The final conclusion for [WS2021-00655] ⿲口击頁 was "Kept postponed, possible new UCV rule 頓 and ⿰击頁". This ⿰击頁 should be treated identically.

⿰犭邦

⿰火邦

⿰虫邦

⿰𧾷邦

Evidence 1 "云南省楚雄市地名志" depicts ㇯巟丶, not ㇯㐬丶.

倪海曙 拉丁化新文字运动的始末和编年纪事 第1223条

「osmium有译为锇或⿰钅奥，有译为⿰钅米」
(please see https://hc.jsecs.org/irg/ws2024/app/?id=03939 for the context of this quote; ⿰钅奥 is WS2024-03948)

倪海曙 拉丁化新文字运动的始末和编年纪事 第1223条

「⿰钅加、𰾆、镓都是gallium的译名」

Roar Bökset, _Long Story of Short Forms: Simplified Chinese characters from A to Z_, page 244 (錢):



(excerpt)

The writeup depicts a multitude of variations on this shape (although none of them depict the ㇉ stroke).

https://kura.aucklandlibraries.govt.nz/digital/collection/journals/id/1403/rec/1
新​西​蘭​僑​農​月​刊​ N.Z. Chinese Growers Monthly Journal - Volume 001 Issue 000 [page 09]
「惠灵頓埠」 (Wellington)


https://kura.aucklandlibraries.govt.nz/digital/collection/journals/id/10640/rec/201
中​國​大​事​週​刊 New Zealand Chinese Weekly News​ Issue 235 [page 15]
「丹衣頓城」 (Dunedin)


https://books.google.com/books?id=6GNEAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA485
Advertisement, 中西日報 Chung Sai Yat Po: Chinese Daily Paper, 光緒三十四年八月初十日 新聞紙第九卷第一百八十四號禮拜五 Friday, September 4, 1908 - Volume 9, No. 184 [reprinted in Rev. Gong Tyng (translator), A Confucian Chinese Editor's View of Christianity, The Baptist Home Mission Monthly, December 1908]
「嘩慎頓街」 (Washington St.)


https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Phrase_Book_in_the_Canton_Dialect_or_Dialogues_on_Ordinary_and_Familiar_Subjects.djvu/61
T. L. Stedman and K. P. Lee, A Chinese and English phrase book in the Canton dialect (1888), page 45
「波士頓」 (Boston)
(full page translation)


https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Phrase_Book_in_the_Canton_Dialect_or_Dialogues_on_Ordinary_and_Familiar_Subjects.djvu/195
T. L. Stedman and K. P. Lee, A Chinese and English phrase book in the Canton dialect (1888), page 179
「波士噸埠〇〇〇頓」
「紐約埠〇〇〇頓」
「費城〇〇〇頓」
(full page translation)

⿰尹阝 appears repeatedly in Korean works, clearly as a variant of 那.

《重刊老乞大諺解》:

https://ko.wikisource.org/wiki/Special:Search/Page:尹阝 (bad thumbnail quality; please download the PDF directly to verify)

《童蒙先習》 (reported by User:银色雪莉 at zh.wikisource to Andrew West):

https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/童蒙先習
https://kyudb.snu.ac.kr/book/view.do?book_cd=GK01534_00

Error form of 暹 (日光升也)?

Error form of 靁?

星洲日報 潮州歇後語淺釋 1960-05-26
https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/scjp19600526-1.2.44.10


「鷄啄蚶——⿰口霸痠嘴」「⿰口霸痠嘴就是啄痠嘴」
cf. 「鸡啄蚶——啄（罢7）酸嘴」＠潮州市饶平县人民政府网站https://www.raoping.gov.cn/xqqk/lswh/content/post_3473754.html

倪海曙 拉丁化新文字运动的始末和编年纪事 第1223条

「osmium有译为锇或⿰钅奥」
(please see https://hc.jsecs.org/irg/ws2024/app/?id=03939 for the context of this quote)

Evidence depicts ⿰尧火 instead of ⿺尧火; probably normalized to match 𰟞.

