Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #62 2024-03-20 (Wed) 10:18 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | no change. |
Version | Description |
---|---|
7.0 | For 01368, add Discussion Record "No change, IRG 62." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
GZ-2792401 | 1.0 🢂 2.0 |
group | China (GZ - 《古壮字字典》) |
a) Source reference | GZ-2792401 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | U+F0A1 |
c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 61 |
d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 11 |
e) First Stroke(Primary) | 5 |
g) Total Stroke Sount | 14 |
i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿰忄屚 |
k) Ref. to Evidence doc | 《古壮字字典》 page 279 col 2 entry 4 |
l) Optional info | lawq |
Review Comments
I can understand Conifer's comment, but this current glyph matches the PRC conventions based on the rationale more. It's acceptable for this normalization and it's better to accept it.