Character Info
Attributes:
Meeting Minutes
| Date | Description |
|---|
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| UK-20117 |  1.0 |
Raw Info
| group | UK |
| a) Source reference | UK-20117 |
| b) PUA Code of TTF | EC04 |
| c) KangXi Radical Code (Primary) | 167.0 |
| d) Stroke Count (Primary) | 16 |
| e) First Stroke (Primary) | 4 |
| f) Secondary KX Radical Code | N/A |
| f) a. Secondary Stroke Count | N/A |
| f) b. Secondary First Stroke | N/A |
| g) Total Stroke Count | 24 |
| i) IDS | ⿰金磨 |
| j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
| k1) References to evidence documents | 《重修天津府志》（清光緒二十四年刊本）卷43 folio 46 |
| k2) Images Filenames | UK-20117-001.jpg |
| l) Other Information | N/A |
| m1) Previous IRG WS | N/A |
| m2) Sequence No. | N/A |
Review Comments
▲ 《新中國出土墓誌·陝西（叄）》下冊，文物出版社，2015年，pp215
Here is the original rubbing:
Attached PDF file
▲ 《新中國出土墓誌·陝西（叄）》上冊，文物出版社，2015年，pp258.
The image quality is very poor. Since I don't have the printed book, if anyone can provide a clearer printed evidence please reply and thank you. IMO, in the rubbing, the character looks like 𨮀 rather than ⿰金磨.
Anyway the original evidence is good enough to encode.