Please wait while loading

IRG Working Set 2021v6.0

Source: Ken LUNDE
Date: Generated on 2024-02-23

Show Deleted

Attributes

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
03670
03670
虫 142.23.2
GKJ-00355
TS 29 · IDS
Radical
When this ideograph is submitted for IRG Working Set 2024 per its current status, please consider using Radical 196.0 (鳥).
03604
03604
虫 142.11.2
GKJ-00404
TS 17 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
12
Total Stroke Count
18
03597
03597
虫 142.11.1
GKJ-00409
TS 17 · IDS
IDS
Agree with Comment #14834.
03543
03543
虫 142.7.4
GKJ-00431
TS 13 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
8
Total Stroke Count
14
03436
03436
艸 140.14.4
GKJ-00778
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
⿱艹𱰆
03674
03674
血 143.12.1
GKJ-00949
TS 18 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
9
Total Stroke Count
15
03719
03719
衣 145.10.2
GZ-1102402
TS 15 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
16
03701
03701
衣 145.5.2
GZ-2461502
TS 10 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
11
03699
03699
衣 145.4.3
GZ-5131401
TS 9 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
10
03361
03361
艸 140.8.5
KC-05646
TS 12 · IDS
IDS
I feel that ⿱艹⿱劦十 or ⿳艹劦十 would be better IDSes.
03079
03079
糸 120.8.4
SAT-04673
TS 14 · IDS
IDS
I still feel that the IDS should be changed to ⿰糸⿱亠糸. The following are from three IDS databases, and the single use of ⿱玄小 is clearly the outlier:

U+223F8 𢏸
IDS1: ⿰弓⿱亠糸
IDS2: ⿰弓⿱亠糸 (GT)
IDS3: ⿰弓⿱亠.糸.
U+2C0CE 𬃎
IDS1: ⿰木⿱玄小
IDS2: ⿰木⿱亠糸 (T)
IDS3: ⿰木d⿱亠.糸.
03528
03528
虫 142.6.3
SAT-06145
TS 12 · IDS
Radical
Add 118.0 (竹), SC=6, FS=2 as second radical.
03135
03135
缶 121.8.1
TD-535F
TS 14 · IDS 𦈢
Total Stroke Count
15
03567
03567
虫 142.8.5
TD-5562
TS 14 · IDS
Radical
Change Radical to 32.0 (土), SC=11, FS=2 on the basis that it is the most intuitive one.
03441
03441
艸 140.15.3
TE-302D
TS 19 · IDS 𥠺
Residual Stroke Count
14
Total Stroke Count
18
03433
03433
艸 140.14.1
TE-3042
TS 18 · IDS
IDS
Also, all of the component shapes are unifiable, so there is no reason to include the 〾 prefix for the IDS.
03314
03314
舟 137.18.2
TE-4863
TS 24 · IDS
IDS
The IDS does not need the 〾 prefix.
02943
02943
竹 118.10.2
TE-6F34
TS 16 · IDS 𮅕
IDS
⿳竹𰥍刀
02676
02676
皿 108.10.2
UK-20258
TS 15 · IDS
IDS
The IDS does not match the updated representative glyph.
02785
02785
石 112.10.2
UK-20311
TS 15 · IDS
Residual Stroke Count
12
Total Stroke Count
17
02709
02709
目 109.12.1
UK-20411
TS 17 · IDS 𣈆
IDS
The representative glyph was updated, but the IDS was not.
02566
02566
生 100.6.4
V4-4E2B
TS 11 · IDS
Radical
The current radical is not intuitive for this particular ideograph, so either change it to 113.0 (示), SC=6, FS=5, or add 113.0 (示) as a secondary radical.
02866
02866
禸 114.17.4
VN-F0167
TS 21 · IDS
Total Stroke Count
22 per Comment #7636
02731
02731
矢 111.18.2
VN-F1770
TS 23 · IDS
Radical
I suggest adding Radical 169.0 (門), SC=15, FS=2 as a second radical.
02675
02675
皿 108.9.1
VN-F17BC
TS 14 · IDS
Radical
Either change Radical to 37.0 (大), SC=11, FS=4, or add it as a secondary radical. The source suggests to me that Radical 37 should be primary.
03181
03181
羽 124.11.4
VN-F189A
TS 17 · IDS
Radical
Change Radical to 63.0 (戶), SC=13, FS=5
02957
02957
竹 118.11.2
VN-F1AA8
TS 17 · IDS
Radical
Change Radical to 125.0 (老), SC=11, FS=3
03036
03036
米 119.13.1
VN-F1ABC
TS 19 · IDS
Radical
I suggest adding 101.0 (用), SC=14, FS=4 as a secondary radical.
03114
03114
貝 154.12.5
VN-F1AD7
TS 19 · IDS
Radical
Add 120.0 (糸), SC=13, FS=5 as second radical for discoverability.
02669
02669
皮 107.13.4
VN-F1B65
TS 18 · IDS
Radical
I suggest adding 113.0 (示), SC=11, FS=1 as a secondary radical for discoverability.
03672
03672
血 143.4.3
VN-F1CF6
TS 10 · IDS
Radical
Change Radical to 82.0 (毛), SC=6, FS=3


