Normalize the glyph to match the current IDS as ⿱爽田.

U+21641 𡙁 is the unifiable variant of U+723D 爽 per UCV #108, but there is no K-Source reference for U+21641 𡙁 now.





It is better to use ⿱爽田 to match ROK conventions. The Korean reading provided by the submitter is 상, which is the same as 爽.

Change IDS=⿱𡙁田.

KR will change glyph as IDS=⿱爽田.

When KR replies as "KR will change the glyph as ..." to the comment of the glyph change request on the ORT, it means as follows:

When and if IRG "accepts" the glyph change at the IRG meeting, mark the comment of the glyph change request as "resolved", and mark KR's comment to change the glyph as "resolved", then KR will prepare a new font reflecting the glyph change and submit the new font according to the font submission schedule of the relevant IRG recommendation.

IDS has not been changed to ⿱𡙁田.

The evidence shows several person names as 柳楳～ (유매～), 李審 (이심), 蘇受益 (소수익), 禹有錫 (우유석), 王枝明 (왕지명), 朴斗萬 (박두만), 金乭山 (김돌산). And I found other one page shows several person names as 柳楳, 李⿱⿻十𠈌回, 李審, 蘇受益, 禹有錫, 王枝明, 朴斗萬, 金乭山, but I can’t find the original picture.

If 柳楳 is one person, the following character in the submitted evidence should mean the other person 李𤲷 or 李嗇 (이색). The following picture shows the the time.

▲ https://sjw.history.go.kr/id/SJW-F05040300-03900

If yes, it is not better to normalize the glyph to ⿱爽田, and the current reading is incorrect.

There appears to be an open question as to whether the upper component is 𡙁 or 爽. If it is the former, the IDS needs to be changed to ⿱𡙁田. If it is the latter, the glyph needs to be changed to ⿱爽田.