There is a possibility that U+308CB is a variant character, but according to KR Normal Rules, it cannot be converted to the standard form. Moreover, since the same individual does not appear in the same document, it is difficult to definitively conclude that U+308CB is a variant character.
Because the dates recorded on the two pieces of evidence are different, there is a possibility that they are the same individual, but there is also a possibility that they are not.
Because the dates recorded on the two pieces of evidence are different, there is a possibility that they are the same individual, but there is also a possibility that they are not. Additionally, it is common in Korean personal names to find cases where only part of the characters are replaced.
Because the dates recorded on the two pieces of evidence are different, there is a possibility that they are the same individual, but there is also a possibility that they are not. Additionally, it is common in Korean personal names to find cases where only part of the characters are replaced.
Because the dates recorded on the two pieces of evidence are different, there is a possibility that they are the same individual, but there is also a possibility that they are not. Additionally, it is common in Korean personal names to find cases where only part of the characters are replaced.
There is a possibility that they are the same individual, but among the names presented in the evidence, it is impossible to determine which one is correct. Finding further evidence is difficult.
Because the dates recorded on the two pieces of evidence are different, there is a possibility that they are the same individual, but there is also a possibility that they are not. Finding further evidence is difficult.
There is a possibility that they are the same individual, but it is impossible to determine which name among the presented evidence is correct. Finding further evidence is difficult, and overall, KC-10224 is considered to be the correct one.
There is a possibility that they are the same individual, but it is impossible to determine which name among the presented evidence is correct. Finding further evidence is difficult.
There is a possibility that they are the same individual, but it is impossible to determine which name among the presented evidence is correct. Finding further evidence is difficult.
This is a uniquely Korean character. Although it represents the same sound as 兺 (ppun), its glyph structure is different, so it should be left as is. Many similar cases exist, such as with 兺 (ppun) and 哛 (ppun).
Because the dates of the evidence are different, the possibility that they are different individuals cannot be ruled out. Finding further evidence is difficult.
IRG Working Set 2024v4.0
Source: ROK
Date: Generated on 2026-10-04
Attributes
Showing 65 comments.
Change FS=2
Change SC=12.
Change TS=17.
KR requests IRG to discuss.
Evidence
Showing 16 comments.
Glyph Design & Normalization
Showing 16 comments.
KR will add new normalization rule.
Change Radical to 46.0 (山), SC=10, FS=1.
Editorial
Showing 2 comments.
KR wants to keep SN02793.
Other
Showing 1 comments.
Submitter Request
Showing 9 comments.