Character Info
01842
 SAT-06594 |
Not unified to 𢿵 U+22FF5, different structures, IRG 60.
Similar To: Similar: 𢿧 (U+22FE7)/
Attributes:
Meeting Minutes
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #60 2023-03-22 (Wed) 10:36 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Not unified to 𢿵 U+22FF5 |
| IRG #60 2023-03-22 (Wed) 10:37 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | not Unified to 𢿵 U+22FF5, different structures. |
Attribute Changes
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 5.0 | For 01842, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𢿵 U+22FF5, different structures, IRG 60." |
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| SAT-06594 | 1.0 |
Raw Info
| group | SAT |
| a) Source reference | SAT-06594 |
| b) PUA Code of TTF | F1A9 |
| c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 075.0 |
| d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 12 |
| e) First Stroke(Primary) | 2 |
| g) Total Stroke Sount | 16 |
| i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿱敞木 |
| j) Similar/ Variants | Similar: 𢿧/ |
| k) Ref. to Evidence doc | SAT-06594-01.jpg;SAT-06594-02.jpg;SAT-06594-03.jpg |
| l) Optional info | N/A |
| m1)Previous IRG WS | N/A |
| m2)Sequence No of Previous IRG WS | N/A |
Review Comments
Note: The 反切上字 in the first evidence is not right.
▲ 《合併字學集篇》, 明萬曆刻本, 卷之一
We should consider if UCV #307 is suitable for this case to unify with 𢿵 (U+22FF5).
IDS should also be ⿺棠攵.
The importance of setting this classification is that structural differences sometimes lead to non-cognateness and disunifiability. If it is necessary to qualify some of the unifiable cases, a special section will be needed to discuss them.
Since UCV #307 belongs to “j-2. Differences in relative length of strokes”, it may indicate that the length of the strokes [should be in a single component?] leads to differences in the analysis of component structure. But even so, some examples classified as UCV #307 or UCV #305 should be treated as different arrangement of components, like 𢣁 in UCV #305 and examples in UCV #305b/305c/305d.
In this case, we may find:
⿱ ~ ⿹:
螜 ~ 𧏚, 𡠆 ~ 㜌, 𣖫 ~ 榖 ...
頾 ~ 頿, 𩒹 ~ 䫇, 嬃 ~ 𡡓 ...
𣻯 ~ 潁, ⿱頃山 (睡虎地) ~ ⿹頃山, ⿱頃糸 (漢字海) ~ 顈
⿰ ~ ⿺:
𣤚 ~ 燞, ⿺焦刂 B00243-002 ~ 劁 B00243
===============
For ⿱⿰尚A木 ~ ⿰棠A, I can only find ⿱敞木 and 𢿧𢿵𭣜. Consider:
𢿵:
[一切經音義] 染衣倀, [倀] 摘更反, 或作▲, 考聲云 “▲, 展也, 從木敞聲, 律中 (根本説一切有部毘奈耶尼陀那目得迦攝頌) 從手從貞作揁 (“霑衣大小便, 染衣揁認衣”), 非也”.
𢿧:
[一切經音義] 衣▲, [▲] 讁庚反, 考聲云 “𭣜, 展也, 從木敞聲, 律本作揁, 非也”.
𭣜:
[一切經音義] 𢿦前, 上讁更反, 經作楨, 非也. 楨音客庚反, 琴瑟聲也, 若以爲楨像字, 於義乖失. 今偕𭣜字, 用之稍近於理, 順俗爲去聲呼也.
[一切經音義] 衣𢿧, [𢿧] 讁庚反, 考聲云 “▲, 展也, 從木敞聲, 律本作揁, 非也”.
So ⿱敞木 and 𢿧𢿵𭣜 can be analyzed as being unfiable.
The meaning can be related with both 木 "tree" and 攴 "strike", and 一切經音義 consistently consider the semantic component should be 木, while later dictionaries think 攴. The 尚 component is composable with both, and no matter which interpretation you make, the structural integrity of the other possibility is broken.