GKJ-00289 |
Date | Description |
---|---|
IRG #57 2021-09-14 (Tue) 9:12 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | not unified with U+2a22a, Evidence accepted |
Version | Description |
---|---|
2.0 | For 04788, add Discussion Record "Not unified with 𪈪 U+2A22A, evidence accepted, IRG 57." |
Source Reference | Glyph |
---|---|
GKJ-00289 | 1.0 |
group | China (GKJ - Science and Technology Characters) |
a) Source reference | GKJ-00289 |
b) PUA Code of TTF | E04C |
c) KangXi Radical Code(Primary) | 196.0 |
d) Stroke Count(Primary) | 15 |
e) First Stroke(Primary) | 3 |
g) Total Stroke Count | 26 |
i) IDS (Ideographic Description Sequence) | ⿰⿱句奚鳥 |
j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
k) Ref. to Evidence doc | 康熙字典 |
Review Comments
The evidence is from 康熙字典 on 𪈪. It quotes 廣雅 because it contains 鸊𪈪. If 鸊𪈪 is indeed 鸊⿰⿱句奚鳥, 康熙字典 should have printed 𪈪 as 鸊⿰⿱句奚鳥.
廣雅四庫全書本 juan 10 [2] have 鸊𪈪.
[1]: https://iiif.lib.harvard.edu/manifests/view/drs:17752267$3759i
[2]: https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&file=54365&page=137
Agree with Huang Junliang that the evidence shows an error form of U+2A22A, and it should not be encoded without better evidence.