Date | Description |
---|
Version | Description |
---|---|
5.0 | For 01161, add Discussion Record "Evidence accepted, 2023-04." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
UK-20921 | 1.0 |
group | UK |
a) Source reference | UK-20921 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | F76E |
c) KangXi Radical Code (Primary) | 46.0 |
d) Stroke Count (Primary) | 10 |
e) First Stroke (Primary) | 1 |
f) Secondary KX Radical Code | N/A |
f) a. Secondary Stroke Count | N/A |
f) b. Secondary First Stroke | N/A |
g) Total Stroke Count | 13 |
i) IDS | ⿱山秦 |
j) Similar/ Variants | U+21EC8 |
k1) References to evidence documents | 《福建通志》(清乾隆二年刊本)卷20 folio 29 |
k2) Images Filenames | UK-20921-001.jpg |
l) Other Information | N/A |
m1) Previous IRG WS | N/A |
m2) Sequence No. | N/A |
Review Comments
▲ 浙江通志(清乾隆刊本) 卷95 folio 12, which quotes 溫州府志(明萬曆刊本).
▲ 獻徵錄(明萬曆刊本)卷98 folio 97 《四川按察司副使遠齋顧公翀墓志銘》
In the first source 浙江通志(清乾隆刊本)provided by HUANG Junliang, it seems like 未 rather than 禾.
Has there any normalization rule been applied to this issue ?
▲ 溫州府志(明萬曆刊本)卷6葉18 clearly gives ⿱山秦.