Character Info
03467
 UK-20437 |
Not unified to 𬟏 U+2C7CF, non-cognate, the bottom parts of the 2 characters may be considered unifiable in general, IRG 58.
Similar To: 𬟏 (U+2C7CF)
Attributes:
Meeting Minutes
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #58 2022-03-16 (Wed) 10:54 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Not unified to 𬟏 U+2C7CF, non cognate. |
| IRG #58 2022-03-16 (Wed) 10:57 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | Not unified to 𬟏 U+2C7CF, non cognate. (The bottom parts of 2 characters may be considered unifiable generally.) |
Attribute Changes
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 3.0 | For 03467, add Discussion Record "Not unified to 𬟏 U+2C7CF, non-cognate, the bottom parts of the 2 characters may be considered unifiable in general, IRG 58." |
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| UK-20437 | 1.0 |
Raw Info
| group | UK |
| a) Source reference | UK-20437 |
| b) PUA Code of TTF | F730 |
| c) KangXi Radical Code (Primary) | 140.0 |
| d) Stroke Count (Primary) | 16 |
| e) First Stroke (Primary) | 3 |
| f) Secondary KX Radical Code | N/A |
| f) a. Secondary Stroke Count | N/A |
| f) b. Secondary First Stroke | N/A |
| g) Total Stroke Count | 20 |
| i) IDS | ⿱艹龜 |
| j) Similar/ Variants | U+2C7CF |
| k1) References to evidence documents | 《藝文類聚》（明嘉靖胡纘宗刊本）卷64 folio 4 |
| k2) Images Filenames | UK-20437-001.jpg |
| l) Other Information | Lower right part of 龜 written with two horizontal strokes rather than 㐅, but we think the bottom component can be standardized to 龜. |
| m1) Previous IRG WS | WS2015 |
| m2) Sequence No. | 03677 |
Review Comments
The bottom component of U+2C7CF 𬟏 is obviously a turtle, so unification seems justified. Perhaps UCV #160 can be extended to include the bottom component of U+2C7CF 𬟏.
On the other hand, UK-20437 is used in the evidence provided as an alternate way of writing the character 鱉 'softshell turtle' in the specific word 紫鱉, an ancient name for a type of plant. In this case it is obvious that the character is composed of a grass radical above a turtle.
Thus UK-20437 and U+2C7CF are non-cognate, and have significantly different glyph forms, and so cannot be unified.