Evidence

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
03439
03439
艸 140.14.3
GKJ-00249
TS 18 · IDS
Evidence
The previous comments suggested that this is an error form of U+8613 蘓.
02549
02549
瓦 98.6.3
UK-20900
TS 11 · IDS
Evidence
Additional evidence can be found in UTC document L2/21-101 in which this is the second ideograph presented: https://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetDocumentLink?L2/21-101

This ideograph is also in UAX #45 with UTC-03240 as its source reference.
01785
01785
木 75.7.1
UK-20901
TS 11 · IDS 𮕜
Evidence
The same evidence, Evidence 2, can be found in UTC document L2/21-101 in which this is the first ideograph presented: https://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetDocumentLink?L2/21-101

This ideograph is also in UAX #45 with UTC-03239 as its source reference.


Glyph Design & Normalization

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
03694
03694
行 144.11.5
GKJ-00920
TS 17 · IDS 绿
Glyph design
Will China update the glyph per Comments #7714 and #13098?
02857
02857
示 113.13.2
TE-2630
TS 18 · IDS
Normalization
Is still feel that such instances of Radical #162 should be normalized to follow Taiwan regional conventions.
03416
03416
艸 140.13.1
火 86.13.2
TE-275B
TS 17 · IDS
Glyph design
Agree with Comment #14135. A more accurate IDS, such as ⿱艹⿺煮丶, is better than one that includes the 〾 prefix.
03099
03099
糸 120.12.1
TE-2F44
TS 18 · IDS
Normalization
The issue here is about regional conventions, which can influence whether to normalize or not. Such inconsistencies are pervasive and systemic in T-source ideographs in recent Extension blocks, starting from Extension E. UCS is a character encoding standard, not a glyph encoding standard.
03433
03433
艸 140.14.1
TE-3042
TS 18 · IDS
Normalization
To follow up on Comment #5880, TCA is doing a massive disservice to UCS and to the entire standardization community by not normalizing their representative glyphs to follow regional conventions, which is something that seemed to have started from Extension E with Radical #162. What TCA submits for UCS, in terms of representative glyphs, can be different from a specific font implementation that is used by Taiwan's personal name database. By not doing so, it gives the impression that TCA is submitting glyphs, not characters, to the IRG.
02888
02888
禾 115.12.5
TE-7465
TS 17 · IDS
Glyph design
Did TCA provide a new representative glyph? I do not see a Version 2.0 glyph, hence the question based on Comment #12681.


Editorial

SnImage/SourceComment TypeDescription
03651
03651
虫 142.14.5
GKJ-00252
TS 20 · IDS
Editorial issue
Is this ideograph still pending?
03277
03277
自 132.11.3
GKJ-00384
TS 17 · IDS
Editorial issue
Why is this ideograph still postponed?
03659
03659
虫 142.16.2
GKJ-00424
TS 22 · IDS
Editorial issue
Is this ideograph still pending?
03543
03543
虫 142.7.4
GKJ-00431
TS 13 · IDS
Editorial issue
Is this ideograph still postponed?
03660
03660
虫 142.16.4
GKJ-00473
TS 22 · IDS
Editorial issue
This ideograph was withdrawn per Comment #13164, but it is still pending.
03147
03147
网 122.11.4
GKJ-00676
TS 15 · IDS 𠔿鹿
Editorial issue
Should this still be pending?
02880
02880
禾 115.9.3
GKJ-00728
TS 14 · IDS
Editorial issue
Why is this ideograph still postponed?
03280
03280
至 133.11.4
GKJ-00973
TS 17 · IDS
Editorial issue
Per Comment #13163, this ideograph should be withdrawn, not postponed.
03432
03432
艸 140.14.1
GKJ-00985
TS 17 · IDS
Editorial issue
Is this ideograph still postponed?
03607
03607
虫 142.10.1
SAT-07153
TS 17 · IDS 巿
Editorial issue
SAT needs to confirm Comment #13298.
03225
03225
肉 130.5.3
SAT-08616
TS 9 · IDS
Editorial issue
Is this ideograph still postponed?
03381
03381
艸 140.12.3
T9-7C3F
TS 16 · IDS
Editorial issue
Any response to Comment #13324?
03493
03493
虍 141.5.3
TC-5F73
TS 11 · IDS
Editorial issue
Is this ideograph still pending?
02801
02801
石 112.12.2
TE-2622
TS 17 · IDS
Editorial issue
Is this still pending?
02982
02982
竹 118.16.1
TE-446F
TS 22 · IDS
Editorial issue
There appears to be some unfinished business in this discussion record.
02946
02946
竹 118.10.4
UK-20205
TS 16 · IDS
Editorial issue
Per Comment #13679, and given that we are likely at the final review of this IRG working set, should this ideograph be withdrawn?
03204
03204
耳 128.10.4
UK-20713
TS 16 · IDS
Editorial issue
Is this ideograph being postponed?