Character Info
Attributes:
Meeting Minutes
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| IRG #58 2022-03-16 (Wed) 11:26 am +0800 Recorded by CHEN Zhuang | no change, new evidence accepted. |
Attribute Changes
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| 3.0 | For 00894, add Discussion Record "No change, new evidence accepted, IRG 58." |
Glyph Changes
| Source Reference | Glyph |
|---|---|
| UK-20907 |  1.0 |
Raw Info
| group | UK |
| a) Source reference | UK-20907 |
| b) PUA Code of TTF | E4AF |
| c) KangXi Radical Code (Primary) | 32.0 |
| d) Stroke Count (Primary) | 12 |
| e) First Stroke (Primary) | 4 |
| f) Secondary KX Radical Code | N/A |
| f) a. Secondary Stroke Count | N/A |
| f) b. Secondary First Stroke | N/A |
| g) Total Stroke Count | 15 |
| i) IDS | ⿰土富 |
| j) Similar/ Variants | N/A |
| k1) References to evidence documents | 《福建通志》（清乾隆二年刊本）卷7 folio 47 |
| k2) Images Filenames | UK-20907-001.jpg |
| l) Other Information | N/A |
| m1) Previous IRG WS | N/A |
| m2) Sequence No. | N/A |
Review Comments
▲ 延平府志（明嘉靖刊本）卷5 folio 7 gives ⿰土冨. I think ⿰土冨 is unifiable to ⿰土富. So we can accept the new evidence.
Unify to 𭏨
Based on this, the two characters appear to be non-cognate, therefore should not be unified according to the Non-cognate Rule ("Ideographs with different glyph shapes that are unrelated in historical derivation (non-cognate characters) are not unified no matter how similar their glyph shapes may be").
The pronounciation of ⿰土富 is fù, which is absolutely not cognate with ⿰土冨（a variant of 盐）