| Date | Description |
|---|
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| SAT-06466 |
| group | SAT |
| a) Source reference | SAT-06466 |
| b) PUA Code of TTF | F19B |
| c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 134.0 |
| d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 6 |
| e) First Stroke(Primary) | 5 |
| g) Total Stroke Sount | 12 |
| i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿰臼叒 |
| j) Similar/ Variants | Similar: 𦦕/ Non-similar and synonym: 啜/ |
| k) Ref. to Evidence doc | SAT-06466-01.jpg;SAT-06466-02.jpg;SAT-06466-03.jpg |
| l) Optional info | N/A |
| m1)Previous IRG WS | N/A |
| m2)Sequence No of Previous IRG WS | N/A |
Review Comments
Is there any definite reason to confirm how to write the left part?
For the structure, we tried to represent Taisho's glyph as much as possible, and grouped 叒 together because of its cognacy with e.g. 𡂜, but the Tripitaka Koreana (evidence 3) glyph is also acceptable.