Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #57 2021-09-16 (Thu) 9:41 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | withdraw |
Version | Description |
---|---|
2.0 | For 04553, change Status to Withdrawn |
2.0 | For 04553, add Discussion Record "Withdrawn, IRG 57." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
UTC-03184 | 1.0 |
group | UTC |
a) Source Reference | UTC-03184 |
b) PUA Code Point | U+F46F |
c) Kangxi Radical Code | 194 |
d) Stroke Count | 5 |
e) First Stroke | 1 |
g) Total Strokes | 15 |
i) IDS | ⿺鬼戊 |
j) Similar Ideographs | U+9B46 魆 |
k) References for Evidence Images | 電碼新編 (1976), #9561; 新編標準電碼本 (1972), #9635 |
Review Comments
unify to 魆 (U+9B46)?
Unify to 魆 (U+9B46). As telegraph code books should only list relatively common characters that are well-attested elsewhere, any unencoded characters must be variants or mistakes of already-encoded characters. But as the code books do not provide readings or meanings for the characters listed we have to guess what the true identification of the character is. In this case it is almost certainly a mistake or variant for U+9B46.
In this case 戊 is an obvious and minor mistake for 戉. We should not enode error forms of characters just because a component is miswritten. Strongly support unification with 魆 (U+9B46).
Further discussion is necessary before unification with 魆 (U+9B46) can be considered