do you have an earlier book that shows original glyphs?
00566
00566
口 30.11.4
T13-3D4B
TS 14 · IDS 𮭱
Evidence
Does it have a special meaning in Taiwanese? The dictionary entry only suggests that it is a synonym of 嗻, which it may be unified to.
00648
00648
口 30.14.1
T13-3D5D
TS 17 · IDS
Evidence
As per comment #3226, could you check if other editions of 正統道藏 render the character identically?
00679
00679
口 30.15.1
T13-3D5E
TS 18 · IDS 𨊤
Unclear evidence
The right-top part is cluttered in this image. Are you sure that it is ⿲土車人?
00745
00745
口 30.17.4
T13-3D6B
TS 20 · IDS
Unclear evidence
Is there any better image that the shape is not blotted?
00804
00804
口 30.24.2
T13-3D7A
TS 27 · IDS
Evidence
Is this shape stable? The right side apparently looks like a corruption of 戇.
00177
00177
人 9.17.1
UK-30604
TS 19 · IDS 𩋘
Evidence
Evidence 2 apparently suggests that this is a common word in Foochow dialect. Do you have its pronunciation and meaning?
00630
00630
口 30.13.3
UK-30896
TS 16 · IDS
Evidence
Has this character another appearance? According to the transcription table in volume 1, this syllable should be transcribed as 𲔾. 筴 does not seem to make sense as phonetic.
00798
00798
口 30.22.5
UK-30924
TS 25 · IDS
Evidence
Is this character attested in any other edition? The phonetic 巒 does not make much sense; could it be 蠻?
00631
00631
口 30.13.3
UTC-03400
TS 16 · IDS
Evidence
The positions of this character in the evidence should be marked.
00241
00241
冫 15.7.1
VN-F1FCF
TS 9 · IDS
Evidence
The evidence does not provide its meaning.

Glyph Design & Normalization

Showing 13 comments.

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00209
00209
入 11.6.1
GCA-J0022
TS 8 · IDS
Glyph design
As per comment #11734, do you want to change the glyph so that the left top component looks 入?
01944
01944
木 75.11.4
GZ-3982201
TS 15 · IDS
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
Glyph needs to be updated.
01758
01758
日 72.7.3
KC-10202
TS 11 · IDS
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
Glyph needs to be updated.
01367
01367
广 53.12.4
SAT-09315
TS 15 · IDS 广
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
With support of 大正藏 and 高麗藏 versions, we would like to keep the 大 component.
03217
03217
舛 136.0.1
一 1.7.2
SAT-09449
TS 8 · IDS
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v1.0 ]
The glyph is actually designed to have 4 horizontal strokes but we might redesign to make it clear if requested.
04004
04004
阜 170.10.3
SAT-09904
TS 13 · IDS 𠆢
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
We will consider glyph improvement.
03843
03843
邑 163.17.1
SAT-10079
TS 20 · IDS 𦾔
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
The glyph is an apparent mistake and should look same as the IDS. We will update the glyph.
00713
00713
口 30.16.2
UK-30313
TS 19 · IDS
Normalization
Glyph shapes are unstable in each piece of evidence. If there are no opinions, I'd prefer ⿰口⿳艹⿴北自夊.
02725
02725
石 112.18.1
UK-30762
TS 23 · IDS 𡭴
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v3.0 ]
Should the bottom-right component be 𡭽?
01668
01668
手 64.13.4
VN-F18D4
TS 16 · IDS 祿
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
The glyph should be updated.
02270
02270
火 86.12.4
VN-F1E09
TS 16 · IDS 𢧐
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
Just in case, is it sure that the phonetic component is designed as 𢧐 instead of 戦?
01887
01887
木 75.7.3
VN-F2066
TS 11 · IDS
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
The glyph should be updated.
01943
01943
木 75.11.3
VN-F2067
TS 15 · IDS
Glyph design
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
Glyph needs to be updated.

Editorial

Showing 2 comments.

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
02356
02356
牛 93.13.4
SAT-09211
TS 17 · IDS
Editorial issue
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
It should read "similar", without implying synonymity. It is due to a regression bug of our conversion program.
02021
02021
殳 79.7.2
SAT-09922
TS 11 · IDS
Editorial issue
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
Source ref should be updated (SAT-09921).

Other

Showing 8 comments.

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00847
00847
土 32.5.5
GDM-00386
TS 8 · IDS
Comment
The Comment #64 link seems broken. Currently working link: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1XJ4m1H7rj/
01741
01741
日 72.5.2
GDM-00414
TS 9 · IDS
Comment
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
Currently spelled 嘎日? (宝兴县硗碛藏族乡嘎日村)
https://www.yaan.gov.cn/zhangzhe/show/cad71410f46e6d69420d687ae814c945.html
00716
00716
口 30.16.2
UK-30722
TS 19 · IDS
Comment
The pronunciation according to the book is: ˀbak 45.
00570
00570
口 30.11.4
UK-30917
TS 14 · IDS
Comment
I suspect that it was meant to be 嘩.
01544
01544
戈 62.52.4
UTC-03349
TS 56 · IDS 广
Comment
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
The submitted piece of evidence only shows a half of the explanation that justifies the glyph construction. The full context is given in IRG N2634 Feedback as below.
04460
04460
鱼 195′.5.1
UTC-03434
TS 13 · IDS
Comment
[ Unresolved from v2.0 ]
Evidence 1 is probably related to 历 rather than 厉.
01658
01658
手 64.12.4
VN-F0B4E
TS 16 · IDS 𮥷
Comment
[ Unresolved from v4.0 ]
00110
00110
人 9.3.5
VN-F1F0A
TS 5 · IDS
Comment
It is not much likely that MJ000037 is cognate with this character.

Data for Unihan

Showing 2 comments.

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
00560
00560
口 30.11.3
UK-30875
TS 14 · IDS
Semantic variant
00527
00527
口 30.10.5
UK-30931
TS 13 · IDS
Semantic variant