Stable error of 遼? https://www.zdic.net/hant/遼迥 https://kotobank.jp/word/遼迥-2872692

RE: Submitter's note "⿰口虾 is not encoded": Evidence for future consideration:
https://fishyinbowlosoup.tumblr.com/post/761370556857745408/malaysian-chinese-miku-this-is-just-part-one
https://www.instagram.com/fishyin_bowl/p/C_xR_9gyKQU/

Evidence 2 depicts the un-normalized form ⿰口䕃.

https://glyphwiki.org/wiki/toki-01011840
汎用電子情報交換環境整備プログラム成果報告書別冊 p. 5113 http://kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~yasuoka/hanyodenshi/5113.djvu

Considering the given reading マ, #11578 is probably related to 𛃅 (hentaigana 満 MA).

Unless I am mistaken, 廿 also appears to be missing serifs on the bottom (currently, it is completely flat).

Is it not a 一字不兩捺 rule? Searching for characters including the components "辶木" in https://zi.tools/zi/?secondary=search regularly shows 丶 in the G-glyph.

Until the 1900s introduction of PRC simplified characters, 门 was not a separate concept from 門. I believe it is inappropriate to nitpick and say that evidence from pre-modern Korea shows 门 and not 門, and I would support a new normalization rule declaring that such PRC simplified forms of traditional calligraphic derivation are not to be identified in pre-modern works (with the exception of Vietnam who has already repeatedly shown preference for such interpretation).

The glyph should be redesigned such that there are 4 horizontal strokes instead of 2, as shown in the evidence and recorded in the IDS.

Should the dot on the left side be depicted as the dot in 忄 (direction: ↙), or depicted as 丶 (direction: ↘)?

This is already acknowledged; see the note attached to the evidence.

For evidence 1, 《林文忠公政書》 (https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&res=104461, CADAL) writes 喱: 「咪唎𠼤國㗎喱喑」. https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&file=197772&page=4

For evidence 2, 《林文忠公政書》 writes 喱: 「⿰口這啡喱船」. https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=197773&page=41

Re: #12221: In regards to Japanese usage, it seems to be already considered the same as 䏻
(JMJ-003817, Unicode v16.0).

#12759: If ⿰禾達 is a plant, with semantic 禾 and phonetic 達, ⿰禾達 might represent 달, a type of grass or reed.
- Naver: https://ko.dict.naver.com/#/entry/koko/ff504b5b260a4ecfbd8bf81d19d13341
- Wiktionary: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/달#Etymology_2

#12759, #12779: Echo Heo also points out 샘다리, a variety of rice plant. 샘 translates to "spring" (泉), and the coordinate 山稻 also refers to rice plants.
- Naver: https://ko.dict.naver.com/#/entry/koko/6e0923926e4146d2ade89cc93c2fcb75

潮阳方言研究 by 张盛裕 (page 226, entry 96) writes that 潮語十五音 records ⿱善错, pronounced 担(阳去). This seems to be a related character that could be submitted in the future.

Form of 獻?

If this is pronounced as yán, is ⿰万开 a corruption of 硏? Is this related to 𡌎?

How reliable are the readings given, or could it also be 有邊讀邊 on the part of whoever registered it?

Related to 㶅?

Related to 遙?

Related to 宴?

Related to 頡?

Related to 靈?

Related to 樊?

Adding onto #4030, I would like to suggest that it is instead a corrupted form of 讎: ⿰亻钅誰

Similar to 拠
(JP shinjitai form of 據)

Probably a variant of 㗾 (phonetic 靴 hoe1).

I believe that the glyph matches the evidence, and that 4 pieces of evidence is already quite good. The normalized ⿷兀丶 shape was certainly chosen to match the existing G- and UTC-source forms of U+2D016 𭀖, which is clearly recorded in Unihan data as a variant of 厘.

With that being said, I would also support a separate evaluation of the glyph for 𭀖. I would like to note that the variation of ⿷兀丶 ~ ⿸㇇⿺乚丶 is also recorded for Zhuang (古壮字字典 p. 355 - ndei [dei1] “好” ~ 壮语简志 p. 97 [di1] “好”, respectively).

Similar to 羕
; see the next two entries in the initial Tự Điển Chữ Nôm Trích Dẫn evidence.

kHangul 옹